User talk:CorbieVreccan/Archive 21
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Administrators' newsletter – November 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).
|
![]()
|
- An RfC was closed with the consensus that the resysop criteria should be made stricter.
- The follow-up RfC to develop that change is now open at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2).
- A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.
- Eligible editors may now nominate themselves as candidates for the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The self-nomination period will close November 12, with voting running from November 19 through December 2.
Intractable behavior in regard of the Me Too movement article
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Salamandra85 (talk) 18:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
You roughly violated the most important not negotiable neutrality rule, tried to keep content biased and censored, removed the key points with secondary and other sources (also neutrality rule), extensively added original research and removal even the requests of sources, and by now the bad faith can be assumed (you are so much biased) and so this can be considered vandalism.
More details: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=924913943#Intractable_behavior_of_users_CorbieVreccan,_Bishonen,_Yunshui
- Fascinating. See WP:NOTHERE, WP:SPA, WP:BATTLE, and ANI Block Notice. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Strikethrough
FYI, the proper markup is <s>
; the long-winded <strike>
version hasn't been valid HTML since the 1990s, and using it on WP just adds more load to the WP:LINT cleanup efforts. :-) — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- A five-letter code may not be preferred by all, now that there's also a one-letter version, but if a code works, and this does, it's not correct to call it "invalid". I'll assume you're trying to be helpful here, but changing others' edits this way doesn't always come off as helpful. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for November 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tipi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pawnee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Thank you! <3 - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 17:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Skowhegan article
Hi Corbie. Over on the Skowhegan, Maine article, the entirety of the mascot issue was deleted, initially no discussion. I initiated conversation but the editor who removed it would not budge. Another editor restored it and it was removed again. The section was well sourced and in my response I showed that it was of national interest. I had moved it over to the school district page but it was removed there as well. I feel as if the individuals involved don't understand that in the United States, the mascot issue has been happening for decades and has garnered even international attention. I am not sure what to do about this because according to the sources this isn't a one time recent issue in the town of Skowhegan and it spills over from the high school. Indigenous girl (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
IP editor changing Native American to American Indian again
Hello Corbie. Could you please take a look at this and semi protect if you think it's necessary? Thanks. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Native_Americans_in_the_United_States&curid=21217&diff=928378809&oldid=928364581 Indigenous girl (talk) 18:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Looks like a case of WP:LOUTSOCK. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fallyisback - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/ANEWSicon.png/150px-ANEWSicon.png)
EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
Interface administrator changes
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
Wounded Knee Massacre statement that it was "the largest domestic massacre in U.S. history"
Hello, I am KVJackson (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC). I concur with your 1 Jan 2020 reversion to my edits on the Wounded Knee Massacre page on Wikipedia, in that referencing another Wikipedia article is a circular reference.
Respectfully, a question: the current page statement that Wounded Knee was "the largest domestic massacre in U.S. history."
Does this statement not need a supporting inline citation / reputable source?
There are other massacres in U.S. history that rival or exceed the number of casualties at Wounded Knee on 29 Dec 1890, including the Fort Mims Massacre of 1813 and the Wyoming Valley Massacre of 1778.
References for the Fort Mims Massacre casualties, between 250 to 400, include: http://www.fortmims.org/history/history03.html ; and Davis, Karl. ""Remember Fort Mims:" Reinterpreting the Origins of the Creek War." Journal of the Early Republic 22, no. 4 (2002): 611-36. doi:10.2307/3124760.
References for the Wyoming Valley Massacre casualties, between 301 to 376, (including a recognized payment of 227 scalps): https://explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=1-A-219 ; and "The Iroquois in the American Revolution" by Barbara Graymont, Syracuse University Press, 1972, available at https://archive.org/details/iroquoisinameric00gray/page/170 .
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
![]()
|
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
@Angelalindsey77 Angelalindsey77 (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2020 (UTC) |
Thank you!
English word.
I not going to keep correcting the page, you can do that. You're suggesting that I could sit outside a teepee and write down everything I heard. Then copy these words to a dictionary and whala the Indians are now speaking English. And since they have been speaking the same language for ever, their native language is English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.169.164.146 (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- As I said on your talk page and in the edit summaries, this is an English-language term. There is no equivalent standalone word in any Indigenous language that is used the way the English term is used. The article is about the use of the English term. I think that is clear if you read the article. Again, take this up on the talk page of the article, with sources that support the changes you are trying to make if you want to press this. Edit-warring without adding any new sourcing is not the way forward, especially with established, stable, sourced content. Best, - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation
Hi Corbie. I have already asked Oshwah to take a look but I figured a second set of eyes wouldn't hurt regarding Nulhegan Band of the Coosuk Abenaki Nation. Two IPs and a new editor are both adding unsourced content and are removing sources and sourced content. I warned the new editor twice now, no activity since the second warning. I don't know what else to do at this point. I removed the new content that was unsourced, I simply do not have time to source it and it was a lot. Indigenous girl (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- It's on the user adding the content to source it. They also shouldn't be blanking sourced content. This is especially an issue if they have COI here. They've been warned and I've added it to my watchlist. The disruption seems to have stopped for now, but if it resumes I'll step in. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 23:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
About how long is normal for a response to editing discussion?
CorbieVreccan, I'd thanked you for your guidance a few days ago and had 2 additional questions I'd posted in the response on my talk page. I was looking forward to hearing back from you as I'd made the changes you asked for but want to ensure I move forward correctly. How long do replies typically take as I don't want to rush you but I want to ensure I'm following up as I should to contribute and share with Wikipedia. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaches.boats.mtns (talk • contribs) 21:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- The answers are in the informational links I posted on your talk page. Please read the information I posted on your talk page about copyright and sourcing, along with the information about the rules all users must follow here on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a webhost, personal listing site, or blog. We are legally responsible for all content published here. You cannot just copy and paste content from other sites, or blank sourced content just because you don't like it. These rules apply to all users. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 21:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Native American mascot controversy; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sandcherry (talk)
- Uh, nope. I don't think you understand how this works. You have been reverted by two other editors. You are the one who is edit-warring. You do not have consensus for the reverts you keep making, and just throwing back a template at the editor who has warned you, after you've been warned,[1] is not convincing. Respect the process of collaboration and consensus on talk. This is a basic principle of participation on Wikipedia. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
![]()
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Little Big Man photo=
Hi Corbie: I'm MillenialScholar The caption for lower photo on Little Big Man https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Little_Big_Man is incorrect, as it derives from an incorrect note in the Library of Congress. Little Big Man is not in fact in this photo, as the person identified as him is in fact Sharp Nose, a Northern Arapaho. Page 15 of this book has the correct caption: https://books.google.com/books?id=js_3q0j-hv4C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false MillennialScholar (talk) 20:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).
|
![]()
|
- Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
- The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with
wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input
. No proposed process received consensus.
- Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
- When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [2]
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
- Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators
- Voting in the 2020 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2020, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2020, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- The English Wikipedia has reached six million articles. Thank you everyone for your contributions!
no response to earlier requests for guidance on my and your talk pages?
CorbieVreccan, I submitted the info/clarifications you requested on both my talk page and your talk page about 2 weeks ago but have not had a response from you. Sorry to be bothering you again but I worked hard to collect information of value to other people that updates some incorrect information shown on the site. Please advise, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaches.boats.mtns (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Article Angaangaq Lyberth
Hello Corbie, I tried to adapt the article about Angaangaq Lyberth, which you did not appreciate :) I understand that links to Websites are not welcome at Wikipedia. In my opinion the link of the film documentary of German TV which can be seen until 2022 is a reliable ressource. It is done by ZDF which is a public broadcasting station in Germany. They call him a Shaman and Elder. Also the books which are posted as ressources are talking about him as a shaman not about a politician. Please can you give me a short reply. Thanks, Michaela- new at Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.149.167.102 (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- The problem is not with all websites, it's with the type of websites. Event listings, commercial sites, and other unsourced promotional materials are not Reliable Sources for Wikipedia articles. As to his claims to be a spiritual leader in an Indigenous community, these things need to be sourced to the Indigenous communities themselves, not German television presenters or new age sources. If he is a new age practitioner you can list him as that. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 21:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer. Yes in somes ways I get your point, though in Europe, especially Germany, Austria, Switzerland he is much more known and accepted as a significant spiritual teacher- not as a self made "new age-person". Just one question: Why would you not see the "Parliament of the Worlds Religions" (which I had linked) as a reliable source- there are all religions of the world represented and e.g. Dalai Lama or Archbishop Desmond Tutu are one of the honorary advisers. Michaela — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.149.166.5 (talk) 08:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Despite their official-sounding name, the "PoWR", as they call themselves in their fundraising emails, is a private organization that holds interfaith gatherings. A wide range of participants attend and present, and these presenters bona fides are generally not vetted. There are controversies around it. His listing is yet another self-penned bio and event listing. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 18:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Ghilan
this category for ghouls not for arabian or persian myths only
anything called ghoul or translate as ghoul is count
أبو السعد 22 (talk) 20:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not ghouls, but Ghilan. You put Wendigo and others in Ghilan. Stop rearranging categories. You are making a mess of them. Seek consensus with other editors in the relevant wikiprojects and article pages. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Hello!
Hi there,
Thank you for the welcome and the resources! The reason I have been editing the Shamanism page is precisely for the reasons you pointed out: the concept is often used as a means for erasure. In my edits, I tried to focus on the particularity of Indigenous lifeways in order to counteract the notions of universality and pan-Indigeneity prevalent on this page. I believe including Indigenous voices within the conversation on shamanism is crucial to developing an understanding of the term's arbitrariness, as well as its colonial history. This inclusion is something I hope to work towards on this page.
Please let me know of any other resources that may help in this endeavour!
Best,
Schmendrick2112 (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
![]()
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Country Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pawnee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
![]()
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Gwenllian ferch Gruffydd
Thanks. I don't know what I was doing there. Probably typing too fast! Deb (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- 's ok. I was just too tired to fix it. <3 - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
![]()
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/ANEWSicon.png/150px-ANEWSicon.png)
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Taiwan on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Yapperbot (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/ANEWSicon.png/150px-ANEWSicon.png)
CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 07:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Falun Gong on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lists of state leaders by age on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Assassin's Creed on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Glenda Gray on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Obamagate on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. | ![]() |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Grover Furr on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Special:WantedTemplates
Hi, I have been cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates and noticed that Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_" is pointing to your monobook.js pages. clearly these are false positives (basically a bug in how WP parses .js pages). it would be really great if you could add // <syntaxhighlight lang=javascript>
to the top and // </syntaxhighlight>
to the bottom of those pages. by putting these tags in comments, it won't prevent the javascript from executing, but it will remove those pages from Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"_+_"oldafdfull"_+_". alternatively, if you are no longer using the monobook skin (many people are using vector these days) and don't need to keep the old page, you could just have the page deleted. thank you in advance for your help. Frietjes (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
![]()
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging