User talk:Davykamanzi/Archives/Archive 9
|
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Davykamanzi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 13 |
There are currently no archives from Davykamanzi's talk page to show for the 2018 calendar year.
Your submission at Articles for creation: DreamsCloud has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chetsford (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave Dahl (entrepreneur) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Chetsford (talk) 07:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Nomination of DreamsCloud for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DreamsCloud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jytdog (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Direct paid editing in mainspace
H DavyKamanzi. I work on conflict of interest issues along with my regular editing.
I appreciate that you are disclosing your paid edits on the talk pages of relevant articles. However per the COI guideline you should not be directly editing in mainspace on behalf of your clients. For instance you directly created Curve (payment card) in mainspace. I have moved it to Draft:Curve (payment card) and tagged it for AfC review.
Conflict of interest management in Wikipedia has two steps -- disclosure and prior review.
What "prior review" means concretely, is:
- a) if you want to create an article relevant to a COI you have, create the article as a draft through the WP:AFC process, disclose your COI on the Talk page with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, and then submit the draft article for review so it can be reviewed before it publishes; and
- b) And if you want to change content in any existing article on a topic where you have a COI, we ask you to
- (i) disclose at the Talk page of the article with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, putting it at the bottom of the beige box at the top of the page; and
- (ii) propose content on the Talk page for others to review and implement before it goes live, instead of doing it directly yourself. Just open a new section, put the proposed content there, and just below the header (at the top of the editing window) please the
{{request edit}}tag to flag it for other editors to review. In general it should be relatively short so that it is not too much review at once. Sometimes editors propose complete rewrites, providing a link to their sandbox for example. This is OK to do but please be aware that it is lot more for volunteers to process and will probably take longer.
By following those "peer review" processes, editors with a COI can contribute where they have a COI, and the integrity of WP can be protected. We get some great contributions that way, when conflicted editors take the time to understand what kinds of proposals are OK under the content policies. (There are good faith paid editors here, who have signed and follow the Wikipedia:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms, and there are "black hat" paid editors here who lie about what they do and really harm Wikipedia).
Will you please do this going forward? Jytdog (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- I saw that you did this, acknowledging the draftification, but please reply here on the general process. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: I try to maintain a certain level of integrity with my paid edits but I'll keep this in mind going forward. Thanks. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. In Wikipedia it is entirely possible to be a paid editor with integrity. That means submitting paid edits with complete disclosure for review prior to their being published. And making sure that you try as hard as you can to make sure the content and your behavior each meet the highest standards here. This is because paid editing is tolerated not loved, and likewise paid editors. Does that make sense and will you agree to submit all your paid edits for review instead of publishing them yourself? Jytdog (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: I don't mean to be a pain, but the AfC process is extremely backlogged at the moment and every time I log onto Wikipedia the number of unreviewed drafts increases. Since your last message here I've done all my paid articles by the book and had them go through AfC but it's incredibly hard to get a job done when no reviewer seems willing to fulfil their role. I currently have 3 drafts awaiting review and one of them (Draft:Armaan Zorace) has been in waiting for over 8 weeks. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 14:40, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. In Wikipedia it is entirely possible to be a paid editor with integrity. That means submitting paid edits with complete disclosure for review prior to their being published. And making sure that you try as hard as you can to make sure the content and your behavior each meet the highest standards here. This is because paid editing is tolerated not loved, and likewise paid editors. Does that make sense and will you agree to submit all your paid edits for review instead of publishing them yourself? Jytdog (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: I try to maintain a certain level of integrity with my paid edits but I'll keep this in mind going forward. Thanks. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Disclosures
Hi Davykamanzi. The PAID policy says that you need to disclose your employer (who paid you), the client, and any other affiliation for each set of paid edits you make.
You are not quite doing this.
For example at Draft:Curve (payment card) you disclosed that you were paid by "Callum McCaig". I googled him and he is the PR guy for Curve.
So.. really, did he pay you out of his personal bank account, or is/has the company itself paying you?
Also, it is not clear if you work for some kind of PR or digital marketing agency yourself, or if you are a freelancer. If you are freelancer, we look for disclosure of the means by which you found the client - did you use Upwork, Freelancer, or the like?
Those are all real questions. Please do answer them.
The purpose of the disclosure is to understand the relationship. Does that make sense? (also a real question) Best regards Jytdog (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: As you've discovered that McCaig is Curve's PR guy (I didn't bother looking him up myself) then he is probably paying me on behalf of the company. As for the second question, I'm a freelancer on Upwork. I don't work for any PR or marketing agencies. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, but that is too casual. The disclosure is important and shrugging answers like this are not sustainable... Will you please make sure that you understand who your employer actually is, and disclose that, and the affiliation as well, going forward? Jytdog (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Note
The stuff above may feel intrusive to you but my goal here is to make sure that you understand what we expect of you, so that you can do it. If you don't understand and do the wrong things (or if you do understand and ignore what you should) you are going to get into trouble and the rest of us are going to have spend time dealing with that trouble. Good for nobody. So that is what I am up to, here....
I don't know how much you understand about the background of paid editing in Wikipedia - the context in which you are working. If you don't please have a look at User:Jytdog#NPOV_part_2:_COI_and_advocacy_in_Wikipedia and also Wikipedia:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms. I don't know if those folks welcome freelancers but you should consider signing up there. Jytdog (talk) 18:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Curve (payment card) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SeraphWiki (talk) 07:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Tekken images
Please avoid uploading large size images to the Tekken articles. Wikipedia itself tends to resize the images and make a short version of all of them. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: Yeah that was the plan. I'm never quite sure the acceptable size for an image to be according to WP:NFCC so I just let Wikipedia do it for me. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 18:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Good work with Kazuya Mishima's article. Now, if only we could find something about the characters's creation.Tintor2 (talk) 13:41, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kazuya Mishima in Tekken 7.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Heihachi Mishima in Tekken 7.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Yoshimitsu in Tekken 7.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Phoenix in Tekken 7.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nina Williams in Tekken 7.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:King in Tekken 7.jpg
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
|
Happy First Edit Day, Davykamanzi, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 09:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC) |
WOSO Task Force News: April 2018
|
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018 |
 Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014
Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
 Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Upcoming changes to wikitext parsing
Hello,
There will be some changes to the way wikitext is parsed during the next few weeks. It will affect all namespaces. You can see a list of pages that may display incorrectly at Special:LintErrors. Since most of the easy problems have already been solved at the English Wikipedia, I am specifically contacting tech-savvy editors such as yourself with this one-time message, in the hope that you will be able to investigate the remaining high-priority pages during the next month.
There are approximately 10,000 articles (and many more non-article pages) with high-priority errors. The most important ones are the articles with misnested tags and table problems. Some of these involve templates, such as infoboxes, or the way the template is used in the article. In some cases, the "error" is a minor, unimportant difference in the visual appearance. In other cases, the results are undesirable. You can see a before-and-after comparison of any article by adding ?action=parsermigration-edit to the end of a link, like this: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Arthur_Foss?action=parsermigration-edit (which shows a difference in how {{infobox ship}} is parsed).
If you are interested in helping with this project, please see Wikipedia:Linter. There are also some basic instructions (and links to even more information) at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-ambassadors/2018-April/001836.html You can also leave a note at WT:Linter if you have questions.
Thank you for all the good things you do for the English Wikipedia. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Aisenberg has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Kazuya Mishima
By any chance could Kazuya Mishima's Tekken 7 image be mirrored. I thought he had the red eye on the other side. Still, if possible could you give me a link to the image. I tried linking in the official website but I can't save it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: No the image is fine. His red eye is the one on the left, as it is in the image. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 15:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- I see. Guess the wikia had it altered. Still, could you share to me a link of the bigger size Kazuya image (the one you uploaded)? I can't copy it to my computer. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- By any chance, are you interested in making Kazuya Mishima a Good Article? I have been trying to clean up the reception, reference more and find more material about his creation. Two friends did a bit copy-edit (my weak point since English is not my first language) while also leaving it in the Guild of Copy Editors. I think this season is the best period since Tekken 7 has already been released and there is no missing information for it. Anyways, cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: I guess I'll make improvements when I can, but I'm not particularly keen on it. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 16:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll see if I can nominate it following its copyedit.Tintor2 (talk) 16:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Improper disclosures and proxying
Noting that you have had previous problems improperly disclosing paid edits, I just wanted to add a note here for reference and link to the discussion we've had on Onel5969's talk page. If you proxy for a blocked editor again, then expect to be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 19:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Following up, was Brilliant Earth job directly working for them, or was there an agency involved? If there is an NDA, please say so but in that case I am not asking for the name of the agency. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Bri: The job was directly for Brilliant Earth. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2014 Kenyan Premier League positions by round
Template:2014 Kenyan Premier League positions by round has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2010-11 in Kenyan football - CAN Qualifiers matches
Template:2010-11 in Kenyan football - CAN Qualifiers matches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Round8-KPL Top 8
Template:Round8-KPL Top 8 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
.svg)
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: FL Technics (September 30)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FL Technics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FL Technics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Davykamanzi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
|
- @Robert McClenon: Could you please clarify the point you made on the draft being written from the viewpoint of the company? A large majority of the sources I used are third-party reports on things happening with the company. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 09:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- User:Davykamanzi - I do not normally follow a draft through the approval process and do not normally re-review a draft for paid editors. If you think that I made a mistake in my review, you may ask other editors for their opinions at the Teahouse. However, some of the sources that you provided are in the nature of press releases, published by third parties but based on information provided by the company. If you think that I made a mistake in my review and that a stand-alone article is mandatory for the company (as opposed to mention in the article about the parent company), ask for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Davykamanzi! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Armaan Zorace (October 16)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armaan Zorace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Armaan Zorace, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: FL Technics (October 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FL Technics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FL Technics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Armaan Zorace (October 30)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armaan Zorace and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Armaan Zorace, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Baltic Ground Services (November 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baltic Ground Services and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baltic Ground Services, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Polo Piatti (November 18)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polo Piatti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Polo Piatti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Davykamanzi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Davykamanzi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Baltic Ground Services
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Baltic Ground Services, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:FL Technics
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:FL Technics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:34, 8 December 2018 (UTC)