Jump to content

User talk:Explicit/Archive 55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 50←Archive 53Archive 54Archive 55

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories of the Rutul people

Hello! Please explain to me why categories: Category:Guernsey_men, Category:West German men, Category:Italian men, Category:Gibraltarian men (etc.) are allowed, but category Category:Rutulian men, Category:Rutulian martial artists is not allowed? DigitalSpace (talk) 15:06, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@DigitalSpace: Hi, the categories were tagged for deletion simply for being empty. Whatever page(s) populated these categories have seemingly been deleted. ✗plicit 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Dragostea din tei music video still.png

Hey there again. Is this file the same one as the other one deleted per FFD? George Ho (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@George Ho: Hi, it's similar enough to the previous screenshot to qualify for WP:CSD#G4, so I've deleted it as such. ✗plicit 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Doomguy427

Hi Explicit. Doomguy427 is a relatively new account that looks to be editing in good-faith; the problem is that they keep uploading images without any source information or any license. They haven't responded to any of the notifications about this on their user talk page and they don't seem to be slowing down. They're almost certainly getting the files from somewhere online and File:Picture of Captain Roohullah Mohmand.jpeg was cleaned up by another user. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? Would you mind posting something about this on their user talk? -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, I have left the user a warning. ✗plicit 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Greenwich SM City Masinag (2024-11-16).jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Greenwich SM City Masinag (2024-11-16).jpg? It seems to have multiple problems, WP:F5, WP:F7 and maybe even WP:F9 or WP:F11. I'm not sure what tag to place on it. There could also be problems per c:COM:FOP Philippines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Old AFD question

Hello, you closed this AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Governing Body Commission, as a delete in 2022 and deleted the article Pragosh Das as a part of that. I have found the duplicate article Pragosha Dasa still exists, as near as I can tell because Pragosh Das was moved there in 2009 but then someone turned that redirect back into an article. I was wondering if you wanted to delete Pragosha Dasa as a duplicate whose deletion was called for by the AFD, or if I should nominated it for a new AFD now. Obviously this was some time ago so I understand if you have no idea at this point. Here2rewrite (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

@Here2rewrite: Hi, the history is a bit jumbled up, but the page actually survived AFD in 2008. Basically, Pragosha Dasa was renamed from Pragosh Das in May 2009. Someone redirected it to Governing Body Commission in October 2009 in spite of the AFD, and a bot fixed the double redirect, so Pragosh Das also pointed to Governing Body Commission. Pragosha Dasa was written as an article in 2015, but Pragosh Das was never fixed to point back to it, so WP:XFDcloser deleted it along with Governing Body Commission. Pragosha Dasa would need to go through AFD again if someone is seeking to delete it. ✗plicit 05:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for untangling that, that was a very clear explanation. I will look into what to do with the article from here. Here2rewrite (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Why was this deleted?

Hello, I have noticed and a fair few others that I’ve spoken to in person that you deleted the page of “Aleksei Kulashko”? I was confused why as even to this day he has participating in events and even been invited to light the chess olympics torch in New Zealand. So my request is for this page to be undeleted as it’s still significant to this day and there has not been any issue with it up until now. 27.252.156.6 (talk) 07:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksei Kulashko. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Done – as a contested soft deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ✗plicit 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Starship Moments After Liftoff.jpeg

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at File:Starship Moments After Liftoff.jpeg? All of this user's uploads so far have been screenshots from YouTube videos released under YT's standard licensing; so, I've tagged them for speedy deletion per F9. This particular file is also a screenshot but it's via this website, and unlike the others i'm wondering whether it might be possible to convert to a non-free license given the way it's being used in Starship flight test 6. I'm a bit hesitant though because Starship flight test 5 seems to indicate that a free image of these SpaceX launches might be possible. SpaceX, itself, could even provide some acceptably licensed images if it wants. Is it then in your opinion even worth converting this to non-free per WP:FREER? -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, I've deleted all the video screenshots as copyright violations. Aside from the most recent flight test, Starship flight test 4 is the only other in the series that does not contain freely licensed media. It's unlikely that an image for either article would qualify by Wikipedia's fair use standards, unless a particular image itself (and not the flight test in general) is subject to sourced critical commentary in accordance with WP:NFC#CS or considered significant enough for {{Non-free historic image}}. As flight test 6 is incredibly fresh, free media may became available in the coming days or weeks. ✗plicit 06:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for checking on these. Do you suggest tagging the remaining file for speedy deletion per F9 or just letting it be deleted for not having a copyright license per F4? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: My rule of thumb is to just let these types of files meet their fate. Regardless of the process, the end result is usually the same. ✗plicit 13:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Yes, that's probably the best thing to do in this case. Thanks again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Explicit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. qcne (talk) 09:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
@Explicit I emailed you hours ago explaining the situation, and have just had to go to Oversight again to request suppression of the ANI thread where you and @Liz disclosed the supressed username. Utterly stupid behaviour. qcne (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
@Qcne: I'm pretty sure I did not mention the username in my followup response. In fact, I did everything to avoid mentioning or linking it again. I couldn't do much about the initial mention, as your email came in after that. I don't think I could have done much for that. ✗plicit 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
You mentioned the username in your first ANI post. qcne (talk) 13:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
@Qcne: ...Yes, that's why I just said. "I couldn't do much about the initial mention" because your email came afterwards. Like I stated at ANI, I was not aware of the distinction between account suppression and username suppression, given the original case I linked. ✗plicit 13:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
I just would have thought you'd have immediately requested oversight once my email had gone through, instead of waiting hours and continuing the ANI thread. qcne (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Utterly stupid behaviour
That's a nasty way to talk to somebody. Please be kinder! ꧁Zanahary꧂ 06:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

You may want to go for ARB

Hi, another way for solve this, if needed, is trying for an Arbcom case instead of being so angered on AN/I. Please calm down or just take a break for a few hours, which might be better. -Lemonaka 13:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@Lemonaka: (edit conflict) I honestly can not be bothered to tread through the politics of Wikipedia. I have enough work to do around here and mountains of page creations to do on Commons. I'd rather spend my time doing those things. ✗plicit 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Since the thread has now been suppressed, just to let you know (if you didn't see it) that I removed your two personal attacks on Liz (the second one was so egregious, especially to a female editor, that I seriously considered blocking you). Please don't do that again. Black Kite (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@Black Kite: Noted. For the record, I didn't consider the second one being taken that way. It's a heteronormative train of thought, and hetero is something I am not. Viewing the world with a different lens and all, but thanks for the context reminder. ✗plicit 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Allow me to introduce you to the phrase, "get off my back." It means the same thing except no one has to think about your dick. Wins all around. Levivich (talk) 16:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
I don't understand how "get off my dick" means something different in a non-hetronormative context and indeed when I looked into this phrase I found examples of it being used against gay men by straight men. I do understand how you wouldn't get the disgust lots of us have felt seeing it used against Liz. I seriously considered pressing the block button myself. I didn't become an admin to block people and since I respect Black Kite's assessmment that he would have done the same for any user with your editing/block history I didn't take him up on his permission for someone else to do it. But for what it's worth I actually think there is a better case to block an admin for it since there is a higher expectation in these regards. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
I do understand how you wouldn't get the disgust lots of us have felt seeing it used against Liz. Why though? It's pretty obviously offensive and incredibly disrespectful. AusLondonder (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
As I said I felt disgust upon seeing it and I left my message because I find I didn't consider the second one being taken that way. It's a heteronormative train of thought, and hetero is something I am not in adequate. However, when looking into it there do seem to be certain communities (at least online ones) which use it rather than far more reasonable and acceptable "get off my back" and it appears explicit is a part of them. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Not just online communities. It's a common phrase men say to each other, at least in the US (or at least in the parts where I've been), stemming from "stepping on my dick" being a more emphatic version of "stepping on my toes", and thus "get off my dick" being a more emphatic version of "stop stepping on my toes" or "get off my back" or "get off my ass". But a man should never say "get off my dick" to a woman, because it obviously has a very different connotation in that context. Even where the phrase is common, a man saying it to a woman would be a major faux pas. It was a dumb and offensive thing for Explicit to say to Liz. Levivich (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
I concur. Saying something like "hop off [my dick]" is something commonly used as slang in the US to mean like "stop annoying me", but I will admit that there's times it shouldn't be used, especially in this context. Usually it's just a more innapropriate way of saying "leave me alone", but I can't speak on behalf of everyone. EF5 23:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
@Barkeep49: Fair enough. Not being heterosexual myself I found the "heteronormative train of thought" excuse pretty poor. AusLondonder (talk) 19:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
It unfortunately shows the (general, I have no personal issue with Barkeep49) pisspoor way editors who identify as female are treated here. The insult, the report, and the timing from Explicit are an extremely poor showing from a long term admin. (And to head off any questions, no it's not recall worthy and I don't believe in forced apologies) Star Mississippi 23:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
lol at much of this discussion. Several different universes here, but Explicit lived up to their name and should have thought a smidge more, especially during the next several minutes, and edited and spellchecked the thing. If I were an admin I'd give Explicit a justified 4 hours in the penalty box, although assume good faith seems to enter into all viewpoints of this. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Explicit, you're lucky other people got there first. If I had gotten there first, I can tell you with certainty that I would not have exhibited the hesitation that Black Kite and Barkeep49 showed with the block button. RoySmith (talk) 15:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Explicit, I agree with Roy Smith. I was asleep when this was reported. Had I been awake and watching ANI, you would be blocked and it would not have been for four hours. Keep your sexualized insults to yourself. Cullen328 (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Tzamplakon family

Hi User:Explicit, I think the article Tzamplakon family was deleted once, but is now renewed. May you explain this case to me. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) Jingiby (talk) 12:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jingiby: Hi, the article was draftified in early October and the resulting redirect was deleted in accordance with the speedy deletion criterion regarding cross-namespace redirects. The draft was submitted by the author and accepted by a reviewer a little over two weeks later, so it was moved back into mainspace. ✗plicit 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

File:A defence of the constitutions of gov of the USA Book Cover.jpg

I bookmarked this a while ago with a note to myself (possibly PD). It's since been deleted, but could you take a look? I remember nothing of the file beyond the note I left to myself. JayCubby Talk 22:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@JayCubby: The cover in question can be found here. A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America currently uses a different image. ✗plicit 23:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! The portrait is PD and the cover text is by no means a literary work, so couldn't this be below TOO? JayCubby Talk 23:57, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
@JayCubby: The textured background is pretty complex, so I suspect that would push this cover above the threshold of originality. ✗plicit 00:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
@Explicit Good point! JayCubby Talk 00:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
(edit conflict) (talk page watcher) Hi JayCubby. You might be able to argue as much, but it probably would be better to ask about this at c:COM:VPC because that's really where this file should be if the cover art is truly PD. It seems to me that there wouldn't be much point in restoring the file here on Wikipedia if it's ultimately only going to end up at Commons anyway, and there's no point in getting it restored locally if Commons can't host the file. Finally, although being PD means the file doesn't need to be treated as non-free and thus isn't subject to deletion per WP:F5, there could still be encyclopedic or contextual reasons unrelated to copyright as to why the image currently being used in the main infobox of the article might still be considered by others as preferable to this particular one. That's something that you probably would need to resolve through article talk page discussion. One thing you might want to ask about here on Wikipedia at either WP:MCQ or WP:FFD is whether File:John Adams - A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America Vol. II. (1787.jpg needs to be treated as non-free since it seems to be a pretty clear case of c:COM:2D copying given that the file comes from File:John Adams - A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America Vol. I. (1787).djvu (page 7). -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

AlgoSec

Can I please see the deleted article AlgoSec. This is a notable cybersecurity firm, with hundreds of global customers https://www.algosec.com/our-customers and should not be deleted. You can see some of the news coverage they have received https://www.algosec.com/news amechad — Preceding undated comment added 20:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Amechad: Are you affiliated with the company? Would you like to disclose any conflict of interest? ✗plicit 23:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
I am a former employee so am knowledge but am not employed currently nor in any way affiliated on a freelance or contract basis. Regarded, this is a notable company and therefore should have a reputable and quality page according to Wikipedia guidelines Amechad (talk) 08:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Gladiator_20th_Anniversary_Edition.jpg

Hello, I saw you deleted the subject. Had you actually seen the talk pages? How is it a violation when it's low resolution enough? Thx Supermann (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

@Supermann: Hi, the file was not deleted based on its resolution, it was deleted due to its failure to adhere to the non-free content criteria policy. The difference between the deleted file and File:Gladiatorsoundtrack.png were minimal; the only real difference was the addition of the text "20th Anniversary Edition" underneath the title. This is not sufficient to pass WP:NFCC#3a, which dictates that "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." The text at Gladiator (2000 soundtrack)#20th Anniversary Edition suffices. ✗plicit 06:42, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Alrighty. Many thanks for the explanation. I guess a picture is not worth 1000 words after all. Supermann (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Mount Barker United SC

Henge2024 has asked for a deletion review of Mount Barker United SC. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 08:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

About declined deletion Diff

I don't understand what the difference is between this pages and the other spam pages. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Draft:Hamidreza_Ghorbani_(musician_) https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Draft:Hamidreza_Ghorbani_(musician_) and other WikiBayer (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

About the categories of North Indian and South Indian descent.

I noticed that you placed a speedy deletion tag on the categories Category:American people of South Indian descent and Category:American people of North Indian descent. I would like to offer some reasons why these categories should be retained, as they highlight important aspects of diversity within the broader Indian-American community: Recognition of Cultural and Regional Diversity: India is an incredibly diverse country with distinct regional identities, languages, cuisines, traditions, and cultural practices. Categorizing individuals of South Indian and North Indian descent helps acknowledge these unique aspects within the diaspora, which otherwise might be overlooked in broader, generalized categories. Better Representation: These categories allow for a more granular understanding of how various communities contribute to American society. For example, South Indian Americans have made significant contributions in fields like technology and classical arts, while North Indian Americans are prominent in areas like politics and Bollywood-inspired media. Facilitating Research and Accessibility: Scholars, journalists, and readers looking to explore specific contributions or experiences of South Indian or North Indian communities in the U.S. will find such categorization invaluable. It ensures that resources and information are easier to locate and study. Reflecting Diaspora Identity: Many Indian Americans identify strongly with their regional heritage (e.g., Tamil, Kannada, Punjabi, or Gujarati). These categories validate and reflect the lived experiences and identities of people within the diaspora. Consistency with Other Ethnic Subcategories: Wikipedia frequently recognizes subcategories for other ethnic or national groups, such as Category:American people of Basque descent or Category:American people of Scots-Irish descent. The proposed categories are consistent with this practice of nuanced representation. I believe these categories enrich Wikipedia’s diversity and inclusivity by acknowledging the varied and vibrant backgrounds within the Indian-American community. I hope this perspective provides a reason to reconsider the deletion proposal. Looking forward to your response! SavetheSouthofIndia (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S. Please reply on my talk page. SavetheSouthofIndia (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
@SavetheSouthofIndia (talk page watcher) I see that you've also put a message on Lizs talk page. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 16:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Te Pīhopatanga o Aotearoa

Does this close prejudice any decision to redirect the subunits to the main article per WP:BLAR? There were no comments on them to my knowledge and the sources provided in the AfD doesn't provide enough coverage to justify a stand alone article for them. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:50, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

@Traumnovelle: It would probably be best if you made your proposal on the talk pages of the articles and pinging the AFD participants instead of redirecting them outright. Otherwise, your actions may be viewed as an attempt to circumvent the consensus to keep the articles. ✗plicit 03:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
I shall do that, thanks. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:46, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

File:V - Fri(end)s.png

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at File:V - Fri(end)s.png? It seems like it's at least {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} to me per c:COM:TOO US, but I'm not sure whether it's {{PD-shape}}/{{PD-logo}} based on c:COM:TOO South Korea since that's where Big Hit Music, the label that released "Fri(end)s", is located. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, after viewing a larger resolution of the cover, it seems that even the border design is too complex to qualify for {{PD-ineligible-USonly}}. ✗plicit 03:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Karamogo

Hi, you deleted the page on Karamogo saying you couldn't find any sources, but just a quick search on google scholar finds a few:

  • Routledge Handbook of Islam in Africa: The Qur'an school and trajectories of Islamic education A karamogo was an Islamic scholar, a term compounded by the verb "kalan" and noun "mogo". "Kalan" means to read/recite/teach/study while "mogo" means person. A student is called "karamogo den" (lit. scholar child) while a teacher is called "karamogo fa" (lit. scholarly father). A teacher like a father has perpetual authority over his student, one that endures after the student has completed their studies.
  • others just mention the term rather than discuss

Kowal2701 (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

@Kowal2701: Hi, the deletion summary is a copy of the words used by the user who proposed the page for deletion, not mine. Are you contesting the deletion? ✗plicit 03:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I’ll go through the process, thank you Kowal2701 (talk) 07:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
@Kowal2701: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ✗plicit 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Delete close but not done?

Hello,

I see that you closed this as delete, but it would seem that both of the redirects WP:WHITEWASH and WP:WHITEWASHING still function and have not been deleted yet? Can you please complete the delete. Iljhgtn (talk) 04:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

@Kowal2701: Hi, it's deleted on my side. Maybe purging the page can do the trick? ✗plicit 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WHITEWASH: Revision history - Wikipedia
Wikipedia:WHITEWASHING: Revision history - Wikipedia
Looks like there is no history of them being deleted? Am I missing something Iljhgtn (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
@Iljhgtn: Oh, I see now. Only Wikipedia:Whitewash and Wikipedia:Whitewashing were listed for deletion. Wikipedia:WHITEWASH and Wikipedia:WHITEWASHING weren't tagged or mentioned at all. George Ho, you'll need to follow up on these. I can't delete them out of process as they were never nominated for deletion. ✗plicit 13:00, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
What is different with those? Are they not the same? Iljhgtn (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Even so, WP:Whitewash still redirects, when it should not now, correct? Iljhgtn (talk) 13:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

BOOM Buster Deletion

I'm the creator of the BOOM! Buster draft. I noticed that you stated that it wasn't confirmed that I made the request for the draft's deletion, so I intend to fix that. I've been meaning to talk to an administrator to delete the draft. 2603:6010:8B00:44FF:445:73B5:78DD:4F8A (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Flag photo

Would you please restore the local version of File:National flag carried by the 2nd Iowa Infantry throughout the Civil War.jpg? It is ineligible for F8, as I requested that the file be {{keep local}} after I took and while I was uploading it. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

The keep local tag was removed by Special:Contributions/188.163.69.47, and on a bunch of other files too. I've reverted the ones that haven't been deleted yet, but most have been. Explicit, since you probably deleted them all (at least, you did for all the ones where I looked at the logs), would you rather I compile a list, or undelete them myself as I find them? —Cryptic 09:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
@Godsy and Cryptic: Oh, what a naughty IP. I went through their deleted contributions and found that most of their edits that resulted in subtracted bytes to the page were replacing {{keep local}} with {{mtc}}. I've restored a few more files. ✗plicit 11:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
I've restored one more, where {{keep local}} was replaced with {{move to Commons}} and so added bytes instead. —Cryptic 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Does being tagged with "keep local" mean that a file can't be moved to Commons? Adding "keep local" seems to just be a request that a local copy be kept, not that the file not be moved to Commons, right? A local file that has the same name as a Commons file will be used on Wikipedia (it shadows out the Commons file), but the Commons file can still be used by other WMF projects, right? I'm not suggesting the IP was correct in removing the "Keep local" template, but wondering whether the restored files could still be tagged for a move to Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
{{Keep local}} is a request that a file not be moved to Commons - a move, by definition, means that it won't be in the original place anymore. It can still be copied to Commons. There's a {{copy to Commons}} template specifically for that, though it wouldn't have surprised me if there hadn't been. —Cryptic 01:00, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
My bad. I meant "copy" to Commons, but thanks for clarifying. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf

Hi Explicit. You just deleted "File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf" per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 November 26#File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf, but it was shadowing a Commons file uploaded by the same uploader under the same name. The Commons file was actually uploaded after the local file started being discussed at WP:MCQ#File:Florida-Wildlife-Corridor-Map-Corridor-Conserved-Opportunity-Protection-Priorities-1.pdf and concerns were raised about its licensing, but under a different license. Since you're also a Commons admin, perhaps you could advise on the best way to deal with the Commons file. c:COM:CSD#F5? c:COM:DR? -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, thanks for pointing that out. I missed that the file was also on Commons. I've tagged it for lacking permission. ✗plicit 11:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look at this. FWIW, I didn't notice it myself until after the local file had been deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

C-SPAN screenshots

Hi Explicit. Do you think there's any point in discussing these at FFD or can they be tagged for speedy deletion per F3, F9 or F11? I don't see any way to convert their licensing to non-free per F7 and discussing such a thing is unlikely to change that. I'm sure they were uploaded in good faith, but they're not "PD-USGov" eligible works. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, the noncommercial disclaimer is a textbook violates of F3, so I have deleted them as such. ✗plicit 03:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for looking at these. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Michael Ruetz (1).jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Michael Ruetz (1).jpg? It looks like the source for the image Welt might be some kind of German commercial photo/press agency based on this, but I'm not sure. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, I tracked down the news article, where they cite "dpa/A3818 Klaus-Dietmar Gabbert" as the source. I can't determine if either of them are photo agencies. I did a quick spot check of other articles on the website and they use a mix of images from photo agencies and other sources. ✗plicit 00:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for doing that. Do you think this is OK then per F7? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: This would still technically violate WP:NFCC#1. While WP:NFC doesn't mention this directly (it really should), there is an implicit consensus that the recent death of an individual does not automatically grant a waiver for the replaceability aspect of policy. ✗plicit 03:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Yes, it's implicitly assumed by many that the moment someone dies doesn't mean WP:FREER it met; a reasonable attempt still is expected to be made t find a free equivalent. Of course, just as many assume otherwise which is why you'll find non-free images sometimes being uploaded the same day some dies. There have numerous discussions about this at WT:NFCC, but they mostly end up getting nowhere because nobody can agree on the meaning of "reasonable attempt" or whether such an attempt is even necessary, and there are different ideas as to whether a bright-line time period after death should be specified or what it should be if one is specified. So, things are sort of stuck with the status quo where such images need to be discussed on a case-by-case basis. For many, the default is a non-free is OK in such cases until a free equivalent shows up regardless, even if there are F7b issues involved. Many, after all, still think "WP:NFC = fair use" and use the terms interchangeably even though that doesn't seem to have ever been intended to be the case or at least not the case since WP:NFCC became policy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Deleted articles

Can I please see the deleted article Pavlos Danelatos. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 02:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted McMahon–Helmsley Faction. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 06:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Please let me see the deleted Alliance to End Hulkamania. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 05:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted Scott Atkinson article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 05:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Can I please see the deleted article Kshitij (festival). Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. It is a promotional mess, but perhaps the sources may be of value. ✗plicit 13:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Can I please see deleted article Roller coaster phobia. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 00:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Please can I see deleted article Hailey Dunn. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 06:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart@Explicit@pavlos_danelatos
Hello brillliant minds - perhaps if you wanted for the page to be complete you'd get the gist of things than just rushing to delete the page with empty content. Unlike most of you lucky chaps in developed countries, I had a power outage before I could even complete the page.
So, if possible, heroes of Wikipedia, i would like to finish updating the page and only then can you decide to proceed with the deletion.
I'll wait to hear from you masters of the uniververse.
Cheers. Aatsol2007 (talk) 11:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

@Aatsol2007: Hi, which page are you referring to exactly? ✗plicit 00:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

@Aatsol2007 (talk page watcher) Perhaps, under your circumstances, you should start out writing a draft, perhaps in your userspace and then move it to mainspace when you're done, or if you want someone else to check the draft over before it's an article, through articles for creation. Though I have to agree with Explicit above. Knowing which article we're talking about will help greatly. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 06:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

F3 again

Hi Explicit. Would you mind watching User talk:Chadalvarez2021#File permission problem with File:Screenshot 20241201-173309 YouTube.jpg. These file's most likely qualify for speedy deletion per F3, but I figured I give the uploader a chance to sort things out. If there's no response within a day or so, or they respond negatively, perhaps the files should be deleted per F3. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Kang Ju-hyeok

On 6 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kang Ju-hyeok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kang Ju-hyeok (pictured) became the youngest player in FC Seoul's history at the age of 17 years, 9 months, and 6 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kang Ju-hyeok. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kang Ju-hyeok), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Arambegama

I saw your edit on Arambegama (as it is still listed as having dab pages), but it appears to have no content after your edit - should it be deleted?— Rod talk 21:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

@Rodw:  Done. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Kassia St. Clair

Could I please have a copy of Kassia St. Clair (which you deleted), as I had only recently added a photo to it. Edwardx (talk) 00:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

@Edwardx: Here's a copy. There isn't much content. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Invicta Old Logo.gif

Why is File:Invicta Old Logo.gif deleted? I have already altered the non-free use rationale to comply with the guidelines? Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marcnut1996: I have restored the image. If Iruka13 wishes to pursue it further, they should go to WP:FFD. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Marcnut1996 (talk) 00:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Baume-les-messieurs.jpg? It was uploaded without a copyright license or any real source information, but the EXIF data indicates it might be Getty Images stock photo. I tried searching for the image and found it here on Getty page in Korean, but I can't find how the file's being licensed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

https://www.istockphoto.com/en/%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%84/%EB%B4%84-%EB%A0%88-%EB%A9%94%EC%8B%9C%EC%99%B8%EB%A5%B4-%EC%9E%88%EB%8A%94-%EC%A3%BC%EB%9D%BC-gm178824413-25187314 —Cryptic 09:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for that Cryptic. I thought the file might be eligible for speedy deletion per F9, but you deleting the file for that reason takes care of that too. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@Cryptic and Explicit: File:Luigi Mangione Smiling Github Profile Photo.jpeg is another one uploaded (by a different uploader though) that has no copyright license and is sourced to some kind of social media site. I explained the issue (at least what I perceive to be the issue) with this file to the uploader on their user talk page, but they haven't responded yet. FWIW, I'm not seeing any way for Wikipedia to keep this absent an acceptable free license or VRT verification since I don't think it can be converted to non-free. I suggested to the uploader that they tag the file for speedy deletion per G7, but this probably also meets F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Github isn't exactly social-media, but it is user-generated content. I'm less comfortable deleting those as F9s, since there's usually some chance the author's contactable and amenable to freely licensing the image. If it's the same person that Luigi Mangione is redirecting to, that's, um, probably not going to happen here. Definitely not usable as nonfree either way. I'd let it wait out the week to be deleted as an F4 for not having a known license. —Cryptic 12:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for taking a look at this Cryptic. Although your approach seems reasonable to me, another user has tagged the file for speedy deletion per F9, and I'm not sure I should remove the tag at this point. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Nicolás Atanes un-protection

Heya @Explicit, I just accepted Nicolás Atanes via AfC, I think it passes notability - would you mind unprotecting the talk page so I can correctly move it? qcne (talk) 21:57, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Fuzhou Oyster Cake

Hi - I'm contacting you because you are the admin who speedy deleted the redirect created when a user WP:DRAFTIFYed an article I created with no notification to me, and what I think is an explanation at odds with what are described as valid reasons in DRAFTIFY; I just want to make sure I didn't miss anything. I do like to create stubs on things which seem to have enough sources, but I don't have the expertise (language or knowledge-base) to really interpret. Thanks! Tduk (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

@Tduk: Hi, per WP:DRAFTOBJECT, you are free to move it back into mainspace if you object to the draftification of the article. You may also want to contact the user who moved the page to better understand and perhaps address their concerns. ✗plicit 23:54, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Yoon Do-young

On 18 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yoon Do-young, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Yoon Do-young (pictured) scored his debut goal for Daejeon Hana Citizen 50 seconds into a match against Gwangju FC? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yoon Do-young. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yoon Do-young), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

XfD request

I've listed a redirect for discussion per past discussion, the redirect in question is "Leo (kaiju)" and its up on the discussion board. 203.129.49.225 (talk) 10:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Restoration of article

Hello, I would like to ask if there is still a chance to restore the articles. @Lenovya They had real sources and were really well done and didn't break Wikipedia rules. Thank you in advance for your answer @Explicit Historyk.ok (talk) 17:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

@Explicit Historyk.ok (talk) 07:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@Historyk.ok: Hi, I do not restore pages created by banned users per WP:BMB. I can provide the sources as an alternative solution. ✗plicit 12:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Quick note regarding AN discussion on AfD closures that you may be interested in

Information icon There is currently a discussion at WP:AN regarding the timing of AfD closures. The thread is "Early" closes at AfD. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Help me, please

Deletion of "Unlock It" artwork

Hi, I've seen that you decided to delete the "Unlock It" artwork yesterday. I wasn't present in the discussion since I was on vacations and didn't look at my talk page frequently. I saw that a sockpuppet answered with reasons I share about why the file should've been kept. However, I don't know the user and I think its unfair that because of them, my upload had to be deleted. I understand that the user has done things not permitted here but I should've been taken into account also since I'm the one that uploaded the artwork. I've already began a discussion with @Launchballer but nobody else participated. Now that the issue was taken to Files for discussion, I could've been tagged to share my input (I would've look at the alert and share my opinion too). I have nothing against none of you (I understand you're doing your work) but I disagree with the abrupt ending of the discussion and prefer to start the discussion again. I'm new with these type of discussions so if you can give me some guidance about what I can do now, I would gladly accept it. GiankM. M (talk) 04:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

@GiankM. M: Hi, this file was actually deleted by Pppery. Perhaps he is willing to reconsider his closure given this comment. ✗plicit 11:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
I don't believe that to be the song's official cover art (it was using the Pop 2 cover almost immediately after). Nor the one at Out of My Head (Charli XCX song) actually. See the Unlock It file's talk page.--Launchballer 13:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Oh, ok. Thank you for clarifying it. GiankM. M (talk) 14:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
I deleted that because (ignoring a comment by a sock) the nomination argument was uncontested for a month. Deletion discussions have no minimum participation. If you still want the discussion reopened and relisted I would be willing to oblige, but it looks like that is no longer needed. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
@Pppery Oh, I got it. Thank you for explaining. But can I upload the file again or we need to do the discussion first? GiankM. M (talk) 01:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
I have undeleted the file and reopened the discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much! GiankM. M (talk) 04:51, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Bhutabali deletion

While the delete vote looks unanimous, reading the actual arguments instead of the bolded votes shows a clearer consensus for redirection from multiple participants. Could you redirect it instead? Thanks. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

@PARAKANYAA:  Done, closure adjusted. ✗plicit 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings:)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Explicit, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,
— Benison (Beni · talk) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

— Benison (Beni · talk) 18:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Thomas Fellows (activist)

Hey, might need a quick page protection here! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 03:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Already done! No need to worry yourself here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 03:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @YesI'mOnFire: I blocked four accounts as obvious sockpuppets of each other. I didn't see the need to protect it after that, but oh well. ✗plicit 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Seeing that he tried using multiple account, I doubt he was going to stop anytime soon. So imo a page protection was necessary. Anyway thanks. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 03:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Template-deletion

Regarding Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 25#Template:Chembox DrugClass, I don't doubt the nomination and lack of use at that time, but the {{Chembox DrugClass}} template is in support of a feature that was (and still is) implemented and documented. The {{Chembox}} suite is possibly some of the spaghettiest spaghetti we have:( So since then, at least one article invoked {{chembox}} in a way that triggered that template and therefore gave broken output. Is this sufficient basis to un-delete it? DMacks (talk) 13:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

@DMacks: Yes, the template can be undeleted if it is put to use. The nominator does a lot of cleanup with unused templates and nominates them for that reason, as to not keep hundreds of templates laying around for no one to maintain them. ✗plicit 13:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Tryptamine uses it. I definitely have no objection to that sort of cleanup. In this particular case, it would have been easily noticed by the chemistry folks if a note had been posted to the template talkpage. It's a redirect, where the target has decent visibility but the template itself is not, so I'm not surprised nobody noticed that the template itself was tagged. DMacks (talk) 13:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
@DMacks: I've restored the template, so everything is sorted now. ✗plicit 13:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! DMacks (talk) 13:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Appeal of deletion of "List of controversial elections"

I would like to appeal the decision to delete the article List of controversial elections, because the article has been on WP for 12 years, with dozens of editors contributing to it, yet it was removed in the midst of a controversial election in the US with only one week of discussion. Also, no opportunity was given to allow content from the article to be moved to other articles prior to deletion. Sparkie82 (t•c) 19:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

@Sparkie82: There was resounding consensus to delete the article. An article's age is not a valid argument to keep it. A week of discussion is the standard and is only extended if consensus is unclear, which was not the case here. There was no support to move the content anywhere else. ✗plicit 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
I was questioning the timing of the discussion, opening an AFD in the midst of a highly contentious election which could taint any consensus and suggested that the discussion/decision occur some time after the election. In any case, how can I access the information in the article which I need for my own purposes? Sparkie82 (t•c) 22:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Hello Explicit: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Abishe (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Please undelete Draft:Santikaro

Hi Xplicit and happy holidays to you and all your loved ones!

I've left a message on my talk page and on the deletion page to ask for please reinstating / undeleting my draft https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Santikaro

The only reason I did not get to edit it for six months is that I started teaching and it took all my time. I have been intending to make a minor edit before the deadline but forgot by mistake to set the calendar reminder.

I believe this article can be easily accepted - a number of people on here have given me useful advice on what needs to be done for the article to be easily accepted.

I would greatly appreciate undeleting it, please.

Happy holidays and happy new year, may you be well, happy and safe, -Peaceful-D Peaceful-D (talk) 15:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Template:Blockquote protection

No rush, but I think {{Blockquote}} was at template editor protection, not full protection, before the most recent merge/delete/undelete fun adventure that you appear to have had. It has been useful for me to be able to edit it over the past few years as people change their minds about tiny parts of MOS. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: Ah, I see it now. The protection log of {{Blockquote}} shows full protection from 2011, but over at its previous title {{Quote}}, it was reduced to template editors three years later. I've adjusted it accordingly. ✗plicit 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Tricky. Thanks for investigating. I think with under 200K transclusions, we'll be OK with template editor protection. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Hello there! Vestrian24Bio (TALK) wishes you & yours the very best of the season!

Whether you celebrate Christmas, Diwali, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa,
Festivus (for the rest of us!) or even the Saturnalia,
here's hoping your holiday time is wonderful and
- especially -

that the New Year will be an improvement on the old.
CHEERS!

12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:46, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Also, I wanted to know how to add an edit notice like you have... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
@Vestrian24Bio: You can create your edit notice at User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Editnotice. ✗plicit 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Is there a way to create a group edit notice to appear in all my userspace pages... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
@Vestrian24Bio: This can be done on at Template:Editnotices/Group/User talk:Vestrian24Bio. Additional information can be found at the editnotice how-to guide. ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion:Akidearest

Hi there! I wanted to reach out about the recent deletion of the article on YouTuber Akidearest. I understand the sources in the old article weren't sufficient or notable enough, so I would like to fully revise the article and put it up again for review. The original author's account is gone, so I don't know how to access the old article. I would like to reference it, if possible! Maehii (talk) 13:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

F7 deletions

Hi, please restore the following images so I can fix them.

1989 (talk) 06:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

@1989:  Done, files restored. ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
So because both the taken photograph and the box set are non-free, it can’t be hosted here? I would need to find a free image of the non-free box set covers then use it as fair use? Both of the images were taken by Viz Media, who also owns the box art. Given that, there shouldn’t be a layered copyright issue since there is no two separate owners. Correct me if I’m wrong. 1989 (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Freestyle music

Freestyle, or Latin freestyle (initially called Latin hip hop) is a form of electronic dance music that emerged in the New York metropolitan area, Boston, Philadelphia, and Miami, primarily among Hispanic Americans, Irish Americans and Italian Americans in the 1980s. It experienced its greatest popularity from the late 1980s until the early 1990s. A common theme of freestyle lyricism originated as heartbreak in an urban environment typified by New York City. 50.29.112.115 (talk) 03:32, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Alisha Parveen

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alisha Parveen. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Amafanficwriter (talk) 10:10, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Pictures Deleted?

I recently uploaded 2 pictures that you then moved to the delete log, and I’m not sure why. Both of the are from a public website of a public university, UL. Wouldn’t that make them free content? What is needed to allow these to be published? Thanks. Frank042316 (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

@Frank042316: I guess you're referring to File:DOL Property.png and File:OLOL Acregae.png. At the upload form, you must have indicated a licensing restriction, like noncommercial use or no derivatives, as these were automatically tagged for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD#F3. What are the source links for these images? ✗plicit 00:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
they are from the universities web page, and were used to nnou de the purchase of the 2 pieces of property, so very much in the public domain. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank042316 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
@Frank042316: Being available on the university's webpage does not mean the files are in the public domain, unless it explicitly states so. Can you provide links to determine the copyright status of these two files? ✗plicit 11:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Sure:
https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition
https://louisiana.edu/news/ul-lafayette-our-lady-lourdes-finalize-property-acquisition
Thanks again. Frank042316 (talk) 11:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
@Frank042316: There is nothing on the website which indicates these image are freely licensed. The only copyright notice reads, "© 2024 University of Louisiana at Lafayette. All rights reserved." These images can not be used on Wikipedia. ✗plicit 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

A misplaced file (commons/enwiki)

A confused new user has recently uploaded this obviously non-free logo to Commons. They clearly meant to upload it to enwiki, as an updated version of this file that you have recently correctly deleted as unused. Since you, the deleting admin, are conveniently an admin both here and on Commons, would you mind fixing this little mess? It seems to be as simple as deleting the non-free file from Commons, restoring our outdated local version, and then updating that outdated local version with the file that's on Commons right now. Thanks. 78.28.44.127 (talk) 03:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have deleted the Commons file and restored the local file with the recent logo. ✗plicit 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ramesh Panigrahi.jpg

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Ramesh Panigrahi.jpg? I can't tell whether it's a reupload of the same file you deleted the other day per F4 or whether it's a different image with the same file name. The uploader is the same person so I'm thinking the image also has F4 and F11 issues even if it's a new image. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi, it's a different picture from the deleted version. A bot has already tagged it for lacking a source. ✗plicit 06:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for checking on this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion Review for File:BigMacButton1975.png

You have deleted File:BigMacButton1975.png without any discussion having taken place. I have posted a delete review request. Please restore this image until an actual discussion & review have occurred. Christopher Rath (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

File:The Computer Book (BBC 1982).jpg

Hi,

I only got back to editing Wikipedia today, and read the file talk page a little earlier. It was only later in the day that I have time to do some editing and was planning to convert the deletion request to an FFD as the uploader (User:Jheald) was quite passionate in his defence of the image. Would you be willing to restore so I can take it to FFD? -- Whpq (talk) 00:43, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

@Whpq: Very well, I have restored the file. ✗plicit 00:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks -- Whpq (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Bokontayev.jpg

Hi Explicit. Can you take a look at File:Bokontayev.jpg? This is another file that you've previously deleted twice before (once per F4 and once per F11) that could be a reupload or a new file with the same name. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

And happy new year as well! Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

You Deleted a Page but it's still online.

@Explicit I was going to nominate a page for deletion but discovered it had been nominated in the past and ended as delete. I am surprised that the page (this page) is still online. What's happening? Joseph4real1995 (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)@Joseph4real1995: It appears the article was recreated per User talk:Reading Beans/Archives/2024/October#Speedy deletion nomination of Oyebanji Akins. There appears to have been a disagreement as to whether WP:G4 applied to the recreation. I can't see the original article that was deleted, but Explicit can. I'm sure Explicit will figure out whether the article needs to go to AfD again or meets the criteria for G4. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Patrik Kincl

Clariniie has asked for a deletion review of Patrik Kincl. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 15:50, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Explicit/Archive_55&oldid=1267990435"