User talk:Frostly/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Frostly. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi DoggieTimesTwo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:38, Friday, May 1, 2020 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi DoggieTimesTwo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:54, Friday, May 1, 2020 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, DoggieTimesTwo. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Stay safe, EditQwerty (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Caribou Contests (May 3)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caribou Contests and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Caribou Contests, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, DoggieTimesTwo!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
|
DoggieTimesTwo, I wanted to let you know that the nominator has withdrawn this GA nomination, so the review has been cancelled.
Please be sure to read my comments there—based on what you wrote, you don't appear to yet have gained the experience needed to be an effective GA reviewer. I'd like to suggest you try other things over the next few months before making any return to the GA space as a reviewer, and to find a mentor when you do. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Your GA nomination of Doukhobors
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doukhobors you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
Your GA nomination of Doukhobors
The article Doukhobors you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Doukhobors for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
Bad edit with OABOT
When you add links to references with OABOT, as you did to Hessy Levinsons Taft, please make sure that the links you add contain the information that was cited in the reference. You failed to do this in this edit, in which you changed a link that cited "Author biography from [paper]" to add a link to the paper that did not include the author biography. This confused a later editor, User:Pollymarie, into thinking that the reference did not include the information it was used as a reference for. It is not always true that freely linkable versions of publications are identical with the final published version, sometimes the differences are important, and you (not the tools you use) are responsible for checking that the links you add are still relevant despite their differences. You didn't do it in this case and it led to trouble down the road. Please be more careful in future. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:25, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for alerting me of this issue. I will be more careful with my edits using the bot in the future. DoggieTimesTwo 04:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi DoggieTimesTwo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:54, Monday, February 15, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
- News and notes: Maher stepping down
- Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video
- In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house
- News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia
- Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day
- Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?
- Gallery: What is Black history and culture?
The Signpost: 28 March 2021
- News and notes: A future with a for-profit subsidiary?
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Wikimedia LLC and disinformation in Japan
- News from the WMF: Project Rewrite: Tell the missing stories of women on Wikipedia and beyond
- Recent research: 10%-30% of Wikipedia’s contributors have subject-matter expertise
- From the archives: Google isn't responsible for Wikipedia's mistakes
- Obituary: Yoninah
- From the editor: What else can we say?
- Arbitration report: Open letter to the Board of Trustees
- Traffic report: Wanda, Meghan, Liz, Phil and Zack
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bubly (sparkling water) (April 7)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bubly (sparkling water) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bubly (sparkling water), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi EpicPupper! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:32, Tuesday, April 13, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi EpicPupper! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 17:33, Tuesday, April 13, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Reliable sources
At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Willock, you said that neither of the sources are reliable. This is incorrect, both meet the definition of reliable source as they're website where the content is properly peer reviewed before content is added. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of the peer-reviewed source, thank you for bringing that up. I have withdrawn my nomination. EpicPupper 18:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Asia delsort
Hi! I dont think it is necessary to list articles relevant to a smaller location such as India to be listed under "Asia" unless the article is really relevant to Asia. This is in reference to two AFDs you just listed. Best! VV 17:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, I wasn't aware of this before, I'll make sure to watch out in the future. EpicPupper 18:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I did some further thinking on this, and I think that it is beneficial to add "Asia" to smaller locations, in order to better classify AFDs. If you have a specific concern on an AFD that I listed, please feel free to leave a message. Cheers, EpicPupper 23:14, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- hola! Im cool with any category being added as long as it is of value. I do know some admins did get annoyed with regular additions of wrong categories since they had to undo it. If you think a category is relevant then go for it. PS: please tag me as I won't see your replies otherwise. VV 05:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Just Curious
I'm curious to know how you justify this edit to Teahouse/Host start with this edit immediately afterwards to Teahouse/Host landing, when you've only made 206 mainspace edits?
I don't have a problem with you adding your name to the Teahouse Host list, but I can't follow the logic of those two edits. I have reverted the first one, as briefly explained in my edit summary. Best wishes, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm sorry, I didn't read the "mainspace" there. You're right, that is a mistake on my side. EpicPupper 23:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
Hello! I noticed that you'd added redundant delsorts at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushil Pokharel. So, I checked your contributions, and it appears it was not the only time. In fact, in the "GeneralAsia" section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Asia, almost all current transclusions are redundant and they were added by you. Same with Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People. Are you going through AFDs just to add delsorts? You are obviously not qualified. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:07, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Usedtobecool: Hi there, and thank you for leaving this note. I apologize for adding the redundant delsorts, I will make sure that my delsorts are relevant in the future. If needed, I would be open to having my delsorts reverted. As for going through AFDs just to add delsorts, I occasionally do it, as I think that there is no harm in doing it. EpicPupper 04:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- It's helpful when done right, disruptive when not, and they are not easily reverted. If you intend to do it as a specialty, you need to be an expert. That means reading and following all instructions. Please click the bluelinks in the deletion notices you add to the AFDs and read the instructions at the top of the corresponding sorting lists. Go through those lists to see what kind of discussions are transcluded into them. For instance, if you go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People, there's an instruction at the top that says not to list discussions to it if they can be listed in the profession-specific lists instead. And if you go through Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Asia, you will see that all the countries' lists are already transcluded there, so adding an India AFD to Asia would list it twice. And there is some harm, because the Asia list is already too long. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Vi-Jon Laboratories Wikipedia Page Removing Misleading Lawsuit Information
Hello -
I would like to edit the Vi-Jon Laboratories page to remove mention of the Proctor & Gamble lawsuit mention because it is misleading to readers in the way that it is stated.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.134.147.114 (talk) 19:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @35.134.147.114: Hello there, it seems like you have a conflict of interest with the article. Please follow the steps at WP:ER if you would like to make an edit. Cheers, EpicPupper 20:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Please slow down somehow
Hi EpicPupper,
Thank you very much for your numerous helpful contributions. At the moment, I'm worried, though. In short succession:
- you restored unsourced content in a biography of a living person at Special:Diff/1019520240 (arguably undoing vandalism, and mentioned here just for the sake of completeness in case that wasn't the justification)
- you restored content which has been removed with undue weight concerns despite being required to gain consensus to do so (WP:ONUS) at Special:Diff/1019521131, wrongly claiming that the removal has been "unexplained" in your edit summary
- you restored content which has been described as "misleading" in Special:Diff/1019518926, 25 seconds after its removal (so clearly without attempting verification), with the sole justification of "unexplained content removal", which is factually incorrect
- you restored challenged content at Special:Diff/1019525784 without providing the required inline citation, and, as this happened within a minute, likely without any verification attempt. Your justification "unexplained content removal" does not seem to correctly describe the situation.
- you reverted good faith edits, correctly identified as such, in Special:Diff/1019518220, restoring incorrect content in response to someone's well-justified challenging of the information (WP:BURDEN), then reported the user at WP:AIV for "persistent vandalism" (Special:Permalink/1019527981). As you have correctly noticed, this is a BLP issue (Special:Diff/1019517334) – but looking at the revision history, the only person noticeably violating the biographies of living persons policy in this conflict was yourself.
- you made invisible, unnecessary changes in Special:Diff/1019529611, Special:Diff/1019528436 and Special:Diff/1019529330, which should be avoided per WP:COSMETICBOT ("While this policy applies only to bots, human editors may also wish to follow this guidance for the reasons given here, especially if making such changes on large scales")
- you added a short summary of "None" to an article in Special:Diff/1019528511, and it remains there with you continuing to make rapid edits elsewhere
- you seem to have edit warred at Special:Diff/1019530827 without actually disagreeing about the decision with the content in mind?
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello ToBeFree,
- I will try to touch on all of my contributions listed above separately.
- I did not see that my revert would restore unsourced content, and did not pay proper attention to the consequences of my revert. In the future, I will pay attention to what my reverts will do, and what it will revert back to.
- I now see that the removal was not "unexplained". I was previously not aware of WP:ONUS, and have now self-reverted,
- After quick further analysis, I currently realize that the edit was justified (not unexplained content removal). This was a mistake on my end.
- I was not aware of WP:BURDEN and related policies at the time. I now understand that my revert was wrong. In the future, I will attempt to verify anything which I am considering reverting.
- I now understand my violation of WP:BLP and how the user provided a well-justified explanation. As explained in my AIV comment, I recognize this mistake. My revert has now been undone by another administrator.
- I have now read WP:COSMETICBOT and understand the policy now. I was previously using WP:AutoEd for minor changes. Now, I have a bit of a question: Is it appropriate to make minor formatting edits on top of other more significant edits, such as adding a short description, wikilinks, etc.? Examples of what I am talking about are at https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Library_of_Congress&type=revision&diff=1019552939&oldid=1019420683&diffmode=source and https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Microsoft_GIF_Animator&diff=prev&oldid=1019548138.
- I added the short summary per WP:SDNONE, is there some other policy that I do not know of relating to this?
- Looking at this diff (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Bliss_(The_Powerpuff_Girls)&type=revision&diff=1019530752&oldid=1019530688&diffmode=source), I now see that the content removal was justified. I agree that I have wrongly edit warred.
In general, based on your comments, I will take a short wikibreak to read multiple Wikipedia policies, starting from the 5 pillars and including the ones mentioned in your message. Thank you for bringing these concerns up with me, I believe that I have learned much from this experience. I notice that much of my mistakes are in attempted vandalism fighting. Because of this, I plan to enroll in the WP:CVUA to learn the ropes of vandalism fighting. Thanks, EpicPupper 01:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, EpicPupper, and thank you very much for the detailed explanations. WP:BURDEN can be tricky when dealing with vandalism, as interpreting malicious removals as "challenging" puts vandals in a comfortable position and needs to be avoided too. Over time, you'll find a good balance between reverting vandalism and thoroughly verifying restored content. Regarding WP:COSMETICBOT, yes, that's correct and a perfectly fine solution ("Such changes should not usually be done on their own, but may be allowed in an edit that also includes a substantive change.").
- And sorry, I wasn't aware of the explanation at Wikipedia:Short_description#None! It needs to be taken with a grain of salt ("This is an information page. It is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines [...]") but the justification, tracking category removal, seems legitimate to me. Adding "None" in a specific article was probably fine, but I wouldn't do so in masses. That would quickly lead to a lot of raised eyebrows.
- Regarding the edit war, making a single revert is usually fine, and WP:ATD-R is on your side. The specific edit just looked strange to me. :)
- Don't worry too much about all this; enrolling in WP:CVUA is an excellent idea and will cover all of these concerns. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
April blitz bling
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to EpicPupper for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE April 2021 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 23:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 25 April 2021
- From the editor: A change is gonna come
- Disinformation report: Paid editing by a former head of state's business enterprise
- In the media: Fernando, governance, and rugby
- Opinion: The (Universal) Code of Conduct
- Op-Ed: A Little Fun Goes A Long Way
- Changing the world: The reach of protest images on Wikipedia
- Recent research: Quality of aquatic and anatomical articles
- Traffic report: The verdict is guilty, guilty, guilty
- News from Wiki Education: Encouraging professional physicists to engage in outreach on Wikipedia
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Mz7 (talk) 00:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Untitled
Thank you so much for the welcome! Shenezeditor (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Explanation for content removal on the Viktor Perelman page
Hello! Thank you for your feedback. I am the author of this article and I am editing this article based on critique given by Onel5969, a fellow editor, who recommended removing all or most of the essays written by Viktor Perelman from the article based on Wikipedia's established protocol. Please let me know how to proceed since you reinstated the deleted essays. I also noticed you reversed all my edits and I am not sure why. Please let me know what is going on as soon as you possibly can. Thank you very much!
DYK nomination of Waterloo Park, Norwich
Hello! Your submission of Waterloo Park, Norwich at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ykraps (talk) 07:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
😑
😑😑 AviciiFan (talk) 17:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi AviciiFan, do you need anything? EpicPupper (talk) 17:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Damian Green
Could you please explain your deletion of reliably sourced material in this edit? Please see also discussion with User:CyanoTex here. 80.41.95.252 (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hi there, sorry, I made a mistake there and read your diff wrong. I've self-reverted now, thanks for notifying me! EpicPupper (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting. I didn't want to do it myself knowing it would probably trigger another anti-vandalism hammer. 80.41.95.252 (talk) 16:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
EpicPupper, your editing suggestions are on the way
SuggestBot is making a list of articles that you might like to edit. You will receive these suggestions soon. In the meantime, you might be interested in checking out the following WikiProjects. If you're interested in a project, feel free to add yourself to the member list and introduce yourself on the project talk page!
- WikiProject_Politics (project page, talk page)
- WikiProject_Business (project page, talk page)
- WikiProject_Basketball (project page, talk page)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Undid your accepted edit
Hi EpicPupper, I undid an edit you accepted in Pending Changes. Per WP:DOYCITE all additions to the days of the year pages require a direct citation supporting it; blue links are not sufficient for this. I don't know if you are aware of the specific needs that the DOY pages require, so I figured I'd write you a message rather than you just seeing a reversion without explanation. Best, Jip Orlando (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Jip Orlando, I wasn't aware of this before. EpicPupper (talk) 18:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Rivendell
On 12 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rivendell, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in 1968, the inhabitants of a commune in Zealand, Denmark, named themselves after the valley Rivendell from J. R. R. Tolkien's fictional world of Middle-earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rivendell. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rivendell), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Belaftu (May 12)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Belaftu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Belaftu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello, EpicPupper!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cerebellum (talk) 10:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
|
May 2021
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Spicy (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
You made this change ([1]) twice to the page, but many of them are clearly wrong (changing titles with contractions, changing direct links with single brackets to double brackets, linking stuff like "[B]ecause" in caps-modified quotations). You should get that script checked out. — Goszei (talk) 22:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for notifying me (sorry that this is late, didn't see this section). I'll notify the maintainer. EpicPupper (talk) 21:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me!
|
The WikiJaguar Award for Excellence | |
| TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC) |
TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- panthera wikistalkustalkus is good species me wikidodo gooooooodd TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- (bad spelling and grammar is intentional) TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks :) EpicPupper (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- (bad spelling and grammar is intentional) TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Roman Protasevich on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Waterloo Park, Norwich
On 30 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Waterloo Park, Norwich, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that a proposal was made to build a shoe factory on Waterloo Park? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Waterloo Park, Norwich. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Waterloo Park, Norwich), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Congrats, hope you have a happy did-you-know-day! –xenotalk 05:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! EpicPupper (talk) 05:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
|
Happy birthday! Wizzito (talk) 05:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks so much :) ! EpicPupper (talk) 05:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
|
|
Happy birthday! Here's a delicious cupcake. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me if replying off my talk page. Thank you. 05:10, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks so much :) ! EpicPupper (talk) 05:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
|
|
Happy birthday! Justiyaya (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks so much :) ! EpicPupper (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Happy birthday!
Happy birthday, EpicPupper! Today you get a Classical Roman celebratory treat and a rendition of the most recognized song in the English language. Enjoy it - only happens once a year! ezlevtlk/ctrbs 06:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks :) EpicPupper (talk) 06:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
|
|
Happy Birthday from the Discord cabal! Yeeno (talk) 🍁 07:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday!
Have a very happy birthday on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:23, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Your BRFA
Hello EpicPupper, your recent BRFA, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DoggoBot 2, has been denied. This is not an appropriate task for an automatic bot. — xaosflux Talk 00:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Dinosaur userbox requests
This user wishes the Apatosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:LWL-Museum für Naturkunde - Apatosaurus.jpg
This user wishes the Brachiosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Brachiosaurus at Jurassic Research Center.jpg
This user wishes the Diplodocus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Dino Grün 80.jpg Catfurball (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball:
Doing... EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 17:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball:
Done See User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/diplodocus not extinct, User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/apatosaurus not extinct, and User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/brachiosaurus not extinct. Please let me know if there are any problems, or if you want any more userboxes created! EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 18:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball:
Thank you, thank you, thank you :)
Hi,
I hope this isn't annoying but I super appreciate the userboxes. It was super cool that you made 2 userboxes for President Coolidge. I could see that you had a TON of requests for making userboxes/templates so I wanted to give a proper thank you for the work you did; thanks again! Updatewithfacts (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
GOCE copy editing barnstar
While it helps to to update the totals box at your entry on the drive page, I have been trying to catch those who did the copy editing work but were not perfect bookkeepers. I did that for several people, but I somehow missed you. Give me a bit of time, and you should be getting a barnstar. Dhtwiki (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to EpicPupper for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 21:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
About the Userbox
Hello, Before I begin, let me thank you for creating a userbox for me. But I would like a slight change to my userbox. To be polite, I didn't edit it myself. Could you please make bold the "14th century" part of the userbox? My userbox is User:EpicPupper/Userboxes/middle ages end. Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you in advance. AEagleLionThing (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- @AEagleLionThing: Done EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 21:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
More dinosaur userbox requests
This user wishes the Stegosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Stegosaurusmodell.jpg
This user wishes the Kentrosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use photograph in the infobox.
This user wishes the Tuojiangosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Nathismus-2.jpg
This user wishes the Wuerhosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Wuerhosaurus.jpg
This user wishes the Miragaia wasn't extinct. Please use File:Miragaia longicollum (fossil).jpg Catfurball (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Doing... EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 20:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball: Done, see them at User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/miragaia not extinct, User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/kentrosaurus not extinct, User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/tuojiangosaurus not extinct, User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/wuerhosaurus not extinct and User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/stegosaurus not extinct. Please let me know if you want more userboxes created, or some changes to these. Apologies for the delay, I've been really busy in real life lately! 🐶EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 23:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball:
Userbox request
This user likes to surf. Please use File:Stoked logo.jpg The background should be blue. Thanks and regards, DinosaurTrexXX33 (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DinosaurTrexXX33: Doing... EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 18:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DinosaurTrexXX33:
Partly done The userbox is at User:EpicPupper/Code/Userboxes/likes to surf (stoked). Unfortunately, I can't put the file you mentioned in the userbox, because fair use images can only be in mainspace (not in userboxes). Otherwise, I hope you enjoy it! Please let me know if you want more userboxes created, or some changes to these. Apologies for the delay, I've been really busy in real life lately! 🐶EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 23:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- @EpicPupper: it's okay! I knew you had mental health problems so I gave you time. Signed, DinosaurTrexXX33 (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- @DinosaurTrexXX33:
Greetings!
We can't let this stand 
{{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 05:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Another dinosaur userbox request
This user wishes the Pachycephalosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis - Dinópolis.JPG
This user wishes the Stegoceras wasn't extinct. Please use File:Stegoceras.jpg
This user wishes the Maiasaura wasn't extinct. Please use File:Maiasaura skeleton.jpg
This user wishes the Parasaurolophus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Dinosaurier 2018 Tolk Schau.jpg
This user wishes the Ouranosaurus wasn't extinct. Please use File:Ouranosaurus - full.JPG Catfurball (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball: Doing... 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 16:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- @EpicPupper: I see you haven't made my last userbox request. Catfurball (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Catfurball: Yes, I haven't, which is why I haven't marked this as done :) I'll finish it now. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 20:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Grid reference system
Just so you know why I'm hacking the short description for this article: I have been told firmly at Wikipedia talk:Short description#Length – 40 or 90 characters?? that the description must not exceed forty characters. Which is challenging. Hence the strange tweaking as it may look like I'm just being pedantic. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- @John Maynard Friedman: yes, it’s generally enforced that they need to be 40 for technical reasons. Thanks for the heads up. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 23:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
RedWarn Quick Templates
This is a message for EpicPupper provided using RedWarn's Quick Template feature, which allows templating users with templates not included in the list of user warnings. Such templates can be accessed with the "Warn User" option in the page icons. Chlod (say hi!) 02:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- This message was sent with regards to an off-wiki query.
GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter
  Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events
Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports
January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news
Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of nicknames used by Donald Trump on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 July newsletter
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=link}
In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)