User talk:Camellia2009

Welcome!

Hello, Camellia2009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! CtP (t • c) 21:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Slow Tea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Slow Tea, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. CtP (t • c) 21:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, the deleting admin did not tell you, but the article has been deleted. Please see WP:CSD, WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. The problems are the article did not assert significance and was purely promotional in content. As I noted below. It was largely copied and paste from the subject's web page. Never a good idea. Pease see WP:CORP, WP:V and WP:RS for information on writing an article Dloh cierekim 01:21, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and refs

You need references for one thing. The organisation's website is neither reliable (NO organisation's own site is considered reliable about itself) nor independent - and to show notability, refs must be both WP:RS. As to the notability itself, please see WP:GROUP. Notability's not a 'carved in stone' thing, but without references showing coverage in RS sources, your case is lost before the judge even arrives in the court house. Good luck. Peridon (talk) 22:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I dont understand. So what I have to do? Thanks

Your rationale for contesting deletion of this article was "this page introduce Slow Tea philosophy, and Slow Tea belong to Slow Food movement". Sorry, but that is not a reason to keep the article. All topics on Wikipedia must meet our notability criteria for inclusion.

What do you have to do? First, read the following:

Wikipedia:Notability - general notability criteria for all articles
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) - specific criteria for organizations. An organization must have significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization. That means, in-depth coverage (not trivial mentions) is required, and blogs, forum postings, Facebook pages, or press releases don't count.
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources describes what sources qualify as reliable for the purpose of demonstrating that the organization meets the notability criteria.

Once you have understood those, you should probably try to write the article in your own sandbox (just start editing User:Camellia2009/Sandbox) so you can work on it at your leisure before moving the article to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:copyvio

I'm afraid there's another problem. Content here must be licensable under WP:GFDL or Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License. This means it cannot be copied or closely paraphrased from the subject's web site unless it has a compatible license. (Please look at the please note section below the edit box.) Thanks. Dloh cierekim 23:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't panic...

OK. Your article seems to have been deleted. One of the reasons I've seen was copyvio. That means the text (or a lot of it) had already been published somewhere else. Wikipedia is licensed for free reuse by anyone, anywhere, and text that is someone's copyright can't be used here - very simply because it's not free to be used that way. Read the policies I suggested, and try another go at User:Camellia2009/Second cup. Just click that, and it'll give you a page in your userspace to develop your ideas. The title can be changed when it's moved later, if it passes muster. In user space, you're fairly free from deletion while you work. Only attacking someone, using text from somewhere that's copyright, or being blatantly promotional ("Buy two, get one for twice the price!!!!") are not allowed. Notability only comes in when it's sat there for 12 months or so with no attempt to fit it to the policies. You have to show notability - read the GROUP policy which I think is more appropriate than CORP. You have to prove it - that's where RS comes in. A good idea is to look for refs first, and then spin the article round them. Cheating, but who's to know except me and thee? Ask questions - I'm often around, or try User talk:MelanieN or User talk:Cindamuse. Both very friendly and helpful. This time, you must write a fresh article that's not published already. When it's done, you can use it anywhere else that you want, just like anyone else can - just so long as you say it's from Wikipedia. Collect refs and ask us if they're reliable and independent - best way to start. Peridon (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]