User talk:Felipe Menegaz/Archive 9

Rio de Janeiro images

Caro João Felipe, há pouco tempo removi umas alteraçoes de imagens que voce fez no artigo Rio de Janeiro e você as reverteu. Gostaria de explicar-lhe por que acho que as imagens que você retirou sao mais adequadas ao artigo: 1) na subseçao "Rio Downtown" antes havia uma imagem do alto que mostrava claramente (de dia!) os edifícios do centro, inclusive a catedral, uma paisagem muito característica do centro; agora você pôs uma foto escura, tirada no meio de uma avenida que poderia ser qualquer avenida de qualquer cidade grande do planeta (aqui em Buenos Aires eu posso tirar a mesma foto), ou seja, uma foto que nao caracteriza o centro. 2) A foto anterior do Maracana na subseçao "North Zone" era uma foto aérea que mostrava nao só o estádio como a área circundante. Como nao há boas fotos no Commons da zona norte, essa pelo menos mostrava algo do cityscape da zona. A foto que está agora é uma foto que nao mostra nada da zona norte. 3) A foto em "History" do Copacabana Palace mostrava algo da zona circundante (Avenida Atlântica, outros edifícios do bairro), e você a substituiu por uma foto que mostra um close-up da fachada, que nao mostra nada da zona. Seria o mesmo se a foto do Paço Imperial fosse só do portal (há uma foto assim no Commons) ao invés da foto que está no artigo, que mostra o edifício inteiro e dá uma idéia do seu enquadramento urbanístico. Gostaria de saber sua opiniao sobre isso. Fsouza 20:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caro João Felipe, tudo bem que você ache que as imagens que você pôs tenham maior qualidade (você quer dizer talvez resoluçao?). De fato, a foto do início do artigo que você colocou, uma vista aérea da Zona Sul à noite, é muito bonita. Mas eu realmente acho que as outras fotos que você inseriu, ainda que nao tivessem má qualidade, tinham muito menos valor informativo que as que estao agora. Saudaçoes, Fsouza 20:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Img-Link

Template:Img-Link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Banyan Tree 13:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from The Hybrid

How exactly is changing the size of the article bad? Two images was the compromise. If we just use one we will end up in the dispute again. The Hyb rid 20:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there isn't a rule saying that a section can't have more than one image. I don't think that it will cause the article to lose it's status. Also, as far as criterion 5 goes, there's really nothing that I can do about that. The only way to solve that problem is to have people blocked. This dispute is over anyway, though, since inserting the second image made everyone happy for the most part. That's why it was a compromise. The Hyb rid 20:39, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, that is a rather small price to pay to end a rather vicious dispute, and help the article reach a stable position. Also, article layouts change all of the time. The Hyb rid 20:49, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian States by GDP per capita

Na página List of Brazilian states by GDP per capita faltou uma informação muito importante: a unidade monetária. Obviamente ela é baseada no dólar americano, mas isso não significa que tal informação possa ser omitida do artigo sem que haja comprometimento de sua qualidade.

Achei melhor você mesmo corrigir essa omissão, pois o artigo foi criado por você.

Abraços! Sparks1979 13:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, mas vale a pena antes confirmar: está em dólares ou reais? É que vi depois a distribuição dos Estados por GDP e ela está em reais... Sparks1979 15:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portal

I will work with the portal from time to time, you should ask Marcos for some help with it, he has done a great work with Puerto Rico's portal. - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Respostas

Nossa Felipe! Você faz 1001 coisas ao mesmo tempo! Não consigo ser assim não. rsrsrs :-P
Respondendo o primeiro post, sobre os eventos recentes na América Latina. Desculpe, mas não entendi direito o que se trata a página. Poderia me explicar?
Sobre as Organizações Globo, acho que não posso de ajudar. Além do meu inglês também ser horrível, não tenho conhecimento sobre o assunto. Abraços — Guilherme ^(t/c) 21:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio Tennis Arena.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navigation Brazil

Olá Felipe
Qual o motivo da reduplicação do Template:Navigation para a criação deste template, sem ser a adição de uma bandeirinha na esquerda? Porque pelo que percebi, esse foi o único motivo. Caso se confirme, vou nomear para remoção. A redundancia atrapalha em muito, como por exeplo, nessa última mudança que converteram TODOS os templates de navegação nos Template:Navbox e Template:Navbox with columns. Os bots acabaram por não "ver" o template "brasileiro"... Espero que me entenda. Abraços — Guilherme ^(t/c) 01:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Já nomeei :) Abraços — Guilherme ^(t/c) 02:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cara, acho que reverter aquilo depois de toda aquela discussão, nesse momento, não seria uma boa idéia. Tenha a certeza de que o pessoal que participou daquele debate continua "de olho" e não vai deixar passar "em branco". Acho que o momento mais adequado seria após o peer review para FA - se eles derem a sugestão de mudar, você terá fundamentos para tanto. Sparks1979 01:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenho um compromisso importante dia 21, então até lá não dá para me dedicar muito aos meus hobbies... rs Sparks1979 01:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Volleyball_arena.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Barra_da_Tijuca.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio_Olympic_Arena.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed

Thanks for uploading Image:Rio_2016_bid_website.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Maria_Lenk.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hurry

I can't believe this, but I need you to call some of your “buddies” so they'll vote for keeping the Mexico-Brazil templates, some people want to delete ithem and as far as today it has 3 votes against 2 in favour (main and yours), I believe we have one or two days more, till an administrator reviews the case and makes his decision, so the sooner you can get some of the brazilian contributors to vote, the better. Supaman89 20:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's too late now, they already deleted them. Supaman89 20:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale

Thanks for uploading Image:Brazilian day.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil map

I'm saw your Brazil's map, is really nice. But it is possible for you to change the map format from SVG to PNG, also a blank map without colors? Hoping you can reply me. Thanks! --Aleen f1 14:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thanks! :) --Aleen f1 04:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media

Thanks for uploading Image:TIM.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duas Caras

Do you have any references to verify this article you just created? —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 04:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, read up on how to properly cite an article if you don't already know howq. Giving some basic references helps to demonstrate that what you are saying is real and is not made up. :) Cheers! —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 04:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Globo Filmes

A tag has been placed on Globo Filmes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 02:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Globo Vídeo

A tag has been placed on Globo Vídeo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 02:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Globo Marcas

A tag has been placed on Globo Marcas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 02:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Globo Marcas

A tag has been placed on Globo Marcas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 02:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Globo International Network

A tag has been placed on Globo International Network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 02:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question

None of those articles make any assertion of, or demonstrate, notability. I would have thought the tags are quite clear. ---- WebHamster 03:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Globo Vídeo

A tag has been placed on Globo Vídeo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- WebHamster 03:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]