Talk:GeoNet (New Zealand)
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 26 October 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that GeoNet (New Zealand) be renamed and moved to GeoNet. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
GeoNet (New Zealand) → GeoNet – GeoNet (New Zealand) appears to be the primary topic because 1: the other GeoNet does not exist anymore and 2: the New Zealand one is recognisable to most of the New Zealand population, whereas I doubt that many people would recognise the other GeoNet. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I'd be inclined to support this, partially based on the fact that earthquakes in New Zealand show up as spikes in view numbers for the German GeoNet article. I shall point out that the German GeoNet is still going, but only by name (it is an email hosting service these days). Schwede66 19:24, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural comment. This is a malformed request and should be procedurally closed if the format is not converted to a multi-move request. The proposed location of the article currently at GeoNet needs to be made explicit in the move request, and there is currently no notification that a move is under consideration at GeoNet or Talk:GeoNet. Dekimasuよ! 05:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]
( )
- Source: https://thespinoff.co.nz/science/11-10-2024/whos-the-aucklander-who-claims-to-feel-every-earthquake-in-new-zealand -- it says "certain appendage"
―Panamitsu (talk) 03:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC).
- Length, date, qpq, close paraphrase check ok. But is there a possibility for a second reference for the hook fact? The notion that 'certain appendage' is to be understood as a dick requires a bit of reading between the lines, but the ref also talks about this as an one-off incident. --Soman (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm okay. I've had a look for another source but couldn't find one. Does this mean that I have to find another fact? I've at least changed the plurality of the hook to address that concern.
Categories:
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- WikiProject Earthquakes articles
- C-Class New Zealand articles
- Mid-importance New Zealand articles
- WikiProject New Zealand articles
- C-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
- All WikiProject Volcanoes pages
- Requested moves
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know