User talk:Gagaluv1

Nina West

Thanks for adding the EP details. I wonder if you might be able to add chart positions to the EP articles as well? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:48, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

No problem! Gagaluv1 (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

License tagging for File:HadestownPlaybillJune.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:HadestownPlaybillJune.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Awards in Infoboxes

The only awards that belong in the infoboxes of theatre articles are Tonys and Oliviers, unless there is a special case, like a Pulitzer. If the show never went to Broadway or the West End, then we *can* mention the highest award given in the industry for the market where it played, like an Obie, but this is not essential. Please remove all the Drama Desk awards and other lesser awards. If people start adding lesser awards, the infoboxes will become an even more severe space problem at the top of articles; please help to keep non-essential info out of infoboxes. See Article Structure Guidelines at WP:MUSICALS. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Great work, thanks! Please let me know if anyone challenges these edits on any of the articles, and I will be happy to review the situation and weigh in. By the way, in my opinion, the "Awards" sections at the bottom of musicals, especially successful musicals with lots of awards, are out of control and violate WP:BALASP. The better quality articles often move the big fat Awards tables to a separate sub-article and leave in the main article a short section with a text summary that gives a brief overview of the most important awards earned by the musical. For example, see how it is handled in Wicked (musical). Alternately, the awards can simply be mentioned in the Productions section or the Critical reception section. In The King and I we did both, mentioning the key awards in the Productions section, together with the description of each production, and then giving the cross-reference to the sub-article in the Critical reception section near the bottom. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 90 Days (Pink song (featuring Wrabel)) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into 90 Days (song). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Ah, I see it now! Thank you for the information!Gagaluv1 (talk) 00:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please discuss your changes at Melanie Martinez discography

A change as significant as moving promotional singles released while a contestant—in this case, Martinez—was on The Voice should be discussed. If you look around, you will find that basically no articles put these sorts of singles in the main singles table of an artist. Do not edit war; get consensus on the article talk page. Thank you. Ss112 17:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Alright, thank you for the information. I don't follow any Voice alumni outside of Martinez so I wasn't accustomed to how to handle those releases. I'll be sure to take that into account from now on.Gagaluv1 (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Please make use of refnames to avoid unnecessarily repeating references

You have added refnames to references in your edits before, as I have seen them. So please make use of them. You added unnecessary duplicates of references when you expanded Trixie Mattel discography when you could have just added a refname. Ss112 15:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

I actually have never used them before because I wasn't sure how they worked. Thanks to your comment I have looked into it and will implement into my edits going forward. Thank you.Gagaluv1 (talk) 14:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

"Tempo"

I noticed in an edit summary you said I was edit warring and threatened to bring in an admin. But you realize that you are also edit warring so that doesn't make sense? Also the song is not body positive, it shames skinny people. Body positive would support people of all shapes. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 23:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Ariana Grande

I've started a discussion on whether to split Template:Ariana Grande into Template:Ariana Grande songs. Fan4Life (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm Billiekhalidfan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Good as Hell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

I just reverted an edit you made that I felt was factually incorrect. That's not "experimenting."Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Well it was certainly vandalism because you ignored the hidden note. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Not every edit that disagrees with your opinion is vandalism.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race

You're invited! If you wanna come play with us... Wikipedia:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Robyn (album). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is not the first time someone notices you adding unverified material, or you reverting someone without a proper explanation. Adding unsourced information is disruptive; not explaining your edits is disruptive. Drmies (talk) 00:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

I don't know what edits on that article you are referring to. If you want to bring attention to my edits that you have a problem with that's fine. But don't just pick a random article I edited and claim I added unsourced content and then threaten to block me.Gagaluv1 (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Formatting sources

This helpful edit included many errors in the sources, such as mistaken names, malformed dates, inaccuracies, and the placement in the running text instead of the {{reflist}} template. Please take a second look in the future. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Why did you again place references in the incorrect place and insert inaccurate data? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:59, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Not sure what you're referring to, the information was correct and inline references are perfectly acceptable. The chart I made was directly based off of the one on Thank U, Next so I'm not sure what the problem is.Gagaluv1 (talk) 04:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, When was this published? When did you say that it was published? Is there anyone on Earth named "UPROXX MusicTwitter" or "Jonathan Bernstein,Jon Blistein,Jon Dolan,Patrick Doyle,Brenna Ehrlich,Suzy Exposito,Jon Freeman,David Fricke,Kory Grow,Will Hermes,Christian Hoard,Charles Holmes,Joseph Hudak,Brendan Klinkenberg,Elias Leight,Angie Martoccio,Claire Shaffer,Rob Sheffield,Hank Shteamer,Brittany Spanos,Simon Vozick-Levinson"? Does this article use ISO dates or mdy dates? Should articles change citation style mid-article or remain consistent? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

See also WP:DASH re: using hyphens in place of em dashes. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Oh man. You are clearly using some bot or script to insert things like "Jem Aswad,Andrew Barker,Chris". Are you even looking at what you're writing? Please tell me that you are going to audit your work now... How did you do this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

I was mostly cutting and changing the sources from the Ariana Grande article and used that as a basis for the others. Past experiences have taught me not to go by my own decisions and base my formatting on the work of others. I assumed that since it was acceptable in that very big article there wouldn't be an issue. Gagaluv1 (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, Are you going to check your edits to confirm that they are accurate? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Yes in the future I will do a better job of vetting my edits and not just copy/pasting.Gagaluv1 (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:LGBT-related podcasts on Welcome to Night Vale

Hey Gagaluv1, figured it would be easiest to talk to you here about the edits we have been disagreeing on. While (as per your edit summary) sources talk about the two male main characters' relationship and marriage and there are LGBTQ+ characters in the show, none of this is mentioned (and then referenced) in the article. This is why as per WP:CATV I removed the category. The only mention of any LGBTQ+ atm appears to be a very brief mention of a character in a fictional podcast inside the podcast. Greyjoy ^talk 07:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Kate Bush US 'Wuthering Heights' Bubbling Under peak

Hi, in relation to your recent edit on the Kate Bush discography page, "Wuthering Heights" apparently did peak at #8 on the Bubbling Under chart (though, technically, this is not the same as being #108 as was listed on the discography). It does not currently appear on the Billboard site (which, unfortunately, seems to have an incomplete record) here https://www.billboard.com/music/kate-bush under Bubbling Under, though. Someone (who is now deceased) posted her UK & US chart history, along with that of many other artists, here - https://www.ukmix.org/showthread.php?12425&p=483578#post483578 , where "Wuthering Heights" can be seen charting at #108. However, wikipedia does not allow UK Mix to be cited directly (I assume due to it being abused in the past for citing claimed worldwide sales for artists - for which it would not be a reliable source).Nqr9 (talk) 02:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Left at London

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Left at London, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, you have repeatedly removed sourced content from the article. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Multiple users have already told you to stop adding unsourced content (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). 114.158.42.129 (talk) 11:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Left at London, you may be blocked from editing. For the discography of an underground musician like Left at London, whose recordings don't have any chart positions or sales certifications, I don't think it's a good idea to use a table. In addition, your edits like this one are not supported by the sources cited in the article. 180.34.5.180 (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

...Okay. So why didn't you just say that? You have not offered any reason for undoing my edits, you've just kept removing my tables by just claiming its "unsourced" (which it is not). Also going through past versions of my talk page just to dredge up other bad faith attacks against me is just bizzare.Gagaluv1 (talk) 23:17, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Left at London. You haven't provided any good reason to use a table to this article. Furthermore, most of your edits like this one and this one are not supported by the sources cited in the article. For example, does the source state that You Are Not Alone Enough will be released in 2020? No. Do the sources state that Youth Group Computer, 2 Rowdy 4 Dennys / Give Peace a Break, and Will Write Songs 4 Money are demo albums? No. Do the sources state that these recordings were released on vinyl and/or CD? No. Please stop adding unsourced content. 180.34.5.180 (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Whatever, you win. I don't have the time to argue with an IP, and besides I know this isn't going to go anywhere.Gagaluv1 (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Left at London. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 123.225.131.115 (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Why are you so obsessed with this? The content is factual and sourced and reverting it is just disruptive and you would be blocked by now if you were a real account. You don’t get to gatekeep how articles are presented based on personal preference. And stop hiding behind various ips. It’s cowardly.Gagaluv1 (talk) 01:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Left at London. Again, for the discography of an underground musician like Left at London, whose recordings don't have any chart positions or sales certifications, I don't think it's a good idea to use a table. You haven't provided any good reason to use a table to this article. 123.225.131.115 (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Finally an actual discussion instead of empty threats! I think a table is a more succint representation of the information, as such tables are standard across the entire website. Additionally lists can’t give you information like release dates, formats, and record labels without getting overly crowded.Gagaluv1 (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Using a table to the discography is not mandatory in Wikipedia. Release date, record label, and format can be added to the article like this way:

• "6 Feet" (4 December 2019, Left at London Is Gay, digital download)

Again, most of your edits are not supported by the sources cited in the article. For example, does the source state that You Are Not Alone Enough will be released in 2020? No. Do the sources state that Youth Group Computer, 2 Rowdy 4 Dennys / Give Peace a Break, and Will Write Songs 4 Money are demo albums? No. Do the sources state that these recordings were released on vinyl and/or CD? No. Please stop adding unsourced content. 123.225.131.115 (talk) 02:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

All of this can be easily verified and I have never seen an article individually source every single format. I believe that putting it in a table makes it easier to read. This really doesn’t have anything more to it than personal preference.Gagaluv1 (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

In most cases, underground musicians' recordings are not easily verified. Hence the discography for these artists need sourcing. If Left at London's recording appears on any notable chart (Billboard, Official Charts Company, etc.), I won't object to using a table in this article.

With this edit, "Blacknwhite" has been already restored with a source. I have no idea why you keep removing the source. 123.225.131.115 (talk) 02:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Charli XCX discography

Hey, let's not edit. Bring your concerns to the talk page if you believe "Porsche" was sold as a promotional single. I doubt it since it'd be two years after the song came out... However, let's try to reach a consensus. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 19:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Peppermint

Hey, I see that you are editing the Peppermint article. I'm sending you a message here because there there is a request for comment currently ongoing on her talk page precisely about the inclusion of other names, and I think the discussion would be enriched with your input. cave (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Just wondering, “she has spoken about how awful she feels when her birth name is published.” Do you have a link? Gleeanon409 (talk) 15:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Gibi ASMR

Why did you undo my edit when i put the persons name? What dertermines who gets privacy on wikipedia. I dont see any source saying she does — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntManSC (talk • contribs) 19:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Nothing about that source even says it’s her, it’s just a photo of a high school student in a local newspaper that looks like her. It likely is her but we don’t know for sure.Gagaluv1 (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Running out of options

Do you also disagree with simply piping it as BLOODMONEY and omitting the confusing and contradictory note? Because that still makes the most sense to me. Alternatively, would you agree the article should not exist in the first place, like every other song on the album doesn't? It seems complicated just for the sake of complication. Not blaming you, of course. Just the situation. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Standard policy is just listing the song as "Bloodmoney" with a note. That's how it's always done. For recent examples see Norman Fucking Rockwell! or Thank U, Next.

Nothing is always done on Wikipedia. It's a work in progress. For consistency, I've corrected those, too. Do you know any more? It's not much to get used to, one clarifying word. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

It is pedantic and unnecessary. This is common practice in thousands of articles, if you try to make this a personal crusade you will be editing for days.Gagaluv1 (talk) 03:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

I've had personal crusades here that took years. Not sure why you find literal truth worth fighting to hide. We'll meet again, I'm sure, figure it out eventually. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC

DYK nomination

I've nominated How I'm Feeling Now for the DYK project. The nomination can be viewed here. I've listed you as a co-creator because of your work done on the article. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 13:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Meghan Trainor discography

Hi, Gagaluv1. Do you have some time to discuss the recent changes to this list? I believe we should have a secondary source calling these EPs? Buzzfeed referred to The Love Train as her second EP, and so did the Press of Atlantic City and Us Weekly. Billboard didn't refer to her live releases as EPs either. I do not believe it is appropriate for us to do so when there are no sources for it.--NØ 16:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Spotify Sessions and Singles are considered EPs per many other artist discographies: (Dua Lipa, Carly Rae Jepsen, Harry Styles, etc.). It doesn't make sense to separate these two lists as they are both extended plays.Gagaluv1 (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't believe that the application of this should be uniform, that is WP:OSE. The Billboard link above states: The two singles bring fans a more relaxed version of "Let You Be Right" and a tender take on Sloan's lonely party anthem, so they clearly do not consider Spotify Singles an EP. The version of the Swift discography article that passed an FLC listed live albums separately [1], same case with Trainor. So if anything, these should be used as examples to change the Carly, Harry and Dua lists. Regards, NØ 16:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for How I'm Feeling Now

On 1 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article How I'm Feeling Now, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charli XCX, while under self-isolation due to the coronavirus pandemic, is collaborating with her fans to record her album How I'm Feeling Now? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/How I'm Feeling Now. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, How I'm Feeling Now), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Mooo!

Hey! I've actually been wanting to create this article for a while, but I'm really glad you did :) Can I take it to DYK? heyitsben!! ^talk 17:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, that's so nice of you to say! And if you think that it merits DYK consideration, I say go for it!Gagaluv1 (talk) 19:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I've pretty much done as much as I can with the article for now. You are more than welcome to read through and do any corrections. I'm kinda overwhelmed with the amount of options for DYK hooks so I was wondering if you had any suggestions? heyitsben!! ^talk 18:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to add/modify/remove hooks at Template:Did you know nominations/Mooo! :) heyitsben!! ^talk 19:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Trixie and Katya Save the World

Hello, Gagaluv1, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Trixie and Katya Save the World, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trixie and Katya Save the World.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:RFPP

I have responded to your request at WP:RFPP but I haven't closed it, I will leave it for a second opinion. The edit protected requests were denied for two reasons: 1, they didn't provide a specific set of edits required ie change "this line X" to "this line Y." I made one change after a specific request on the talk page. The second reason is because the changes do not have a consensus and are the cause of the edit warring that has caused the page to be temporarily protected in the first place. Instead of the edit protected requests please contribute to the discussion as to how to move all of the articles forward and prevent the edit warring. Woody (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 17:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Mooo!

On 28 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mooo!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in her self-made music video for "Mooo!", Doja Cat (pictured) raps in front of a green screen that alternates between cartoon GIFs of food, farms, and bouncing anime breasts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mooo!. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mooo!), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Antonyo awards

Hey, is there a reason why we need to add the Antonyo award nominations to articles? Per WP:MT/AS#Response, awards sections should focus on major awards. Considering the Antonyos have been around for one season, are not created by an established nominating body, and are voted on by users (which we are supposed to be avoiding anyways per WP:UGC), I don't think they qualify. BOVINEBOY2008 17:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

It seems that this award is against consensus, by the language explained in the project guideline, so I'm going to remove the award. BOVINEBOY2008 15:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Genres

Just FYI, per WP:RSMUSIC, AllMusic isn't considered a reliable source when citing genres in the infobox, unless in the AllMusic review itself, definitely not the sidebar. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm seconding that: Stop referencing the AllMusic sidebar as stated above, hence my reverting your edits. Robvanvee 11:10, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I’m sorry I will stop doing it in the future. However I did not like how on Haus Party, Pt. 2 you reverted other helpful edits of mine that had nothing to do with genres.Gagaluv1 (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced genres to Wikipedia, as you did at Scenery (Emily King album). This will be your final warning before we go to WP:ANI Robvanvee 07:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Both of those genres are sourced within the body of the article. How about you actually look at the edits you revert.Gagaluv1 (talk) 13:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Given your track record, how about you add a footnote to your edits, start abiding by policy and there won't be any problems. Robvanvee 14:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

It seems Gaga was editing in good faith. Gaga, if the item is sourced solidly in the article, maybe just add to your edit summary “sourced in article already” or similar to preemptively address that concern.

I know that genres are routinely changed so I understand where someone might challenge the edit. Gleeanon409 (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Live at Emo's for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live at Emo's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at Emo's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 15:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Arca

Currently some users are trying to include edits in regards to Arca's gender identity with the apparent intent to highlight the perceived masculine side of her identity. I see you're involved in the article so I'd appreciate your help with any gender-related disruptive edits. cave (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

She produced many albums and came to prominence with her old name/gender before, so there's nothing wrong with mentioning it. You've been reverted multiple times and yet refuse discuss on the talk page. You've also violated WP:3RR once. You should move on. nyxærös 09:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

I think you may have the wrong editor? I have no idea what you’re talking about.Gagaluv1 (talk) 13:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Moonlight (Grace VanderWaal song)

I saw that you linked Dylan Brady (producer) and then undid it. Is it not him? -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Citing a YouTube video

Hi, I noticed your edit to Axiom's End. For a YouTube video, you can use {{cite AV media}} (Template:Cite AV media) which allows a time parameter so you can include the timestamp for the location in the video that supports the content. That way readers (and other editors) don't have to listen/watch the whole thing to verify information. Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for the information! I'll be sure to implement that into my future editing!Gagaluv1 (talk) 00:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop

If an article is tagged with {{in use}}, why would you edit it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:25, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

It's a new topic and I'm adding necessary information that was left out. Don't create a page that's barely started.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, I'm in the middle of editing it. Why would you change the citation style, too? And rewrite the copy entirely? You also added unsourced information. What are you doing? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

I changed it to a citation style that is more standard and easy to use. Again, don't just create an article with barely any information and just expect people to leave it be.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, See WP:CITEVAR: don't change things just because you don't like them, don't add unsourced information (WP:V), don't edit articles that are in use. You can wait 45 minutes. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Don't change things just because you don't like them and then introduce a bunch of errors. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry if what I did upset you, but I don't see why it's a bad thing to edit articles that have been created already. Also, why did you create Category:Orville Peck EPs? It's a useless category since there's only one in it, and EPs are completely allowed to be in artist album category.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Because it had {{in use}} on it, you introduced several errors, you broke rules like WP:CITEVAR, and you aren't listening. That's why. I created the category to diffuse subcategories of Category:Pop EPs and Category:Country music EPs. "EPs are completely allowed to be in artist album category": ??? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Literally all "Category:*artist name* albums" articles include EPs as well, it's an unnecessary distinction. Besides categories shouldn't exist if there's only one page in them.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, What is your problem? You cannot keep doing this: you are introducing source and formatting errors. This article uses list-defined sources and does not use {{Track listing}}. Stop. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Excuse me, why doesn't this article use Track listing? Because you said? You don't own this article.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, WHAT ARE YOU DOING? I am in the middle of writing this. If you do this again, I'm taking this to WP:ANI. You have to stop. And yes, it doesn't use the track listing template because I said so: I started the article, so I get to choose the style. Just like the citation style, per WP:CITEVAR. See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Track_listing. You obviously don't know what you're doing and aren't previewing your edits because you keep on removing the artwork and introducing errors over and over again. Stop it. Wait until the {{in use}} template is removed and don't change citation styles or the track listing style. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Again, YOU DON'T OWN THIS ARTICLE, and I expanded the tracklisting cuz it allows for more information. And yes I know what I've been doing, I've been editing for six years. You're just being a control freak about this article when wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborative spaceGagaluv1 (talk) 16:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, It is supposed to be a collaborative space, which is why I expect my colleagues to be respectful and not make arbitrary changes, keep on reverting errors into articles, insert unsourced info, and fight me on long-standing guidelines. How is it I am the control freak when you keep on changing an established style? You don't have any right to do that, so stop. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

@Koavf: I came here from the WP:AN discussion so I am aware that things have changed since this discussion started. I just want to say that the next time something like this happens, and particularly if it involves Gagaluv1, please let me know and I will block them if they persist after a warning. Anyone can edit and anyone can be rude and intrusive. The latter get blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

I'm explicitly soliciting your feedback to the changes that I just made on Show Pony and I hope that you can refer to my rationale on the talk page for a clear understanding of why I made the changes that I made. If you feel like you have more to add there, I look forward to your contributions. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 16:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 7G (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Notice of AN discussion

This is to let you know that some of your edits are being discussed on the Administrators' Noticeboard, in this thread. Your editing is not the main focus of the thread, and no one has suggested any sanctions against you, but I thought you should be aware of the discussion. (I know you were pinged when it started, but it has moved on a bit since then.) Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oil of Every Pearl's Un-Insides, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sadder badder cooler.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sadder badder cooler.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liz (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mitski lush.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mitski lush.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

More Love isn’t a soundtrack album

It’s not appropriate to call More Love by Sara Bareilles a soundtrack album because Bareilles’s recordings (other than the theme song) aren’t used in the series. There’s a separate soundtrack album from the Little Voice cast, and even the recording of “Little Voice” on Bareilles’s album is unique to her album and has significant differences from that used as the theme song. I’ll be reverting your edit but wanted to explain in detail why better than I could in an edit summary. I didn’t catch the album listed in its own soundtrack section, or else I’d have removed it. 67.6.100.195 (talk) 17:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fergie discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Duchess.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alma albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Alma albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

A. G. Cook template

Hi, when creating navigational box templates such as {{A. G. Cook}}, be sure you add it to all the articles you list in the navbox as well. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

But is that applicaple to related articles? I didn't feel like it would be relevant to put the template at the end of those articles.Gagaluv1 (talk) 20:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Then they shouldn't be included in the navbox. Navboxes are intended to be able to navigate to and from the articles within the navbox. See WP:NAV-WITHIN. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Emily king sides.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emily king sides.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chromatica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honey Dijon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Magdalene

You added this in the article, next time make sure the genres are not sourced in a tacky way, and all that don't need to be in the lead section. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Congrats.

Ive been watching ur qork on Mileys pages. But i see an error on it and i see ur confirmed and know how to edit colums. The track Forguveness and Love was nwver released as a single and the source used is Rate Yout Music qich is a page that an user can catalogue a non ifficial release. Can u remove the song from promotional singles! Thank u a lot.6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by OMG4323 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes

added a link pointing to Digital download

Mad at Disney

added a link pointing to Digital download

StarKid Productions

added a link pointing to Horror

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angels in America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages West End and Marianne Elliott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Why are you reverting obsesibly my edits? --Night Crawling (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I put the information. You reverted it multiple times. You are the one constantly reverting not me. These are releases of multiple songs, officially released. They are EPs.Gagaluv1 (talk) 18:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I dont understand why you are treating me like that we both LGBT pals and this is not fair to be treated like this. I said that 2 track singles are not Eps and even so they were only made available on Spotify. This are not official releases available on any plataform except Spotify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Night Crawling (talk • contribs) 18:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok, first of our identities have nothing to do with this discussion and I don't know why you'd even think to bring that up. Secondly, Spotify is 100% official. Spotify Singles even have their own wikipedia article and their own curated playlist by Spotify themselves.Gagaluv1 (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Still I Think you are being insesntive and cruel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Night Crawling (talk • contribs) 18:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Okay, you are entitled to that opinion but I think you are being childish and oversensitive. It's Wikipedia, restoring sourced information is not a personal attack on you.19:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Gagaluv1 (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:Caroline polachek parachute.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caroline polachek parachute.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kinky (Kesha song); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 16:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Let Me Love You Like a Woman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Let Me Love You Like a Woman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Your recent editing history at Miley Cyrus discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Left at london dazed.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Left at london dazed.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:25, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:100 gecs mtv.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:100 gecs mtv.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Juno Birch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Juno Birch.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

UNHhhh

Do you know where the episode names went? I can’t find the list and it was there before :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99centlips (talk • contribs) 03:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

They are collapsible tables, there should be a “show” button for you to click on the far right side of the table.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Your recent editing history at Miley Cyrus discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

This is from the dispute that's been going on over this article. Night Crawling was warned for this, and it's only fair that you are, too. Please see my user talk page; I'd like to help if I can... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Oops

I managed to fat-finger the rollback link and reverted your edits to an article – I immediately self-reverted but wanted to let you know why you (probably) got a notification that your edits had been reverted. Sorry to be so clumsy. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 17:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus discography

I just lowered the protection from full back to semi, since I feel that we've done our best to discuss everything, and because I now have a good idea as to who the "problem child" is in this dispute. Thanks again for participating in the discussion, and I'm sorry you had to get roped into it like that. Just take my advice and what you learned and proceed carefully. Before editing, maybe start a discussion on the article's talk page, state your intentions, and ask for any objections from other users. If Night Crawling responds, let him. If he becomes uncivil or tries other things, just point others to the discussion on my user talk page and advise they read it. If you need my input or advice, let me know. My user talk page is open. I'll keep eyes on the article, but don't hesitate to let me know if things spiral out of control. :-) Keep up the great work, and thanks again for doing your best to collaborate and try and work things out. It's too bad that it didn't happen, but it's not your fault. Cheers! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

No worries! Thank you for getting involved, I hope this user will back off from now on, but as you said they do appear to be potentially trolling us, so who knows. Regardless, I'm hoping we can all move forward!Gagaluv1 (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Start a discussion on the article's talk page and ping Night Crawling. It looks like things are resuming as they did before. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Oh brother, what is their deal??Gagaluv1 (talk) 23:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Saturday Night Live

I thought it was worth mentioning that the Allstate Man was in the sketch. Uncle Ben is also a well-known character.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

The Allstate Man was not in the sketch, Dave Chappelle portraying him was. It does not matter if the characters are well known. SNL features impressions of well-known people fictional or not, and it is not normal to list what characters get portrayed in every episode. It's only notable when celebrities outside the host or main cast perform in the episode and who they're playing is merely trivia. The only exceptions I would see are cases like Maya Rudolph as Kamala and Alec Baldwin as Trump, because these are recurring characters.Gagaluv1 (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

An update for you

I just wanted to let you know that I've indefinitely blocked Night Crawling as a sock puppet account of OMG4323. I don't think you'll have any more issues with editing that discography page and adding that content. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I've restored the article to the last revision that you made. If there's anything you previously added that is missing, feel free to add them back. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your support. I had my suspicions that one might’ve been the sock puppet of the other due to the similarities in the writing styles. So sorry you ever got mixed up in this I hope you have a good day!Gagaluv1 (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sawayama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rough Trade.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Albums by drag queens has been nominated for conversion

Category:Albums by drag queens has been nominated for conversion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:38, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chasing rainbows.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chasing rainbows.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Since i was young.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Since i was young.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Soccer Mommy

Hi. When you add chart positions to discographies, please don't just list them with no source, as you did several months ago at Soccer Mommy here. As I'm sure you know, with all material added to Wikipedia, it needs a source per WP:V. Thanks. Ss112 12:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sadder badder cooler.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sadder badder cooler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rina sawayama bad friend.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rina sawayama bad friend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rina Sawayama Lucid.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rina Sawayama Lucid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Julien

Hey there, in regards to your revert of my edit on Carly’s discography page, on the single page for “Julien”, it has a source for it being an official single, not just a promotional one. I’m not sure what discussion was had that contradicts this, but I just wanted to let you know that that was the reason why I made that edit. If you believe this is incorrect, please look at the source on the single page first. Thanks. 2601:48:8100:9740:3853:227B:38D9:CAF0 (talk) 04:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Categorizing "albums by artist" subcategories by genre

FYI - I read your edit summary at Category:Taylor Swift albums and wanted to point out to you the RFC that took place in 2019 which stated that such categories should only be placed in genre categories that apply to all the albums of that artist as it is a requirement per WP:CATV. The categorization of such categories is based on the articles that populate it and not every genre an artist has delved into throughout their career. If a specific genre doesn't apply to all their albums, then those album articles that don't apply should be individually categorized by that genre. Thanks and happy holidays. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Demidevil genres

Hi Gagaluv1. I noticed you added genres to Demidevil, but upon further looking at the sources, one of the sources calls Ashnikko herself a "bubblegum pop-punk star", not the mixtape itself, which we would explicitly need. The DIY source says the album has "R&B-infused pop backings", and most users would deem R&B an influence in that context, so I removed the genres aside from reinstating pop. Please use refnames in future to tell other users where you specifically got the genres from. The genres are/were not discussed on the article, which they need to be if there are no refnames directly next to the genres. Thanks. Ss112 17:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

I guess I was confused, I assumed that sourcing in the lead and infobox isn't necessary if the source itself is listed in the article, but now I understand that only applies if the specific claim appears sourced later in the article. Thanks you for your comment and I will try to be more careful in the future.Gagaluv1 (talk) 17:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

34+35

Per WP:BRD: re this edit, why did you revert? Having the disclaimer there makes the row too ambiguous. Which version charted? That’s not specified in the table. Which version was on Positions (album)? That’s not specified either. They are two different singles. If you want. we can just list it below in a separate row. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 16:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand this rule. We're listing singles, not just singles that charted. The song was released as a single in two forms, why wouldn't we list that? The remix is already being released to radio, and will contribute to the song's chart growth. You could make the argument that it's a single in it's own right apart from the original, but I think it's fine to list them together since they are two versions of the same song.Gagaluv1 (talk) 17:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but the original charted those positions. The original was included on Positions. The remix did neither. So it would be incorrect to list them on the same row, as it would be too ambiguous. It’s not clear which version charted. It’s not clear which version was on Positions. That’s the definition of "ambiguous". To disambiguate, what we could do is list the remix on a separate line; that way, it would resolve both examples of ambiguity. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 00:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't really see the need but sure, I think including them together with a note saying only the original was included on the album is sufficient.Gagaluv1 (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I’ll implement that into the article. I’d also like to include a note saying "Charting is for the original" or something like that, as those were my two issues. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 03:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

• In response to this, the solo version peaked at number two, not number four, according to Billboard. Hayman30 (talk) 04:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Dedicated Side B

Hi there! If Dedicated Side B is a studio album, then why does it say it’s a companion album on the main article page? Doesn’t that seem like a discrepancy? Also, if it is a studio album, then why isn’t it listed on her artist page under discography? I have been told that multiple editors here have come to the consensus that it is a companion album, not a studio album. Because if it truly is a studio album, then it needs to be included in the discography section on her main article page. 2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 04:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

It is both. It is a studio album and a companion to Dedicated. However, "Companion album" isn't an official title so it goes in the studio album section. The confusion is whether this counts as her fifth studio album. It didn't get an extensive promo campaign or a separate tour, so we're avoiding officially numbering it until her next album is announced. If the official press release for her next album calls it her sixth we know that Side B officially counts as her fifth. If her next album is her fifth, then this is just a studio album outside of the main chronology. Does that make sense?Gagaluv1 (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I suppose that makes sense, but I’m just wondering why “companion album” can’t be considered an official title. There are other types of albums such as compilation and remix albums, so why exactly can’t we say that this is a type of album? 2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Remix albums and compilation albums are official titles that describe specific things. "Companion album" is a loose term that could describe re-releases like The Fame Monster or whole different studio albums like Evermore. It's not a formal term or type of release.Gagaluv1 (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Idk, to me, the two examples you have aren’t examples or companion albums. I would consider The Fame Monster to be a re-release, and Evermore is simply a studio album. Just bc Evermore feels like a second act to Folklore doesn’t change the fact that it is its own separate album whose name doesn’t connect it to Folklore at all, whereas Dedicated Side B does connect it to Dedicated. 2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 15:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Also, when it comes to The Fame Monster, I’ve always considered that to be an EP that Gaga added on to The Fame, but I’ve always seen it as a separate EP, since it is sonically quite different than The Fame. 2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

That's exactly my point. Companion album is not a real term and could be applied to sequels, re-releases or anything you want.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Idk, I would consider an album of B-sides to be a companion album, but only if it’s marked as such. For example, Taylor very well could’ve named Evermore “Folklore Side B”, but she didn’t, therefore it’s not a companion album to Folklore. That makes sense to me, but maybe it doesn’t to others, idk. 2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 16:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

If I may ask, currently the first sentence on Dedicated Side B says “Dedicated Side B is a companion album to Dedicated.” However, since you’re saying that companion album isn’t a real term, would it not be more appropriate to say “Dedicated Side B is a studio album by Carly Rae Jepsen. It is a companion album to Dedicated.”?2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, that sounds about right.Gagaluv1 (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok great! 2601:48:8100:9740:CD79:D42B:6C38:5D4F (talk) 16:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greatest Hits... So Far!!! (Pink album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babyface.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pang (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yeehaw.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oil of every pearls uninsides remix album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oil of every pearls uninsides remix album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Grammy Award for Best Pop Vocal Album

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Grammy Award for Best Pop Vocal Album requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 July 13#Non-major Grammy Awards. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 07:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Creating navigational templates

Hello. Per WP:NENAN, which defines the informal "rule of five", please stop making navigational templates unless there are at least five topics by that artist to link to. This total does not include the artist's main article. "Related articles", which usually only include mere mentions of an artist at them and are usually only put in to "fill out" such templates, do not count. Thus, you should not have created Template:Lucy Dacus. Dacus does not have a discography page—you've merely linked to a section there—and by some users' definitions this should not be there either, so I have removed it. Thus, there are essentially two articles in that template. Much the same with Template:Dorian Electra. Before you create another one of these padded-out navigational templates, consider that per NENAN, not everything needs a navbox and you should not make one until there are five articles for that artist's own topics. Thank you. Ss112 19:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 01:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tank and the Bangas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page What the World Needs Now.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charli xcx - claws cover 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charli xcx - claws cover 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charli xcx - claws cover 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charli xcx - claws cover 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I Finally Understand cover 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Finally Understand cover 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I Finally Understand cover 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Finally Understand cover 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scenery (Emily King album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calypso and Sade.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Tanya Tagaq navbox

Hi, you added the navbox you created for {{ Tanya Tagaq}} to the articles listed in it, except the one in related articles. I added it for you. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taurus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:People with synesthesia has been nominated for deletion

Category:People with synesthesia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:13, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Dodie Clark albums category

Please don't change the names of categories unilaterally and out of process as you did here. Such categories can be renamed through the speedy renaming process as outlined in WP:CFDS. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 03:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everything's Gonna Be Okay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asexual.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Carrie & Lowell

Hi Gagaluv1. As you have undone my edit at this article you may want to fix the Cite Error you've caused by doing so. Thanks 92.5.2.97 (talk) 12:29, 9 June 2021 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Tiapfyh left at london.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tiapfyh left at london.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Idomoh vol 1.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Idomoh vol 1.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Archiving

Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is 126.2 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 17:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

WP:USCHARTS

Hi. It appears you restored the Adult Alternative Songs chart to Stop Making This Hurt after I previously removed it. Please see WP:USCHARTS. This chart is no longer considered relevant when the song has charted on either the main Hot Rock & Alternative Songs or Rock Airplay charts, both of which this song has appeared on. Thanks. Ss112 19:47, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Undo on RuPaul's Drag Race

Hi there. I noticed that you undid without explanation an addition to the article by Chocochipscookies, who has added it again. I don't really have an opinion on whether that material should be there, but to avoid an edit war or hurt feelings I would suggest leaving an edit summary when you undo someone else's edit. Or perhaps leave a note on Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race with your reasoning. – Anon423 (talk) 15:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disco (Kylie Minogue album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love to Love You Baby.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sin miedo vinyl.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sin miedo vinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who support transgender rights has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedians who support transgender rights has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My agenda deluxe.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My agenda deluxe.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Megan Thee Stallion discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 22:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

It updated here https://www.billboard.com/artist/megan-thee-stallion/chart-history/hbu/ Gagaluv1 (talk) 22:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hiiii, thanks for improving Saddest Factory Records, I really appreciate it! Also I really liked your userpage, think I'll be listening to some albums from your list when I need new albums to listen to. Thanks for all your contributions on Wikipedia and happy editing :D

Justiyaya 17:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Also this rewrite of Madison (album) is quite impressive, thank you so much for expanding it :D

(in case you are wondering why I keep stumbling upon your edits, I created both articles and have them on my watchlist) Justiyaya 14:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add year spans to chart tables unless a new peak is achieved in that year

The year span in chart wikitables is for what year peaks were achieved. The tables are a list of peaks, not the years those songs have charted in. And when you do add a year span, it should be with an en dash between the years (2021–2022), not a hyphen (2021-2022). Please do not jump the gun in future. Thank you. Ss112 03:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Between the Lines Robyn.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Between the Lines Robyn.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Reputation (Taylor Swift album), concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 13:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at FKA Twigs discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 13:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Dorian Electra

The fact that they were assigned female at birth is just as relevant as their parents' names and occupations, that they are Jewish, the schools they went to, the fact that they have ADHD, etc. There is no reason to treat this sourced information as any different from what else is in the article. ... discospinster _talk 23:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

It really isn't. It is useless trivia that is not the public's business. Noting what someone's genitals at birth were in an article is not relevant. All anyone needs to know about a trans person is their pronouns and gender identity if they choose to share it, not their past. Just because information is out there doesn't mean it needs to be broadcasted to the world and we should normalize someone's birth sex not being a point of discussion at all.Gagaluv1 (talk) 00:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Considering https://www.gaytimes.co.uk/amplify/dorian-electra-is-the-gender-fluid-pop-star-making-camp-cool-amplify/ they have referred to themselves as AFAB], they have chosen to share this information, and therefore it is as relevant as the rest of the article. ... discospinster _talk 00:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Lin-Manuel Miranda

You added Moana to the first paragraph of the lead and I reverted it saying this in the edit summary; I don't know if you missed it or ignored it on purpose, but I'm citing it again here anyway, because I reverted your latest (and the same) edit on the article. Regards. Ronherry 18:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Labrinth discography

Your edits to this article were careless and you simply stopped editing when you shouldn't have been done yet. You added a chart column header, then added no content for that said column. What are you doing? Also, please learn now that I've told you that the other charted songs section is ordered by year that the song charted. Note it's not a singles section where we order by chronological order and year of release. This is a whole different section guided by the fact that the songs are not singles and merely charted. Putting 2019 for the Euphoria songs implies they charted upon release and it's misleading because you know as well as I do that they did not. If a song only started charting in a certain year, it should be added for that year. Please be more careful when editing pages. Don't leave tables with formatting errors that you caused. Check your edits. Also start leaving more edit summaries. Ss112 10:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry I meant to finish it but I fell asleep before I could add the numbers. To be honest this is my first time editing while high and that was probably a stupid idea.Gagaluv1 (talk) 15:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Please at least summarize major edits

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 17:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

People of the Pride

Coldplay literally released a Let Somebody Go single version today, it's clear that People of the Pride is just a promotional single, they're not even sending it to pop radio, but alternative. GustavoCza (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

If you'd look at Wikipedia:Singles criteria, it does not matter what genre of radio the song is released to. Being released to a radio station confirmed by All Access is enough to be considered a single on its own.Gagaluv1 (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

All Access is about America, why would that influence in the single choices of an European band? The world doesn't revolve around US. GustavoCza (talk) 04:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Again, if you would actually read the criteria I linked, you would know that it doesn't matter if a single is only released in one territory, it's still a single.Gagaluv1 (talk) 12:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Sure. Gaga stan. --GustavoCza (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Says the Coldplay fanboy lol.Gagaluv1 (talk) 16:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

You know damn well this song is like when Gaga released 911 as a promo but you want to make Coldplay look like flops because tHeY cOpIeD cHrOmAtIcA. Embarrassing. --GustavoCza (talk) 13:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

What? First off 911 is a single not a promo. All I care about is truthful information being shared on wikipedia. I’ve never even heard this song or its album and I have no investment in Coldplay whatsoever. People can disagree with you without being a supervillain intent on distroyint your fave lmao. Get a grip.Gagaluv1 (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Before creating any more navigational templates

I suggest you read WP:NENAN. There is an informal "rule of five" you should follow when considering creating a navigational template. Template:Dominic Fike only has four articles to link to besides his main article, which does not count. Unless an artist has five notable articles about their own projects to link to besides their main article, it probably does not need a template yet. I'm letting you know in case you find your templates nominated at TfD in future. I'm not sure if you've made templates like this previously, but if you have and have had myself or another editor tell you about this, then consider this is a reminder. Ss112 03:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Also, if I come across another mess you've made, like on Zendaya discography, I'm reverting your edits outright. You seem content to leave discographies in some misformatted state with broken tables. Either ceck your edits when or directly after you make them. It's getting annoying. Ss112 03:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caissie Levy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Macy Rodman

On 25 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Macy Rodman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Macy Rodman's 2021 album Unbelievable Animals was described as combining "radio-rock shine with dirt-punk roots" and "a dash of Ray of Light–esque experimental pop"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Macy Rodman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Macy Rodman), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Muni Long navbox

Hi, in the navbox you created for Muni Long, you included a group of songs on which she has received writing credits, but you didn’t add the navbox to those articles. Per WP:NAV-WITHIN, “every article listed on a particular navigation template generally has the template placed on its page.” Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disco guest list.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disco guest list.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kick I reissue.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kick I reissue.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Muna

Template:Muna has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Please use Edit Comments

n/t --84.132.144.110 (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022: Citing a source you know doesn't contain the information you're claiming on Wet Leg and Wet Leg (album)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wet Leg, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 20:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RuPaul's Drag Race, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosco.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monique Samuels. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop adding "rapper" and "blogger" in the infobox unless you can demonstrate that reliable sources commonly associate her with those professions. KyleJoan^talk 16:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Monique Samuels, you may be blocked from editing. KyleJoan^talk 17:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yola (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walk Through Fire.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The hardest part noah cyrus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The hardest part noah cyrus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Saves the World, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 12:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at A Light for Attracting Attention, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Actually test the links made by the album chart templates work when you add them to articles. Ss112 00:33, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Saves the World. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 02:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince singles discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Songs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Do not edit war

Reverting me after my manual revert of you is edit warring, so I suggest you don't do that or I will send you a template warning next time. Your revert also changed "Released:" back to "Scheduled:", which you clearly didn't bother to change back or rectify, so that isn't helpful. I cited Apple Music, it says "Ryan Taylor" only. I don't know what you're talking about and I have no interest if you can't cite a source all editors can access on the page, not telling me in an edit summary what it says then not citing it on the page. Ss112 23:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Lizzo special target.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lizzo special target.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 15:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Top gun maverick soundtrack v2.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Top gun maverick soundtrack v2.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Till Forever Falls Apart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Till Forever Falls Apart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Americana/Folk Albums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hozier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scene Queen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scene Queen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sonichits.com/artist/Scene_Queen. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

OK so I'm very confused. I have never visited the website in question nor have I ever even heard of sonichits.com. Either this is a full coincidence, or (more likely) they have copied my writing from the wikipedia article. I will be reinstating the article, as this is complete madness.Gagaluv1 (talk) 16:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Femuline gaymeova.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Femuline gaymeova.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Todrick hall algorhythm.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Todrick hall algorhythm.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Rising (Mxmtoon album)

Hello, Gagaluv1,

Thank you for creating Rising (Mxmtoon album).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The long direct quotes seem to take up almost as much of the article as any original prose. Would be great if you can rewrite some of the quotes in your own words instead. See WP:OVERQUOTE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bennv123}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bennv123 (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

WP:BRD

I have no horse in this race, but this edit summary is unacceptable. You made some edits. Someone thought the edit was not an improvement and reverted, with a viable edit summary. Note I'm not saying they are correct, just that they gave a reason. You now need to discuss, not edit war and certainly not use foul language. Please correct this. --Muhandes (talk) 09:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

I already asked you once to stop edit warring and discuss on the talk page. Don't think I will hesitate to go to WP:ANI, where that edit summary enough will be enough to block you. --Muhandes (talk) 07:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for choosing to WP:ENGAGE. Edit warring gets us nowhere. Muhandes (talk) 09:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mel Stone

Hello, Gagaluv1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mel Stone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kane Brown discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Christmas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rebecca Black, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Please look at the discussion I started at Talk:Rebecca Black#Singles. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Little Simz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. In this edit you added the UK R&B Albums peak for No Thank You but did not provide a source. I think you know at this point every UK chart that's not the main singles and albums charts needs a separate citation. You have never responded to any of the messages I've left here so I will now send you templates when you add unsourced material. Do better, there is no excuse when you have been a registered editor this long. Ss112 15:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Wet Leg, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please don't replace citations with WP:BAREURLS Sciencefish (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

This is the second time we have been through this. Please read WP:EPTALK, and pay attention to the first bullet of this warning regarding content dispute. I made my argument that nobody has countered on other than revert because WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. Adding these songs does absolutely nothing to improve her article, it isn't even a full list (yes some are missing from the version you want included), If you want a full listing of her songs there are external links for that. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mitski lush.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mitski lush.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Czello 18:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Calling someone transphobic for including a trans person's deadname in an article against their wishes is not a personal attack, it is an accurate description of the behavior they are engaging in.Gagaluv1 (talk) 22:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

It is an unambiguous personal attack, and given that you did it after reverting another user it's clear it was directed at them. Please read WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. — Czello 07:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I guess we agree to disagree.Gagaluv1 (talk) 18:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lush (Mitski album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lush (Mitski album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lush (Mitski album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Beccaynr (talk) 20:53, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Gagaluv1, I'm glad you're interested in the gender-related disputes topic area, and I hope you stick around. Since it's so contentious, we really prefer that people discuss when their edits are reverted, rather than just re-revert. You'll see an open discussion (more than one, actually) at Talk:J. K. Rowling about how to discuss her views, and it would be helpful to start one at the Joyce book's talk page. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello again - instead of continuing to restore the contentious disputed content at Michael Gira, per WP:BLPRESTORE, please discuss this at the article Talk page (there is an existing discussion). Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 22:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Category:Patreon creators has been nominated for deletion

Category:Patreon creators has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 13:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Black Butta

Hey! You say you do editing for RuPaul’s drag race? Even though this has nothing to do with her drag race show, her album "Black Butta" needs an article, now I tried to do something but I f-ed it up, and I think you know wayyy more than I do. And here's a random question... Are you a Little Monster (Lady Gaga fan) or a Kesha fan? LittleMonsterrrrrrr (talk) 11:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Kitty

I had added missing citation (which also doesn't have separate wiki page) for Hello Kitty Island Adventure
(though I missed pre-2000 Apple & old consoles except Nintendo DS which have fun cute games)
the other 2020s (only) game mentioned - Hello Kitty and Friends: Happiness Parade - (2022/2023) did have source cited
--- Cat12zu3 (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Welcome to Night Vale episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Audacious re release.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Audacious re release.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § Drag (entertainment)-related categories

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § Drag (entertainment)-related categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Music to scream to.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Music to scream to.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)