Jump to content

User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 68

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 65Archive 66Archive 67Archive 68Archive 69Archive 70→Archive 75

Concern regarding Draft:Susan Sher

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Susan Sher, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Ledell Smith

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Sher (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
It appears to be notable, but is lacking sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 08:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merriman Howard (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 10:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Sher has been accepted

Susan Sher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib3005 (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Half-Century Magazine (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Belka Games

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belka Games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merriman Howard has been accepted

Merriman Howard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 16:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmett "Babe" Wallace (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Emmett "Babe" Wallace has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emmett "Babe" Wallace. Thanks! Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emmett "Babe" Wallace has been accepted

Emmett "Babe" Wallace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred N. Sack has been accepted

Alfred N. Sack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Byrd (vaudeville) has been accepted

Joe Byrd (vaudeville), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I think we got off on the wrong foot. I was just a bit upset at you calling my edits disruptive, which is fair because I only became an afc reviewer yesterday. I apologise for not accepting your drafts, most of the drafts I have reviewed were on recent people and not old people. I understand that it can be hard to get sources for actors from years ago. I will promise to try and review drafts more carefully, instead of assuming it is not notable because of how much references it has. I think that you are more experienced with the notability policy than I am. I wonder why do you continue to go through the afc system when you can create articles yourself without going through afc. It doesn't really matter, if that is your general preference. Anyway bye.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Lemonier (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Iamfarzan were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Iamfarzan (talk) 00:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Lemonier (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Even by my exceptionally lenient standards for perfomers in this era, this is insufficient. If he "collaborated with various other musicians and lyricists to produce compositions." list the musicians and lyricists and the compositions. DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:She's Too Mean for Me has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:She's Too Mean for Me. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Urgent advice

You're going too fast again. Now that you are writing decent quality articles, you should try to get all of your articles to a decent level before you submit them. I am trying to help, but I cannot keep up with you. It shouldn't take several successive tries before you realize the need to put in enough material. Every time you write one that's inadequate, you make it harder yourself and everyone reviewing these.

I think trying to limit yourself in some artificial manner would help, likfe perhaps 5 a week and no more. That's better than trying to do 15, with most of them needing to be done over. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

The entry you rejected User:DGG notes that "Numerous recordings of his songs were made including on Victor Records and Columbia Records.[1]" As I noted on the page when I resubmitted, recording artists with at least two albums on major labels are considered notable. If you want to expand have at it but he clearly meets the notability threshold.
The problem is not that I'm going too fast but that Wikipedia doesn't have an entry on him or the Draft:National Half Century Exposition and Lincoln Jubilee and Draft:Peter P. Jones and so mamy similar important subjects.
Let's get our shit together and stop making ediitng difficult for those trying to fix the problem. Guess whose song composition backs the Exposition photographer's photo album? Tom Lemonier. FloridaArmy (talk) 06:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
In some WPs, like deWP, an indirect reference like that would be enough. In the enWP it's considered an example of vague writing, and most people, including myself, would not consider it an acceptable proof of notability. We expect direct references to the facts that show the notability. You will surely have noticed that I have been checking your page to identify articles that other reviews have declined, that I think are sufficiently acceptable to pass afd, and have therefore accepted-- and almost everything of your's I've accepted have stayed in wp. Except for the work I've done to help you, I think half of what you;ve written would have been declined or deleted, and i wouldn't have been surprised if further action had been taken beyond the existing topic ban from starting articles in main space. The reason I am trying to help is because you are covering fields that interest me, and especially that you have been covering the contributions that segregated education institutes have made, and the roles of Black politicians during the reconstruction. I don't think anyone else is doing that work, and I thinks it's extremely important work. don't shoot the messanger--you should realize what would happen if I got too frustrated to continue defending and improving your work. DGG ( talk ) 09:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi FloridaArmy, to a large extent I'd like to echo DGG's sentiments. To a large extent I understand what you are trying to do: there are so many, many encyclopedic topics that are getting no attention, and it's better to have something rather than nothing. However, the "something" that is being presented in your stub articles do not make it clear the topic is notable by the prose, and they require a LOT of cleanup. For instance, I may get around to the "Babe" Wallace article, because there is a LOT more that can be added from the sources, but at the snail's pace at which I work on articles I'll never keep up with your prolific output, even for those articles that are in my area of expertise. I think just a little more time spent on each article, highlighting the notable aspects of the topic rather than throwing out references and one random fact from that reference would increase the percentage of "accepts" you get at AfC, which in turn would have the benefit of allowing you more time to do your research instead of wasting time resubmitting.
Regarding Draft:Tom Lemonier, the problem is that you are confusing notability for a recording artist with that of a composer. Lemonier was the composer of several recorded tunes from the turn of the last century. However, he is not the recording artist. Therefore WP:COMPOSER applies, but not WP:MUSICBIO, which is the basis of your argument. I think he is definately notable as a composer, because from 1890 to 1920, except for celebrity opera singers and a few celebrity vaudvillians such as Cal Stewart, the artist was not important but the song was all-important. A record company of that era did not record a song unless it was *already* a hit. Therefore it is clear to me, but only because of my background and area of study, that this composer had many hits at the turn of the last century, and is therefore notable. Unfortunately I doubt I have the persuasive rhetoric to convince WP to modify it's notability standards for composers to make this rather narrow distinction. Probably articles need to be written about these compositions first, demonstrating their notability, and then notability can be demonstrated per COMPOSER#1. I hope this is slightly helpful. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
>P.S. "Dear Old Moonlight" which I found out is composed by Lemonier thanks to your draft, is one of my favorite cylinder records in my collection. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
PPS. See Draft talk:Tom Lemonier. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter P. Jones (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy for Classical Education (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tame (talk) 17:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
As you know, I consider schools like this to be intrinsically notable, and for many years the community did accept this, But a few years ago at the schools RfC, it was decided by the closers--in my opinion incorrectly--that something more than this was needed, I had argued for this so many times over he years, that I have become unwilling to argue it further. For those schools which had a significant role in the era of segregation, there can sometimes be enough documentation, and I think those can be defended, I think those with substantial numbers of notable alumni can also be defended. But if I were to pass this, it would almost certain be deleted at AfD. What does work, is adding it to a list of schools in the scool district or equivalent, and making a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 17:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
K-12 Blue Ribbon school. In order to understand segregated schools and school systems we need to cover the white and black schools. Not the end of the world. I will merge to the school district despite common sense, undue, and spinout guidelines. I would be shocked if this article was deleted at AFD and your refusal to accept it prevents such a discussion from taking place. Unfortunate. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Accooe (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't think the two sources cited (discounting the blog, which is obviously primary) are enough to establish WP:GNG notability, so we're left with SNG instead. Can the creator please point to which specific criteria of WP:COMPOSER and/or WP:MUSICBIO this satisfies, and what evidence supports that?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:George W. Hendry

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George W. Hendry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Linval Thomas

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Linval Thomas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Finley Wilson has been accepted

J. Finley Wilson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 05:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Turner Industrial School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Turner Industrial School, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Simp (1921 film)

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Simp (1921 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Peter P. Jones has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter P. Jones. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Will Accooe has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Will Accooe. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Isaac Bailey

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isaac Bailey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vince Ellison

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vince Ellison".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:56, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Isaac Bailey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Isaac Bailey. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:47, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: McCarver Brothers has been accepted

McCarver Brothers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ireland Thomas has been accepted

Ireland Thomas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Phrenologist Coon (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
All links are primary sources except possibly performing arts encyclopedia, but that link is dead. I think it is intended to refer to http://memory.loc.gov/diglib/ihas-natlib/loc.award.rpbaasm.0005/default.html which is also a primary source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anise Boyer has been accepted

Anise Boyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Issac Bailey has been accepted

Issac Bailey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 23:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edna Alexander (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I also asked at WP:WIR for help finding sources, but they didn't really find anything more of significance.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
User:78:26 do you have access to any sources for this subject? I suppose we can merge her to her husband. Seems a pity for someone that strikes me as being a notable performer and songrwiter. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Broadway Rastus (revue) has been accepted

Broadway Rastus (revue), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Evalyn Bostock

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Evalyn Bostock, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olly Oakley (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No evidence here he meets WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sionk (talk) 17:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Maurice Pledger

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maurice Pledger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olly Oakley (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter P. Jones has been accepted

Peter P. Jones, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ferd Havis

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ferd Havis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Merge to Ferdinand Havis if anything mwrgeable. Otherwise move and redirect. Sadly my redirect note at top of submission was ignored. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gilbert & Friedland

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gilbert & Friedland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Merged. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jack Lloyd

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Lloyd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olly Oakley has been accepted

Olly Oakley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ed S. Carl Lee

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ed S. Carl Lee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Two term state legislator in Arkansas. [1] CarlLee? Also newspaper editor? Judge? FloridaArmy (talk) 00:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Paula Barra

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paula Barra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: R. B. Carl Lee has been accepted

R. B. Carl Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Tyson (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles W. M. Shackford (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jeremy Gillam

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeremy Gillam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wallingford Academy has been accepted

Wallingford Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 14:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bristo W. Reese has been accepted

Bristo W. Reese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Fagan (Alabama) has been accepted

Charles Fagan (Alabama), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeremy Gillam has been accepted

Jeremy Gillam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:16, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Tyson (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ascher Brothers

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ascher Brothers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jerry Horwin

Information icon Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jerry Horwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James H. Nunnelee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James H. Nunnelee. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Polygala setacea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Polygala setacea. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Tyson (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala setacea has been accepted

Polygala setacea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Martin (Alabama politician) has been accepted

Jacob Martin (Alabama politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mayesville Industrial and Educational Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mayesville Industrial and Educational Institute. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ascher Brothers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ascher Brothers. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ascher Brothers has been accepted

Ascher Brothers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:James Jefferson Morrison

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Jefferson Morrison".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Covered quite substantially here. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Soup for Nuts

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Soup for Nuts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

See Bob Hope short subjects. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jackson Davis (photographer) (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mayesville Industrial and Educational Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mayesville Industrial and Educational Institute. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mayesville Industrial and Educational Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mayesville Industrial and Educational Institute. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Julio J. Figueroa

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julio J. Figueroa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


Your draft article, Draft:Joseph W. Waldo

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph W. Waldo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Merge and redirect seems wise. Borderline notability. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:James W. Starnes

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James W. Starnes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Commanding officer in Civil War. There's a book about him but independently published. I can't remember if a family member wrote it. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roslyn Litman

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roslyn Litman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Civil Rights lawyer I determined to have marginal notability. Not plannong to worl on beyond what's innher hubs entry (Harry Litman). Might be something to merge but deleted now so.. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Julie Roskies Litman

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julie Roskies Litman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Actually this may ne the wife. Regardless, not my cup of tea and didn't seem especially notable. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Colored Girls and Boys' Inspiring United States History, and a Heart to Heart Talk about White Folks

I've left you a fairly elaborate note about this. It's worth developing, and so are some related articles. DGG ( talk ) 02:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Albert Alexander Smith

A tag has been placed on Albert Alexander Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Albert Alexander Smith has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Albert Alexander Smith. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louis Klopsch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

  1. ^ "Lemonier, Tom - Discography of American Historical Recordings". adp.library.ucsb.edu.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FloridaArmy/Archive_68&oldid=1046350867"