User talk:Closedmouth: Difference between revisions
Closedmouth (talk | contribs) |
→quickerazy: new section |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::That's the old news, this record is broken multiple times, I've removed the old source from the section, there's also a problem in "See Also" section, could you please change that, the mistake is repeated there[[Special:Contributions/92.61.181.24|92.61.181.24]] ([[User talk:92.61.181.24|talk]]) 11:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC) |
::That's the old news, this record is broken multiple times, I've removed the old source from the section, there's also a problem in "See Also" section, could you please change that, the mistake is repeated there[[Special:Contributions/92.61.181.24|92.61.181.24]] ([[User talk:92.61.181.24|talk]]) 11:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::That should be fixed; apologies for the warning, you can remove it if you'd like. --[[User:Closedmouth|Closedmouth]] ([[User talk:Closedmouth#top|talk]]) 11:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC) |
:::That should be fixed; apologies for the warning, you can remove it if you'd like. --[[User:Closedmouth|Closedmouth]] ([[User talk:Closedmouth#top|talk]]) 11:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
== quickerazy == |
|||
sorry |
|||
Revision as of 11:30, 22 February 2011
 | This user is lazy and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
| This is Closedmouth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
National Asshole Day
It is a fictional holiday but it deserves a Wikipedia page. Restore the page now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Helenak0991 (talk • contribs)
Indonesian misinformation vandal back again...
Hello.
The Indonesian misninformation vandal has returned right this minute. This time, he used the address 118.137.75.198 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Probably, the rangeblock on the 118.137.0.0/17 has now expired and is now taking advantage. Need your action ASAP. Thank you. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Never mind. Already blocked for 12 hours. But just in case, if you could do rangeblocks, can you put reapply it on the 118.137.0.0/17 range? The guy must taken advantage since the rangeblock expired a few days ago. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye on it. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Ehsan ghaem maghami is Iranian, not Israeili!
I've changed the mistake on "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_chess#Most_simultaneous_games" but you reverted it! Take a look here to see where he is really from! http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ehsan_Ghaem-Maghami —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.61.181.24 (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- But the title of the source is "Israeli strips Iran of Guinness world record in chess"[1]. Has somebody screwed with that? --Closedmouth (talk) 11:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's the old news, this record is broken multiple times, I've removed the old source from the section, there's also a problem in "See Also" section, could you please change that, the mistake is repeated there92.61.181.24 (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That should be fixed; apologies for the warning, you can remove it if you'd like. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- That's the old news, this record is broken multiple times, I've removed the old source from the section, there's also a problem in "See Also" section, could you please change that, the mistake is repeated there92.61.181.24 (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
quickerazy
sorry