User talk:CorbieVreccan/Archive 23
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:CorbieVreccan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 28 |
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
Regarding Nampeyo Page
Nampeyo's daughter Annie Healing was not added to the list of descendants but is mentioned within a paragraph as her daughter. Annie and Willie Healing had a daughter named Beatrice. Beatrice married Vinton Naha and they had many children including a son, Willie Naha. Willie Naha was my father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.64.92 (talk) 20:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- As noted on your talk page, please read WP:WTAF and WP:RS. As we are writing an encyclopedia, everything needs to be sourced according to policies. It's against WP standards to add redlinks to See also sections, as that section is specifically for finding other, existing articles related to that person/topic. Best, - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
Order of Woodcraft Chivalry
Hi Corbie As you saw I tried to make an edit on the OWC Wikipedia page. I am a member of the the OWC and would like to make changes to the page to correct some missconceptions about the group. The particular entry associating the group with witchcraft in the New Forest is incorrect.
I would appreciate your help on how to make the changes properly.
thanks
Morcott99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morcott99 (talk • contribs) 09:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- The best place for this discussion is on the talk page of the article, so others interested in the article can help with this, as well. I'll move this there: Talk:Order of Woodcraft Chivalry - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Postcrossing on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment, and at Template talk:Coup d'état on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
NMAI Native American Women Wikipedia Edit-a-thon
NMAI is hosting a NMAI Native American Women Edit-a-thon on Friday, April 23, from 1:00 pm to 2:30 pm EDT. Pre-registration recommended via Eventbrite. Ahalenia (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Ahalenia
March 2021
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
sorry
sorry if I stepped on the humor a bit ... it just brought back memories. And we've had a fair share of .. ummm ... let's say "sub-optimal" editors through the years. — Ched (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, no problem whatsoever. My gods, I brought up WOW, after all. ;) - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Administrator changes
Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
Arbitration
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Argentina national football team results (2020–present) on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elon Musk on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Drew Pinsky on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Windsor, Virginia on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Munay-ki for deletion
Hello—I've nominated the article about Munay-ki for deletion, and thought you might be interested in weighing in: Munay-ki AfD. Suomichris (talk) 15:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021
Your recent editing history at St. Joseph's Indian School shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Elizium23 (talk) 04:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting. But you didn't warn the sourced-content-blanking, POV-pushing, Catholic-COI-having, not engaging on talkpages, user, Natemup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). Quite a few of Nate's attempts to remove sourced, but critical content from St. Joseph's Indian School could be considered vandalism, and my edits reversions of vandalism. This is not a simple content dispute, nor are you neutral here. This is you taking sides and misusing the templates. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 05:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:F. Murray Abraham on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Romani Americans
Hello CorbieVreccan, and thank you for removing copyright violations from the article. I remember that I had restored some sourced content which was previously removed without an explanation by an IP address, but I did not check the content I was restoring for any copyright violations. I would hate it if my edits made the copyright problem worse, and since I cannot check my revisions, would you be able to tell me if I made a mistake there? Would you have any tips and suggestions on how to better spot potential copyright violations? I feel that copyright violations is still an area on Wikipedia where my confidence is shaky at best. — The Most Comfortable Chair 03:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is one of the tools we use: Earwigs Copyvio Detector. There are others as well, but this one is pretty good. You can also take a chunk of text and paste it into a search engine and just see what comes up. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:19, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Catholic bishops in the Philippines on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:James Barry (surgeon) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User causing disruption in Catholic topic areas. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catawba language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catawba.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of countries by GDP (nominal) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
No original research
Please add a source on St. Joseph's Indian School that states parents were given information from the school that mislead them prior to their kids sending them those letters. There is a source for the student letters, but otherwise it's original research to add what parents "assumed" about the school, etc. You can't add two different sources together if they both don't mention the letters and misleading information by the school per Wikipedia:No original research. oncamera (talk page) 22:14, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, ideally we need a source from a parent talking about what the recruiters said to them. The quote you put in your edit summary is not the one you removed. The quote in the source was, "Danielle Kucera, associate director of communications and outreach for the school, told CNA she is proud that St. Joseph’s provides a safe environment in which students can learn and be involved in extracurricular activities, and where their parents trust that they are safe." So, we have a p.r./outreach person going out and saying the kids are safe. So far I think that's the best we've got. We can probably do better, though. Or we can reword it. The way you reworded it though made it sound like the kids were the sole informants to their parents, and the reason they were sent there in the first place. That doesn't make sense. The parents had to have been told promotional things in the first place to send their kids there. We have to cover that in some way so the kids aren't blamed, in WP's voice, for being sent there. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
"Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves." Those letters and the statement by the PR team are not related in the sources so you can't use it to make your statement as it's written. The PR statement seems to be a more recent statement as well and it's not clear the time period of when the student letters were forged. It's misleading. oncamera (talk page) 22:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
Technical news
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
Arbitration
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Reporters Without Borders on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Could you have a look at this IP editors contributions to Indigenous peoples of Mexico
Hi Corbie, I know you are very busy, but if you find a moment, could you please have a look at this IP editor's recent edits to Indigenous peoples of Mexico. They are changing statistics and leaving inflamatory edit summaries.[1] They may be right about the population numbers (?) but I am not sure they are going about this in the right way. I haven't reverted them, nor left a message on their talk page yet. I wanted to run it by you first to get a "temperature read". Thanks in advance. Netherzone (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again, you can ignore this message, OhnoitsJamie took care of it, and reverted the IPs edits. Best regards, Netherzone (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
User: Natemup
In what seems to be an increasingly evident trend, I am having repeated issues with User:Natemup, who seems to be unwilling to engage in constructive dialogue about unexplained and highly questionable edits and reverts he has made on Institute Catholique. He has repeatedly either replaced "citation needed" markers with unreliable sources or simply deleted them without explanation. He has also refused to admit or understand why the clearly unreliable source he is citing is indeed unreliable (it literally lifted all of its information that the very Wikipedia article in question!). It's one thing to make an editing mistake or not understand the proper process—I'm certainly been guilty of this many times. But this editor is incredibly confrontational, unwilling to admit any mistakes, and is nearly impossible to engage in any form of meaningful discussion. I have left messages on his talk page as well as tried to engage him on Talk:Institute Catholique. Everywhere, he has been unreasonably argumentative. I know that you have had issues with him, at least based on what I see on his talk page (which also shows a long history of this type of behavior), so I thought it would be helpful if I made you aware of it. I appreciate any help or guidance you can provide. Anwegmann (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Corbie and co. attempted to make something out nothing and got nowhere. The page they were attempting to protect is now in great hands, and the page you and I discussed is also in better shape now (with your help). Feel free to end this.
- Corbie will tell you what you want to hear, in any case—which, of course, you already know. natemup (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- we have vandalism by User:Eccekevin, who denies LGBT popes and cardinals in history of Roman-Catholic church. --188.96.230.248 (talk) 20:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Anwegmann: I'm sorry you're having to deal with yet more of his disruptive editing and gaslighting. Natemup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is clearly a WP:TENDENTIOUS editor, and is WP:NOTHERE to collaborate or follow Wikipedia policy.
- If you haven't seen it, here's the previous ANI thread on Natemup which unfortunately scrolled out without action. As an involved admin, I unfortunately can't take an admin action like blocking Natemup at this juncture. But if his disruption has continued, I suggest taking him to WP:ANI again. Make a note of that past thread, then thoroughly but concisely document the disruption that has taken place since then with diffs that clearly illustrate the problem. Hopefully this time uninvolved admins will either topic ban/semi-block him from the articles in question, or see that he's WP:NOTHERE to build the encyclopedia and block him. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:59, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons at Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Apologies
I don't think I have ever really apologized to you. I don't make excuses and I am not about to start. We had a disagreement months ago and you were right. I was wrong. I apologize for my over-reaction. I appreciate you holding everyone accountable, including myself. How else are we to learn and grow? Thank you for your contributions here and I think you should hear that more often. --ARoseWolf 21:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Wikipedia can be challenging at the best of times. Working on Indigenous articles can really be a thankless task, as we both know. Staying the course and learning how to source difficult-to-source articles can be trying, but your help is appreciated. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 21:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ideological bias on Wikipedia on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Justin Bieber on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Philadelphia 76ers on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Disruption
Per your final warning here, the user has again returned to Wind River (film) to remove sourced information (their second attempt to remove some of the production companies). Grandpallama (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- And in terms of the previous suspicions about socking, this might be of interest. Grandpallama (talk) 16:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. They have clearly earned a block on Wind River. Have any of their edits on the other pages been useful, or have all of them been disruptive? - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 17:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Some of their other edits have been what appear to be malicious changes to film grosses and budgets[2][3], so it does seem disruption-only. Since they edit a few times and then disappear for months on end, I'm sure they've long flown under the radar. Grandpallama (talk) 14:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry if I'm bothering you here, but the editor seemed to have returned as another anon in what is apparently the same region based on a IP check, although there isn't hard (like 100%) evidence that it is a sock puppet of the original editor, it seems to be behaving in the same ways. I really have no to minimal experience dealing with socks so can you block, tag or do any other action if you think it's necessary? thanks! Justiyaya 13:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Some of their other edits have been what appear to be malicious changes to film grosses and budgets[2][3], so it does seem disruption-only. Since they edit a few times and then disappear for months on end, I'm sure they've long flown under the radar. Grandpallama (talk) 14:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know. They have clearly earned a block on Wind River. Have any of their edits on the other pages been useful, or have all of them been disruptive? - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 17:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Looking into it. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
@Justiyaya: I've tagged them based on the rather clear pattern. The IP is static, but I'm waiting to see if they disrupt further before blocking. If they do and I miss it, let me know. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:21, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
And sure enough, continued identical pattern of edits with zero talk engagements after warnings. Blocked from all pages the drawer targets. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:49, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox Playboy Playmate on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pan Sophic on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Naja mos
I habe no idea what this is. From capitalization of indigenous re Squaw. I tried searching, but maybe not in the right place. deisenbe (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and Native American Journalists Association Manuals of Style. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Indigenous peoples of the Americas
Please, explain how that section are "very higly disputed", all text is about evidence of the topic, even none text is about another point of view about the topic. Thanks. Janiclett (talk) 22:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Have you read the section? Stop edit warring and take it to article talk. Indigenous identity is not defined by DNA. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:45, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Indigenous identity is not defined by DNA"?, duh... Janiclett (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is CorbieVreccan. Thank you. Janiclett (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, Janiclett (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), disrupt the 'pedia, edit war, engage in personal attacks, abuse the templates, then go straight to ARBCOM Sanctions Enforcement for an issue that has nothing to do with ARBCOM. That should go fantastic. See the block log. LOL. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 00:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)