Talk:Saturn V/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DoggieTimesTwo (talk · contribs) 18:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article seemed like a good Featured Article. I will be starting the review.

Hi DoggieTimesTwo, came across this while looking through the article. I hope you don't mind me intruding, but do you plan on actually finishing (or even starting) this? Most GA reviews are finished within 7 days of the review being taken up. If you aren't still interested, that's fine, we can (with the approval of nominator The4lines), relist this nomination on the GA page. All the best, -- puddleglum^2.0 02:37, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure if DoggieTimesTwo does't not want to do it, I'm fine with it being relisted. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I have Done.)} 02:41, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hey, oops, I forgot that I started this! I am happy to finish this review today or tomorrow.DoggieTimesTwo (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DoggieTimesTwo, it appears that you are a fairly new editor with no experience on Good Articles; indeed, you referred to this as a "good Featured Article" above, and Featured Articles and Good Articles are very different things. How familiar are you with the Good Article Criteria and how to judge whether an article meets those criteria? You might want to review the GA nomination instructions to see whether you might have been overly ambitious here. If you do plan on conducting this review—and it's been five days since you were going to finish it that day or the next—I would strongly recommend that you either find a mentor to aid you or, when you finish your review but before you pass or fail the article, get an experienced reviewer to give a second opinion. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]