User talk:Historyk.ok

August 2024

Hello, I'm Hamtechperson. I noticed that in this edit to Russo-Polish War (1654–1667), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ham tech person 00:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because many of these battles are poorly documented Historyk.ok (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Polish–Ottoman War (1620–1621). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 23:22, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Siege of Belaya. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Polish–Cossack–Tatar War (1666–1671) while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was logged out by accident, but why are you changing the result if it says that the Tatar and Cossack groups have been broken down, read about it before you change it Historyk.ok (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply here, which essentially applies to both the edits mentioned above. R Prazeres (talk) 16:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have repeated your edit again at Siege of Belaya without discussion ([1]). If you continue to do that you will be reported to administrators which could result in a block, as you were warned about above. Please take this seriously, stop editing the infoboxes without consensus. R Prazeres (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I gave proof, so what should I do? Historyk.ok (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't "proof". And I already told you: discuss on the talk page and do not edit the same thing again unless there is a consensus with other editors. Also, when referring to sources, be specific: cite the exact page and quote the relevant part of the source if necessary. Depending on the activity of other editors of the article, you may need to be patient before other editors comment. If there is no agreement to change the result, then it stays the same. R Prazeres (talk) 16:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do not change the Polish-Cossack-Tatar war as an unresolved war has its result and is not unresolved, give proof before you change something Historyk.ok (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]