User talk:PPEMES

Please address issues on related talk pages in the article realm rather than here. Feel free to {{ping}} on location, though.

Unfortunately, I am generally unable to respond to messages via e-mail. If still sent, they may be published on this talk page instead. Thank you!

Userboxes

This editor has been awarded the
Original Barnstar

This editor has been awarded the Christianity Barnstar

This editor has been awarded the Teamwork Barnstar

This user has been identified as an awesome Wikipedian.

Archives

Category:Ecclesiastical passivity to Catholic sexual abuse cases has been nominated for renaming

Category:Ecclesiastical passivity to Catholic sexual abuse cases has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Dove gray" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Dove gray has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 29 § Dove gray until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of Saint Ignatius of Antioch has been nominated for deletion

Category:Recipients of the Order of Saint Ignatius of Antioch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of gentlemen's clubs has been nominated for deletion

Category:Members of gentlemen's clubs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SVWP

@Adville: Hello Adville. I have a request for you. After a stint of exiguous contributions a few years ago to this beautiful project for free information, I haven't been able to contribute much the last couple of years. As for the SVWP coverage further ago, clearly a significant chunk of those contributions and their offered rationale did not univocally please the admins. However, now that the overall contributions have ended here as much as there, with no intention to be resumed for the foreseeable future, do you think it would be possible to consider reinstating the editing rights of the user talk page over at SVWP? And possibly even the account's userpage? Thanks. PPEMES (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My apologizes for not answering earlier (you wrote 2 weeks ago somewhere). I just sat and read your svwp talk page. As it looks, even if it was a long time ago, it was very hard the first time to make it open to let you back. I guess it is even harder now. I do not see the reason you want it to be opened again (and not start on a new blank account, but keeping away from church-related subjects). If you explained the purpose here on your talk page I could start a KAW to see what the gemenskapen thinks about it. Br Adville (talk) 16:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adville: Thank you. It concerns but perfunctory reaccess to account talk page. PPEMES (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adville: Do let me know should I be able to assist you. PPEMES (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ternarius: I was previously in good contact also with you. Perhaps the two of you would be willing to have a look at it? Let me know if I can help with any more information than above. PPEMES (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If Adville wants my help, I'm of course willing to help him. Respectfully, I think I limit my contribution to that level. BR / Ternarius (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again for a late answer. Working and not lookong too much on enwp. Why do you need access to your talk page on svwp? Just give a reason, and ping me, and I might open the access to write. Br. Adville (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adville: Thanks. No stress. Excuse, though, I'm not sure I understood the question why I would prefer to have the talk page blocked as opposed to not having it blocked? PPEMES (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adville: Been blocked from userpage and talk page for more than 5 years. Along with the general block. What do you think about the idea of unblocking userpage and talk page? Do you think it could be justified? PPEMES (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is "why?" you will most sertain not be unblocked on svwp anyway. Last time you were unblocked it lasted maximum a month... Do you want to change your user page, then I can help you to do the change (if it is a neutral change). Br. Adville (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Military saints has been nominated for deletion

Category:Military saints has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 21:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]