User talk:Deepfriedokra/20120823-20130831
User talk:Dlohcierekim/boatramp
Muthoot Pappachan Group
[edit]Err, thanks, I guess. I'm not usually one for that sort of thing, but A7s that rely on lazy racism tend to get my goat. WilyD 08:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- nevertheless. U dun good :) Dlohcierekim 17:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 20:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Jsharpminor (talk) 20:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello - I'm Baffled!
[edit]I rarely edit Wikipedia. When I do, it's usually to straighten out a sentence to make it more coherent. Today, I logged in and read that I had a new message - from April of 2010. What the? It's now August of 2012. The message: "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dlohcierekim 02:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)"
I've no idea what this refers to, if this is glitch, the result of a shared IP address or a mis-identification of an edit. As I say, I only edit for clarity, never to gut and article, insert idiotic opinions, and I don't consider myself a vandal. If the message I received is ancient history that isn't worth looking into, that's fine by me. I'm not bothered because I'm pretty sure this is an inexplicable Wikipedia hiccup. Otherwise, keep on editing and keep Wikipedia sailing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheStockwell (talk • contribs) 05:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
? Theopolisme :) 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Question
[edit]yesterday i wrote a document here about a nubian music artist and you deleted it..i am not complaining...i just want to know why you deleted it? and how can i make another one avoiding mistakes i've made in my previous article?...it is not a complain..i just want to know what's wrong with it
Welcome home ...
[edit]good to see that sig. around again. — Ched : ? 12:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Good to be seen and good to see so many blue and white sigs. :) Dlohcierekim 20:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your support at my RfA and the well wishes. Don't be surprised if I take you up on your offer for help :-) —Bagumba (talk) 01:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- certainly Dlohcierekim 01:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Purple meteorite
[edit]is a brand name for a watch, and the age given in the article of 14 billion years is the age of the universe - the oldest thing found in the solar system is about 4.5 billion. Peridon (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- LOL. I new that date looked familiar. Thanks. Purple rain sounds like a good name, right? Dlohcierekim 17:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- It was an age of purple dinosaurs; be among the first to own a memento of a time 14 xillion years ago! Acroterion (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Barney!!! I want one! Dlohcierekim 17:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- It was an age of purple dinosaurs; be among the first to own a memento of a time 14 xillion years ago! Acroterion (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Could I set this page up to be a redirect to Happy Wheels again, or would you not recommend that given that the page has been deleted a number of times now? I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 21:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- This was deleted 3 times so it is amenable to WP:SALT. Maybe I can restore the redirect and then protect it. Dlohcierekim 21:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. Result was just plain delete. Will need WP:DRV . Dlohcierekim 21:56, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
For List of unreleased Lana Del Rey songs, can you please give me your opinion? Am I delusional or what? Because this article was deleted per WP:LISTN, but it follows WP:LISTN? So I'm 100000% confused why everyone's nominating and saying it doesn't follow policy. I honestly have absolutely no idea. You can see my comment at the bottom of the review. The reliable sources are very reliable so... I don't get it. --MrIndustry (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- It seems to be the issues are notability and sourcing. The consensus is that as a group, the items on the list are not notable. As they have not been released, they have not attained notability. No argument was successfully made that they were. Behind that is the sourcing problem. The consensus was that there is an insurmountable lack of WP:RS for the contents. The arguments for deletion were thorough and well supported. Arguments such as "valuable information" and "frequently updated" are never compelling, especially when sourcing is in doubt. The closing admin did appear to leave open the possibility of adding any items that have WP:RS to another page, though it might be best to obtain consensus on that pages talk first. Sorry I could not be more helpful. Dlohcierekim 13:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- But that's what I don't get, because the sources are reliable. They're MTV, ASCAP, HFA, BMI, Entertainment Weekly, Ryan Seacrest, Glamour Magazine, Huffington Post, etc. I don't get how List of unreleased Britney Spears songs and List of unreleased Michael Jackson material can be featured lists with so unreliable sources?? My whole thing was Lana still performs these songs and Britney never will/never did.--MrIndustry (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently the other participants did not agree w/ your assessment of the sources. Dlohcierekim 16:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- I don't mean to sound rude/condescending to them, but would they like it written in the constitution? Because Hollywood Reporter, MTV, and Huffington Post are some of the top news sites in the world. If they're not reliable then I don't know what sources are. --MrIndustry (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently the other participants did not agree w/ your assessment of the sources. Dlohcierekim 16:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
- But that's what I don't get, because the sources are reliable. They're MTV, ASCAP, HFA, BMI, Entertainment Weekly, Ryan Seacrest, Glamour Magazine, Huffington Post, etc. I don't get how List of unreleased Britney Spears songs and List of unreleased Michael Jackson material can be featured lists with so unreliable sources?? My whole thing was Lana still performs these songs and Britney never will/never did.--MrIndustry (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 00:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of artmatch4U in Wikipedia
[edit]An associate of mine was kind enough to spend three hours this morning putting together a Wikipedia page for artmatch4U.com, and you quickly deleted this legitimate website, obviously without verifying the content of it. I would like to know why. . . . .? Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLS2012 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Slow tea
[edit]WHere is my work? Why I can not find it? I spend a lot of time to write it. Where is it now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camellia2009 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- reply] A7, g11, g12 Dlohcierekim 01:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Vanished user
[edit]Hi. How should we continue I and Jc37 continue an attempt at resolving our editorial conflict if the page is blanked? Nightscream (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- (Note, for clarification, I was merely asked for a 3PO. The Vanished user and NS are having the conflict, or rather were, since the user has, well, vanished...) - jc37 06:16, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Well if he's WP:vanished, I don't think you can continue the conflict resolution if it's with that user? An editorial conflict RE: a specific article might be best on the T:article in question. But that's just basic. What has the discussion on this been here-to-for? Dlohcierekim 14:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Don't we need to remove talk page ref's to the vanished users former nick? Such as those on Jc37's talk??
User page
[edit]Your user page is unique, I would follow suit with similar additions to my own user page. Perhaps you'd be kind enough to advise me of successful longevity in the contributing to Wikipedia. And thanks for the welcome. Draconrex (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I want new users to be welcome. 1) never take yourself too seriously. 2)Keep an open mind. 3) If you are not experiencing joy while editing, you need to do something else for a while. 4) ask questions, learn, grow. 5) share joy with others. 6) Take frequent breaks. Dlohcierekim 18:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
I removed the BLPProd on Samnee's article. There was a reference present in the article, albeit unreliable. In order to apply BLPProd, there has to be no references in the article. Bgwhite (talk) 22:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- I was not counting his personal web page. The article is sourcible, but I can't say he's notable. Agree w/ WP:PROD. Dlohcierekim 00:12, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Apparently I tried to re-edit the deletion page on author R.M. Engelhardt. Unsure if it was done correctly. Will comeback to retry after I take awhile studying the Wiki Guidelines. Thank you.
(Poemflower (talk) 00:09, 5 September 2012 (UTC))
Prayner Conservatory of Music and Dramatic Arts in Vienna
[edit]Hi Dlohcierekim:
May I ask you what was the reason to put a speedy deletion tag on my article about Prayner Conservatory of Music and Dramatic Arts in Vienna? Regards, Helen-Heller (talk) 04:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I should have removed that notice. First reading it felt G11. Reread an saw it was not. Should have removed the notice. Dlohcierekim 04:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Because you were a participating member of the Deletion review for Category:Gay Wikipedians, I've contacted you to let you (and all others involved) know about and participate in the current category discussion. Thanks for your participation! Ncboy2010 (talk) 17:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of responsivewebdesignblog.com entry
[edit]please don't put removed links on talk ages. Dlohcierekim 15:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
giorgi latsabidze
[edit]Dear Dlohcierekim
You made a lot of great edits in my article in past. I got a problem again, I don't know why, but just recently somebody from French editors put a deletion tag on my article about Giorgi Latsabidze. I need to ask you to look the article again and let me know what can we fix. I would very much appreciate if you can help with. I really put so much efforts in past, i believe there must be a solution for this. This guy is talking about unreliable sources in article, however I do find a lot of reliable sources which can not be disregarded. Also the editors (and admins including you) who made contributions helped this article to become more encyclopedic. I would appreciate your advice and feel free to edit it. Sincerely Sausa (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Page Curation newsletter
[edit]Hey Deepfriedokra. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Somsa/test
[edit]User:Somsa/test, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Somsa/test and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Somsa/test during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. kelapstick(bainuu) 13:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
For your contributions! Sausa (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC) |
Holiday cheer
[edit]Holiday Cheer | ||
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
For your CSD related message on User talk:Fhs man 2 (presumably amongst others). I've been thinking we need a better way of new users understanding why things get deleted, as many don't, and this looks like a good step forward. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC) |
please support Vell Baria article
[edit]yeah I know that she is not that popular but we promise that we would post only RELIABLE sources related to Vell Baria and it's been 2 years after the speedy deletion of the article how awkward it is to say. Please help for bringing back Vell Baria article it's best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.18.209.4 (talk) 12:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
AN discussion
[edit]Hi, I've added some comments to the discussion at Wikipedia:An#indian_castes_and_CSD:A1. I see that the underlying dispute has also been running at Arya Vaishya. Working on Indian caste articles is probably what I am best known for here - as User:Sitush - but I am still recovering from an operation and am not going to be based at home/capable of my usual input for a while yet. It might be worth soliciting the opinions of Salvio giuliano, Qwyrxian and Boing! said Zebedee, all of whom have/had held the bit and have quite a lot of experience in dealing with these outbreaks of inter-caste rivalry/forking etc. I'll certainly get to grips with it when I do return but things are likely to spiral out of control quite substantially before that happens.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Dlohcierekim; I think it's the same New Zealand native as in the 2006 AfD, just grown from age 14 aspiring singer to 20 year old cameraman. Cheers, 99.136.254.88 (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. But the content is significantly different. The person is likely the same, but the claim to significance, if there is one, is different. Were it a repost of the rapper article, I'd gleefully redelete. I think PROD is the way to go. Maybe he did grow up to become notable. Or almost. Dlohcierekim 21:54, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
It's a combination of the André Villas-Boas article with some fake information, the other articles created by User:Jacob cannon are similar hoaxes. Peter James (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I see you've sent to AfD. Dlohcierekim 00:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 17:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
...William 17:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Barnstar of Diligence | |
for not being afraid to call out bad or questionable CSD nominations when necessary. Nice to see someone else defending stubs when their subjects do turn out to be notable after all. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC) |
PS: I forgot I already did this a few weeks back....
Cryoserver
[edit]Thank you for your message and your advice. I would like to work with you on finding the right and correct approach with publishing some content on Wiki. I may have made a mistake with my posting earlier for Cryoserver. Can we work together so we can have compliant content on wiki. I will go back to the page and will refine following your guidance.
Kind regards
Robin Bingeman robin@cryoserver.com Cryoserver (talk) 16:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Robin. The first problem is your purpose appears to be to promote your company rather than build our encyclopedia. This is a Conflict of Interest. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Content of articles needs to be supported by reliable information from sources unconnected with the subject. I cannot overemphasize this. It is the key to building the encyclopedia. The article as it sits is promotional in tone. It looks like it was taken from a corporate "about" page. It should begin with declarative sentences that show recognition of the subject, by outsiders, of it's importance, significance, notability. For instance, "George Washington was President of the United States." Please see the general notability guideline for what is considered notable. There are more specific guidelines, such as WP:CORP that pertain to businesses. You should work on the article in a sandbox in your userspace until it is ready. Or use the article wizard. Unfortunately, you are using your business' name as a user name. You must select a name unique to yourself. Hope this helps. Dlohcierekim 16:35, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Movement for Change at Suncoast Seabird Sanctuary
[edit]- A list of facts and their sources does not equal a soapbox.Forthebirds1 (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, when I started working on the article about a week ago, it had no independent sources and was packed full of promotional language. I have trimmed it considerably, and added four references which support most of the information in the article. I am curious why you felt it necessary to add a refimprove tag to an article with four references? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, you've made a big difference in the thing. But I was unsure of which content was supported. If all the content is supported by sources, then never mind. I intend to look for more, if i can find them. Unfortunately, I worked last night and am not fully recovered. Do as you think best, because it's a darn sight better than it was. Ugh, getting sleepy again. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 21:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. There are many articles in Google News archives. I am trying to select the best of them. The group is notable but seems to be going down the tubes. Sad. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I removed the BLP prod from Coşkun Yılmaz because some sources were added. It may still qualify for a traditional prod or AfD if you still doubt the notability. J04n(talk page) 11:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!
[edit]World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Deepfriedokra! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC) |
Significance
[edit]Hi there, I disagree with your comment that Jay Soderberg assers significance. I think it only asserts that he has a job in the media, but no info what so ever about what creative contribution, legacy or even any awards won. I think it was a poor call. The-Pope (talk) 02:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps you confuse significance and notability. Ergo, PROD. Dlohcierekim 02:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Whisperback
[edit]Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 23:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Special Barnstar | |
For your brilliant CSD deletions work! You sir (unlike most) use Common sense too! :) |
- thank you. Dlohcierekim 13:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- I had very good teachers Dlohcierekim 12:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aruvikkuzhy Falls
[edit]Message added by Tito☸Dutta 12:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.
Message added by Tito☸Dutta 12:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.
Strictly 2013
[edit]Hi, could you take a look at Strictly Come Dancing (series 11) --MSalmon (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- <cringe /> O.K. Dlohcierekim 13:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I only just created the page (with sources) and it was tagged --MSalmon (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
1) Fails A7. does not apply to TV shows, as much as we might wish it so. It should be as notable as the other seasons 2) Promotional? not really. compare with articles about other shows, and though a bit fluffy, it is not unquestionably promotional in nature. 3) Is it real? apparently so 4) is it notable? apparently so 5) primary sourcing connected with aubject, but new sourcing should emerge 6)Tagged? not for long 7)Suggestion- look at other seasons and down down the fluff. Hope this helps Dlohcierekim 13:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- It is early days yet but more sources and details will be added --MSalmon (talk) 13:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Hello
Thank You For Your Reviews. I'll be more careful. Thanks Jay 14:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pakithedjay (talk • contribs)
Apology
[edit]I'm really sorry for my behavior first of all! I felt that the articles doesn't have sufficient references and subjects should be deleted so I marked them for deletion. I'll be more careful on that in future. Thanks a lot for your guidance and assistance. Sorry again! -- L o g X 13:56, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- no problem. we all need to learn. remember to trying to build articles is better than trying to delete them. Dlohcierekim 15:58, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sure I will -- L o g X 16:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete User page
[edit]Can you please delete my User page alone? -- L o g X 16:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's done by an other administrator. You can ignore this post! Thanks -- L o g X 16:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Question About Article on Hbmdb
[edit]Hi i wrote an article on a website by keeping in view of the page Bollywod hungama but my article was tagged A7 although it was much more informative then this one. Any suggestions?
- It read like an advertisement. It did not indicate significance. It did not have information from reliable, 3rd party sources that would indicate it is notable in the narrow, encyclopedic sense we use on wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Subject should be encyclopedic and article should be based on what reliable media with a reputation for fact checking have written. Reviews, news media, books, journals are potential sources.`19:14, 26 August 2013 (UTC) Dlohcierekim 19:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Jennifer N. Pritzker
[edit]Hi there. I was wondering why you deleted the entry. It was not vandalism.Patapsco913 (talk)
- no I'm either too stupid or too tired to edit. Profoundest apologies. It should b back now. Dlohcierekim 02:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Request For Protection
[edit]Hello, Can you please make this Article semi protected? Random Ip's are adding fake Organisations or if you see there is one organisation "HELP Organisation" in every category. I tried removing that spam but someone comes back and re-enter everything. Page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_NGOs_in_Pakistan @Peridon: . Thanks --Jay 15:09, 27 August 2013 (UTC) Done
Talkback
[edit]Message added 03:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
EuroCarGT 03:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Your remove of speedy deletion nomination tag from Victor Zaragoza
[edit]Well according to The Bushranger and his WP:NOTMEMORIAL we can't write articles on soldiers who have them or Silver Stars for that matter. However, John Kerry have four Purple Hearts, go figure... In fact, he have just nominated them for deletion according to WP:SOLDIER, again, go figure which one meets his or WP:SOLDIER demand and which isn't.--Mishae (talk) 00:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
About my article about Lance Lucido
[edit]Hi, Mr. Dlohcierekim. I already added citations to reliable sources(which includes an Official Website of a TV Network, a Philippine Broadsheet, etc.) to my article, Lance Lucido. When you have time, kindly check whether if already met the relevant notability guideline or not. I'm new to Wikipedia, and ain't sure if already does.
Thanks,
Arxquefyga (talk) 01:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- DearArxquefyga, Thanks. Any links connected with Official Website are connected to subject. We need reviews and so forth not connected to subject from 3rd parties. Thanks again. Dlohcierekim 13:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arden Leigh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I managed to do that just before you did
[edit]Thank you. I almost had to redact a testy reply. Fiddle Faddle 20:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- no harm done. It made me take a rest also. Fiddle Faddle 21:11, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Like
Talkback
[edit]Message added 23:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
///EuroCarGT 23:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
87.115.38.227
[edit]HA! HA! I am 87.115.38.227 but I now have a new IP address: 87.113.220.212 87.113.220.212 (talk) 14:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
URGENT MESSAGE!
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.106.233 (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)