User talk:Binodkpn
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Max Healthcare
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Max Healthcare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TeapotgeorgeTalk 12:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Max Healthcare
[edit]
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Max Healthcare. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. TeapotgeorgeTalk 12:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit]
- Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Because Wikipedia does not allow any form of spam or other promotion of people, products, companies or other groups (even non-commercial or charitable ones). Wikipedia's use for such purposes will result in the blocking of the account involved. Please read Wikipedia:FAQ/Organization and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for our rules about this.
In addition, user accounts are for individuals only, not for companies or groups or other collective editing. Your username should reflect this. Usernames that appear to be promotional (such as those that make reference to a company or product) violate our username policy and are typically blocked to enforce that policy.
- What can I do now?
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
If you do intend to make contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
- Add the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}below this message box. - Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Tell us what new username you want to use. Please make sure that your new username does not violate our username policy and check that it has not already been taken (click here to search).
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message box and replace the text "Your reason here" with the reason why. See also Wikipedia:Appealing a block for more information. – B.hotep •talk• 14:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC){{unblock|reason}}, and post the following directly underneath the unblock template:
If we unblock you and grant your name change (which actually seems OK), will you be interested in editing anything other than articles about the firm you were promoting? Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Definitely I would be interested in editing other articles related to healthcare industry as well as others. I've written about Max because they don’t have any article in Wiki. Max article page will really help people because they are one of the largest healthcare service providers in India. Before putting any article I'll make sure that my articles are not promotional and are in neutral tone, also I'll gather references for notability keeping in mind all the terms and conditions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxcaringforyou (talk • contribs)
{{unblock|I’m unable to change my user name, as the rename request page still shows the block .“ IP address is 59.92.166.43, and the block ID is #1504572” Please help.}}
- I can't believe I forgot that essential step. Sorry! Exploding Boy (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Max Healthcare. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Max Healthcare
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Max Healthcare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Drm310 (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Healthcare. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.
Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.
Here's an example of how to add references:
He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>
== References ==
{{reflist}}
That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.
Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.
Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 12:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
Binodkpn (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Hello!
[edit]Hello Binodkpn, what was it that you wanted to tell me just now on IRC? Regards,--Hallows AG (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Max Healthcare
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Max Healthcare, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Στc. 04:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Max Healthcare
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Max Healthcare. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:
- Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
- This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Max Healthcare
[edit]Hope you can breathe now. Happy Editing. -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles for creation/Max Healthcare
[edit]Hi. You made an Article for creation page, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Healthcare (2011-11-02), but it was never actually submitted for a review.
I have submitted it just now, so you should get feedback soon. Cheers! Chzz ► 00:17, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Healthcare.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ★ Pikks ★ MsG 09:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Greenply
[edit]Hi dude, welcome back! The article you created: Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Greenply is almost good. No doubt, very much notable they are. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- No thanks dude, its notability deserves a article on the topic. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- You have a message here. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 11:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for creating good-quality articles on Indian companies. Well done! --SupernovaExplosion Talk 15:24, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket
[edit]Hello Binodkpn,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Rushbugled13 (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:MSSH SAKET.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:MSSH SAKET.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: Max Super Speciality Hospital Patparganj
[edit]Is this the article you are referring to? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I am talking about this article...http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Max_Super_Speciality_Hospital,_Patparganj
- Ravi
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CNN-IBN, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and TV18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Max Super Speciality Hospital, Patparganj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ENT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Binodkpn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 203.122.33.125 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Rashapparels". The reason given for Rashapparels's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully. Why can't I edit Wikipedia? Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy. Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username? Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. What can I do now? If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following: Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ".
Decline reason: Well, normally this would be a simple matter. But then there's your actual behavior. You were blocked before for spamming and having a promotional username. You changed your name but went back to spamming for the exact same organization, which you explicitly said, in a message still visible on this very page, you would not do. I am therefore directly blocking you for spamming Wikipedia. Any new unblock requerst should address that issue. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to CNN-IBN may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- is responsible for the strategic, financial and operational management of CNN-IBN and IBN7. <ref>[http://www.campaignindia.in/Article/316881,dilip-venkatraman-appointed-ceo-ibn7.aspx Dilip
- 316881,dilip-venkatraman-appointed-ceo-ibn7.aspx Dilip Venkatraman appointed CEO of CNN-IBN & IBN7[</ref> In his earlier role he was responsible for all marketing operations for all existing and
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship
[edit]I have reverted your addition here. If you have not yet created your RFA, I politely advise you not to bother, per WP:TOOSOON. GiantSnowman 12:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
The article Max Super Speciality Hospital, Patparganj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 12:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
The article Max Hospital, Noida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 12:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
)
Binodkpn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am new to Wikipedia and learning many things on it. my article was not intended to promote and if it is i would say sorry for that. If this is the reason for block, i promise i won't make any edits to Max articles. Please don't disallow me from editing Wikipedia. please unblock me.
Decline reason:
you have been here for about four years. You are not new here, and know full well what promotion means. If you want to be unblocked you will need to explain both your understanding of promotion and also why you feel that four years experience qualifies you as a new editor. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note - Anthony Bradbury, the time since registering here would not equate to experience here. As someone with 200 edits, I think the editor would still be considered as new, given that I seem little to no non-template (or direct) interaction that others have with them (Direct interaction does correlate with experience, in my opinion). No comments on the promotional part. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 22:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Binodkpn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
According to me,promotion means publicizing or advertising a company, product, individual or service. As I already mentioned, I has no intention to promote anything on Wikipedia. I am on Wikipedia since last 4 years but made edits to some specific articles. there are numerous articles on Wikipedia that are directly promoting their products & services. For example, asian paints. If i agree to my mistake and ready to correct it, I think I should be allowed to move further. I want to learn more on Wikipedia and would request you to please consider my request.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Binodkpn (talk • contribs) 05:52, 3 July 2013
Decline reason:
No indication that this editor intends to or understands how to make non-promotional articles after numerous problematic episodes. Toddst1 (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Further Note to reviewing admin- As an Indian myself, I am familiar with most of the companies whose articles Binod is creating. I can also confirm that almost all of them, (excluding the Max hospitals where I have no prior idea about) are well known Indian companies, which would ordinarily get articles, and would have sources available for them. I highly doubt that there is any COI involved for all of them, since as far as I know, all of them are unrelated. I believe Binod could do much better with some help on how to write neutral articles, but otherwise just making sure they dont edit Max articles should be fine, In my humble opinion. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Max Healthcare, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Greenply logo.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Greenply logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Binodkpn, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable - sources are advertorial/PR, fails GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. creffett (talk) 20:36, 26 April 2020 (UTC)