User talk:Davykamanzi/Archives/Archive 11

You can view the header if you want by clicking [show].

Home	Talk	Contributions	Log	Sandbox	Awards	Archives

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

The following archive covers messages posted on Davykamanzi's talk page during the 2020 calendar year.

Orphaned non-free image File:Eddy Gordo (T7).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eddy Gordo (T7).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSI - Lamborghini sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KSI - Lamborghini sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! You created a thread called Pending edit request at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox YouTube personality

Template:Infobox YouTube personality has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox presenter. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! You created a thread called Edit request at Talk:Innocent Umezulike at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Davykamanzi/Archives/Archive 11,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 16:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

GoTv

Hi, sorry if may be i disturb you. Please i just find out you redirect a page [GOtv] to DSTV with due respect i'll like you to permits me so that i'll recreate the page [GOtv] because i have already write the [GOtv] article in my android Note Book . Much respect. (F5pillar---^{Let's talk🖋📩}) 16:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

@F5pillar: You can create a draft for the article and finish it first, then copy the content to the page here or submit it for review using {{subst:submit|F5pillar}} at the top of the draft. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 15:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

OK how about this one GOtv Africa, is it OK. (F5pillar---^{Let's talk🖋📩}) 10:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FIFA World Release 9 interface.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FIFA World Release 9 interface.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phoenix Starr College (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by John from Idegon were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phoenix Starr College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Phoenix Starr College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Davykamanzi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! John from Idegon (talk) 01:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

@John from Idegon: The tone of the draft could be altered, but Luton Today is an established news source in the Bedfordshire area; I feel other similar institutions, even in the same area, have articles in the mainspace despite receiving a smaller amount of significant coverage (e.g. the Stella Mann College of Performing Arts, which I assume is able to remain on the mainspace thanks to some brief coverage on one BBC News article, though admittedly that is a more reputed source than Luton Today). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 01:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Football match line-ups

Template:Football match line-ups has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Prezzee concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Prezzee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Anne Kabagambe, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Kabagambe has been accepted

Anne Kabagambe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 16:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fbml

Template:Fbml has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Anne Kabagambe, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Thank you very much! Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 05:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Davykamanzi a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

@Synoman Barris: Thank you! Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 06:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Umezulike (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Em-mustapha ^talk 13:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Davykamanzi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Em-mustapha talk 13:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

@M-Mustapha: May I ask how the sources provided don't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BASIC? Various aspects of the subject's life and career are covered at length in the provided sources; the content in the draft is referenced to info provided by the sources' authors prior to the interviews with the subject, rather than from info provided by the subject herself (per WP:INTERVIEW). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 16:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

OK! Please if I may ask you, which of the GNG and Basic criteria did the article subject pass? that made her worthy of encyclopedic. Em-mustapha ^talk 19:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

@M-Mustapha: All the references besides refs 1, 6, and 8 (which are used to simply establish her association with the Child's Rights Advocacy Journal, Birkbeck University of London and Come Dine with Me respectively) are secondary sources that provide significant coverage and are independent of the subject. The sources are all published by established news organisations in Nigeria (and London, in the case of the Newham Recorder). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

This is my question, which of the GNG and Basic criteria did the article subject pass? And regarding your claim of significant coverage I still don't see the subject covered significantly in reliable sources. Em-mustapha ^talk 09:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@M-Mustapha: As far as I'm concerned, all the criteria have been satisfied by the subject. According to WP:GNG, "significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." The sources provided in the draft apart from refs 1, 6 and 8 as previously mentioned all provide significant coverage per the aforementioned definition, and info referenced to the interviews (refs 2, 3 and 5) is drawn from secondary sources as outlined at WP:INTERVIEW. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 11:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

I don't think significant coverage is enough with less than 10 sources and most of them are not Reliable, You also claim WP:Basic in your argument, tell me how the subject pass the criteria. Please I just want you to judge your article yourself, if you are satisfied then resubmit your draft and another editor will review it. Em-mustapha ^talk 19:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@M-Mustapha: There are no guidelines anywhere that stipulate a fixed number of sources required to establish notability. WP:BASIC requires the subject to have "received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject" and I've already explained how I feel the subject has satisfied these criteria. I already resubmitted the draft so I'll be waiting on the review of another editor. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 06:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cynthia Umezulike (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cynthia Umezulike, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Justin Picard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justin Picard. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 09:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: I dropped six of the citations and left in what I felt were the most comprehensive sources for that statement. Kindly have another look. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 11:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: On another note, the specific criteria notes at WP:ACADEMIC also state that:

Criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea, made a significant discovery or solved a major problem in their academic discipline. In this case it is necessary to explicitly demonstrate, by a substantial number of references to academic publications of researchers other than the person in question, that this contribution is indeed widely considered to be significant and is widely attributed to the person in question.

With this in mind, the 11 citations as previously included in the draft were perhaps needed, so that introduces some confusion on my part when you mention WP:CITEKILL. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 11:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

A fact once verified, is verified. I am just providing you with advice. Fiddle Faddle 11:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: No worries. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 12:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: I don't mean to be a bother, but if there aren't any other outstanding issues, would you be willing to review the draft? Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 06:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

I try only to make one review, either by comment or by formal review. My review today would be very similar to my prior comment. While you have reduced the citekill I stil see it present. You need a different reviewer. They are likely, though, to have the same opinion. You may wish to look at WP:BOMBARD Fiddle Faddle 07:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: I've gone through the draft again and done my best to minimise the citekill—while still maintaining what I feel are the most comprehensive sources—to at most three references per statement as advised earlier. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 08:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

If the 'spare' references contain other facts, use them to write those facts and cite them. You will produce a better aticle that way. There is little point in even three, though most folk seem to like it Fiddle Faddle 10:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: None of the "spare" refs contain other facts other than the ones asserted in the draft. In instances where multiple refs are used for one statement, those refs are used to verify the subject's invention of the copy detection pattern (CDP) following advice at the specific criteria notes at WP:ACADEMIC as previously illustrated, or verifying examples given of uses of CDP technology (e.g. "it was used to protect FIFA badges at the 2006 World Cup, and by pharmaceutical manufacturers to restrict illicit trade in medicine"). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 12:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Archive index

Template:Archive index has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Hayat (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Hayat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Hayat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 15:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Celestina007: Could you provide some detail on your comment? As far as I can tell, multiple sources in the draft give detailed information on various aspects of the subject's life and career. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 18:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Davykamanzi, I believe GNG is not met nor any criterion from WP:JOURNALIST, if you think otherwise you may re-submit the article. I should however let you know that doing minimal or no substantial work pertaining to what I have pointed out would mean your article would still be declined. Celestina007 (talk) 19:14, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Justin Picard has a further new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justin Picard. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 13:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent: I trimmed out the content providing information on the copy detection pattern and limited it to just the first statement attributing Mr Picard as the inventor. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 20:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Do not stop improving the draft while awaiting review. The best process is the following:

1. seek out references about Picard
2. from those references selective facts, additional facts, you wish to assert
3. create a storyboard from those facts
4. Write (or rewrite) the draft based upon the storyboard, using your references in a rifle targeted manner as citations for those deleted facts

In this way you create a draft that is hard to challenge in terms of referencing and facts. The only thing then standing in the way of acceptance is whether those facts are genuinely notable. This tends to be proven with three substantial references in major WP:RS which are significant coverage about Picard. A respected scientific journal, respected computing journal, respected national newspaper.

I think you have worked hard and done a good job. I will not make a formal review because I have helped you sufficiently to have become involved with the draft. My work is to teach you to fish, not to throw you a fish. Whether you and I have been successful is in the hands of the next reviewer(s). Fiddle Faddle 21:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Pending draft submissions, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020

WP:WOSO News: October 2020

Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020. Hello WOSO editors! What a year to be alive. As usual (but perhaps even moreso since there have been unexpected quarantines), there has been a lot of activity on player, team, league and tournament-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of women's football / soccer. Great work! Fall Focus: FA WSL articles You may have noticed lots of great things going on for the top English league this year: the FA WSL. More (international!) broadcasts, top international player signings, improved media coverage, and increased viewership. Let's keep the momentum brewing, shall we? Here's a sampling of articles that could use creation, expansion or updating. What will you commit to working on? Historical Topics 1921 FA Ban on Women's Football Gender pay gap in sports update Managers Gemma Davies Kelly Chambers (football manager) Emma Hayes update Juan Amoros (football manager) Teams Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. roster update, add stadium, broadcasting sections Everton F.C. (women) roster update, add broadcasting section, former manager articles Players Caroline Siems de (Aston Villa) Ramona Petzelberger de (Aston Villa) Asmita Ale (Aston Villa) Ella Franklin-Fraiture (Aston Villa) Elisha N'Dow (Aston Villa) Jodie Hutton (Aston Villa) Hannah Blundell (Chelsea) update Danielle Turner (Everton captain) update Nor Mustafa (West Ham) Natasha Harding (Reading captain) update Jane Ross (Manchester United) expand Kirsty Hanson (Manchester United) expand Chloe Peplow (Tottenham) expand Hannah Godfrey (Tottenham) expand Other England women's national under-15 football team (see under-16 men's for inspiration) See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors. Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions! Did you know... WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}} Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues Australia: 2020–21 W-League Belgium: 2019–20 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal China PR: 2020 Chinese Women's Super League Colombia: 2020 Colombian Women's Football League Croatia: 2020–21 Croatian Women's First Football League Czech Republic: 2020–21 Czech First Division (women) England: 2020–21 FA WSL Faroe Islands: 2020 1. deild kvinnur France: 2020–21 Division 1 Féminine Germany: 2020–21 Frauen-Bundesliga Iceland: 2020 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) Republic of Ireland: 2020 Women's National League Israel: 2020–21 Ligat Nashim Italy: 2020–21 Serie A (women) Korea Republic: 2020 WK League Japan: 2020 Nadeshiko League Mexico: 2020–21 Liga MX Femenil Moldova: 2020–21 Moldovan Women Top League Netherlands: 2020–21 Eredivisie (women) New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League Nigeria: 2020 Nigeria Women Premier League Scotland: 2020 Scottish Women's Premier League Spain: 2020-21 First Division (women) Sweden: 2020 Damallsvenskan United States: 2020 National Women's Soccer League season Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks. Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See: Primer for AfD, AfC and PROD Contributing to Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussions Request a copy of a deleted article Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force #wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Joey Badass - The Light Pack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Joey Badass - The Light Pack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Justin Picard, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SportPesa Premier League.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SportPesa Premier League.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Nomination of Michael Kamure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Kamure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kamure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 11:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ligi Ndogo Grounds

The article Ligi Ndogo Grounds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not a stadium but a series of football pitches; I can't see how this meets any inclusion criteria (e.g. WP:GNG)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 12:46, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ligi Ndogo Grounds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ligi Ndogo Grounds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ligi Ndogo Grounds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 12:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Innocent Umezulike

Please refrain from updating this with false information. My updates are factual and not fake dates!!

Your thread has been archived

Hi Davykamanzi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Justin Picard, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2011 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season

The article 2011 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not covered by WP:NSEASONS and completely fails WP:GNG; also violates WP:NOTSTATS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2013 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season

The article 2013 Ligi Ndogo S.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not covered by WP:NSEASONS and completely fails WP:GNG; also violates WP:NOTSTATS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 14:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Picard (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Picard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Justin Picard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Davykamanzi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@SL93: The notion that the subject isn't notable doesn't make sense to me when the academic publications referenced in the draft (and the ones removed in line with WP:CITEKILL) demonstrate that he passes (at least) criterion 1 of WP:NACADEMIC. If there's something I'm missing or have missed, kindly explain it to me. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 12:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm not entirely convinced, but I think it has a chance of surviving a deletion discussion so I accepted it. SL93 (talk) 14:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@SL93: If such a discussion arises and there's consensus to delete, I'll be sure that more work needs to be done. Thanks for reviewing the draft. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 15:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Omondi

The article Kevin Omondi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 08:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)