User talk:Closedmouth/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Closedmouth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
New Page Patrolling
Thanks for new page patrolling, with the new function, please remember to log pages as having been patrolled, saves looking at them multiple times. Cheers. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- I haven't had time to patrol new pages since they introduced the new feature. Thanks for the heads-up anyway. --Closedmouth (talk) 01:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Victoria Cup history merge
Okay, I think I fixed it now. Forgive me, I'm not an expert when it comes to history merges. Spebi 07:15, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- I also completed the history merge of Chōsokabe Morichika for you, as well. Spebi 05:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Closedmouth (talk) 05:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Return of Quiet Days
Hi Closedmouth,
Not sure why, but you put a notice on my talk page saying "Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles" in connection with "Return of Quiet Days." This is puzzling, since I moved the article from that title back to Kadena Air Base about five minutes after a vandal had moved it. This vandal has been active over the past several months, and I undid a similar move a couple of days ago. Let's unite in opposing this vandal.
Best regards, Fg2 (talk) 21:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- No problem! Fg2 (talk) 03:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Can you guide User:Whiteknight13 on where he/she can publish this information? That will be really helpful in not discouraging this newbie. Anshuk (talk) 06:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Help create a page
Though I am a webdesigner and a graphic designer, I havn't gotten around to study the techniques of create a wikipedia page.
I Want to create a page about "Josh Hoge" (www.JoshHoge.com) (www.myspace.com/Joshhoge) But I can't seem to get sources and credibility for it.
Please help: --Cammyzcool (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hey Closedmouth,
I just noticed that you added a missing AfD tag to Look to the Sky, and I just wanted to drop by and thank you! I don't know what went wrong there--Twinkle did its job in listing the AfD and notifying the contributor, but I guess something got snagged along the way. Anyways, I appreciate it! --jonny-mt(t)(c)Tell me what you think! 16:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. --Closedmouth (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Azaghal (Band) = WTF?
Please take a look at User talk:Green-Dragon#Speedy deletion of Azaghal (Band). Thanks. --Green-Dragon (talk) 06:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Again, please. --Green-Dragon (talk) 22:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Buffalodaughter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Buffalodaughter.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of descrption pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris.B | talk 17:32, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- I've been waiting for this message since I uploaded that image. I can't think of a reason why it's not replaceable, so it's gonna get deleted.--Closedmouth (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Lateral aperture
I might be wrong, but I am under the impression that when an editor deletes a page which consists of their own edits only and no other edits, it is a request for page deletion. The page move that I am suggesting is from "Lateral apertures" to "Lateral aperture". This is to change it from the pleural to the singular, which is uncontroversial, I think. Any editor can make a page move that is not controversial, so in this case, I think, that it need not be a requested and listed for discussion. I was working on wiki pages that have been requested for more than one year, after I was asked to look at the list of Anatomy page requests. Lateral aperture was one of the pages that has been requested, but not sorted out, for more than one year. Snowman (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Critical assembly
I saw you reverted my attempt to create a disambiguity page for Critical assembly.
My intention was to be able to reach a page whith info about the movie [1].
How is the best way to do that, if appropriate? Paxinum (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
November 2007
Hello. I understand the change you made to Saul Kaiserman removing the link I put in. I put the link in because someone else created the page and made it a redirect page to his brother's article listing, which seemed silly. Either create the article itself or don't bother creating the page in my opinion. But that's water under the bridge.
My concern is the tone of the post you left me. Perhaps it is simply a template you leave in lots of places, but the tone of the post on my user talk page treated me as if I was a newbie editor making some grossly offensive edit for my own personal benefit. I thought Wikipedia was all about assume good faith. I appreciate that you are taking the time to check articles for vandalism and for spam links. My suggestion is that the notes you leave for editors assume we are not idiots, new editors, or malicious in our actions. Thank you. JerseyRabbi (talk) 12:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- I will take up my concern with the tone with the originators of the warning. But the post came from you, so as you use it in the future, be aware that editors that users - or at least this one - don't like being treated as newbies or spammers. Thank you for responding so quickly and for your good faith efforts in helping Wikipedia. Maybe consider altering the user warnings you use to a less judgmental one. JerseyRabbi
AfD nomination of Pon farr
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pon farr, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pon farr. Thank you. Ejfetters 03:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
PROD
Sorry I misunderstood the PROD purpose. I hope I did that the right way then, since someone removed the PROD tag before you, they obviously didn't agree, so I felt that made it controversial and should be taked to AFD so it could be discussed. Also, if you'd like to input on another one - Section 31, appears to be nothing but in-universe short article again. Thanks for your help again. Ejfetters 04:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pit Fighter (film)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pit Fighter (film), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pit Fighter (film). Thank you. --B. Wolterding (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
redirected
Thanks. I was bound to miss one somewhere. Have done it now. --Bart | talk page 13:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cool --Closedmouth (talk) 13:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Great idea for Friendly!
|
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
| For envisioning and suggesting that Friendly's tagging feature extend to redirect tagging I award you this Barnstar, Closedmouth! Kudos, and keep up the good work! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
About the Hanoi - Amsterdam High School international awards
Dear Closedmouth, Thanks for your notice. Indeed, I did not clear texts from the article but merged it into the main article of Hanoi Amsterdam High school. I think it will be neater if those texts are contained in the article on the school.
Thank you again for your advice. But something wrong happened :D. When I click on the link to Hanoi-Amsterdam High school International Awards, I was otherwise directed to the list of Hanoi National University of Education High school International Awards. I'm sure that Amser would be down a little bit if they know this. I have corrected it already. Nice day. ^^ Thieugia (talk) 14:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Best regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thieugia (talk • contribs) 12:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Woops! --Closedmouth (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Chabad related controversy
If you wish wikipedia to have any credibility on this subject within Judaism, you will need to remove this page and split up each item into its own page. There is no reasons to entries on people such as Lew, Levitin and Jaffe when each on their own may or may not merit a page on wikipedia. Judge each one separately, and set up a separate page for them.
Additionally, the title is misleading. Some of the issues there are scandals, not controversy. Controversy implies that Chabad supports what they did tacitly or otherwise and others don't. What they did was simply a scandal for which each suffered the consequence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.50.83 (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Stop, Look and Laugh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stop, Look and Laugh, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Stop!, Look and Laugh. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- If you use the move tab at the top of an article as has been explained to you, you won't get messages like this. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hey Closedmouth - I am learning slowly, so please bear with me. I used the "redirect" icon, but forgot to paste the establised text into the new page. I had some difficulty then adding the text afterwards. My error. What is the difference between "move" and "redirect?" Or is there one? Oanabay04 (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
December 2007
I have not made the destructive edits you implied on my talk-page. Seriously, I have no history of vandalism, in fact I very often look out for and repair vandalism. It could be that my account has been hijacked, so I will change my password. Thank you for letting me know. -ramz- (talk) 14:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Deleted. Regards, Tonywalton Talk 01:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Danke. --Closedmouth (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
re. Geoffrey Box/Godfrey Box
re. CSD R3 on the former. Aha, I see, now... For some reason I thought that if I blanked the redirect that a bot would pick up and delete that as an empty page. Cheers, David. Harami2000 (talk) 09:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Dance Karaoke DKara
You didn't want to read my explanation for keeping the redirect alive? It's better to contribute than to discourage other from doing so. AeronPrometheus (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- What's your point? --Closedmouth (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
- Listen to other people's point of view before acting, that's part of being a Wikipedia user. I'm willing to listen to yours, but instead of communicating with me you acted as if it didn't matter. I don't mind, I can ignore this, unless you try to stop the page from reoccurring when I need it to be there. I'd rather work with you than against you, what say you? AeronPrometheus (talk) 22:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Undid revert
I see you reverted the c3a redirect to go straight to the "C3 (complement)" instead of giving the option to go to the also relevent cement chemistry page. I have un-done your revision as I for one came looking for the cement chemistry page and would have found it difficult to find otherwise.
Noodle snacks (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Your current edit looks good to me, thanks Noodle snacks (talk) 08:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Spanish Haiti
Please stop reverting the move of Spanish Haiti. This is a very important piece of history with a large number of references available. Although it did become the Dominican Republic it was not the same. I am in the process of expanding it. UnclePaco (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- some is but not to the degree that I have and am building. Even the name of the former nation of Spanish Haiti is in the article of Dominican Republic. please allow me to build this. UnclePaco (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- thanks i'm building it on my userspace now before moving it over. UnclePaco (talk) 12:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
alright this is what I have for now. [2] UnclePaco (talk) 13:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Please dont deleate
Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital I have just begun to edit it.Ill do a substantial amnt of it today. Please dont delete it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijayantgovinda (talk • contribs) 12:41, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
{{subst:dis}}
Thanks for reminding me about the subst being required on this template. I'll try to remember on my own next time. Karl Hahn (T) (C) 04:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- No harm done :) --Closedmouth (talk) 04:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Dapto High School
Yeah, I didn't see anything for that anon to warrant a block. Then I saw the pattern of edits at the Dapto High School, so I've protected the article for a month. Hopefully, that addresses the situation better than a block would (since they'd just move on to the next IP). —C.Fred (talk) 05:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
User:206.213.251.31 - incorrect TW vandal warning?
I don't normally follow up these things, but after seeing a personal attack left by User:206.213.251.31 on User:Scarian's talk page ([3]), I had a look through his contributions, and then at his talk page. However, it seems that one warning on his talk page, from you, may be incorrect. Specifically, this warning, regarding edits to Flat Earth Society. However, this user's only edit to that article is this, which is removing vandalism. Would you be able to review the edit, and, if you feel your warning was incorrect (I assume it was an accident in Twinkle, rather than a genuine malicious intent on your part - mistakes are easily made), would you be able to retract it? Again, sorry for bothering you with such a trivial thing. --Dreaded Walrus t c 22:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
I appreciate the welcome notice. Just little ol' me tagging and bagging vandals before I hit the sack since I'm too lazy to sign in and I'd basically retired from that sort of thing in the first place. Oh, well. Some habits are hard to break. :) Happy new year! PMDrive1061 via --71.102.80.39 (talk) 09:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem whatsoever. I'm glad to see that there are still some users on this site with class enough to welcome another user. A user whom I'm familiar just hung an ID template on the talk page. I guess I'll need to sign in for future NPP, but I probably won't be back for a little while. I might be back sooner than later to prepare another old article of mine for parsing over to Veropedia. Anyway, take care. It's late here and I'm finally getting sleepy, thank goodness. --71.102.80.39 (talk) 09:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
LHC vandalism
Hi, I have to take this to WP:ANI, I can't block the editor as I work at CERN and there could be a conflict of interest I've replied opn the article talk page. Thanks for keeping an eye on it. Khukri 11:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. --Closedmouth (talk) 11:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Mouled Sidi El-Latini
Hi! How are you?! I noticed that you requested a merge between Mouled Sidi El Latini and Mouled Sidi El-Latini... I'm new at this and i dont really know what merging will do :S but can the final page be Mouled Sidi El-Latini?! coz there's a "-" present :)... I know this could be counted as trivial but i mean we should name things right over here to the last character :) thanks... Oh, do you mind if i copied that userbox that shows when a person is online in my userpage?! (A) Maged M. Mahfouz (talk) 10:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, i get it now... Thanks for the help and info :) Maged M. Mahfouz (talk) 10:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
prod-2
OK, I get the message that {{prod-2}} don't need to be substed but may I request that either:
- You agree with me that it simply does not matter whether prod2 is substed or not, or
- You:
- explain at Template talk:Prod-2#Subst why it is so important not to subst the template
- add a note in the <noinclude> part of the template definition to say "do not subst", or even
- change the definition to give a big warning if users attempt to subst it (similar to the warning in {{prod}} if users do not subst it).
-- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Strangelet
You keep erasing the strangelet material based in the non-true fact that is original research. Can you at least tell me how people solve a dispute of this type. I DO NOT QUOTE MY WORK. Do i have to raise this to wikipedians and show them my true identity? or there is a possible mediation without going so far? What is the normal procdure. Do you know it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.210.93 (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
All in the Family dab page
While Jazzeur's actions verge on vandalism, I agree with him/her in one respect - the dab page under its current title is bad. It should be All in the Family (disambiguation). Since this is the English wikipedia, the TV series is the primary meaning and should be moved back IMO. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Nanoelionics
Helloy,Closedmouth! Fifteen years ago, when the paper “A step towards nanoionics” was written, Prof. Ukshe E.A., said (before he recommended the paper to Solid State Ionics): "nanoionics" is the curious word and it can be published. Now, nanoelectronics is rapid running towards his fundamental ultimate limits. In such area as the thickness of dielectric layer, it reaches a few atomic layer thick, and cannot shrink further. Fast ion transport at nanoscale will help break this limit, and at this important area of meeting, the nanoelectronics and nanoionics merge in common. It will be nanoelionics. "Nanoelionics" is the new scientific term with a rich future. Despotuli (talk) 08:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
All in the Family
I consider the page that I inadvertently blanked out as a useless and frivolous disambiguation page. What made it NECESSARY is the loose translation of an obscure Asian film title. So, if the the title of the new article named "All in the Family (film)" remains as is, the need for the disambiguation page totally disappears. I therefore need help in getting the proper procedure to remove this useless and damaging disambiguation page so that the original name for "All in the Family (US series)" can be moved back to "All in the Family". Thank you, --Jazzeur (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Would I be blamed for vandalism if I attempt to move the "All in the Family" dab page to "All in the Family (disambiguation)" as proposed by user:Clarityfiend? Thank you, --Jazzeur (talk) 06:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much Closedmouth for all your work, which I inadvertently caused in part, after user "Blofeld of SPECTRE" had done something totally useless by renaming (moving) the "All in the Family" article and creating a disambiguation page named "All in the Family". Wikipedia was working fine at the time with the existing "All in the Family (disambiguation)" page which had been created back in July 2006. If something like this ever happens again, I'll go to the experts with WP:RM rather than try to resolve it myself. Thank you again, --Jazzeur (talk) 16:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ethical Implictions of WorkChoices, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- With 3 edits you had the majority of the edits of this article. BJTalk 04:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, that's a bit sad. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Is this a joke?
You mean you are not going to delete a page that I created? I'm am trying to correct another article and need this page gone. I'm moving another page, why is this being denied??? WTF?? Why can't I get my project finished?--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 03:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Request For Rollback
I am pleased ot tell you I have fulfilled your request and added rollback to your user rights. Best Wishes. Pedro : Chat 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- ありがとう! --Closedmouth (talk) 14:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Mese
What is the reason for removing the extra links? It does look cleaner, but seems less useful.Quickmythril (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Palpatine
There remains one talk page which remains: Talk:Darth_Sidious I'm not sure where it goes. Perhaps you can fix it, or you can drop me a note on my talk page if you need my help. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 08:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
whoa cowboy!
I noticed you deleted my new article on Felix A. Croes.
I was in the middle of building it only to find out it was gone. The message posted on my talk page said I could use "hangon" but when I tried to do so, the article was already gone.
Felix A. Croes is the author of DGD, and also its sole copyright holder, and Skotos Games has a commercial license from him for corporate usage of DGD, costing Skotos a whopping 100K per year.
I consider this noteworthy...would you mind if I readd it if I include the relevant information?
I'd consider him sort of a celebrity in the MUD world.
Would like to readd it myself, but that could start an edit war. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shentino (talk • contribs) 22:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
The page Wapanese was previously deleted, and I temporarily restored it so that its contents can be seen in the debate about the related redirect Weeaboo (with an intention that it is re-deleted once the debate is closed). If you believe that the article should exist, please go to deletion review. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
PDA
I don't know. He kinda has a point. Lazylaces (Talk to me 01:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry! Wrong talk age. Don't know how that happened. Lazylaces (Talk to me 15:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
how to cite
I tried citing another article once before and botched the syntax so badly that another editor reverted me.
A short tutorial on how to cite would be most helpful. Either that or a pointer to where to find this out.
I am pretty new at editing here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shentino (talk • contribs) 16:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Truly
I am truly sorry about the Darth Sidious thing. Earthbendingmaster (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Fat Cunt
I don't know if you know this, but one of your user boxes uses this very term to describe yourself. Just wanted to bring that to your attention.71.164.201.64 (talk) 05:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know, it's an in-joke --Closedmouth (talk) 02:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Cloverfield
hey i looked at the cloverfield page on here and it makes me really wanna see the movie but is it worth the 10 bucks because everyone i ask of my friends tell me it sucked —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.62.28.32 (talk) 17:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nowell Khosla
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nowell Khosla, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nowell Khosla. Thank you. Panesarisking (talk) 19:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
disambig
Hi. You removed my disambig page Satter to redirect it, with the summary 'agh'. What is agh? Cheers--Dr. Friendly (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Guitar hero 4: Rock to the top, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Header
You have mistunderstood the article I am trying to keep alive on Wikipedia. It is not an ad to get more viewers because how could I get more viewers when I'm just a fan of the show? I doubt the creator of the show even knows about the fight for this article on Wikipedia.
I believe that this article should stay in the encyclopedia because it is currently being edited through to meet Wikipedia's standards. Further plans to edit this page have also been established. I believe the article is put in an encyclopedic manner because the article contains information about West Ville's impact on fans of the show and detailed information about almost all of the characters. More details in episode summaries will be added soon as well. Any assistance in editing this page will be more than appreciated. Now you may want this article to be deleted because you may think that there isn't any significance to the article. Let me assure you though, this article is signifant and offers important information that certain people may want to know. The animated series "West Ville" may not be very popular, but it is still an existing animated series with several fans who would greatly appreciate an article in an encyclopedia about the show. It seems like you only want shows with millions of viewers on the encyclopedia, but I believe it doesn't matter. If the show exists, no matter how many viewers it has, there is a lot of good information about it that many people would probably want to know. Furhtermore, the characters in the show "West Ville" are constantly growing. There is a lot of character growth in this show, and I believe it is necessary to record how certain character's personalities have changed overtime in an encyclopedia because some people may find it difficult to stay up-to-date with information about their favorite characters. In conclusion, I believe that if you want this article to be deleted, give the article a change and truly find the significance of the article. Several people would greatly appreciate an article about this show and I would appreciate it if you let me, and all the other people who edit this page continue editing this page. Please give this article a chance to grow, there is significance in this article that you may have not found, so please keep this article on the encyclopedia, and thank you for your time.
Thekidwithoutaname (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
West Ville
Well, I completely miscalled that one. :) Noting how often the article had been created and deleted, I hoped that going through AfD would eliminate drama by allowing clear-cut salting and enabling future incarnations at variant titles to be G4ed. This is my first major encounter with the world of SPAs. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know that swirly-minded feeling. I spent half of yesterday in a medicated haze. (Flu, yay.) I do wonder how many individuals we're actually dealing with. The similarities in their formatting is telling, as is the slip where Jennifer18 referred to her own comment in the third person. Peculiar error. :) After I pointed it out, she changed it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- If this AfD is the end of it, I wouldn't bother. If they persist, most definitely. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Ice 9 fusion
Would you care to weigh in on WP:Articles for deletion/Ice-nine fusion? Dark Formal (talk) 03:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Long comments
You recently added a "long comment" on a page which had just the {{wi}} template in order to prevent the page from popping up on Special:Shortpages. I've seen that often before but have never found the template used to add the long comment. I'd like to put a reference to it on Template talk:Wi. Could you drop me a link when you have a minute? Thanks. Rossami (talk) 05:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting. The comments were so similar that I just assumed that they were the result of a template. Well, I've now created one. I put it at Template:longcomment for lack of a better name. It seems to be working when I test it but I'd appreciate other feedback and corrections. (In particular, if you know how to force the notice when someone forgets to subst the template, that might be helpful.) Thanks. Rossami (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
"Nihongo" template
On this edit of yours: Using your favorite OS/browser combinations, when you look at the resulting page, what do you see?
When I look at it via the computer in my office, I see a mysterious and disconcerting gap after just about every series of kanji. When I look at it via the computer at home, I see a mysterious and disconcerting little "i" in its place. Uh-oh, the "nihongo" template.
What's it all for? As I understand it, for two purposes:
- It does something via CSS (I can't be bothered to look into the external stylesheet) to suggest to the browser that the browser should display Japanese.
- It links to Help:Japanese.
The first seems superfluous to me. Browsers that can handle UTF-8 can do this, if there's a font available. But I suppose it's harmless enough.
The second is all very well. But I wonder how many links to Help:Japanese are necessary. It's not as if there's any explanation of the particular kanji (cf the individualized pages generated from ISBN links); they're just link after link to the exact same page. Gods know how this repetition might help anyone.
Moreover, do you have any idea of the HTML payload of all this? Here's just one sample:
<i>Camera, Eye x Iron, Construction</i> <span style="font-weight: normal">(<span class="t_nihongo_kanji" lang="ja" xml:lang="ja">カメラ・眼×鉄・構成</span><span class="t_nihongo_norom" style="display:none"><span class="t_nihongo_comma" style="display:none">,</span> <i><span class="t_nihongo_romaji"><i>Camera, Eye x Iron, Construction</i></span></i></span><span class="t_nihongo_help"> <sup><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:9px; height:{{{height}}}; z-index:2;"><a href="/wiki/Image:Info_Sign.svg" class="image" title="Info Sign.svg"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Info_Sign.svg/9px-Info_Sign.svg.png" width="9" height="9" border="0" /></a><span style="position:absolute; top:0; left:0; padding-top:3px; z-index:3;"><a href="/wiki/Help:Japanese" title="Help:Japanese"><span style="float:left; width:9px; height:{{{height}}}; font-size:{{{height}}}; line-height:{{{height}}}; word-spacing:9px; cursor:pointer;"> </span></a></span></span></sup></span>)</span>
While there are plenty of opinions about what is and isn't good HTML, my own is that the style exemplified above might reasonably be called, excuse me, batshit style. (And as for the CSS, I've no idea what kind of value of "{{{height}}}" might mean.)
May I now draw your attention to Shōji Ueda. It's no great shakes as an article, but it's fresh on my mind as I twiddled with it just today. It has a minimum of "nihongo" and a maximum of "nihongo2". It looks a lot less distracting than if I'd used "nihongo", the HTML is a lot less bulked up, and there's still a conspicuous link to Help:Japanese
In the future, could you consider adding "nihongo2" rather than "nihongo" where possible? -- Hoary (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- PS The guidance to the browser that this is Japanese is probably limited to lang="ja" xml:lang="ja". That may help with audio browsers. I continue to be puzzled by Wikimedia's use of XHTML Transitional, which has no advantage over HTML. Of course, it can't move to (X)HTML Strict, not only because of all the people who love the FONT tag and similar junk but because of the fundamentally anachronistic and paper-based approach to italics and bold ("Forget about the function, just think of the appearance"). -- Hoary (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the amicable response. Cat and pigeons! -- Hoary (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
{{Oldprodfull}}
Hello, Closedmouth ...
Please see this talk page and tell me what you think of my newly created Template:Oldprodfull ... would you use it, or update it if you encountered it?
Please forgive this WP:CANVAS, but I noticed that you converted a second PROD to a PROD-2, so I thought that I would solicit your feedback. :-)
Also, what are your thoughts on my proposed WP:FLAG-BIO and other flag templates?
Happy Editing! — 72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 17:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: WP:JUSTAVOTE
Thanks, I was not aware. I'll abide by that from now on. Gary King (talk) 09:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Finding vandalism
Hey, question: Where do you go to find edits that might be vandalism? I want to fight vandalism but don't know where to start. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 09:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Just as an FYI, I reverted you here. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 07:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Fat Cunt
My edit was not a joke. Readers looking for information regarding Admiral Ackbar will not be offended. Please reference [4] for further information.
Thank you. 15:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
No, it is clearly not a joke edit, and you've been told numerous times to stop removing it from the article. This is Wikipedia, not Encyclopedia Dramatica. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.201.64 (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
England national sports team managers thingy
Yeah, it was a mistake. I've speedied it myself. Thanks. --Dweller (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Lol. I missed the "Category:" off the front of it. I couldn't work out what I'd done wrong till I got your speedy notice... never occurred to me to check my contribs. Duh. --Dweller (talk) 07:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Buddha disambig-cleanup
Hi Closedmouth -
Given that you changed the dab tag to dab-cleanup on Buddha, could you please add a few words to the talk page to help us understand what you feel needs to be cleaned up? I hope you can understand that by articulating your concerns it would help direct our efforts. (Just to be clear: I do not disagree that the page could benefit from a "clean up"; it's just that guidance about such would be beneficial for many reasons :-) ) Thanks so much. Best wishes,
Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maxwell's silver hammer cartoon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the belated welcome - I have been editing for about three years now :) It wasn't vandalism, but a deletion of a page which had been put up, as far as I can see solely to give false information for the purposes of supporting the sale of fake memorabilia. There is a long history of this. Look at the deletion logs for Last Memento of The Beatles and you will see what I mean. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Admin
Ever considered becoming one? --Dweller (talk) 17:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- The extra tools are the only reason to become an admin. You don't need to be an admin to be involved in the "bureaucracy or policy discussions or anything important like that", so that's an excellent start. I see what you mean about article writing - you would get objections for that, that's for sure, but the question is how many. I've seen plenty of good candidates who dont write articles pass RfA; I've also seen em fail, but they've usually got other failings too. The main criteria people want to see are (IMHO):
- civility
- experience
- understanding of WP policies surrounding the tool usage the candidate says they'd be interested in.
So, if I trawled your recent history, would I find (much) any civility? Experience, you seem to have plenty of. How bout the third one; I guess you'd like to be able to do your own speedying - do you ever participate in deletion debates? Do admins often knock back your speedy tags? --Dweller (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Chess Project
|
We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Chess, an attempt to build and maintain Chess-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the Participants section of WikiProject Chess. |
ChessCreator (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:47, 27 February 2008 (UTC)