User talk:Janiclett
Mesoamerican ballgame
[edit]Why are you referencing me in your edit summary for this article? I have had no involvement with this article at all (and I'm neither religious nor Canadian). Colonies Chris (talk) 10:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Indigenous peoples of the Americas, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you have any questions, you may leave a message at article talk to keep the discussion centralized. You came and made massive changes to an established article, and then hit "undo" on two established editors of said article, with the WP:INCIVIL and inaccurate edit summary, "the only dispute here are you." Engage on the talk page before editing further. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Indigenous peoples of the Americas. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Indigenous peoples of the Americas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are now reverting multiple editors, with no edit summaries or attempt to dialogue. This is your final warning. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:52, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Heironymous Rowe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. On top of all the other disruption, you are now abusing the template warning system to harass and misrepresent the work of editors in good standing.[1] Heironymous Rowe is not a vandal. You are the one engage in disruptive edits and revert-warring, Janiclett. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Heiro 23:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)October 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.