User talk:Crcolas

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Crcolas, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Duke University have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Mobility Tech moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Urban Mobility Tech, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It's my first time publishing an article, so really appreciate the feedback. Are there specific elements/sections of the article that require more reliable sourcing? This company I'm writing about is a mobility startup based in Bangkok, so there will also be more information in the Thai language. Should that be added as well? Any help on remedying this would be hugely helpful. Thank you for your help!

Best,

C Crcolas (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding conflict of interest

Hi. Do you happen to work for or have any other form of conflict of interest in regard to the subjects of the articles you edit? If so, these will need to be clearly stated. See WP:Conflict of interest for details. Below is a form message that provides some important points. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crcolas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:50, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UrbanMobilityTechCo Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UrbanMobilityTechCo Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Kingfish Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Kingfish Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kingfish Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Morpho achilles (talk) 09:50, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Closed Loop Partners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Closed Loop Partners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Osarius 11:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swap & Go moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Swap & Go, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Crcolas, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Crcolas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I do not have a financial stake in any company's page, nor have I have ever been compensated for making edits on Wikipedia. Hope that clarifies. Crcolas (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Could you elucidate further on your relationship to the topics of electric vehicles and aquaculture, on which you've been creating a lot of new articles about companies? Are they side interests on a purely personal level? Do you work or have you worked in either of these industries or institutions related to them? --Paul_012 (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a public policy student (Thailand), with interests in urban design—particularly mobility and urban food production. I have not graduated, and have yet to work in a formal industry beyond tourism. Crcolas (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. What first raised my concern was the addition of mentions to Muvmi in various Bangkok district and train station articles, which seemed overly promotional and undue, so I reverted them. I haven't checked all your new articles in detail, so I can't comment on them just yet. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understand that, it probably would have been more appropriate for wiki travel or something more related to mobility. Crcolas (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any links with Duke Kunshan University? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just declared the COI on the relevant pages. Crcolas (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have fixed some of the formatting for you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TransparentSea Farm moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TransparentSea Farm, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closed Loop Partners moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Closed Loop Partners, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swap & Go Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swap & Go Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TransparentSea Farm Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TransparentSea Farm Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suraj Patel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suraj Patel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suraj Patel (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diaspora Co. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Diaspora Co., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating content directly in mainspace, especially given your clear conflicts of interest. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Praxidicae, Crcolas has already explicitly denied COI above. If you doubt the veracity of their statement, maybe you should raise it at WP:COIN rather than continuing to just blanket draftify their articles like this. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Gonen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ron Gonen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diaspora Co. Logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diaspora Co. Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joanne Roberts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joanne Roberts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Roberts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A loose necktie (talk) 10:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judith Kelley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Staples High School Logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Staples High School Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Kingfish Company logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Kingfish Company logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Tatarski

Hello Crcolas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Michael Tatarski for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 12:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand

Hello, Crcolas,

Thank you for creating Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

An incomplete job was done here. Please collect all the sources on the subject to make the article as comprehensive as possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:12, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patpong Museum Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patpong Museum Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urban Mobility Tech (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urban Mobility Tech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crcolas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Austin Bush for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Austin Bush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austin Bush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 05:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gil Peñalosa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gil Peñalosa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Opera House metro station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opera House metro station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opera House metro station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SparklingSnail (talk) 21:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Xuân Thủy Street

The article Xuân Thủy Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Electric vehicles in Indonesia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Electric vehicles in Indonesia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ReThink Studio (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReThink Studio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PAU Studio (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PAU Studio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MuvMi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MuvMi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MuvMi Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MuvMi Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 23 Park moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, September 23 Park, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Consulate General of China, New York

Hello, Crcolas

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Consulate General of China, New York, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating Lee White (conservationist). Bearian (talk) 02:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Closed Loop Partners

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Closed Loop Partners, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TransparentSea Farm

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TransparentSea Farm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ron Gonen

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ron Gonen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MuvMi (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MuvMi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diaspora Co.

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diaspora Co., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ben Falk (landscape architect)

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ben Falk (landscape architect), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Closed Loop Partners

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Closed Loop Partners".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TransparentSea Farm

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TransparentSea Farm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Diaspora Co.

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Diaspora Co.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ben Falk (landscape architect)

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ben Falk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Swap & Go

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Swap & Go, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ReThink Studio

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ReThink Studio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PAU Studio

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PAU Studio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gil Peñalosa (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing has changed since the last time. People still do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates for offices they have not won election to -- and that doesn't change based on whether the election is in the future or the past, either, so declaring a second candidacy in an upcoming election still doesn't change anything in and of itself.
Non-winning candidates for political office only get to have Wikipedia articles if you can show that they already had preexisting notability prior to running as a candidate -- but the sourcing for his prior work as an urbanist and commentator still isn't cutting it, and is still too strongly dependent on primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, with virtually no evidence of reliable source coverage about his work as an urbanist.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gil Peñalosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 13:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vietcetera moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vietcetera, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Please note that significant coverage is required from sources to establish notability; a mere mention will not do. Thanks, Silikonz💬 23:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MuvMi (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MuvMi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 13:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ReThink Studio

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ReThink Studio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:PAU Studio

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PAU Studio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:September 23 Park

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:September 23 Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Sports Development Fund-Sports Authority of Thailand (NSDF-SAT) Park

The article National Sports Development Fund-Sports Authority of Thailand (NSDF-SAT) Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not an actual park, but a PR campaign to promote public use of the three parks plus the connecting corridor, all of which independently exist. In any case, there is no third-party coverage at all that isn't from the press release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul_012 (talk) 15:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Indonesia

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Indonesia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Plug-in electric vehicles in Indonesia

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Plug-in electric vehicles in Indonesia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ron Gonen

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ron Gonen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vietcetera

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vietcetera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Urban Mobility Tech

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Urban Mobility Tech, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saigon South International School Logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saigon South International School Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vietcetera

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vietcetera".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Swap & Go

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Swap & Go".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Urban Mobility Tech

Hello, Crcolas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Urban Mobility Tech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MuvMi (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akshithmanya was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MuvMi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akshithmanya ^talk 23:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kunshan Wenhuayishuzhongxin station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kunshan Wenhuayishuzhongxin station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 16:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zuchongzhigongyuan station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zuchongzhigongyuan station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Begocc (talk) 17:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zuchongzhigongyuan station (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S5A-0043 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zuchongzhigongyuan station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S5A-0043^Talk 00:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunshan Wenhuayishuzhongxin station (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RetroCraft314 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Note that train stations are not automatically notable. Are there any sources that cover this station specifically, and not the line in general?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kunshan Wenhuayishuzhongxin station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<RetroCraft314 /> 21:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Please note that drafts are not allowed to be filed in categories as if they were already finished articles. Categories must stay off the page while it's in draftspace, and may be added only if and when it actually gets approved for promotion to mainspace. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake—thank you for clarifying! Crcolas (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MuvMi

Hello, Crcolas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MuvMi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chawadee Nualkhair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chawadee Nualkhair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chawadee Nualkhair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS ^💬 16:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Modacity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modacity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modacity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS ^💬 19:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Yala Batik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Yala Batik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Yala Batik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS ^💬 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southern Urbanism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southern Urbanism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern Urbanism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS ^💬 05:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories, stub tags, etc.

Hi. When editing article foot matter, please take care not to mess up the order of references, categories, and stub templates. Categories should only come after visible article content, including the <references> tag or {{reflist}} template, and stub templates go at the very bottom, with two blank lines before them. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout for details. Also, stub categories should only be populated via the inclusion of stub templates, so don't manually include them. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Southern Urbanism Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Southern Urbanism Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ray Nayler

Hello, Crcolas,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Wikisteveb4, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Ray Nayler, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Wikisteveb4}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wikisteveb4 (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National University station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National University station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National University station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished, or remove comments from the discussion.

Toadspike (talk) 10:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pisanu Suvanajata moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pisanu Suvanajata. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Clear friend a ^💬 00:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luke Farrell (chef), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Taylor Ogan

Hello Crcolas, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Taylor Ogan, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Ogan.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pisanu Suvanajata (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We're looking for coverage about the subject, not coverage about events he hosted as part of his job. Is there anything like that?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pisanu Suvanajata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 23:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liu Yaolin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page China University of Geosciences.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This is for your contributions. Pachu Kannan (talk) 09:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Creative Economy Agency (Public Organization) Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Creative Economy Agency (Public Organization) Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 03:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of political families in Thailand

Hello, Crcolas,

Thank you for creating List of political families in Thailand.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is an interesting list. Please add references to this article from reputable sources. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Simongraham}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

simongraham (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MuvMi has been accepted

MuvMi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sirikanya Tansakun

Hello Crcolas, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sirikanya Tansakun, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirikanya Tansakun.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rest of World logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rest of World logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Last Breath of Sam Yan

Not sure if it's a coincidence or if you already saw this and it was what prompted you to write, but I just requested undeletion of Draft:The Last Breath of Sam Yan. In case you hadn't seen it, there's some content that could be used, though it has some tone issues that need fixing. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:58, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style issues

Hi. May I suggest a few pointers, which I think would greatly improve the articles you create?

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Culture-specific usages, Thai people should be referred to by given name (rather than surname) on subsequent mentions. There are other relevant pointers for Thailand-related articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand/Style guide, if you haven't already seen it.
I understand that you're using the Visual Editor, which has limited functionality when dealing with categories and template placement. It seems the issues I mentioned above under #Categories, stub tags, etc. can only be fixed using the old-fashioned Source Editor, so I'll try to follow up with fixes now and then if others haven't got to them first. But if you're ever interested in giving the Source Editor a try, let me know and I can help out.
In any case, biographical articles should have the DEFAULTSORT tag specified to have them sorted in categories by surname. You'll find more details at Wikipedia:Categorization/Sorting names, but if using the Visual Editor, you'll find the relevant option when adding categories, under the box labelled "Sort this page by default as". For Surapong Piyachote, for example, you would enter "Piyachote, Surapong" in the box. A bot will take care of the sorting for Thai categories.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask. (I usually keep pages on my watchlist for a week, so please ping me after that.) --Paul_012 (talk) 07:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashwin Ramaswami for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashwin Ramaswami, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashwin Ramaswami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nate Douglas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nate Douglas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Douglas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 07:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Werapong Prapha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Werapong Prapha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) ^Talk 21:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Werapong Prapha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Werapong Prapha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi—I support moving it back to draft space. I didn't make any of the recent edits, which I agree make it look promotional. Crcolas (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, it appears that you have some knowledge of Durham, North Carolina. WikiProject Durham NC would like to invite you to join us and expand Wikipedia's information on Durham.

-- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 06:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Museum of Islamic Cultural Heritage and Al-Quran Learning Center. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Chao Mae Thapthim Shrine, Saphan Lueang. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Mark Shepard (farmer). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Dan Wang (analyst). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Kris Yenbamroong. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Rest of World. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Lucas Sin. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Nitirat. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Thủ Thiêm–Long Thành Light Rail. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. And a good place to cover stations which typically shouldn't be a separate article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Y Quynh Bđăp. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Kitrat Panphet. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Crcolas. Thank you for your work on Plian Phasakorawong. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]