User talk:Felipe Menegaz/Archive 13
|
 | This is an archive of past discussions with Felipe Menegaz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| < Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 > |
| All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - ... (up to 100) |
A new FL contestWikipedia's epic FL directors Matthewedwards and Scorpion0422 have decided to try another FL contest as a follow up to the one held last June. As you are a regular at WP:FLC, you may be interested in taking a look at the new one, which will have different rules. Although they are still being fiddled with, three FLs in different topics will be required this time around. For more information, see here. A start date has not yet been determined, but it will likely begin some time next week. Thanks for the time, Scorpion0422 22:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC) AfD nomination of Marina da Glória Orphaned non-free media (Image:Globo Network - Domingão do Faustão.png)
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Sobre Os MutantesOlá! Vi que você classificou o artigo dos Mutantes como sendo de "low-importance". Gostaria de saber se mesmo hoje o artigo receberia a mesma classificação, embora eu ache que a relevância deles não tenha mudado muito em pouco mais de um ano. Estou perguntando isso por quê pretendo classificar o artigos dos Titãs, e estou procurando referências. Só que os artigos das grandes bandas brasileiras estão todos sem classificação em relação à importância, então fiquei sem muita orientação. É que eu acho que bandas como os Mutantes, os Titãs, Legião Urbana e outras poderiam muito bem ser classificadas como "mid-importance" ou até "high-importance". Obrigado, Victor Lopes (talk) 02:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC) GA Reassessment of BrazilAs a major contributor to this article, I thought you would want to know that it has been placed on hold as a result of its GA Sweeps Review, which can be found here. --Malleus Fatuorum 15:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Notability of G1 (website) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting G1 (website), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC) Notability of G1 (website)If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 22:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC) Caminho das ÍndiasOi Felipe. Sim, apenas fiz pequenas correções no inglês. A página está muito boa. Foi tu que fez também a página d'A Favorita? Achei impressionante a sessão da Audiência! Muito bom. =D Se quiser me explicar um pouco do projeto, ficaria lisonjeado. Não estou acompanhando muito a nova novela, mas acho importante haver artigos completos sobre todas elas, já que são invariavelmente exportadas e se tornam uma das principais maneiras de veicular nossa cultura no exterior. Krystoffer 02:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krys Brazil (talk • contribs) Interessante a ideia de construir artigos satélites aos personagens principais da trama (e um artigo mais geral para os personagens coadjuvantes de ambos os núcleos). Quanto a elaborar artigos para cada capítulo, acredito que não seja muito viável - imagina 200 artigos! Mas um artigo específico para o roteiro, bem organizado e bastante completo, seria interessante. E ao falar em detalhar a audiência, tu te refere ao share ou a algo mais? E onde tu tá conseguindo os índices consolidados do IBOPE? Penso que se for somente publicar os pontos e o share de cada capítulo, a organização em uma tabela em tópico do próprio artigo principal, assim como no artigo d'A Favorita, já é suficiente. É fácil de entender e não exige muito espaço, nem outro artigo. Mas claro, são só minhas opiniões. Como já falei, não estou acompanhando muito a novela, mas ficarei feliz em ajudar no que eu puder. =) Krystoffer 02:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krys Brazil (talk • contribs) Ainda acho exagerado fazer um artigo para cada capítulo... Os Simpsons é uma série, com pouco mais de 20 episódios por ano (temporada), um por semana. Caminho das Índias terá 6 episódios por semana. Será bem exaustivo construir um por dia. E eu diria, desnecessário. Veja, por exemplo, como funciona o artigo do roteiro da série Brothers and Sisters: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_Brothers_%26_Sisters_episodes. Uma só página para todos os episódios, mas todos bem organizadinhos, com audiência e tudo. Quanto à correção do artigo Production of... e da (novíssima) seção Production no artigo principal, farei sábado quando tiver mais tempo. =) Krystoffer 00:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krys Brazil (talk • contribs) Problems with uploadThanks for uploading File:Caminho das Indias.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator. To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC) Replaceable fair useThanks for uploading Image:Central Bank of Brazil.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic bidI'm willing to help edit this article to trim length and remove the 'promotional' sentences. Will not be before next week however. Natecull (talk) 08:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC) RequestHi! I'm writing an article on Brazilian television for a major Indian newspaper, and I was wondering if you'd be interested in commenting for it. If you are, please do let me know: I can enable email, or I can give you an email address we can use to correspond. I'm very impressed by your work here, by the way. Cheers, Amomentofyourtime (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC) New Olympix navboxI have started a discussion thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics#New navbox about your recent edits to remove {{Olympic Games}} from many articles. This is a very bold action that requires project consensus first, I believe. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC) "Bidding project" section in Rio 2016 bid articleOlá de novo. Queria saber se já conseguiste reunir mais informação para esta secção. Pelo que vi do esquema que está na "talk page", o que falta adicionar são as informações gerais do projecto e sobre os palcos dos eventos, já que os dois parágrafos que existem referem-se às condições climatéricas e ao projecto paralímpico. Outra coisa, penso que muitas das citações internas não apontam exactamente para as referências que corroboram as informações escritas. Será melhor, numa fase posterior, quando a secção estiver mais completa, rever as citações. Parutakupiu (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC) Hola EveryoneHi, here's the spanish slogan: de:image:Hola Everyone Logo.svg --Afrank99 (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Barnstar
Chicago bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics GA
RevertedThe newer version was just reverted to the ugly version. Ikip (talk) 01:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
|
){kind=link}
