User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2012-06

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started

2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

Replaceable fair use File:Shoshana Johnson being interviewed by Arab TV.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shoshana Johnson being interviewed by Arab TV.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, something odd here. Contributor above is suggesting that an image of a remarkable one time event is replaceable.

Ms Johnson is unlikely to ever be a POW again. In the unlikely event she is, she is likely to have captors who don`t force her to appear on their TV networks. Geo Swan (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

cut and paste from User talk:Hammersoft
Thanks for honoring the reocmmendation and and leaving me a heads up when you nominated the image for deletion. I placed the disputed tag because I think you overlooked that the image is of a one-time event -- Ms Johnson while a POW. Images of POWs are almost never broadcast by their captors. Geo Swan (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] consolidating discussion from my talk page --Hammersoft (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] I've found replacements for both non-free images on the article, and both are public domain as works of the United States military. I'll be uploading them to Commons shortly, and placing them in the article. The first image, File:Shoshana Johnson being interviewed by Arab TV.jpg, is used "to illustrate a historically important person" in the infobox on her page. I've found a much, much higher quality image that performs the same task. The second image, File:Shoshana Johnson, at the end of her rescue.jpg, I have found an image from the same event, from a different angle, made by a member of the U.S. military. It will serve the same purpose as well. The first image might be appropriate for use somewhere in the article, tied to secondary sourced prose regarding the Al Jazeera interview. I'll leave that to you to craft if you want to include it. In the infobox, for depiction purposes, it's inappropriate. I'll advise here when I'm done making changes. Thanks, ::--Hammersoft (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please note File:Shoshana Johnson, at the end of her rescue.jpg and File:Shoshana Johnson being interviewed by Arab TV.jpg are both now orphaned. I will not tag them as such to give you an opportunity to respond. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

You found a higher quality image of her, that both shows her while she is in captivity -- and is in the public domainʔ

You are correct that the description field and the purpose field of the image template should have more clearly explained how rare and irreplacable an image of a POW is. Geo Swan (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. I have no opinion on how rare such an event is or is not. The image might be useful in the context of such a secondary sourced discussion on the article. As the article stands now, Al Jazeera is not mentioned. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shoshana Johnson, at the end of her rescue.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shoshana Johnson, at the end of her rescue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akhbarona

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akhbarona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SL93 (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still needed?

Hi! I'm wondering if these files are still needed. File:Ref-1-context a.png and File:Ref-2-context-a.png. If yes just ignore this message and if no perhaps you could request a deletion? --MGA73 (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

I've also wondered if they were still worth keeping. Have you ever use {{ref}} template? Clearly superior to roll your own <ref></ref> pair contents, clearly inferior to {{cite}} templates enclosed within <ref></ref>.

I just checked -- there are still over 15,000 articles that use the older {{ref}} templates.

If you never used them the major disadvantage is that the order the references were listed in was the order within the list at the end of the article -- so if you moved a paragraph, and that resulted in a reference appearing later or earlier in the article, you had manually move its corresponding spot in the reference list.

Anyhow, that is why I hadn't requested deletion earlier. I'll do so now. Geo Swan (talk) 17:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your reply. It was the "If you are considering initiating an xfd on material I started" on your userpage that gave me the idea to ask you. And now it resulted in a suggestion on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Images_and_Media/Commons/Drives#Orphan_images. We have many good files that will never be used because they have a bad description. So I think it would be a big step forward if uploaders checked and fixed the discription of the files. And if the file is no longer usable there is no reason that other users spend long time trying to figure out what the files show. --MGA73 (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I'm here to disturb you anyway I just got the idea to give you a link to all the unused files where you are listed as the uploader: Some of the files looks quite usable for Commons but I thought I would let you have a look first. --MGA73 (talk) 17:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

name	action
File:Battlel_oval.jpg
File:CCGS_Louis_St_Laurent.jpg
File:Des_Groseillier_Coldones.gif
File:Does_the_red_river_enclose_another_basis....PNG
File:Fast_Response_Cutter.jpg
File:Glaciallakeiroquois.jpg
File:Guantanamo_cell_021203-A-7236L-010.jpg
File:HMCS-Brandon-Minesweeperlow.jpg
File:HMS_Endurance_3_copy.jpg
File:Humvee_with_marine_armor_kit.jpg
File:Iviewcapture_date_07_08_2005_time_19_12_13.png
File:Kabul_Afghanistan.png
File:Lakhdar_Boumediene.jpg
File:MG_Geoffrey_D._Miller_attending_church_in_Guantanamo.jpg
File:Niagara_oval.jpg
File:Note-2-backlink-a.png	{{db-author}}
File:Note-2-backlink.png	{{db-author}}
File:Orthographic_projection_centered_over_Nanisivik,_Nunavut.png	moved to commons
File:Orthographic_projection_centred_over_Cocos_Islands,_Indian_Ocean.png	moved to commons
File:Orthographic_projection_centred_over_Yellowknife,_NWT.png	moved to commons
File:Orthographic_projection_over_Johnston_Atoll.png	moved to commons
File:PPE-004low.jpg	{{db-f8}}
File:Pitcherplants.jpg	moved to commons
File:Ref-1-context.png	{{db-author}}
File:Ref-1-context_a.png	{{db-author}}
File:Ref-2-context-a.png	{{db-author}}
File:Ref-2-context.png	{{db-author}}

Nomination of Mustaq Aksari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mustaq Aksari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustaq Aksari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 15:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Response Cutter

Thanks for the comments. I've now deleted it. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 02:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Manning

Hello, Geo Swan. You have new messages at Bduke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bduke (Discussion) 22:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bduke confirmed that although I had inserted a wikilink to an article on Stephen Manning, I had not edited the article, which was speedy deleted. It looks like the link I left was a red-link. I thanked them for their prompt attention to my request. Geo Swan (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did I post a comment about the wikipedia to the RISKS digest?

Hello, Geo Swan/archive. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Lexein (talk) 15:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Yes, I will confirm, onwiki, that I posted a followup comment to the RISKS digest about a public relations industry criticism of the wikipedia. [1]

In it I spoke about the article on the Somali based remittance firm Dahabshiil, and the undercover investigation of UK public relations firm Bell Pottinger that they had successfully employed shills -- actors paid to pretend to be genuine wikipedia volunteers -- to "subtly and gradually remove" information their clients wanted to suppress.

Yes, I would be interested in participating in any followup discussions triggered by my comment -- onwiki or elsewhere. I will keep any comments emailed to me private. To anyone emailing me, please use the "email user" feature here -- as I rarely use the e-mail address I used to make the RISKS post.

FWIW, there is a discussion at uk.wikimedia.org, [2] that touches on Bell Pottinger.

FWIW, the article on Dahabshiil was nominated for deletion, triggered I believe by a discussion somewhere of the reports on Bell Pottinger. I'll try to track down those discussions.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hello. I think you're good at reviewing people's edits. Can you review me here? Thanks. Your review will be very valuable. Dipankan ^{(Have a chat?)} 06:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 09:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kwasind for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kwasind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwasind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 10:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ongiara (ship, 1885) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ongiara (ship, 1885) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ongiara (ship, 1885) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 12:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rahmatullah Mansoor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahmatullah Mansoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahmatullah Mansoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 12:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

articles violating WP:N

after your reply i looked at the history both of these were started in March-April 2012 so the policies were still the same when you had started--DBig Xray 15:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patrice McAllister (ship, 1919)

Patrice McAllister (ship, 1919) any comments of why this is notable enough ? --DBig Xray 13:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatcom Chief

Whatcom Chief could not find anything that makes this ferry notable to be included here. Please comment. regards--DBig Xray 13:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

a request

Moved from User talk:DBigXray

– i have brought this here to keep all the discussion at one place, it is difficult to keep replying both places--DBig Xray 15:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have nominated four articles I started for deletion in less than four hours. A meaningful response to an {{afd}} takes time, and I suggest it is not in the best interests of the project to nominate for deletion a series of articles all started by a single individual. Geo Swan (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess keeping non notable articles is also not in the best interest of the project, I have raised valid concerns regarding the problems with these articles, I will be glad if these concerns can be satisfied. In my opinion such articles violating WP:N should not have been started in the first place. As for the time in AFD, you can help saving the time of the community by nominating it yourself if you agree with my reasons. I dont see any better way other than a discussion. Thanks. --DBig Xray 13:12, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do take good faith concerns seriously. I do place a {{db-author}} on articles, where I have been the sole contributor of intellectual content, and another contributor raises what I agree were valid concerns.

I have been on the wikipedia for a long time, and there are articles I started that were completely compliant with the policies and standards current then, that would not comply with today's standards. Some of those were kept up to date by other individuals. Some weren't kept up to standard, but probably could be brought up to date, with some effort. There are articles that complied with the standards current when they were written, but probably can't be made to comply with today's sandards, and I will happily place an {{db-g7}} on these. Our rules are arcane, and are in a constant state of flux -- so it is possible I started some articles that didn't comply with the standards current at the time they were started. These too would merit a {{db-g7}}.

I have written on topics that attracted a lot of vandals, who employed sockpuppetry and other disgusting practices to impede my efforts. If you took their assertions about my efforts at face value you would believe I was a vandal who didn't deserve any assumption of good faith. I encourage you to not take any such claims you have come across at face value. Many of my most persistent critics have ended up being permanently blocked.

You wrote above, "I dont see any better way other than a discussion." I see you request contributors with a concern over your contributions leave a comment on the article's talk page, and leave you a heads-up on your talk page. This seems like a very reasonable request, and I made a similar request. Between reasonable people this is the approach which uses the least community resources, and I request you treat my contributions the same way you requested your own contributions be treated.

With regard to the concerns you voiced about the Patrice McCallister and the other vessel -- the Hintif article had been heavily vandalized prior to your placement of the {{afd}}. Fixing this vandalized article will be a lot of work, work that has to be done right now, before too many others weigh in, because practically no one ever changes their mind once they have voiced an opinion at {{afd}}. So, I really don't think I have time to look at them, until I have finished responding to the Hintif afd, and the other 3 afd. Geo Swan (talk) 14:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Establishing Notability is the first and the most important thing on the article. The author needs to satisfy WP:N before starting the article. All you need is proper refs that show that the article is notable. The boats i Have AfDed are non notable now (or even 2 year back) when they were started, there is nothing that makes them notable. I have left a note on your talk page. If you agree with me you can place {{db-g7}} .
Also I dont think using phrases such as Many of my most persistent critics have ended up being permanently blocked. help our discussion in any way, as this amounts to a veiled threat. regards--DBig Xray 14:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- With regard to vieled threats. Only one of the sockpuppet masters who wikistalked me were blocked because I complained about them. That was back in 2005. She seemed to be going through some kind breakdown that prevented her from understanding what she was doing wrong. As I recall I asked for some kind of advice, and the administrator in question saw that she had left messages with the passwords of wiki-ids she was no longer using, which was grounds for an instant block.

I mentioned how some of my challengers who claimed I am a big vandal had themselves been blocked for vandalism solely as a reason for you to not take those criticisms at face velue. Geo Swan (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After your request i have started a discussion on

I dont think i have ever called you vandal or disruptive ? all i say is i find these articles non - notable You are a great editor indeed, no doubt about that. But when we read a lot about something then anything related to our favourite subject seems to be notable, so its not entirely your fault. please do not get offended by the deletion requests. and WP:AGF thanks --DBig Xray 15:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frankfurt (icebreaker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frankfurt (icebreaker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frankfurt (icebreaker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 18:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keiler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keiler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keiler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 22:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Participating in Deletion discussion

It was already pointed out to you once earlier by another editor. I am doing it again, please check WP:DISCUSSAFD which clearly states.

"Please disclose whether you are the article's creator, a substantial or minor contributor, or if you otherwise have a vested interest in the article; WP:AVOIDCOI."

I hope this is clear enough, and you will include it in your comments. Thanks --DBig Xray 20:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you Explain why you are so inclined to hide that you are commenting as the article's creator ? clearly violating policies ? --DBig Xray 21:01, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Could you please be more careful? Editing other contributor's comments is also not a good idea. As I explained on User talk:DBigXray#explanation, I think you didn't read my comment carefully enough. Geo Swan (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DBigXray cut a comment I left on his or her talk page, and pasted them here on my page. A few contributors do this. But I find it disruptive, and I am going to excise those comments.

Please do not point fingers at others, I see a vested interest in you hiding this fact that you are article creator, Please follow the policies, specially if you are requested to do so. --DBig Xray 21:06, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page, your rules. On my talk page I request you leave comments in a simpler way, that is not potentially misleading.

Could you please stop cutting and pasting comments from your talk page to mine? First, that it potentially misleading to third parties, as the timestamps on the comments are bogus. Second, the way you do this requires you to make a series of multiple edit, and both earlier today, and just now, I kept butting up against edit conflicts, because you kept editing my talk page unnecessarily.

If you choose to place a comment on my talk page, and you want to reference a comment I left on your talk page, I request you make a SINGLE edit -- and place a simple diff to the comments on your talk page. Geo Swan (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, Its good to keep things/comments together isnt it :). sorry for the (edit conflict). So are you going to Disclose your COI as the creator on the AfD dicussions or not ? --DBig Xray 22:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will explicitly disclaim my initiation in these {{afd}}s. I won't promise to remember to always do so in future. I will think about it.

Are you sure that being the initiator of an article places an individual in a conflict of interest?

In the comment that initiated this thread you quoted WP:DISCUSSAFD

"Please disclose whether you are the article's creator, a substantial or minor contributor, or if you otherwise have a vested interest in the article; WP:AVOIDCOI."

You called the passage you quoted "clear". I suggest it can't be that clear, as I disagree that this passage was intended to say article contributors or initiators had a conflict of interest. Rather, I suggest, everything after the "or" is addressed to those who would be considered to have a conflict of interest as described in WP:COI. I suggest this passage was not meant to imply anyone in the first part of the passage was in a conflict of interest. As per WP:AGF, every contributor should be assumed to be able and willing to put the interests of the project ahead of ego attachment to material they contributed to.

Really, that passage recommends even those who made minor edits making a disclaimer. If everyone complied with this recommendation practically every {{xfd}} would have mutliple disclaimers, and, in some xfd more than 50 percent of contributors would have left a disclaimer.

It seems to me that WP:AVOIDCOI says nothing about disclaimers. Geo Swan (talk) 22:46, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It clearly says Please disclose whether you are the article's creator as the comments of the creator will be obviously biased to save his work. I have seen creators using (as creator) when they participate. AS you were already reminded twice you cannot plead, ignorance. In case you are not happy with this policy then you can try getting it removed. As of now it is there and being a responsible editor you are expected to follow them. Thanks--DBig Xray 09:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed your "adminhelp" but as I had written a response I may as well give it: WP:AVOIDCOI, and the whole WP:COI guideline, are about conflicts between an editor's external interests and their WP activities. I do not think the passage quoted from WP:DISCUSSAFD is very clearly written, but an article creator's interest in defending his article only involves a different opinion about what is best for the encyclopedia, not a conflict between the encyclopedia's interests and outside ones.

DISCUSSAFD is advice, "a few basic practices that most Wikipedians use", not cast-iron law;
declaration of authorship is a courtesy, rather than an essential disclosure, because the article history is available both to other AfD contributors and to the closing administrator;
the closer will in any case be considering the arguments advanced rather than the motives of the contributors.

I think this discussion has run its course, and I suggest it is now concluded. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks John.

Noting for any later readers who come along -- it was DBigXray who placed the {{adminhelp}} template and DBigXray who erased it a couple of hours later.

DBigXray, I said I would disclaim in these {{afd}}, so, even though John has confirmed it is a courtesy, not an obligtion, I will do so -- in these six {{afd}}.

How would you feel if I used "Keep (as initiator, as per http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Geo_Swan&diff=497997917&oldid=497784302#Participating_in_Deletion_discussion)" in my edit summaries? Geo Swan (talk) 13:33, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I removed the admin help as i thought its your talk page and Its for you to place that not for me hence I removed it, nobody looks at the edit history of AFD pages. The simple statement Keep(as creator) before your comment is all that is needed, to help the AfD discussions, thanks for taking my comments in good faith, regards--DBig Xray 13:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, mentioning Keep (as creator) in the edit summary is of no use as no one sees it. Please mention Keep(as creator) before your comments on AfD debates--DBig Xray 07:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

update

In a comment below DBig warned me that they thought the explicit disclaimer I left in response to the request above looked like an instance of attacking the nominator. As I explained above I think explicit disclaimers are quite rare. I thought some kind of explanation was necessary to explain why I left one. Geo Swan (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Responded

From the above comment i dont feel i can say this is WP:AGF. Any way, I have replied to your comment on this page below, regards --DBig Xray 17:09, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Conn (judge) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Conn (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Conn (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nick-D (talk) 23:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ahmed Siddiqu, son of Aafia Siddiqui, in 2008.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ahmed Siddiqu, son of Aafia Siddiqui, in 2008.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I requested restoration of a previously deleted fair use image, for use in a new article. This notice shows it had been restored, and was ready to be added to the new article -- which I have now taken care of. Geo Swan (talk) 13:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abu Ubaydh Al Tunisi

The article Abu Ubaydh Al Tunisi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one source present, and that too dead. Reliable sources are needed to be added which verifies controversial claims like his association with the Al-Qaeda and his death.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 08:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haji Yacoub (Al Qaeda) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haji Yacoub (Al Qaeda) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Yacoub (Al Qaeda) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 11:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmed Abdullah Al Zahrani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Abdullah Al Zahrani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Abdullah Al Zahrani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 20:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fahd Raggad Samir Al-Ruwaili for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahd Raggad Samir Al-Ruwaili is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahd Raggad Samir Al-Ruwaili until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 06:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmed Owaidan Al-Harbi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Owaidan Al-Harbi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Owaidan Al-Harbi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 06:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sultan Radi al-Utaibi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sultan Radi al-Utaibi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Radi al-Utaibi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 07:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammed Abdel-Rahman al-Rashed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammed Abdel-Rahman al-Rashed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Abdel-Rahman al-Rashed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 07:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fahd Salih Sulayman Al Jutayli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahd Salih Sulayman Al Jutayli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahd Salih Sulayman Al Jutayli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 07:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sa ad Ibraham Sa ad Al Bidna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sa ad Ibraham Sa ad Al Bidna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sa ad Ibraham Sa ad Al Bidna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 08:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Musa Ali Said Al Said Al Amari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musa Ali Said Al Said Al Amari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musa Ali Said Al Said Al Amari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 14:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting to what version?

Could you indicate to which version you reverted here? Your version is about double the size of the previous largest version, so it doesn't look as if this was actually a revert. Fram (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Explanation was provided at the talk page, in what I consider was a timely manner. Geo Swan (talk)

Deleted articles

I've restored the articles in question to your userspace here and here. Hope this helps. :) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. For later reading the requests were [3] and [4]. Geo Swan (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bagram detainees' uniforms for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bagram detainees' uniforms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagram detainees' uniforms until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khan v. Bush for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khan v. Bush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khan v. Bush until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:47, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rustam Akhmyarov (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rustam Akhmyarov (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustam Akhmyarov (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 08:43, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daud Shah (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daud Shah (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daud Shah (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Padshah (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Padshah (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padshah (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gholam Faruq (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gholam Faruq (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gholam Faruq (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keiler (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keiler (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keiler (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:29, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camp Echo (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Echo (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Echo (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shoaib Khan (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shoaib Khan (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoaib Khan (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 10:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Hello, Geo Swan. I saw a page nominated for deletion, and then saw several you created had been nominated. I've commented at all the AfDs, you might want to add your comments too. I've added entries to a few of them, so hopefully those AfDs will be withdrawn. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That is synchronicity. I was going to ask for your opinion on those {{afd}}s. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 11:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdullah Muhammed Abdel Aziz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdullah Muhammed Abdel Aziz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Muhammed Abdel Aziz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 20:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sultan Sari Sayel Al Anazi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sultan Sari Sayel Al Anazi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Sari Sayel Al Anazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 21:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ronald A. Gregory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald A. Gregory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronald A. Gregory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 05:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amy Bechtold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Bechtold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Bechtold (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 06:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abu Ubaydh Al Tunisi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Ubaydh Al Tunisi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Ubaydh Al Tunisi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 15:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rami Bin Said Al Taibi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rami Bin Said Al Taibi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Bin Said Al Taibi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 22:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdullah Hamid al Qahtani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdullah Hamid al Qahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Hamid al Qahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 22:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Said Muhammad Husayn Qahtani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Said Muhammad Husayn Qahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Said Muhammad Husayn Qahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 22:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khalid Malu Shia al Ghatani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalid Malu Shia al Ghatani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Malu Shia al Ghatani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 23:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jabir Hasan Mohamed Al Qahtani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jabir Hasan Mohamed Al Qahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabir Hasan Mohamed Al Qahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 23:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kashmir separatist movement

Has been renominated.... for the third time here. Informing people who were part of prior discussions, as courtesy. Mar4d (talk) 03:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Padishah Khatun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venetian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Kashmir separatist movement

Thank you for sharing your opinion at the TfD of that template. I have taken into account your observation about there not being enough discussion and also about how the delete camp has asked to "prove some of the militant groups are really separatist groups"; accordingly a thread has been started here where you may want to comment and give your opinion, if you are interested in the subject. As of now, I believe the debate has been less than coherent from those who are challenging the inclusion of pro-Pakistan groups in the template. The thread directly above that one is also recent and may be relevant. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 03:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kushky Yar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kushky Yar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kushky Yar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 23:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdulah Alhamiri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdulah Alhamiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulah Alhamiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 06:50, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salah Bin Al Hadi Asasi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salah Bin Al Hadi Asasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salah Bin Al Hadi Asasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 10:26, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of most wanted suspected jihadists listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of most wanted suspected jihadists. Since you had some involvement with the List of most wanted suspected jihadists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). DBig Xray 13:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking the nominator at multiple AFDs

Please WP:AGF and see WP:Comment on content, not on the contributor attacking nominator will do no good to your case. you have already done it at a number of AfD's and RfD. --DBig Xray 14:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please WP:AAGF.

I responded above. Geo Swan (talk) 16:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The personal attack by Geo Swan at the nominator was done in the AfD below

For which I have given a polite message [5] not to attack the nominator and to WP:Comment on content, not on the contributor --DBig Xray 17:06, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Update I have mentioned the links above so as to clear any misunderstanding about my comments--DBig Xray 17:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The comments by Geo Swan don't seem to be personal attacks against the nominator. Still, it would have been simpler if Geo had simply prefaced his AfD comment with 'Keep (as creator).' EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment and clarification ED. Much appreciated. I hope Geo swan will address the article and its content on AfDs and follows the advice. --DBig Xray 18:45, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Rahman Mohamed Saleh Naser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Rahman Mohamed Saleh Naser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Rahman Mohamed Saleh Naser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 18:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asim Thahit Abdullah Al Khalaqi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asim Thahit Abdullah Al Khalaqi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim Thahit Abdullah Al Khalaqi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 19:12, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Abdullah Taha Mattan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 19:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

For assuming Good Faith, our concern is to improve the encyclopedia. I hope the discussion will only be concentrated on the content, for a healthy policy based discussion. DBig Xray 19:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Ali Hussein Khenaina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Ali Hussein Khenaina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali Hussein Khenaina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. DBig Xray 23:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]