User talk:Felipe Menegaz/Archive 11

Human Development Index map

Thank you for the map, but I'm having difficulty making out the red. Maybe I'm color blind, but can you please try to make the red a little less muted on Image:UN_Human_Development_Report_2007_(1).png. Thank you! ☆ CieloEstrellado 22:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by HDI

It was ok when you decided to ask me in my discussion page why the arrows are needed in both columns; However, after I had explained there very well why they are really needed - you did not respond. It's ok not to respond, but then - it is unfair to behave unilaterally and remove the arrows in spite of my unresponded explanation. In my opinion, the arrows are usefull in both columns. Please consult in the discussion page before removing them. Thank you in advance. Eliko (talk) 22:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FLC nom

Hello. Just notifying you that when nominating articles for FL status, adding {{FLC}} to the article's talk page and then creating the nomination is preferred, as it avoids any possible problems that comes up. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 20:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Os textos normativos já foram perscrutados

Sr. João Felipe

Não encontro nenhuma passagem dos textos normativos que pudessem ser usadas para qualificar as minhas edições como inapropiadas. Se Vossa Senhoria discorda, por favor detalhe os procedimentos e indique cláusulas específicas. Me parece que não há uma limitação para a quantidade de gravuras e, baseado nessa condição, continuo julgando as minhas contribuições como adequadas.

No entanto, desta vez baseado em juízos de valores pessoais, considero sim sofrível a forma de edição que prima por uma limitação do acervo visual do específico verbete, por muitas vezes ignorando a relevância racional de determinadas imagens para determinados tópicos, como nos casos da troca de uma imagem da Marginal Pinheiros orlada por edificios que sediam importantes empresas por outra de um complexo comercial não tão conhecido em uma fotografia que oferece pouca contribuição estética, ou então, da eliminação das imagens de centros de ensino superior historicamente importantíssimos para a história da educação brasileira como as Faculdades de Direito de Recife e de São Paulo em prol da presença únivoca da Universidade Federal do Paraná, que não se equipara a esses dois outros centros educacionais nem importância histórica nem no quantitativo de formação de figuras ilustres do cenário intelectual, político e econômico brasileiro através dos tempos.

A partir desses argumentos e de uma numerosidade de outros mais que poderiam ser explanados em uma conversa detalhada Sr. João Felipe, eu sou obrigado a discordar do seu procedimento e a até a afirmar que a sua conduta, de acordo com os referenciais éticos delimitados não apenas pelos meus parâmetros mais pelos parâmetros de uso de um patrimônio intelectual de domínio público como a Wikipédia, se aproximariam mais consistentemente do que poderia ser qualificado como "vandalismo", substancializado na ação de eliminar contribuições ilustrativas pertinentes às questões que são tratadas e que foram remetidas por outros usuários.

Espero vossa compreensão e disponibilidade para que entremos em acordo acerca de nossas divergências para que possamos juntos contribuir para o melhoramento do verbete "Brazil".

Cordialmente, .--MigraineBigBoy, 03 December 2007 (UTC)

Qual é o objetivo em apagar tantas fotografias?

As ilustrações enriquecem tanto o verbete! Qual é o seu objetivo em apagar tantas fotografias? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MigraineBigBoy (talk • contribs) 17:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pedidos

Olá Felipe Você criou vários templates para as bandeiras dos estados do Brasil. Mas já existem uns templates padronizados quê fazem exatamente o mesmo, você poderia solicitar a remoção dos que você criou? E ví que você está fazendo umas modificações nas listas dos estados. Está ficando bem legal, mas você poderia usar a tabela ordenável, assim como foi feito na lista por área? Fica mais fácil visualizar por partes. Obrigado — Guilherme ^(t/c) 16:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agora só listando um por um. só prestar mais atenção da próxima vez. ;-).
Sobre as tabelas, realmente você tem razão. A única solução que vejo é não dividir as tabelas em duas, como é feito em Rank, que se divide em Posição e em diferença entre o último ano apurado. Não fica com um melhor visual, mas é mais "usável". :)

Ah... ví também que você criou um Template para as regiões do Brasil. Poxa... por que você ainda insiste em seguir aquele modelo da wikipédia PT? :-/ — Guilherme ^(t/c) 23:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1) Wikipedia:Templates for deletion Mas ao invés de criar uma sessão para cada, coloca logo todos em uma só. Assim facilita a sua vida, pq já que é Speed Delete, creio que não haja problema.

2) Ok... só acho que melhora um pouco a navegação.

3) Eu me refiro ao estilo adotado. Já disse que o conteúdo pode ser acrescentado... Mas acho melhor esperarmos mais um pouco então... — Guilherme ^(t/c) 17:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images in Brazil article

As ilustrações enriquecem tanto o verbete! Qual é o seu objetivo em apagar tantas fotografias? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MigraineBigBoy (talk • contribs) 17:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sr. João Felipe. Não encontro nenhuma passagem dos textos normativos que pudessem ser usadas para qualificar as minhas edições como inapropiadas. Se Vossa Senhoria discorda, por favor detalhe os procedimentos e indique cláusulas específicas. Me parece que não há uma limitação para a quantidade de gravuras e, baseado nessa condição, continuo julgando as minhas contribuições como adequadas. No entanto, desta vez baseado em juízos de valores pessoais, considero sim sofrível a forma de edição que prima por uma limitação do acervo visual do específico verbete, por muitas vezes ignorando a relevância racional de determinadas imagens para determinados tópicos, como nos casos da troca de uma imagem da Marginal Pinheiros orlada por edificios que sediam importantes empresas por outra de um complexo comercial não tão conhecido em uma fotografia que oferece pouca contribuição estética, ou então, da eliminação das imagens de centros de ensino superior historicamente importantíssimos para a história da educação brasileira como as Faculdades de Direito de Recife e de São Paulo em prol da presença únivoca da Universidade Federal do Paraná, que não se equipara a esses dois outros centros educacionais nem importância histórica nem no quantitativo de formação de figuras ilustres do cenário intelectual, político e econômico brasileiro através dos tempos.

A partir desses argumentos e de uma numerosidade de outros mais que poderiam ser explanados em uma conversa detalhada Sr. João Felipe, eu sou obrigado a discordar do seu procedimento e a até a afirmar que a sua conduta, de acordo com os referenciais éticos delimitados não apenas pelos meus parâmetros mais pelos parâmetros de uso de um patrimônio intelectual de domínio público como a Wikipédia, se aproximariam mais consistentemente do que poderia ser qualificado como "vandalismo", substancializado na ação de eliminar contribuições ilustrativas pertinentes às questões que são tratadas e que foram remetidas por outros usuários. Espero vossa compreensão e disponibilidade para que entremos em acordo acerca de nossas divergências para que possamos juntos contribuir para o melhoramento do verbete "Brazil".

Cordialmente, MigraineBigBoy, 03 December 2007 (UTC)

Globo

Olá Felipe! Estou tentando voltar. Tenho algumas idéias de trabalho e vi que algumas semanas atrás você pediu ajuda. Como posso ajudar?

Sparks1979 (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Felipe, darei uma olhada em ambos os casos. Sparks1979 (talk) 15:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olá! Ainda estou com pouco tempo, pois comecei a estudar na Escola de Administração do Exército. Espero voltar a contribuir com mais regularidade algum dia. No momento, considerando essa situação, prefiro focar meu esforço em artigos que estejam mais relacionados às minhas áreas (Direito e Militar), logo, acho que não poderei ajudar muito com o artigo da Globo agora. Quem sabe mais para frente? Abraços! Sparks1979 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crime against foreigners in India

Hi, I have created an article Crime against foreigners in India, but some user has nominated it for deletion claiming it non-notable. If you are interested in the subject, you can post your opinion here. Thanks and regards. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can this be construed as vote-canvassing? I am compiling diffs of this otolemur guy running around wp frantically defending articles he created with malice that are being AfD'ed one-by-one (and not all by me mind you, see violence in India this and this for instance, both articles created by Mr otolemus Crassicaudatus).Ghanadar galpa (talk) 12:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is not vote-canvassing. This is to inform another user who is interested in tourism. User Ghanadar galpa IS BUSY TO SPREAD A DIRTY PROPAGANDA AGAINST ME AND MY ARTICLES. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beware of user Ghanadar galpa

Please let me aware you of user Ghanadar galpa. User Ghanadar galpa seems to be an irrational Indophilic propagandist. See the Talk:Human rights in India. There he have falsely accused me that I have violated WP:CIVIL by boldifying words and refering him in third person in a article talk page? He had added POV texts in Human rights in India page. Custodial death is very high in India, torture in widespread in police custody. But user Ghanadar galpa tried to make it seems like that the police is innocent and the custodial deaths are exaggerated. In the Custodial death section of that article, he added texts like "The media in India enjoys a wide measure of freedom and has enormous reach and power. Technological advances witnessed during the last few decades have provided the media with new abilities hitherto denied them", which I later deleted. He is accusing me that I am not neutral. But the truth is that, it seems user Ghanadar galpa cannot tolerate any article or text which depict human rights violation in India, which depict violence against non-Indian religions in India. As I am trying to bring the truth in light, he is accusing me that I am not neutral. In India, violence against Christians by Hindu-nationalists is a issue. Conversion to Christianity or trying to convert someone to Christianity may result in death in India. His motivation is very clear. He is using wikipedia as a tool to spread a dirty Indophilic propaganda. See this[1]. He have just whitewashed the mention of anti-Indian sentiment in Sri Lanka. Why? Seems very clear. He could not tolerate the texts "The atrocities committed by the Indian Peacekeeping Force and support for LTTE in southern India".

User Ghanadar galpa is presently busy in a dirty propaganda campaign against me and articles I have created. He is more likely to disrupt the articles and texts he claim "anti-Indian".
He used several wikipedia policies abusively. He nominated the article Anarchism in India for speedy deletion claiming it attack page. See this[2]. Anarchism an attack page? Please note anarchism has nothing to do with attck. In wikipedia, there are articles depicting anarchist movements in various countries. Thus this article depict anarchist movement in India. See Talk:Anarchism in India. Also List of anarchist movements by region. Currenty he has nominated Anarchism in India for deletion to spread anti-Anarchist propaganda.
He also used anonymous IP address besides his username to edit wikipedia. The IP address 70.112.72.233 is used by this user for editing same texts. See this[3] and this[4]. This IP address has good contributions to the article on Bharatiya Janata Party, a political party in India known for there Hindutva ideology. See this IP address's contribution to the Hinduism in Malaysia [5] - added information on anti-Hindu incidents.
See his edit in Deepa Mehta, a film-director faced opposition by Hindu fundamentalists. He added criticism section. His intentions are clear. He is trying to disparge subjects critical to Hindu fundamentalism.
I have created an article Anti-Christian violence in India. I know fanatic Hindu fundamentalists will not be able to tolerate this article. User Ghanadar galpa has nominated this article for deletion.
I have created an article Crime against foreigners in India. Do you know rape incidents on foreigners are increasing in India? Scam are prevalent in India with scam artists preying for foreign tourists? I have added all these information in that article. But some user have nominated it for deletion claiming it non-notable. Now user Ghanadar galpa is abusingly trying to distract the debate there. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crime against foreigners in India and see [6] and [7]. He is now busy to distract votes from favour of articles I have created which this guy see "anti-Indian". I want to acknowledge good editors these facts. Thanks and regards.Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This fellow is engaging in a smear campaign against me in multiple talk pages that tantamounts to a personal attack[8][9]. [10][11] [12][13].Should I report him? Ghanadar galpa (talk) 19:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio 2016 provisory logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-Use

Fala conterrâneo! Eu também sou do Brasil, porém edito somente na Wikipédia em português.
Vamos ao assunto: eu desejo copiar o logotipo da TV Globo para a Wikipédia em português, então qual seria a forma mais possível de mim utilizar esta imagem sem que ela seja excluída. Espero sua resposta. Atensiosamente Vhg msn (discussão)

Life in Brazil

Olá Felipe!
Cara, estava analisando o artigo do Brasil e fiquei um uma dúvida. Você não acha que o Template:Life in Brazil é uma quase duplicação do Template:Brazil topics? Eu sei que a sua boa intenção foi fazer algo parecido com o Template:Life in the United States, porém acho que não temos ainda artigos falando do Brasil sobre o assunto. O que você acha? — Guilherme ^(t/c) 15:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale

Thanks for uploading Image:Big Brother Brasil.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil and Macau

Realmente quero criar uma relação article:Foreign entre Brasil e Macau. Infelizmente não sei muito sobre Brasil. Se você não se lembrar, por favor crie um artigo para isto? Coloane (talk) 05:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

por favor vá a esta página Foreign relations of Macau. Você pode criar uma seção como Brasil e Macau neste artigo??? Coloane (talk) 06:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:BC Nomination

A tag has been placed on Template:BC Nomination requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian

Yes I am Brazilian, however I am not speake english. Please it does not erase that table, therefore it gave work very to me to make. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe, me importo sim, essa tabela foi algo muito trabalhoso de se fazer, se você puder mante-la no artigo eu agradeceria. Sei que a tabela que você colocou é mais completa, porém é pobre em termos de ilustração. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, mas não existe uma forma de trocar as imagens que estão na sua tabela? Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 22:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trocar pelas imagens que estavam na minha tabela, as duas primeiras, de São Paulo e do Rio. Veja no histórico. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 00:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pelo visto com você não existe discussão, mantenha o artigo da forma que quiser, vou voltar pro meu lugar que é a Wikipédia Lusófona. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

João o usuário Rafazero27 é um vândalo, tente entrar com um pedido de bloqueio para ele aqui na Wikipédia inglesa. Abraço. Hector.C.Jorge (talk) 22:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil

Cara, eu não sei o que tá acontecendo--mas esse artigo tá horrendo. Passou de 300kb o arquivo e ganhou mais de mil palavras de prosa quando a gente sabia durante o GA que ele estava grande demais. Por mais que seja interessante aprofundar o conteúdo, isso deve ser feito nos sub-articles, não o artigo principal. Veja o talk page do Brazil.--Dali-Llama (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi! As per this page ("Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred"), Opinoso can remove comments from his own talk page, but he is wrong accusing you of vandalism, as your messages were not vandalism. --Carioca (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Olá! De acordo com esta página ("A política não proíbe usuários de remover comentários de suas próprias páginas de discussão, apesar de que arquivar é preferido"), Opinoso pode remover comentários de suas própria página de discussão, mas ele está errado em acusar você de vandalismo, já que suas mensagens não foram vandalismo. --Carioca (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media

Thanks for uploading Image:Globo Network - Pan American Games.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Brazil. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 15:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Globo Network HD (Soccer).PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media

Thanks for uploading Image:Carnaval HD Globo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map

I prefer my map because every county is differentiated from the other. That means that they are different colors and (in this case) are very easy to find and understand its position with the other countries around it. The map that you are replacing it with is just wrong. It is all one color and that makes it hard to determine witch country is witch. I do, however, like the ones you did for the individual countries. The map that you are trying to replace mine with only works better when showing the position of one country as a single identity. Articles that describe multiple nations look better with a multicolor image.[14][15] — Nuclear Vacuum 23:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]