Jump to content

User talk:Datumizer/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slow down on the color edits

[edit]

Shark, go a bit slower when making substantive changes to material that other editors have a lot of good work invested in. Dozens of edits in a row in one day makes it very hard for others to check and collaborate on your contributions. Dicklyon (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible to see a cumulative log of changes on the History page of an article by clicking on the left radio button for the first edit, and the right radio button for the last edit. This is a very convenient tool, as you can see all the interim changes on a single page. There aren't a lot of people contributing to the article, so I didn't think it was that important to monitor changes. SharkD (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I know how to use it. But when you've done a ton of section rearrangements and rewrites, it's very hard to tell what meanings might have changed without inspecting each edit. And when there are 4 or 5 in a row to get the wording right on a section, it's that much harder. And all that in one day makes you look too much like User:Brews ohare :). Dicklyon (talk) 05:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Bastille Day!

[edit]

Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not!  :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 23:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pool of Radiance

[edit]

Hey there. :) I've put in a bunch of work on Pool of Radiance, and I'd like to take it to GA before the month is over. If there's any way you can help out, great! BOZ (talk) 03:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)\[reply]

I've nominated the article for GA. :) BOZ (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 Speedy moves you proposed

[edit]

I removed the proposals for Category:Video games by license and Category:Lua-scripted games because neither qualifies for speedy renaming. The first one doesn't because "not specific enough" is not one of the accepted reasons. And the second one doesn't qualify because conformity is only acceptable if it's x by y or x of y or x in y. I will say, though, that if you nominate both in the regular Wikipedia:Categories for Deletion page, they will probably be approved. They simply don't fit in the speedy guidelines. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 05:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VG review template

[edit]

Are you satisfied enough to move it out of the sandbox? There hasn't been any comments in about a week.陣内Jinnai 21:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you mean User:Guyinblack25? He's the guy who made the template. SharkD (talk) 00:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, sorry about that.陣内Jinnai 01:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VG template

[edit]

I think i've clarified it as best I can without knowing the code. Several of the new items would require parent fields.陣内Jinnai 04:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Datumizer. You have new messages at Template talk: VG reviews.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy Labor Day!

[edit]

Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A NobodyMy talk 04:32, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

[edit]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

File:Rhombic dodecahedron.jpg

[edit]
Retreived code
This template should only be used on file (image) pages.

Rhombic dodecahedron, rendered in povray 3.5. See also Image:Rhombic_dodecahedra.jpg.

{{gfdl}}

Povray code

The file was produced via the command "povray rhombic_dodecahedron.ini" on a Mac OS X machine with the fink installation of POV-Ray. The following three files are used. (GFDL applies to all)

File "rhombic_dodecahedron.povi"

#declare A=sqrt(2);
#declare R=0.025;

#declare rhombdod =
intersection {
    box { < -2, -2, -2>, <2,2,2> }
    plane { < 1, 1, 0>, A } 
    plane { < 1,-1, 0>, A }
    plane { <-1, 1, 0>, A }
    plane { <-1,-1, 0>, A }
    plane { < 1, 0, 1>, A }
    plane { < 1, 0,-1>, A }
    plane { <-1, 0, 1>, A }
    plane { <-1, 0,-1>, A }
    plane { < 0, 1, 1>, A }
    plane { < 0, 1,-1>, A }
    plane { < 0,-1, 1>, A }
    plane { < 0,-1,-1>, A }
    }

#declare tripod = 
    union{
        cylinder { <2,0,0>, <1,1,1>, R }
        cylinder { <0,2,0>, <1,1,1>, R }
        cylinder { <0,0,2>, <1,1,1>, R }
        sphere { <1,1,1>, R }
        }
#declare rhombdodedges =
    union {
        object { tripod }
        object { tripod rotate 90*z }
        object { tripod rotate 180*z }
        object { tripod rotate 270*z }
        object { tripod rotate 180*x }
        object { tripod rotate 180*x rotate 90*z }
        object { tripod rotate 180*x rotate 180*z }
        object { tripod rotate 180*x rotate 270*z }
        sphere { < 2, 0, 0 >, R }
        sphere { <-2, 0, 0 >, R }
        sphere { < 0, 2, 0 >, R }
        sphere { < 0,-2, 0 >, R }
        sphere { < 0, 0, 2 >, R }
        sphere { < 0, 0,-2 >, R }
        }

File "rhombic_dodecahedron.pov"

#include "colors.inc"
#include "rhombic_dodecahedron.povi"

global_settings{ ambient_light White }
background { color White }

#declare LX = 20;
#declare LZ = 50;
light_source { <LX,-LX,LZ> color White}
light_source { <-LX,LX,LZ> color White}
light_source { <LX,LX,LZ> color White}
light_source { <-LX,-LX,LZ> color White}

object { rhombdod
    texture {
        pigment { colour rgbt <1,1,0.4,0.3> }
        finish { ambient 0.1 diffuse 0.9 phong 1 }
        }
    }


object { rhombdodedges
    texture { pigment { colour Black } }
    }

camera {
    location 15*y
    direction -y
    right 0.3*x
    up 0.3*z
    rotate 10*x
    rotate 30*z
    }

File "rhombic_dodecahedron.ini"

Input_File_Name="rhombic_dodecahedron.pov"
Output_File_Type=N
Library_Path="/sw/share/povray-3.5/include/"
+v
+h256 +w256 Antialias=on

— Edokter • Talk • 16:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!

[edit]
File:Halloween Hush Puppies.jpg
Photograph of my Halloween-themed Hush Puppies plush basset hounds in my bedroom.

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:48, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

eMusic

[edit]

Hi there - i have some draft copy for the eMusic page on my user talk page. The first section would replace the "Selection" section in the existing entry, and the second section, "Site Features," is new. Take a look and let me know your thoughts. (Note I'm still working on a few of the links.) Melomania (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look over it in the next couple of days. SharkD (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token eee046ff651bb14693b1ce449737201a

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Software

[edit]

See: Stella_(software) Tom Ruen (talk) 02:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! SharkD (talk) 02:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sphere problem still

[edit]

this image still has two HSL spheres, one of which has no grays. Did you mean one to be HSV? I'd be happy to review any changes you may consider. Dicklyon (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now. You might have to refresh your browser cache. SharkD (talk) 23:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving!

[edit]
Happy Thanksgiving!

I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 06:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like a mop?

[edit]
If you don't wish to run for adminship, that's OK. I understand. Q3 does kind of concern me as will many others at RFA. MuZemike 08:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO, perhaps now might not exactly be the best time to run for adminship. Apart from Q3, I notice you haven't been very active in the past few months. I think you might want to get a few months of sustained editing before attempting RfA...just my two cents. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 09:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, maybe that would be for the best. Some weeks I am very involved in Wikipedia, others I am totally absent. SharkD  Talk  13:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problems with me. I really appreciate you being upfront about it. MuZemike 16:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naming/content of Role-playing game

[edit]

Hi, I see from your previous posts that you have an interest in the naming/content of Role-playing game. That article currently describes tabletop roleplaying games, with other forms of roleplaying such as video RPGs and LARP described as a variety of tabletop game. Based on the comments on the talk page, it seems that many users are surprised to find that the article Role-playing game is about tabletop role-playing games.

I have made a proposal that in order to meet the WP:NAME policy that article should describe all activities commonly described as role-playing games on an equal footing, and that a new article Tabletop role-playing game should be created to describe tabletop roleplaying games. If you have the time I'd be grateful if you could give your opinion on my proposal at Talk:Role-playing game. Ryan Paddy (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFD for Comparison between Roman and Han Empires

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at [AFD] for Comparison between Roman and Han Empires, since you have participated in the last AFD.Teeninvestor (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

[edit]

A NobodyMy talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 18:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another gentle ping from WP:VG

[edit]

Dear SharkD,

You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 22:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Console role-playing game

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Console role-playing game. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Console role-playing game. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vgrelease new

[edit]

You may or may not be aware that the current consensus is for dates no longer be linked, and a bot was assigned to delink full dates with the blessing of Arbcom. With that in mind, with regards to the above template which you authored, I would ask that you disable the linking function within the template, and any other such template you are involved in maintaining. Thanks, Ohconfucius ¡digame! 02:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a proposed changed in Template talk:Dts vgr. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. I have not tested the change, but I've double checked it visually. Thanks. -- 02:59, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

TOC for 1980's Console RPG's

[edit]

I put the 1980's Console RPG list back together as one list, so the list can be sorted as a whole again. But I added a few tags and changed the Table of Contents so that one can jump straight to a specific year. See what you think. I won't be offended if you choose to revert to the default TOC, or use a different TOC altogether. Dawynn (talk) 16:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Once again, good job. I'd like to see a TOC like that on all the video game lists. SharkD  Talk  00:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super Robot Taisen: Original Generation

[edit]

I'm about two years late in commenting on this, but I noticed in the past you moved Super Robot Taisen: Original Generation to Super Robot Wars: Original Generation with the comment that the latter was the English title. I have an English copy of the game and the official English title is the former, as seen on the official English Web site for the game, so I went ahead and moved it back. --Evice (talk) 22:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, my mistake. :) SharkD  Talk  00:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Y&

[edit]

Template:Y& has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gnevin (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:N&

[edit]

Template:N& has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gnevin (talk) 16:48, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Transcendence (video game)

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Transcendence (video game). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcendence (video game). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bias in your topics

[edit]

I find the topics you write about that pertain to RPGs are highly biased in the favor of WRPGs. You should do something to fix this 69.253.43.211 (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Good for you. SharkD  Talk  05:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

[edit]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:-•

[edit]

Template:-• has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 09:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble on HSL and HSV; 3RR warning

[edit]

SharkD, I notice that you've been doing a lot of reverting on HSL and HSV, including 3 in less than 24 hours a few days ago, with no explanation beyond that you don't like the wording. Please review WP:3RR, and realize that even without getting to 4 reverts in 24 hours you may be subject to being temporarily blocked for edit warring. Instead of reverting, use the talk page to explain your objections, or do the edits that will improve the wording. Dicklyon (talk) 04:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SharkD, I agree with you that some of the captions you have been reverting to your re-write aren’t ideally worded, and can use some work. I adopted several of your changes, but in other cases I think that your version either changes the meaning, or is wordier or less clear than the original. Instead of just reverting, I've been trying to make some compromises or further improvements, but if you just revert every one of my tries with a short and non-descriptive summary, we can’t really make any effective progress. I welcome your discussion at the talk page; I think we should be able to iron this out amicably and find text we can all agree on. That can only happen if you take part in the discussion though. –jacobolus (t) 05:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vgrelease tbl/sub

[edit]

Template:Vgrelease tbl/sub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork (talk) 14:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many, minor edits

[edit]

I'm making too many numerous small edits and hogging up the Talk pages, I know. Sorry! SharkD  Talk  03:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ivg test

[edit]

Template:Ivg test has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Svick (talk) 11:02, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your work on the History of role-playing video games page

[edit]

I just wanted to say that your hard work on the History of role-playing video games page is much appreciated. I'm not an admin or editor or anything - just a regular user stopping by who appreciates the work you've been doing this week.Caidh (talk) 03:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you for the complement! Luckily for me a lot of the content and structure were already there to begin with, and I instead was able to concentrate on minor refinements and fleshing things out with additional (and often, updated) information. Thanks again! SharkD  Talk  03:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of massively multiplayer online role-playing games

[edit]

Hey SharkD, great work converting this article to a sortable table. Here's a wikignome mini-barnstar: *

One thing I noticed though is that the letter rows ("0-9", "A", etc) look a bit strange when the table is sorted using a non-alphabetic criteria. Do you think we need them at all? Marasmusine (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left them in there in case someone wanted them. If removing them would be better, that would be OK too. SharkD  Talk  23:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout (video game)

[edit]

Hello. Some IP keeps on removing section you've added (about character development). Maybe article should be temporarily blocked for anonymous users? Thanks, Sir Lothar (talk) 10:55, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's pretty annoying. But I don't think a general lock would be a good idea since it's most likely the same guy. SharkD  Talk  12:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Video game lists

[edit]

While digging around the online print archive, I stumbled across PC Gamer UK's 2001 list of the 100 best games ever. The link is here, if you're interested in adding it to your list of lists. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Found this one, too. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot!! SharkD  Talk  05:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all. I may find more in the archive as time goes on; if I do, I'll let you know here. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I thought I'd compliment your highly impressive work on that list. Before I gave you those links, I never really paid attention to it; I decided to check it out recently, and was amazed by how helpful and usable it was. Thanks for all your hard work; I'll definitely be using it in the future. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you like it! SharkD  Talk  23:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work making the online print archive's indexing system more usable. I figured that most people wouldn't bother with the raw archives; they were largely set up for my own convenience while digging up reviews and other material. However, your efforts have greatly improved their transparency for the average editor, without sacrificing their aforementioned convenience on my end. Great job.

One thing I'd like to mention, though: the CGM articles' login issue can, in fact, be bypassed. You first need to copy the link from the greater archive, since clicking on it redirects you to that broken page forever; then, paste it into the Wayback Machine and go for one of the 2003 dates. It works for all of them, as far as I know. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 08:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like the version you selected automatically avoids that. In that case, I've never encountered the issue you mentioned in all my time editing the archive. Could you describe it in detail? JimmyBlackwing (talk) 08:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize there was a way to get around it. Will take another look at it later today. SharkD  Talk  13:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, impressive work. I've made a few tweaks, and will probably make a few more before I'm done, but you've drastically improved the quality of the index system. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome!!! SharkD  Talk  07:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting comment on a reliable source discussion

[edit]

I'm looking for folks to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources#XBLAfans. Can you drop in and take a look and comment on my proposal? --Teancum (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Games Artist

[edit]

Hi! I nominated Computer Games Artist you nominated for merger to Game art design for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computer Games Artist. I explained the details in the AfD. Regards. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 16:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rspan

[edit]

Template:Rspan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this

[edit]

Delete this and then delete this. — CpiralCpiral 07:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC) (I do.)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Geneforge

[edit]

Category:Geneforge, which you edited, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 05:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merchant Prince II listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Merchant Prince II. Since you had some involvement with the Merchant Prince II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John of Reading (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzles template

[edit]

Hi, Recently I have skimmed long lists of articles with titles *problem, *puzzle, or *paradox, and along the way I have discovered Template: Puzzles, which you created by a move from Template: VG Puzzle. Do you recall any discussion of how to cover puzzles in generally? Did the effort grow out of a video games project?

P.S. The closest page that concerns paradoxes in name is List of paradoxes which is claimed by the philosophy project. --P64 (talk) 18:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of History of role-playing video games

[edit]

The article History of role-playing video games you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:History of role-playing video games for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Yes, it is neutral. The main problems are the fair-use tags and the unaddressed tags that are already in the article. Everything else is looking good. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:35, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glass Joe

[edit]

While you may be busy, I was hoping that you could give Glass Joe a copyedit and/or provide a comment on its FAC. In return, I could help out with your History of RPGs in some way. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 04:11, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

[edit]

Hey there SharkD, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:SharkD/Sandbox/Role-playing video game. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cat vgr

[edit]

Template:Cat vgr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vgrsort2

[edit]

Template:Vgrsort2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vgtrpg-chrono

[edit]

Template:Vgtrpg-chrono has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 16:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited History of Western role-playing video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ultima (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Find video game sources" Template

[edit]

I realize you've not been directly involved in the conversation, so I thought I'd give you a quick heads-up regarding why I altered this template.

  • The Custom Google Search engine (CSE) that was used by WP:VG was way out of date and contradictory. Originally WP:VG had been using Gwern's Anime RS CSE to find related material on video games.
  • Then in July 2009, it seems that User:Odie5533 created his own CSE, got it whitelisted, and changed the links but accidentally left Gwern's name as the CSE operator. Since then Gwern has been getting questions regarding the WP:VG CSE and has been disclaiming ownership. Odie5533's CSE is sort of useful, however it only seems to cover 5 sources, 2 of which are now considered NON-RS, one of which is listed as "situational", and 1 of which is unlisted.
  • Before discovering that this was Odie5533's CSE I created my own set of them in order to help me personally search for RS sources. After a discussion at WT:VG/S, User:Salvidrim got these new CSEs whitelisted and they're now listed as WP:VG's CSE.

So that's the whole story. I just wanted to let you know in case you had this template on your watchlist and were curious about the change. Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and I just got around to changing the link in "Find video game sources short" as well. -Thibbs (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. SharkD  Talk  07:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

[edit]

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Datumizer. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 02:02, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Your GA nomination of History of Western role-playing video games

[edit]

The article History of Western role-playing video games you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:History of Western role-playing video games for things which need to be addressed. You've done some amazing work, and I look forward to promoting the article soon. —Torchiest talkedits 17:35, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just wanted to double check to see if you'd noticed my good article review. I saw that you'd made some changes, but it doesn't look like you addressed any of the issues I raised. I'll leave it open for a while longer to make sure you have a chance to fix the problems. —Torchiest talkedits 21:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Spaceempires.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Spaceempires.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Video games article bot

[edit]

I think someone from the Video Games project is using a bot to collect assessment data from the WP 1.0 project on toolserver - but I don't know who it is, I just have the records of the web requests on toolserver. Do you know of any frequently-updated stats that for the project that could be generated that way? — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not frequently collected stats, no. I also don't know how to use bots. SharkD  Talk  19:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. — Carl (CBM · talk) 20:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Video game Barnstar

For the History of Western role-playing video games, the first good work on a genre article I've seen for a long time. bridies (talk) 16:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think getting it up to FA was too big a task for the time allowed, but then taking something to peer-review at WP:VG doesn't tend to get one very far... Better luck next time. bridies (talk) 16:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! Yeah, I'm a little disappointed it didn't make it. Maybe it will at some point in the future. SharkD  Talk  19:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Space Empire Elite

[edit]

The article Space Empire Elite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I love BBS history, but this game game does not meet WP:N criteria. It doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 06:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Brave Saga

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Brave Saga. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Brave series. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Brave series – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. - MrX 12:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter (4th Quarter 2012)

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2012
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2012, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Wasteland 2#Game_Camera_View".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 19:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VG newsletter interview

[edit]

Hey there. Are you interested in being interviewed for the Q2 2013 WikiProject Video Games Newsletter? Considering the amount of substantial work you've done over the years, I think you'd be a good editor to talk to about what your work. We're going to put it out in early July, so there's still a good amount of time to decide if you want to. If so, let me know and I'll post a link to a page with some questions. Cheers. —Torchiest talkedits 14:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, October 2013

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Datumizer/Archive_3&oldid=1088360112"