User talk:Aatsol2007

Your submission at AfC Frederick Samuel Modise was accepted

Frederick Samuel Modise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Belshay (talk) 17:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Oleseng Shuping

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Oleseng Shuping, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=346207082105438&story_fbid=418164578243021, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Oleseng Shuping and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Oleseng Shuping, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Oleseng Shuping with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Oleseng Shuping. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Oleseng Shuping saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Paul A (talk) 01:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oleseng Shuping

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oleseng Shuping requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=346207082105438&story_fbid=418164578243021. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Glayton Modise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glayton Modise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glayton Modise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Glayton Modise

The article Glayton Modise has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Zondi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eddie Zondi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~GMC ^{{talk to me}} 18:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Mokokoma-M.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Mokokoma-M.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mokokoma Mokhonoana moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mokokoma Mokhonoana. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and the cited source does not show any significant coverage nor any importance of the subject. See WP:NBIO and WP:RS. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. dxneo (talk) 20:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mokokoma Mokhonoana (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mokokoma Mokhonoana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 13:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aatsol2007! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 13:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mokokoma Mokhonoana

Hello, Aatsol2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mokokoma Mokhonoana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhav Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bhav Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 16:30, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 and @Wikishovel

== Hello OWNERS OF WIKIPEDIA ==

How's the article you passionately and speedily deleted (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Bhav_Singh) different to any of the following?

Is it pure hatred or simply ignorance from your end? Are you trying to prove your superioisity ort stupidity? I am confused, please enlighted me.

Like, did you even read the article??? Aatsol2007 (talk) 06:40, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mokokoma Mokhonoana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mokokoma Mokhonoana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

knock yourself out playa... I hope it makes you feel big in all the right places! Aatsol2007 (talk) 05:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Bbb23. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Euryalus (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus Very valid question though... how's any of those pages different to the pages he deleted. It's like he's after me specifically. Aatsol2007 (talk) 06:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You make a reasonable point: the Bhav Singh article is of the same quality as the other ones you list. I'd say the difference is this: Bhav Singh was deleted as non-notable by community consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhav Singh. I haven't examined it in enough detail to be sure, but your recreation of the article seems basically the same as the preceding version which of itself justifies re-deletion to enforce that consensus. The other articles you mention have not been taken to WP:AFD, but their notability (or absence of notability) doesn't affect the decision on whether your article is notable or not. There's a Wikipedia page discusisng this concept at WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS - essentially just because soime other article is non-notable but still here doesnt mean we keep every article that is non-notable to make it fair.

In general there's also some skepticism towards articles on business figures where most of the references are trade magazines or low-profile business media. Wikipedia has many paid editors trying to force non-notable articles into the encyclopedia to promote people who think having a Wikipedia article gives them status or business credibility. This may or may not be true of the articles in your list, but there is certainly a starting point that articles on busienss figures need extra-strong referencing to support their notability. Worth addingt hat anyone with a close connecton to an article subejct, especially a paid econnection, must delcare that on their userpage and ideally avoid making any edits to the article they have a conflict with.

Now it might be that your new version of the Bhav Singh article is significantly different to the preceding deleted one. A cursory glance at it suggests otherwise, but I haven't gone through the references in detail so I may be completely wrong. If you do feel the new version of this article is notable enough for an encyclopedia entry you can contest the deletion at WP:DRV and see if consensus can be changed. Up to you: DRV is a pretty easy process to follow so might be worth a try if you really think this article is worth keeping.

Hope this information is helpful. And either way, please no more personal attacks. I get that you don't welcome deletion of the page, but always best to comment on content and not contributors. -- Euryalus (talk) 07:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalusso then can the page be restored?

cc: Big boss @BBb23 Aatsol2007 (talk) 10:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ask ar WP:deletion review, See what they say. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]