Module talk:Political party/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Green Party of England and Wales

Is it sensible to add a new colour for the Green Party of England and Wales rather than just updating the existing one? Has this been done for any other party? I don't think it's really necessary to use two colours for the same party just because of a minor rebrand.  dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 13:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Agreed, this is not sensible. The Labour Party (UK) changed their colour in 2020 and this was simply reflected in the template. GPEW 2023- is not a new political party, so this new field is confusing and ambiguous. Joeykins82 (talk) 13:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Two options, either make a post-2023 variant to show the new colour, or change the colour and accept that pages referring which should show the old colour will not be correct. Primefac (talk) 13:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

I think the latter is fine – it's roughly the same hue and it's still widely recognisable as the party colour. Parties can change their shades quite often and making a new entry for each change could get out of hand.  dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 22:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 May 2023

change the Unity Party of America color to #733795 Vaulttec2022 (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -Lemonaka‎ 08:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Labor–Farm Party of Wisconsin

Can we get this row set with the color value #17aa5c to match the Wisconsin Green Party, a pseudo-successor party. That makes most sense to me. -- Asdasdasdff (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Also would like to see the shortname listed as "Labor–Farm". Thanks! -- Asdasdasdff (talk) 18:58, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

If you think it's uncontroversial, go for it. Primefac (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok will do, wasn't sure if this required some kind of approval process. -- Asdasdasdff (talk) 19:20, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Kuomintang has a abbrev KMT

Kuomintang has a general abbreviation KMT. That abbreviation is well known.

Democratic Progressive Party is already there with DPP abbrev. So KMT should be too.

—- Running 19:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome to add it in. Primefac (talk) 08:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 23 April 2023 Red Green Alliance - Request for a color change to Orange

Description of suggested change:

Over some time now, I've been reverting edits, and had edits reversed as a conflict has occured in relation to color codes for Danish Politics. So after arguing with other wikipedia editors, I have now acknowledged that there needs to be a solution. I will therefore apologize for my behavior, and I will admit that it has not been ideal. However, I hope you will consider my case, and I will now present the reasons I believe for why a color change is necessary for Red Green Alliance .

Here in Denmark, our main brodcasters are DR and TV2. They use some specific political colors assigned to the different parties we have at the moment. Both of them uses the color orange to represent the party, as seen here (Ø represent the party) . Apart from that on the official site of the parliament, orange is also the color used to represent Red Green Alliance (EL represents the party)

Here is two pictures to demonstrate why I believe that orange would be an improved color for the party.

(current)

(my proposal)

Another argument is that the color code used Danish People's Party is yellow. This is despite the fact yellow doesn't appear on their own website.

I really hope you will consider this, as I believe it would become easier to see the difference between Green Left and Red Green Alliance

To whoever reading this, have a nice day :)

Diff:

−

ORIGINAL_TEXT

+

CHANGED_TEXT

Thomediter (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Party colours should match what the party's logos etc are. The proposed change doesn't match. IMO the two colours are different enough to be visible (  ). Number 57 21:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

But Danish People's Party doesn't do that. Thomediter (talk) 21:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

So propose a change there. Number 57 21:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

No, because the point I want to make is that the top priority should be to make each party stand out from the others. Danish People's Party's other colors are red and blue, but we already have multiple parties with those colors. Therefore yellow is used on wikipedia, just like our brodcasters use yellow. It is the same for Die Linke, who has a red logo, but we use purple on wikipedia to seperate them from the SPD. I think the same should account here, so that Red-Green Alliance is easy to seperate from Green Left. Orange is the color used by the brodcasters. So as we have applied this logic for Danish People's Party and Die Linke, I think we should apply the same logic for Red-Green Alliance. Thomediter (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

But they already have colours that are visibly different (as shown above), so your suggestion is needless. I could equally argue that your proposal makes their colour too similar to the Social Democrats. Number 57 22:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Well the diagram should match the colors. Also you are trying to argue that these look alike?   , when one is red and the other is orange. Thomediter (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

It would if the parliament diagram module wasn't broken at the moment (or you could just update the svg version on commons). And yes, I personally can see much less difference between those colours than the two compared above. Number 57 22:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

If that is the case, then we should consider updating that color code too. Another thing is that Green Left and Red-Green Alliance are both closer to each other on parliament diagrams, and therefore not being able to see the difference between those two parties are a bigger issue. Thomediter (talk) 22:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Apart from that, on the parliament diagrams it is not easy to see the difference. I would like some other's inputs, even if it's also disagreement, cause if I'm in the wrong here, then so be it. But then I'd like an explanation for why we use a different logic for Danish People's Party and Die Linke. Thomediter (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

It appears the parliament diagram does not use the parties' logo colours, which I used above. This is where the problem lies. Number 57 22:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

I still think that having 3 colors that are red is way too much, when we have unused colors like orange. There is a reason our brodcasters use orange, and I think it will be confusing to see a different color when look at Danish sources, compared to looking on wikipedia. Thomediter (talk) 22:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

References

Still yet to be solved

- 25 April 2023 Thomediter (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

It's only been two days. WP:3O is always an option if no one is responding. Primefac (talk) 07:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi again :) I've now recieved agreement on this edit request from a third and fourth opinion. Apart from this, on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#RfC about party colours, another opinion argues that per WP:RS, supports the logic behind my edit request.

@Primefac Can this edit request be performed now? Thomediter (talk) 15:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, there seems to be a consensus, so you can implement your proposed changes. Primefac (talk) 10:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for looking at it :) Thomediter (talk) 10:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Dispute - Asking for a third opinion.

The color code being used for Red-Green Alliance is being discussed. The current color code being used is  . This color is being used due to the image of their logo on the Red-Green Alliance.

The discussion revolves around whether this should be maintained as the color.

The arguments for keeping the current color code   is

• We should use the color of the party's logo on wikipedia
• The colors of Red-Green Alliance  , Social Democrats   and Green Left   on here are not confusing

While the arguments for changing the current color code to  

• The media (DR, TV2, parliament site) in Denmark uses Orange for the party, and there is a personal analysis that the reason the media uses Orange is to make it stand out from other parties
• Other parties such as Danish People's Party and Liberal Alliance uses their media color instead of their logo color on Wikipedia
• Having red colors for 3 Danish parties, when there are not a very high number of Danish parties, are too many

Thomediter (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't understand why you are still pushing this. You got a third opinion in the other discussion (which you then tried to hide), which was to stick with the logo colour as is standard practice. Why try and create inconsistency... Number 57 22:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Because it matters a lot to me. I like spending my times on making Danish election pages, but I become so frustrated when the colors are too similar and doesn't make sense. Why have incosistency with some parties having their colors based on media and other parties based on logos. Thomediter (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Response to third opinion request (Disagreement on color code being used for Red-Green Alliance):

I am responding to a third opinion request for this page. I have made no previous edits on Module:Political party and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The third opinion process is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes.

It appears that reliable sources use orange for the Red-Green Alliance, so we should follow the reliable sources. "What about X" isn't a particularly compelling argument; perhaps the practice for Die Linke and Danish People's Party should be changed too. This issue might require a broader discussion (and potentially an RfC) to establish consensus. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Number 57 22:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

A third opinion given here argues that orange should be used as reliable sources uses Orange. I am asking for your permission to change the color code based on this. I'll give you some time to agree on it, if you won't allow it, we should find an agreement on how to further proceed the case.

Best regards, Thomediter (talk) 00:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't agree to it. I presume the provider of the third opinion isn't familiar with how party colours are usually decided on Wikipedia (similar to the issue you created on the Green Left one, where an editor who is familiar gave a third opinion, you ignored it and got another one that was different). If you want to get informed views on how to decide party colours, advertise this discussion at WT:E&R. Number 57 08:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I did not ignore it, it’s shocking that you can make yourself create a a wrong telling of events just to fit your preferred point of view. All I simply did was to point out that the third opinion did not include argumentation, which is required, and asked for a new one until the other one had argumentation. We had a new one which agreed with me, and now we have a 2-2 in that case.

Here because you disagree, your are saying that the editor isn’t qualified to give their opinion? I could just argue the same about editors who disagree with me.

Either I’m changing the color now, or we agree to start a bigger disscussion, to solve this issue.

Before when the third opinion agreed with you, you were ready to close the discussion, but now that the third opinion disagree with you, you consider it invalid. That’s not how it works. Thomediter (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

It's shocking that you would seek another opinion rather than wait for the third opinion provider to explain their rationale. It was clearly an attempt to try and bypass an opinion you sought but then disagreed with. Your conduct throughout this dispute has been appalling, even sinking so low as to add revenge !votes to AfDs I started. As for my view on the third opinion above, we have an established way of deciding party colours, and this clearly goes against it. I would like informed opinion rather than drive by ones. Number 57 09:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

THE Fourth opinion also agrees with me about the color change. Looking at the different parties we have on wikipedia, we can't conclude that party colors are chosen based on their logos, when at least all these parties (Die Linke - Liberal Alliance - Danish People's Party - DUP - Socialist Left Party - Christian Democratic Party - Swedish People's Party of Finland - Fine Gael - Lega - Forza Italia) doesn't have their party colors based on their logo, but on the media colors instead. I'm eager to change the color codes, but will wait for your permission of course. If not I'd like your help start a new broad discussion about this case. Thirdly, I can also wait of changing the Green Left color until we get more opinions there, but the arguments on this page agrees to change Red-Green Alliance to orange.

About the third opinion case on the other site. I agreed to consider it done as I read the third opinion, but later learned that argumentation was a requirement, and we didn't know if arguemntation would ever come, and so I listed it on the third opinion again until either argumentation or a new third opinion came.

Where should the eventual discussion take place? Thomediter (talk) 09:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

You could have waited a few hours, but were clearly desperate to get an opinion you agreed with. As I said above, the best place for a discussion is WT:E&R. Number 57 09:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I will add a talk page. It's true I was desperate to get an argumented third opinion, because the case means a lot to me, I didn't ask for an opinion I agreed with, I asked for argumentation as to why editors would believe I was wrong Thomediter (talk) 09:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Fourth opinion: much as I hate to disagree with N57,a much respected admin, it seems fairly clear here that insofar as any standardised colours exist for these two parties, it is indeed orange for the Green Red alliance and pink for the Green Left, usage we see across several different reliable sources. Picking the colour based on selecting part of the logo with no other evidence seems less robust and more like original research. I'd suggest we go ahead with the change. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I would strongly suggest we don't, and instead we have a proper discussion with editors who are familiar with how party colours are usually decided on Wikipedia. Number 57 09:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Aside from the WP:OWNership issues implied by the assertion that we have to wait for unspecified people "familiar with" the topic in question, it's not like those people's opinions would carry much weight anyway, if they don't conform to WP:V. If the only rationale for the dark red is that it's plucked by Wikipedians from a logo, versus numerous reliable sources using the orange, then there's not really anything those experts can say to alter the situation. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 09:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I agree with your saying here :)

Also an important factor is that currently when taking the color code from the logo on their website, it doesn't match with dark red, as it has been updated since. Logo's change relatively often, so to have their colors based on logos, would mean we'd might have to change color codes too often. On their website they even have a white logo as well, but we don't use white for the party. Thomediter (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Agree with this. I've seen no evidence of a consensus on color-picking, other than thr allegation that this is standard practice, but silence is the weakest form of consensus and that alleged consensus is being challenged now. If this is a broader issue, and disputes like this arrive often, I think an RfC at WT:E&R might be appropriate. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 1 August 2023

Description of suggested change: Could Module:Political party/D be restored to revision 1167046416 made on 10:06, 25 July 2023 and could Module:Political party/R also be restored to revision 1165601200 made on 06:30, 16 July 2023? The revisions following this by a guy named named Mikeblas as casued pages with the alternative parties of the Democratic and Republican parties (United States) to show no color in infoboxes and tables. 199.168.200.8 (talk) 02:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Could you give an example of where this is causing issues? I can't see anything obviously wrong with his changes that would cause them not to show up. Cheers, Number 57 05:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Courtesy ping to Mikeblas. Primefac (talk) 07:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

This is happening for any election that uses the state-level parties in their infoboxes. For instance, see the 2022 California State Assembly election page. Since the infobox was made using links to the California Democratic and California Republican parties, there are no colors in the infobox. UruGhan (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Ah, this is presumably because that article uses "California Democratic Party" rather than "Democratic Party (California)", so Mike's edits broke the redirect at Module:Political party/C to "Republican Party (US)". The solution is to go through all the modules and fix any double redirects like this. Perhaps some code/bot needs to be set up to identify any double redirects within the template and fix them? Cheers, Number 57 10:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Is there a way to fix this for all jurisdictions (the states, DC, and territories)? UruGhan (talk) 11:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

 Partly done: I've gone through and avoided any double redirects (i.e. US -> United States). Should all be good now. Primefac (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Actually, I meant to revert my changes completely when I figured out that this code is developing a short name and not a link target. I was trying to avoid links to redirects which I thought were consistently generated by this module, but this module isn't involved and it's instead the parameters to the template that cause the redirects.

I want to revert my changes to both Module:Political party/R and Module:Political party/D ... I thought I had done back on the 29th. Does that mean the compensating changes to Module:Political party/C should be rolled back at the same time? (I think so.) -- Mikeblas (talk) Mikeblas (talk) 16:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Let's figure out what we want this to look like, and I'll hit things with AWB and get all of them at once. Primefac (talk) 16:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 August 2023

Need to include some party colors for a few political parties inside Albania and add a few. Gjondeda (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Primefac (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Add Request: Vesna – Green Party

["Vesna – Green Party"] = {abbrev = "Vesna", color = "#00A65E", shortname = "",}, Jocafus (talk) 02:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

​ Go for it, though I will note that "Vesna" should go in shortname not abbrev. Primefac (talk) 07:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Perfect, done. Thanks! Jocafus (talk) 16:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Some Indonesian Political Parties

• ["Crescent Star Party (Indonesia)"] = {abbrev = "PBB", color = "#005825", shortname = "",},
• ["Reform Star Party"] = {abbrev = "PBR", color = "#BCDA00", shortname = "",},
• ["Prosperous Peace Party"] = {abbrev = "PDS", color = "#893BFF", shortname = "",},
• ["Concern for the Nation Functional Party"] = {abbrev = "PKPB", color = "#014133", shortname = "",},
• ["Indonesian Justice and Unity Party"] = {abbrev = "PKP", color = "#E4000E", shortname = "",},
• ["United Democratic Nationhood Party"] = {abbrev = "PDK", color = "##12452A", shortname = "",},
• ["Indonesian National Party Marhaenism"] = {abbrev = "PNIM", color = "#A50005", shortname = "",},
• ["Pioneers' Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FA0437", shortname = "Pelopor",},
• ["Indonesian Democratic Vanguard Party"] = {abbrev = "PDI", color = "#F90313", shortname = "",},

65434fedcd ^(Talk) 03:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

 Partly done: Some of these were already done. Primefac (talk) 06:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Partido Federal ng Pilipinas color

This was originally dark green, based on the party's original logo. It was changed to blue User:Siuhl10, based on the new logo. The party has changed logos on every election it participated (2019, 2022). If it changes logos in 2025, will we change the color as well?

Blue is problematic as a similar shade already used by the Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino. This causes confusion as both parties have put up presidential and vice presidential candidates in history. Granted, PFP green is very similar to National Unity Party green, but perhaps we can change PFP green to another shade of green. Even in 2022, UniTeam used PFP green in its logo, along with Hugpong ng Pagbabago red. Green is their campaign color. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps of changing the shade of PFP's green, we should instead change NUP's. Since the color code #97c639ff is much more fitting for the NUP than the darker shade it currently has. Siuhl10 (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Then it would be similar to the Nacionalista Party color (but not too similar re: PFP vs NUP). Also, I have a long-standing project about Philippine political party colors here in Wikipedia here. For the fifth Republic, I'd agree with you on changing NUP colors to this one that you suggested as Nacionalistas won't be using this shade any more.

With that being said, I'd be okay with your suggestion at this time, only that we have to change some maps as NUP has been far more active in elections than PFP, and probably a slightly darker color. Howard the Duck (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Citizens Coalition for Change

Two requests in regard to this party:

1) Is it possible to have the name be recognised both with and without a capital F on the word 'for'?

2) The graphic designers of the political maps have had a discussion and have colour-matched the campaign material that the CCC uses to the colour #FAE64D. Please could the colour for this party be updated to reflect this more yellow/less orange tone?

Thank you! Mangwanani ^(talk) 21:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Number 57 21:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Add request: Third Way (Poland)

["Third Way (Polish political alliance)"] = {abbrev = "TD", color = "#4FBD90", shortname = "Third Way",},

Note: this color is taken from campaign material (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=675045017993055&set=a.148315667332662) and is slightly different than the currently used PSL color (#2ED397). CrimsonCube (talk) 15:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Number 57 21:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

National Constitutional Assembly

Based off recent electoral campaigning, the NCA is now using orange as their party colour: #EA6646 Could this please be updated accordingly? Mangwanani ^(talk) 14:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Number 57 21:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Mavambo/Kusile/Dawn

Simba Makoni used yellow for his 2008 Presidential Campaign. Please could this colour be updated accordingly. Green was restricted for ZANU-PF in 2008... Thank you! Mangwanani ^(talk) 10:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Number 57 21:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

America Coming Together Party

["America Coming Together Party"] = {abbrev = "ACT", color = "#890200", shortname = "ACT",}, BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 20:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

​ go for it, though I will note "ACT" should not be in the shortname, just the abbrev. Primefac (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Liverpool Community Independents

Liverpool Community Independents (abbrev: LCI) (actually a registered party, not just an independent group) uses colour   #9f0000 Nattatatat (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

 Already done They've been added to the template, though with the slightly different   by dummelaksen. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

May I get a Sanseitō color?

Same color (Orange) as the one from Sanseito's Wikipedia Japan Article, thanks! https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%82%E6%94%BF%E5%85%9A#%E5%85%9A%E6%AD%8C U2You Too (talk) 13:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done I've updated the color from   to  . Elli (talk | contribs) 06:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Request to change Janata Party Color

The JP is now used purple as their party colour: #800080 Could this please be updated accordingly? P J Chatterjee (talk) 10:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: @P J Chatterjee: Can you please clarify exactly which party you're talking about and provide a source for them using this color? Elli (talk | contribs) 06:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Add Request: There is One Poland

["There is One Poland"] = {abbrev = "PJJ", color = "#0054A5",}, KrzysztofRCV (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 06:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Asar (political party)

["Asar (political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF0000", shortname = "Asar",}, ShadZ01 (talk) 00:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

 Already done by N Panama 84534 in Special:Diff/1168195283 Elli (talk | contribs) 07:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 8 October 2023

Description of suggested change: To change the Move Forward Party's colour from that of the current one which neither matches the orange hex value present on the party's official website nor on the party logo as it appears on their official website. The proposed edit seeks to change it to the colour as used by the menu text present on the party's official website.

Diff:

−

["Move Forward Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F2A", shortname = "Move Forward",},

+

["Move Forward Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF6A00", shortname = "Move Forward",},

KrebsLovesFiesh (Talk) 13:42, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Going to need more, editor KrebsLovesFiesh: First, here are the two colors...

• #FF7F2A =  
• #FF6A00 =  

Need you to point me to the exact location on their official website where, as you say, the orange hex value is shown. I looked all over and didn't find it. Thank you for your help in this! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 17:59, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Ah @Paine Ellsworth, it's simply that the proposed colour value is taken from the text on the header of the website (I eyedropped it with Photoshop). The first colour (#FF7F2A) is that which is on the logo of the party present on the website, and the second (#FF6A00) is taken from the colour that the website itself uses for navigational texts and things. There is no explicitly stated colour value that you can find on their website, so this'll have to be your discretion whether to take the colour used in the logo itself or to take the colour that the website header text uses. KrebsLovesFiesh (Talk) 03:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Interesting, editor KrebsLovesFiesh. When the MFP was added with [this edit] back in April by editor PLATEL using the #FF7F2A   hex color code, he probably did something similar to find the code for the logo of the party. I can see by looking at the website, which uses several different shades of orange in various contexts, how this might be confusing. Why do you think it's better to use the color from texts and things instead of the color of the logo? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

@Paine Ellsworth On second thought, yeah. I think it will be better if we stick to the colour of the actual party logo. As for topical variations, I will just use the specific hex code where needed. Thank you for having me think about it that way. KrebsLovesFiesh (Talk) 06:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

It's my pleasure, and thank you for your edits! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 07:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

United Right (Poland) color

["United Right (Poland)"] = {abbrev = "ZP", color = "#263778", shortname = "United Right",},

Currently ZP uses PiS color but since the alliance is used in 2019 election templates (and will probably be used in 2023) it would be a great convenience to have it. CrimsonCube (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done Already in Module:Political party/U. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Greek Solution

93C4EB, please change the color, that is the colour by its logo Greek Rebel (talk) 17:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

The color of the blue part of Greek Solution's logo is slightly variable, but the colors of the interface website on the party's website are different.

• Current:   #5493CE
• Proposed:   #93C4EB
• Website:   #3576CC

As such, I have chosen #3576CC as the new color. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:01, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 24 October 2023

Argentine political party Renewal Front and its abbrevation:

Diff:

−

FR-PJ (stand from Justicialist Party)

+

FR

Segagustin (talk) 16:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

 Already done this is already listed at Module:Political party/R. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Movement fo Autonomy color

@Nick.mon I saw that you reverted my edit about the Movement for Autonomy's color, but it seems to me that its official color is the orange, not the Robin egg blue. In which graphs is robin egg blue used to indicate party? Scia Della Cometa (talk) 11:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@Scia Della Cometa: This color was used in the graph about the 2008 general election, and all the Sicilian parliaments since 2008. Moreover, the color you proposed is quite similar to those of UDEUR and Great South. And despite than little portion of the logo, orange wasn't used by the party, if I remember well, all the electoral posters were in blue or azure. -- Nick.mon (talk) 16:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Polisario Front's colour

The colour of Polisario Front here should be changed. I assume the colour red was chosen due to Polisario being seen as some sort of communist party. The colour is however not used by the Front to represent Polisario itself, with the logo having orange as the dominant colour. That's why I request to change it to the hex colour #E16026, which derives from the logo itself (as based on the source of the one used in the infobox). I am using this colour in the template for the national liberation movement and I think it's more fitting. Tidjani Saleh (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 5 November 2023

I challenge the current 'abbreviation' of Direction – Social Democracy SMER–SD. First, SMER–SD does not fulfill the essence of the acronym. SMER should not be written in capital letters, because they are not initial letters of words in a phrase, but actually is a single word in the Slovak language (Direction).

Secondly, the dash, which in the abbreviation SMER–SD is supposed to fulfill the function of connecting with the epithet 'Social Democracy' brings confusion because it creates the appearance of connecting two acronyms. To give an example, when you want to list the current ruling coalition in Slovakia with this abbreviation, it would have to be SMER–SD–HLAS–SD–SNS, which creates the impression that the coalition consists of 5 entities and is graphically unclear and inconsistent.

I propose the following solution to this problem: remove the current abbreviation and introduce the shortname 'Smer'.

This shortname complies with customs and is both content and graphically consistent.

I add other examples to confirm: Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance (Fidesz – Magyar Polgári Szötségé) uses the abbreviation Fidesz, not the shortname-acronym Fidesz–MPS. Just like the Latvian Social Democratic Party "Harmony" (Sociālmokratiskā partija "Saskaņa") does not use something like SDP SASKAŅA or SDP–SASKAŅA, but simply just the short name 'Harmony'. If we look at the common abbreviation used in Slovak and also in the international press, there is no consensus reached, we can find SMER–SD, Smer–SD, and finally Smer.

In addition: this political party was founded in 1999 as Direction (Smer) and adopted the epithet 'Social Democracy' only in 2005, so if the abbreviation SMER–SD is used for the elections from 1999 until 2005, it is not correct.

90.64.71.124 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

I challenge the current 'abbreviation' of Voice – Social Democracy HLAD–SD. First, HLAS–SD does not fulfill the essence of the acronym. HLAS should not be written in capital letters, because they are not initial letters of words in a phrase, but actually is a single word in the Slovak language (Voice or Vote).

Secondly, the dash, which in the abbreviation HLAS–SD is supposed to fulfill the function of connecting with the epithet 'Social Democracy' brings confusion because it creates the appearance of connecting two acronyms. To give an example, when you want to list the current ruling coalition in Slovakia with this abbreviation, it would have to be SMER–SD–HLAS–SD–SNS, which creates the impression that the coalition consists of 5 entities and is graphically unclear and inconsistent.

I propose the following solution to this problem: remove the current abbreviation and introduce the shortname 'Hlas'.

This shortname complies with customs and is both content and graphically consistent.

I add other examples to confirm: Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance (Fidesz – Magyar Polgári Szötségé) uses the abbreviation Fidesz, not the shortname-acronym Fidesz–MPS. Just like the Latvian Social Democratic Party "Harmony" (Sociālmokratiskā partija "Saskaņa") does not use something like SDP SASKAŅA or SDP–SASKAŅA, but simply just the short name 'Harmony'. If we look at the common abbreviation used in Slovak and also in the international press, there is no consensus reached, we can find HLAS–SD, HLAS–SD, and finally Hlas. 90.64.71.124 (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Shas Request for a color change

Shas's colors in the template are now   black and   gold. but in their publications the main color is yellow (or gold...) and i should be the first color. its is a bit strange to pic black as the main color. I suggest that it will be change to:   gold   black or   yellow   black. 5.22.135.54 (talk) 08:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Conservative Union of the Right

Hello. The color of the Conservative Union of the Right is #100A54. Can you make a template for it? Thanks. 95.87.235.200 (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Free Voters of Bavaria #FF8000

cc @Brainiac242:

I would like to suggest to harmonize national "Free Voters" (FW) and state "Free Voters of Bavaria" (FWB) to both use orange  , and use the same orange as in de:Vorlage:Wahldiagramm/Partei/DE to support multi-lingual diagrams across wikipedias like c:File:Composition of the German Bundesrat as a pie chart small.svg, thanks. Aeroid (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

see Sync colors from dewiki below.

Aeroid (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done (see below) Aeroid (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Sync colors from dewiki

Following my earlier subject, I would actually expand my suggestion to use all major parties colors from the German template for political party colors also here. In most cases the differences are minor and using these colors should not add issues here, I guess.

A synched color scheme would allow election diagrams on Commons to match to both Wikipedias: enwiki and dewiki.

German election diagram colors EN vs DE

EN	DE	Party
#161a1d	#000000	Christian Democratic Union
#64a12d	#46962b	The Greens
#e3010f	#E3000F	Social Democratic Party
#be3075	#BE3075	The Left
#ffed00	#FFFF00	Free Democratic Party
#008ac5	#0088CE	Christian Social Union in Bavaria
#f59b00	#FF8000	Free Voters
#007e82	#FF8000	Free Voters of Bavaria
#009ee0	#009EE0	Alternative for Germany

Changes:

["Christian Democratic Union of Germany"] = {abbrev = "CDU", color = "#000000", shortname = "",},
["Alliance 90/The Greens"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#46962b", shortname = "Greens",},
["Social Democratic Party of Germany"] = {abbrev = "SPD", color = "#E3000F", shortname = "",},
["Free Democratic Party (Germany)"] = {abbrev = "FDP", color = "#FFFF00", shortname = "",},
["Christian Social Union in Bavaria"] = {abbrev = "CSU", color = "#0088CE", shortname = "",},
["Free Voters"] = {abbrev = "FW", color = "#FF8000", shortname = "",},
["Free Voters of Bavaria"] = {abbrev = "FWB", color = "#FF8000", shortname = "",},

Aeroid (talk) 21:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

@Aeroid: I support using the same colours in both Wikipedias. I oppose simply copying the colours used in the German version to the English version, or vice versa. I think we need to look at the actual colours used in the party logos to decide which colours to use. I downloaded all the logos used in the infoboxes of both Wikipedias and checked:

Party	Party logo(s)	Colour(s) used	Notes / Opinion
Social Democratic Party of Germany		#E3000F	The German Wikipedia already uses the colour in the logo (top), and the colour in the flag (bottom) is only slightly different. As the English Wikipedia uses neither, I think we should use the colour from the German wiki.
		#E30013
Christian Democratic Union of Germany		#151518	Logo and flag use the same colour, which is different from both the German and the English versions. I think we should use this colour in both.
		#151518
Christian Social Union in Bavaria		#008AC5	The opposite of the SPD. The English Wikipedia already uses the colour in the logo. The German Wikipedia uses neither. I think we should use the colour from the English wiki.
		#0E88D3
Alliance 90/The Greens		#409A3C	All four colours are different. I think we should use one of these in both Wikipedias. I’d prefer the colour of the logo (top), as that is what we are doing (hopefully) with the SPD and the CSU.
		#1FA12D
Free Democratic Party		#FFED00	Logo and flag use the same colour, which is the one used in the English Wikipedia. I think we should use it in both.
		#FFED00
Alternative for Germany		#0066A5	The logo uses a gradient of these two colours. We can use either one of them, or the average of the two (#0084C2:  ). Or just leave it as it is, seeing as both wikis agree for once.
		#00A2DE
The Left		#DC0000	Both logo and flag use the same shade of red, but it’s customary to use purple/pink for The Left to distinguish it from the SPD. Both wikis use the exact same purple/pink, so we should probably leave that one.
		#DC0000
Free Voters	Logo used in the English Wikipedia Logo used in the German Wikipedia	#F7A600	Interestingly, both wikis use orange (the colour of the sun) instead of blue (the colour of the text), possibly to distinguish the party from the CSU and the AfD. The two logos use a different shade of blue for the text, but in both the sun uses a gradient of these exact two colours. We can use either one of them, or the average of the two (#F49700:  ).
		#F18700
Free Voters of Bavaria		#F7A800	I agree with you, I think we should use the same colour for both the federal and the state parties. Possibly this one, as this sun has a solid colour instead of a gradient.

Brainiac242 (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Good discussion!

Let me summarize to check that I understand your suggestion:

German election diagram colors EN vs DE

EN	DE	Brainiac242	Party
#161A1D	#000000	#151518	Christian Democratic Union
#64A12D	#46962B	#409A3C	The Greens
#E3010F	#E3000F	#E3000F	Social Democratic Party
#BE3075	#BE3075	#BE3075	The Left
#FFED00	#FFFF00	#FFED00	Free Democratic Party
#008AC5	#0088CE	#008AC5	Christian Social Union in Bavaria
#F59B00	#FF8000	#F7A800	Free Voters
#007E82	#FF8000	#F7A800	Free Voters of Bavaria
#009EE0	#009EE0	#00A2DE	Alternative for Germany

This would mean the following changes here in enwiki:

["Christian Democratic Union of Germany"] = {abbrev = "CDU", color = "#151518", shortname = "",},
["Alliance 90/The Greens"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#409A3C", shortname = "Greens",},
["Social Democratic Party of Germany"] = {abbrev = "SPD", color = "#E3000F", shortname = "",},
["Free Voters"] = {abbrev = "FW", color = "#F7A800", shortname = "",},
["Free Voters of Bavaria"] = {abbrev = "FWB", color = "#F7A800", shortname = "",},
["Alternative for Germany"] = {abbrev = "AfD", color = "#00A2DE", shortname = "",},

...and these changes to dewiki (just touching dark/dunkel colors for now):

 |CDU = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=cccccc|dunkel=151518|link=[[Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands|CDU]]}}
 |CSUE = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=a4c8eb|dunkel=008AC5|link=[[Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern|CSU]]}}
 |GRÜNE|Grüne = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=9bd29b|dunkel=409A3C|link=[[Bündnis 90/Die Grünen|Grüne]]}}
 |FDP = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=ffff99|dunkel=FFED00|link=[[Freie Demokratische Partei|FDP]]}}
 |FW(BV) = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=F5BE95|dunkel=F7A800|link=[[Freie Wähler (Partei)|FW]]}}
 |FW(BY) = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=F5BE95|dunkel=F7A800|link=[[Landesvereinigung Freie Wähler Bayern|FW]]}}
 |AfD|AFD = {{#switch: {{{2|}}}|hell=99ccff|dunkel=00A2DE|link=[[Alternative für Deutschland|AfD]]}}

PS: I'll crosspost to the german discussion page to get hear their opinion, once you confirm that my summary of your suggestion is correct.

--Aeroid (talk) 11:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

@Aeroid: I made some corrections to your edit. I proposed changing the colour of the Greens in both Wikipedias (not just the English), the colour of the CSU only in the German (not both), and the colour of the SPD only in the English (not both). I also removed the colours of the CDU/CSU in your German changes because that wasn’t discussed, and I’m not actually sure we should be using the same colour for the Union as for the CDU (see here). Other than that, it all looks good.

I just want to clarify that these aren’t hard suggestions, and I’d also be in favour of using, for example, #1FA12D for the Greens and #F49700 for Free Voters. Brainiac242 (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, gave notice on dewiki to join discussion. de:Vorlage Diskussion:Wahldiagramm/Partei/DE#Notice: Color harmonization discussion on enwiki Aeroid (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't see averaging colors across de/en as a solution in general. It would be as good as a single change on either side. Currently I see no need to "compromise". (Greens)

It would be much more desireable to me, if we can get closer to some "reality", if that isn't creating some othe problem. Aeroid (talk) 12:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

@Aeroid: I never suggested averaging the colours used in the English and German Wikipedias as a compromise. As I said in the table above, the AfD and FW logos use a color gradient of two shades of the same colour (blue for AfD and orange for FW). My example of another acceptable colour for FW (#F49700) is the average of those two shades. My example of another acceptable colour for the Greens (#1FA12D) is the colour used in the second party logo in the table above. My (apparently rather bad) clarification was: “Yes, I suggested the colours in your summary, but I also suggested others in the table above, and if other editors prefer any of those to the ones in the summary, I’d support those as well.” Brainiac242 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Gotcha! They make it quite difficult to find a better source for the "real" color, just look at their various section. on a website, different websites and logos. This is nothing we can solve for them. So, let's not bind ourselfs religiously to the exact colors the party use (and change more often than we would like).

Of course, our main goal with these templates/modules is to distinguish them whenever they are displayed together (in a diagram) and use a color across the wiki that generally is associated with them politically.

This suggestion is just to harmonize across wikis and better use common diagrams.

I'm fine with your suggestions. Aeroid (talk) 15:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't hear any further things to consider. Neigther here nor on the German discussion page. Thus I guess we could head into implementing the sugesstion soon. Aeroid (talk) 06:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I agree. I can change the colours here and you do it in the German Wikipedia. One more thing, would you also support using #00A2DE for the AfD instead? Unlike the other colour, this one is actually used in the logo and is a bit more different from the colour of the CSU. Brainiac242 (talk) 10:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

It's not such a big issue: e.g. German article on Bavarian Parlament uses the alternative black for CSU, which is often used if you don't need to distinguish CSU / CDU sister parties on same chart. But since it was part of the suggestion to be reviewed on both wikis, lets implement the changeset including it. Aeroid (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

All done here. Brainiac242 (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Also done in dewiki. I'll update the Bundesrat diagram over the weekend! Great collaboration and thanks for raising the issue. Aeroid (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done Aeroid (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Better Way 2022

Hi, please could you add the following;

["Better Way 2022"] = {abbrev = "BW", color = "#3494CD", shortname = "Better Way",},

Colour taken from the title text on its website, rather than its logo to avoid confusion with Reform Jersey (   vs   )

Thanks :) Saltywalrusprkl (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

@Saltywalrusprkl: done. In the future you should use an edit request to make sure someone will see your proposed change. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

The Collaborative Party

Need color for a newly formed political party:  

Color is taken from their official website U2You Too (talk) 09:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2023 (2)

Progress Party (Jersey);  #FF0000 →  #D32126, add abbreviation and shortname without disambiguator.

["Progress Party (Jersey)"] = {abbrev = "PP", color = "#D32126", shortname = "Progress Party",},

Color taken from the logo on the last version of their website.

Thanks :) Saltywalrusprkl (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 21:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2023

Remove the shortname "Liberal Conservatives" from Jersey Liberal Conservatives. ["Jersey Liberal Conservatives"] = {abbrev = "JLC", color = "#3741F0", shortname = "",},

"Liberal Conservatives" isn't used by the party or in any media reporting as far as I can tell. Either the full name or "JLC" is used. [1][2][3][4] Saltywalrusprkl (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 21:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 28 November 2023

Description of suggested change:

Color change as in party's logo: File:Suwerenna Polska logo.png (text) and party's official website: link.

Diff:

−

["Sovereign Poland"] = {abbrev = "SP", color = "#AAAAAA", shortname = "",},

+

["Sovereign Poland"] = {abbrev = "SP", color = "#04337c", shortname = "",},

— Antoni12345 (talk) 17:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. SWinxy (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 1 December 2023

Description of suggested change: Add

["Aberdeen United Trades Council"] = {abbrev = "AUTC", color = "#DA0F19", shortname = "Trades Council",},

See Aberdeen Trades Union Council, former name that they ran candidates under, color picked from current logo.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguin1737 (talk • contribs) 00:17, December 1, 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. The part you want to edit is at Module:Political party/A. SWinxy (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

New Hope (Poland)

Hi, request for pacing an entry for the New Hope (Poland) party, formerly KORWiN which has its entry.

• ["New Hope (Poland)"] = {abbrev = "NN", color = "#e5b813ff", shortname = "New Hope",}

Color   #e5b813ff originates from party's logo: File:New Hope (Poland) logo.png (right side of the crown) avalible on party's official website. — Antoni12345 (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

@Antoni12345: do you think we should keep the entry for KORWiN or make it an alias for the New Hope (Poland)? Elli (talk | contribs) 21:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

In my opinion it should be kept as it was widely used name for the party for a long time between 2015 and 2022. In that period party was active - it took part in many elections - so it's for shure used in many wiki articles (like it should). — Antoni12345 (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Lightoil (talk) 03:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 19 November 2023

Description of suggested change:

Changing the Color of the Swiss Political Party " Geneva Citizens' Movement" from the current color to #CE9D24 to differentiate from the Party Color of the "Evangelical People's Party of Switzerland" and to match it with the color of the German Wikipedia site.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.199.150.60 (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:49, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Edit request 13 December 2023

Description of suggested change: To change the party name and colour to the correct version as present on the Thai Election Commission website. The name here seems to be a direct translation of the party name so I'm not sure if that's what it is or if there's indeed another party with that exact name. If the latter is the case making a new listing is also acceptable. The source for the party name and colour derived from the officially given logo is present here.

Diff:

−

["New Social Power Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#2B934A", shortname = "",},

+

["Plung Sungkom Mai"] = {abbrev = "PSM", color = "#972C36", shortname = "",},

KrebsLovesFiesh (Talk) 09:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done. Kept New Social Power Party as alternative name for backwards compatibility. TGHL ↗ 🍁 21:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Volt Cyprus (Cyprus)

Hey, could you add the color fpr the political party Volt Cyprus

abbrev = Volt

color = same as for Volt Greece or Volt Europa, HEX #502379 / RGB 80 35 121 / CMYK 82 98 0 12 Heideneii (talk) 17:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done TGHL ↗ 🍁 21:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Direction - Social Democracy (Slovakia)

I challenge the current 'abbreviation' of Direction – Social Democracy SMER–SD. First, SMER–SD does not fulfill the essence of the acronym. SMER should not be written in capital letters, because they are not initial letters of words in a phrase, but actually is a single word in the Slovak language (Direction).

Secondly, the dash, which in the abbreviation SMER–SD is supposed to fulfill the function of connecting with the epithet 'Social Democracy' brings confusion because it creates the appearance of connecting two acronyms. To give an example, when you want to list the current ruling coalition in Slovakia with this abbreviation, it would have to be SMER–SD–HLAS–SD–SNS, which creates the impression that the coalition consists of 5 entities and is graphically unclear and inconsistent.

I propose the following solution to this problem: remove the current abbreviation and introduce the shortname 'Smer'.

This shortname complies with customs and is both content and graphically consistent.

I add other examples to confirm: Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance (Fidesz – Magyar Polgári Szötségé) uses the abbreviation Fidesz, not the shortname-acronym Fidesz–MPS. Just like the Latvian Social Democratic Party "Harmony" (Sociālmokratiskā partija "Saskaņa") does not use something like SDP SASKAŅA or SDP–SASKAŅA, but simply just the short name 'Harmony'. If we look at the common abbreviation used in Slovak and also in the international press, there is no consensus reached, we can find SMER–SD, Smer–SD, and finally Smer.

In addition: this political party was founded in 1999 as Direction (Smer) and adopted the epithet 'Social Democracy' only in 2005, so if the abbreviation SMER–SD is used for the elections from 1999 until 2005, it is not correct. 91.127.208.210 (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

U.S. Taxpayers Party (Affiliate of Constitution Party (United States))

The U.S. Taxpayers Party is the name of the Michigan affiliate of the Constitution Party (United States). It was also the name of the Constitution Party (United States) until the late 1990s/early 2000s. When putting U.S. Taxpayers' Party into the election box template to get this color, it changes the name automatically to the US Constitution Party. There are a number of candidates in historic articles and present articles that are on the ballot under the former name. Is there a way to create a template that does not change the name? Mpen320 (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 27 December 2024

["Gerindra Party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#B79164", shortname = "Gerindra",},

This color is often used as the party color.

• https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSzQQGVXDZxM0dQVa8E_aQACEA0pjU9cSM2Xg&usqp=CAU
• https://asset.kompas.com/crops/wQF2OLV73MdSFeW-i66ni-Bnukg=/0x0:0x0/750x500/data/photo/2020/02/06/5e3ba73eda15c.jpg
• https://filebroker-cdn.lazada.co.id/kf/S9a7a7ebf93a64fc3ad10e393c6a01c94Z.jpg

👤^{📝📖🔬🧪} 00:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: Not convinced this is more prominent as their color than the dark red in their logo. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 27 January 2024

Add party

−

+

["United People's Party (Poland)"] = {abbrev = "ZSL", color = "#05764eff", shortname = "United People's Party",},

Colour is approximate. From: [1]. Colour is the one used for background of the banners [2] and wall plaques [3] rather than the logo. Also I'm not a native English speaker so I'm not shure if it shouldn't be "United Peoples' Party" instead of "United People's Party". Chears! — Antoni12345 (talk) 19:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done I've changed the color per your request. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 14 February 2024

Please add Democratic Hope, it's color is #DE2118 and as far as I know it doesn't have a shortname. Charles Essie (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 23:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Green Party of Finland shortname change

the shortname for the Finnish Green Party, "VIHR" should be changed to the plain, English "Greens", or alternatively, the Green League, as the shortname is simply a shorthand for the color in Finnish. Wikipedia doesn't refer to the German greens as "Grüne" in the infoboxes, so why should the Finnish Greens be any different?

"VIHR" looks strange and it seems to be directly copied from Finnish language articles, that simply shorten political parties' names. They do this to every other Finnish political party, with shortnames like "kok." "sd." and "ps." to refer to the National Coalition, the Social Democrats, and the Finns Party. However, in English Wikipedia, these are correctly named with their proper English translation, with the exception of the Green Party's "VIHR". I say this should be corrected. Starredlabrador (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

 Completed, editor Starredlabrador. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 23:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 15 February 2024

Please add Broad Democratic Alliance, it's abbreviation is ADA and it's color is #15D9FB. Charles Essie (talk) 03:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Curious, you appear to be an extended-confirmed editor. While the main module, Module:Political party, is template-protected, the sub-module, Module:Political party/B, is only extended-confirmed-protected. Why don't you make this edit yourself? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 05:53, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

I didn't realize I could. Charles Essie (talk) 05:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Thought that might be the case. Let me know if you need further assistance. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 06:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate it and it's done. Charles Essie (talk) 06:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Happy to help! Paine  06:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Query: colours of Plaid Cymru, and Sinn Féin

Could someone look at the colours of the parties, Plaid Cymru (Wales/UK), and Sinn Féin (Ireland, Northern Ireland)? They look the same shade of green and I'm not sure that they are the same, I think they need to be different. doktorb _words^deeds 00:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 23 February 2024

["Acción Democrática Nacional"] = {abbrev = "ADN", color = "#6F2C91",} Eveintimilla (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

New Future Party (South Korea)

I would like to request the color of New Future Party (South Korea) be changed from the current   #003153 to   #2ad2c9. The latter color is already used as the primary color on Korean Wikipedia and there are photos (linked below) that strongly suggest the proposed color is used as the party's main color while the current one is used exclusively on the logo.

• https://search.pstatic.net/common/?src=http%3A%2F%2Fimgnews.naver.net%2Fimage%2F001%2F2024%2F02%2F28%2FPYH2024022804840001300_P4_20240228102609658.jpg&type=sc960_832 (color is used on candidate's jackets and for the background)

• https://postfiles.pstatic.net/MjAyNDAyMjdfMjUw/MDAxNzA4OTYxMDM5OTU5._af-EoBnCRGc2MdII-D6XfMXeI_wVeQ0u7VCb90OAuYg.IvQnY5MQ1-Tsj2b3PGSdFuYNLzlsjR3sjsdTKUNX_cQg.JPEG/20240227%EF%BC%BF002320.jpg?type=w773 (color is used on a party poster) MogasTheThird (talk) 05:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Direction - Social Democracy (Slovakia)

I challenge the current 'abbreviation' of Direction – Social Democracy SMER–SD. First, SMER–SD does not fulfill the essence of the acronym. SMER should not be written in capital letters, because they are not initial letters of words in a phrase, but actually is a single word in the Slovak language (Direction).

Secondly, the dash, which in the abbreviation SMER–SD is supposed to fulfill the function of connecting with the epithet 'Social Democracy' brings confusion because it creates the appearance of connecting two acronyms. To give an example, when you want to list the current ruling coalition in Slovakia with this abbreviation, it would have to be SMER–SD–HLAS–SD–SNS, which creates the impression that the coalition consists of 5 entities and is graphically unclear and inconsistent.

I propose the following solution to this problem: remove the current abbreviation and introduce the shortname 'Smer'.

This shortname complies with customs and is both content and graphically consistent.

I add other examples to confirm: Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance (Fidesz – Magyar Polgári Szötségé) uses the abbreviation Fidesz, not the shortname-acronym Fidesz–MPS. Just like the Latvian Social Democratic Party "Harmony" (Sociālmokratiskā partija "Saskaņa") does not use something like SDP SASKAŅA or SDP–SASKAŅA, but simply just the short name 'Harmony'. If we look at the common abbreviation used in Slovak and also in the international press, there is no consensus reached, we can find SMER–SD, Smer–SD, and finally Smer.

In addition: this political party was founded in 1999 as Direction (Smer) and adopted the epithet 'Social Democracy' only in 2005, so if the abbreviation SMER–SD is used for the elections from 1999 until 2005, it is not correct. 90.64.70.228 (talk) 12:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 25 February 2024

Czech Political Parties I would like to request changes to several Czech or Czechoslovak parties.

Senator 21 changed its name to SEN 21 and its color to #1a4973 shown here

The Left (Czech Republic) changed its color slightly to #d70e44 can be find here

German National Party color should be #75781A

Slovak National Party (historical) should be #214F15

German Liberal Party (Czechoslovakia) should be #23B68A

Hungarian National Party (Czechoslovakia) should be #23B68

United Jewish Parties (Czechoslovakia) were translated incorrectly and should be called Associated Jewish Parties (Czechoslovakia). "Sdružené" in original is closer to Associated then to United (which would be "Sjednocené"). Their color should be #291CE8

Party of Smallholders, Cottiers and Entrepreneurs of Czechoslovakia is translated incorrectly ("domkař" is a homeowner, cottier would be "chalupář") so it should be renamed to Party of Smallholders, Homeowners and Entrepreneurs of Czechoslovakia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kroulacek (talk • contribs) 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

@Kroulacek: Where are you getting the colors for the 6 historic parties? SilverLocust 💬 09:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

For the historical parties, the colors are those currently used on the Czech version of Wikipedia, as well as in parliamentary diagrams and maps in articles like 1920 Czechoslovak parliamentary election. I belive it would be easier to change the color in the module then to change all the diagrams and maps. The colors don't have any particular source, and are more of customary colors used in Czechia for the parties.

For SEN 21, I add links to their Instagram and Facebook, where the new darker blue is being used exlusively. For the website, I belive they've not updated it yet and will update it with the start of the campaign for the EP elections. Kroulacek (talk) 10:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

• SEN 21 —  Partly done: I have changed the name, but the current color is still one of the colors listed at that link, and it is still used on the party's website. There are also images that use the current color. I think it should be kept as it is for now.
• The Left (Czech Republic) —  Done.
• German National Party —  Done (so that the color matches the images in 1920 Czechoslovak parliamentary election, et seq.).
• Slovak National Party (historical) —  Done (same reason).
• Associated Jewish Parties (Czechoslovakia) —  Not done: You have already fixed the name in the one article where it appears, 1920 Czechoslovak parliamentary election. There is no entry in these modules for this minor historical party.
• Party of Smallholders, Homeowners and Entrepreneurs of Czechoslovakia —  Not done: The name can be changed in the articles, as you have already done for the 1920 election. I assume that change would also apply to the slightly different name in the 1925 election article. There is no entry in these modules for this minor historical party.
• German Liberal Party (Czechoslovakia) —  Not done: I don't see this mentioned in any article, so I don't see a reason for this. There is no entry in these modules for this minor hitorical party.
• Hungarian National Party (Czechoslovakia) —  Not done for now: Please give some reason for changing the color.

SilverLocust 💬 20:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit Request for Egyptian Social Democratic Party

I would like to request a change for the colour of the Egyptian Social Democratic Party To change the colour from:   #C40C04 to   #F5A301. Orange is more commonly used by the party rather than Red. The red colour is more considered to a customary colour. German2000 (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 4 March 2024

Description of suggested change:

Change of the Peasants' Agreement colour to:

  #7dad0bff

per the only avalible source:

• Ulotka wyborcza Komitetu Wyborczego Ruch Ludowy "Porozumienie Ludowe" [Election flyer of the People's Movement Electoral Committie "Peasants' Agreement"]. 1991. Scan.

Diff:

−

["Peasants' Agreement"] = {abbrev = "PSL-PL", color = "#54A405", shortname = "",},

+

["Peasants' Agreement"] = {abbrev = "PSL-PL", color = "#7dad0bff", shortname = "",},

— Antoni12345 (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

To editor Antoni12345: first of all, color hexcodes are six digits in length, so I wonder where the eight-digit code you propose comes from. I did not find it at the "scan" link you gave. I may have missed it, so please focus me to where in that document I can find the code. There is a fairly substantial difference between the existing color:

•   #54A405, and your proposed color:
•   #7dad0b (the hex reader only reads the first six digits, so the "ff" is not necessary)

so more info is needed before a change can be made to Module:Political party/P, which btw is not template-protected. Thank you for your help! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 14:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

@Paine Ellsworth: Ok! Thanks for feedback. The link I’ve provided under the “scan” is an item site at the Biała Podlaska digital library website, where the scan of the mentioned flyer can be found. After downloading it I’ve extracted the approximate colour using Inkscape tool. The scan is a raster image of a print with uneven colour distribution, so different colours may be found. Maybe I have wrongly used the Inkscape tool. As I’ve mentioned the electoral flyer is the only reference for the party colour available in the Internet, so also the question is what’s the reference for the currently used colour. — Antoni12345 (talk) 18:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and changed it to your proposed color; we'll leave it at that unless challenged, which would have to include an answer to your question. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 21:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Nonpartisan

Make "Nonpartisan" as an input generate a disambiguated link to Nonpartisanism. Make it so that (in the electionbox) it reads as "nonpartisan" lowercase.

Do the same automatically for when someone inputs "Nonpartisan candidate", "nonpartisan candidate", and "nonpartisan".

SecretName101 (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

I would greatly prefer for it to link to Independent politician, which is where Nonpartisan politician redirects. Nonpartisanism is not a very good article.

I am opposed to making it lowercase. Labels in infoboxes and rows in tables generally have their first letter capitalized. E.g., "Party", "Votes", "Candidate", etc. That's also how "Independent" is done.

On a side note, this edit would be to Module:Political party/P, which only has extended-confirmed protection. SilverLocust 💬 09:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

@SilverLocust Issue is that a lot of times this is used, it's in elections in which party affiliations are unable to be listed on the ballot (such as Chicago mayoral elections since 1999). Many of the nominees who run in such elections are well-affiliated with parties, just are listed on a nonpartisan ballot. SecretName101 (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

@SilverLocust An good alternative is (if possible), instead having it generate a grey color indicator but having the text generated contain no link to any page. SecretName101 (talk) 23:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

@SecretName101: If the whole race is nonpartisan, there is the option of using Template:Election box candidate no party to not show a column for party. 1999 Chicago mayoral election (and so forth) shows those links because it uses "with party" in the rows.

But if only some candidates are nonpartisan, then the "Nonpartisan" link should be included. 2016 San Diego elections is an example that includes some party-affiliated candidates and some nonpartisan candidates using party = Nonpartisan politician, which is a redirect to Independent politician via the link [[Nonpartisan politician|Nonpartisan]]. (It works the same for "candidate".)

How about making "Nonpartisan election" be another option that links [[Nonpartisan election|Nonpartisan]], since that title redirects to Non-partisan democracy, the article about nonpartisan elections. SilverLocust 💬 01:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

@SilverLocust But we have countless instances where elections with nonpartisan elections were done with partylinks, hence this will appear on each of them.

unless you plan on going to every election page and changing election boxes where that is the case, hundreds or even thousands of nonpartisan races will be having their election boxes impacted

I think for now we don’t include an link for “nonpartisan”, but we DO link “nonpartisan candidate” to thaw page of the same name and “nonpartisan election” to the page of that name. SecretName101 (talk) 04:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

No, my suggested change to the module doesn't affect any existing electionbox because none of them currently use party = Nonpartisan election, since that doesn't currently shorten to "Nonpartisan". (I have also confirmed that none use that by searching insource:/[Pp]arty\s*\=\s*[Nn]onpartisan election/.) And the suggested change is only as an option beyond the existing options that I noted (among others). SilverLocust 💬 04:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 7 March 2024

Description of suggested change: To change New Future Party (South Korea)'s color from   #003153 to   #45BABD.

The current color is a secondary color that is used exclusively in the party's logo.

MogasTheThird (talk) 07:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

 Completed. Actually changed from #182752   to #45BABD  . You may also want to take note that the page where this was edited, Module:Political party/N, is not template-protected. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 14:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 9 March 2024

Description of suggested change: Addition of shortnames for Volt parties and addition of missing parties. Following Parties are Missing yet:

• Volt Austria
• Volt Belgium
• Volt Czech Republic
• Volt France
• Volt Greece
• Volt Italy
• Volt Romania
• Volt Slovakia
• Volt Spain
• Volt Sweden
• Volt Switzerland
• Volt Ukraine

The color code from all of them is #502379 + The color code of Volt Bulgaria is wrong and should be #502379 too. The abbreviation off all Volt Parties is Volt. With one exception: for Volt Portugal it is VP. The Shortname from all Volt parties is Volt, thats missing for Volt Bulgaria, Luxemburg, Malta and UK.

Tanks a lot! Heideneii (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 11 March 2024

Description of suggested change: Addition of "Reformer" as a shortname for Whigs (British political party) with color #FF7F00.

The shortname "Reformer" is used on these pages (1835 Liverpool Town Council election, 1836 Liverpool Town Council election, 1839 Liverpool Town Council election, 1840 Liverpool Town Council election, 1841 Liverpool Town Council election, Abercromby (Liverpool ward)) to refer to Whigs (British political party), but the shortname currently links to a disambiguation page. Please can this shortname be added, so that the links to the disambiguation page can be removed? BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Done. Do you need the plural "Reformers" as well? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks @MSGJ, and yes - please can the plural be added as well? BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Please can you describe the exact change needed to the code because I'm not familiar with this module. I notice on 1841 Liverpool Town Council election#Abercromby the term "Reformer" is used, but it is still linking to the disambiguation page. So the change I made does not seem to have had the desired effect — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I think adding ["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Reformer",}, and ["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Reformers",}, to this page should produce the desired outcome. BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

You can't have two entries with the same value (in this case "Whigs (British political party)"). This is just a quick "please don't do this", I'll try and figure out what you're attempting to do shortly. Primefac (talk) 20:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay, the reason why it's linking to a dab is because {{Election box candidate with party link}} links to the party given to the template, not to whatever it is you think you're linking to -- it links to [[{{{party}}}|<shortname>]] where <shortname> is provided by the module. In other words, if you want to link to the Whigs, you need to set |party=Whigs (British political party), which will then output Reformer while linking to Whigs (British political party). Primefac (talk) 20:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

In other words, the template calls in the articles are wrong, not the module. Primefac (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into this @Primefac, I've set |party=Whigs (British political party) but it still outputs Whig rather than Reformer - I feel like I might be being stupid here! Thanks BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

We currently have

	["Whig Party (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#819FF7", shortname = "Whig",},
	["Whig Party (US)"] = {abbrev = "W", color = "#F0C862", shortname = "Whig",},
	["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Whig",},

Should one of those Whig values for the UK show something else for the shortname? Primefac (talk) 07:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Changing ["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Whig",}, to ["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Reformer",}, would solve the Reformer shortname issue, but I'm concerned it might affect other articles which currently use the Whig shortname. BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 13:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

You need to be clearer about what exactly you are expecting to see. When you use "Reformer" you want the link to point to Whigs (British political party) but how should it be piped? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for not being clearer, I'm expecting to link to Whigs (British political party) but to pipe it as "Reformer".

@Primefac clarified the desired outcome above:

In other words, if you want to link to the Whigs, you need to set |party=Whigs (British political party), which will then output Reformer while linking to Whigs (British political party).

In order to do so, ["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Whig",}, would need to be changed to ["Whigs (British political party)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#FF7F00", shortname = "Reformer",}, but I'm concerned it might affect other articles which currently use the Whig shortname and want to pipe it as "Whig". BlueberryIntoTheWild (talk) 14:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay, let's back up a step and talk less code. Why are the Whigs called by two different names? Are there actually two different groups? Are they just called different names depending on what they called themselves? Are there any time periods where one name was used more than the other? There's no point in futzing about with the code until we can actually determine what should be done visually. Primefac (talk) 15:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 16 March 2024

Description of suggested change: The German party Human Environment Animal Protection recently changed their colour from #87CEFA (current) to #00545F (new).
Additionally, The Homeland also changed its colour in 2023 with the renaming from brown (current) to #D79E2A (new). However this change might be more controversial as brown, the currently displayed customary colour, was applied by outsiders instead of the party itself so we might want to wait if this is still the case. German Wikipedia does use the party's new preferred colour, but we might want to wait for what official diagrams and news outlets use.

JonahF (talk) 11:43, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Not done: Since you are extended-confirmed, you don't need an edit request for this. The data for each party is in a subpage with only extended-confirmed protection. The data for Human Environment Animal Protection is located in Module:Political party/H. The data for The Homeland (German political party) is in Module:Political party/N under the article's actual title, "National Democratic Party of Germany". It could have this new name added to Module:Political party/T. You can reactivate this request if you have trouble making those edits. SilverLocust 💬 16:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I've not done this before so I rather wanted to ask. But that helped and it seems to work! JonahF (talk) 22:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 4 March 2024

Request for changing the name from Majlis Bachao Tahreek to Majlis Bachao Tehreek on the party module list to maintain consistency. This change involves replacing a with e in the word Tahreek. It seems that the article was moved on Wikipedia a while ago, and this inconsistency is causing issues with the short name in the election tables. 456legendtalk 07:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Can someone responsible for the changes on the Module, please look into this? Thank you. 456legendtalk 01:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

456legend, you can make this change yourself, which is likely why no one has replied. Primefac (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Reminder

Please look into my unattended request: Module talk:Political party#Edit request 4 March 2024 456legendtalk 01:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

You're still able to do this yourself. PianoDan (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @PianoDan for the heads up. I was able to do it myself. 456legendtalk 03:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Conservative Party of Japan

The Conservative Party of Japan will be competing in April 2024 by-elections, I would like a party color prepared before then for the subsequent election pages that will be created as the election approaches.

  #0b80db is generally accepted as the party color, including in their logo and official website. Anime King (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome to make the change. Primefac (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

You think you can help me out? I'm not so skilled with modules. Anime King (talk) 15:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

It is just editing the correct submodule (which I believe would be /C in this case) and adding the following:

	["Conservative Party of Japan"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#0b80db", shortname = "",},

If they use a shortname or abbrev you can add those in as well. Primefac (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks! Anime King (talk) 12:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Change INDIA alliance color

Please change INDIA alliance color from sky blue   to Indian flag green  . The current color contradicts with the color of INC and former UPA. Many news use green color for INDIA. This is even present in their logo. The current color is not present in logo. Jack deGrasse Tyson (talk) 05:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Yellow can also be used as it denotes Liberalism but INDIA also has Left parties. So I strongly prescribes the use of Green. Jack deGrasse Tyson (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

−

+

["Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance"] = {abbrev = "INDIA", color = "#046A38", shortname = "Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance",},

Jack deGrasse Tyson (talk) 05:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Just not true, they are usually represented with the blue that is present. Their logo has that color. MrMkG (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Blue is used to represent INC. But they are not same. Jack deGrasse Tyson (talk) 09:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

FYI - the requestor has been blocked as a sock from a VERY active sockfarm. Similar requests to this will almost certainly be from a sock of the same master. Ravensfire (talk) 21:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

People's Alliance (Fiji) colour

Why are we using maroon for the People's Alliance? The logo is dark blue, maroon and white and it seems that the party campaigns in both dark blue and maroon. I think maybe we could use dark blue as it represents conservatism (the only problem being that the Social Democratic Liberal Party, another conservative party, uses a shade of blue, and the centrist FijiFirst party uses a light shade of blue). Red in Fiji represents the Fiji Labour Party and dark green represents the National Federation Party. Schestos (talk) 23:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Lëvizja Bashkë party color

Can you please add the party color for the Lëvizja Bashkë political party in Albania? The hex value extracted from the logo of their website is #E82D36. The abbreviation is BASHKE, taken from the Albanian elections results website (in the Results for Council tab).

["Lëvizja Bashkë"] = {abbrev = "BASHKE", color = "#E82D36", shortname = "",}

Thanks! 686F7065 (talk) 20:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 April 2024

Please revert the last edit. It removed the Centre Alliance party from the list and now this has effected things everywhere. Schestos (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: The Centre Alliance is still in the list. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 23:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 10 April 2024

Please add Bharatheeya Jawan Kisan Party, according to it's website its abbreviation is BJKP and it's colour code could be #20317F it can be found here

 Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 12:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 10 April 2024

Please change the colour code of Socialist Unity Centre of India (Communist) to #FF0000. It can be verified using this link[4] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editormallu (talk • contribs) 15:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 13 April

Could anyone please rename “Thawbit Al-Ummah” into their English name “Ummah’s Principles Alliance” with their current color code unchanged. Also make could anyone set their short name into Thawbit Al-Ummah. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawtheeeq (talk • contribs) 20:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

No longer necessary as article renamed. Number 57 16:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit Request 14 April 2024

Law and Justice (Poland) is no longer the only political party with that name, breaking the party colour dependence on every election page that uses it. Please update Template:Party color to match the new name of the article and add Law and Justice (Croatia)'s party colour and name to the template. Thanks in advance. GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@CanonNi Apologies, but for backwards compatibility, would you be able to add back "Law and Justice" as an alternate/backup link to the Template:Party color colour for Law and Justice (Poland)? Since it seems like replacing the original name entirely within the template instead of adding it as another link to the same hex has broken some other dependencies, such as on the party's wikipage that still uses the old article name for the template. I hope I've explained that well enough, I'm not too familiar with Template editing to be honest. GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 05:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done I've added Law and Justice as the short name for the party, let me know if it works. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@CanonNi Doesn't look like it's worked sadly, the composition bars in the infobox for Law and Justice (Poland) are still all

  #F8F9FA

GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 05:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I've changed it to "Law and Justice", it should work now. Sorry for the mistake. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Really appreciate it! GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 05:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Ah wait, but now {{party color|Law and Justice (Poland)}} doesn't work anymore GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 06:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@CanonNi Yeah, you've {{Party color|Law and Justice}} working again, but {{Party color|Law and Justice (Poland)}} doesn't work anymore GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 06:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I have an idea. Instead of using Law and Justice, which is a name shared by multiple political parties, we use Law and Justice (Poland) for articles that mention it. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

User:CanonNi The only trouble with that is that it breaks all the articles that use the old article's name to link to it and you end up with a situation like this in the infobox:

Seats in the Sejm:

163 / 460

Seats in the Senate:

29 / 100

And my reasoning for having both is that the new Croatian one can just be {{party color|Law and Justice (Croatia)}} while the Polish party can use both {{party color|Law and Justice (Poland)}} for accuracy and {{party color|Law and Justice}} for backwards compatibility and to not break old pages written before the foundation of the new Law and Justice (Croatia). GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 06:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I've added Law and Justice as an alternative name for Law and Justice (Poland). Now it should finally work for both names. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I really do appreciate it, hope you have a great rest of your day! GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 06:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

No problem at all. Thank you, and have a great day too! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 20 April 2024

Hi, I would like to request a change of color for the SEN 21 to #1a4973 as their logo and website was updated. I would request some new entries.

Motorists for Themselves ["Motorists for Themselves"] = {abbrev = "AUTO", color = "#007FC6", shortname = "Motorists"}

Přísaha and Motorists ["Přísaha and Motorists"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#0641f5", shortname = ""}

Alliance for the Independence of the Czech Republic ["Alliance for the Independence of the Czech Republic"] = {abbrev = "AZNČR", color = "#2e5efe", shortname = ""}

United Democrats - Association of Independents ["United Democrats - Association of Independents"] = {abbrev = "SD-SN", color = "#00397C", shortname = ""} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kroulacek (talk • contribs) 17:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 April 2024

I want to propose a change to the Alliance for Albanians abbreviation, make it ASh instead of AS, because ASh has always been used for display on all wiki pages, and the Sh is actually one sound in the Shqiptarët word of the party name in Albanian. Lastjourneyman. (talk) 11:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Done. Cheers, Number 57 12:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 April 2024

Change the hex code for Animal Justice Party from #A52A2A to #5B2C86 to reflect party color recognised by media outlets such as the national broadcaster ABC News https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/dunkley-by-election-2024#:~:text=%2B0.9%25-,Animal%20Justice,Bronwyn%20Currie,-Vote%3A https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/cook-by-election-2024/results#:~:text=AJP,Natasha%20Brown- https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/vic/2022/guide/lc-results#:~:text=%2D1-,Animal%20Justice%20Party,-1 WombatDuckKangarooBrumby (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 00:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 April 2024

A proposal to change the colour hex of the All-Ukrainian Union "Cherkashchany" party from   lightblue to   #019CDE, extracted from the party's website, as it seems like the colour prevailing out of three main ones, unlike lightblue, which has never been used for the party and has no connection to it whatsoever. Lastjourneyman. (talk) 20:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Done. The light blue colour scheme appears to have originated from this edit to uk.wiki (the addition of the council seats held), which was then copied into the infobox on en.wiki, then into the module. Cheers, Number 57 23:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

SEN 21

I would like to request the change of SEN 21 color to #1a4973 in order to reflect its logo change. Kroulacek (talk) 12:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 12 May 2024

["Liberal Party USA"] = {abbrev = "LPUSA", color = "#0b106b", shortname = "Liberal",},

Taken from their official web site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longestview (talk • contribs) 01:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Primefac (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 15 May 2024

Description of suggested change: Add party Diff:

−

+

["Christian Democracy Sicily"] = {abbrev = "DCS", color = "#87CEFA", shortname = "",

} SilverShadow2 (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 02:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 25 May 2024

Fuerza y Corazón por México

I would like to request a change in color to Fuerza y Corazón por México to #c71585. This color is used in the presidential candidate's website ([5]) and during the coalition's marches ([6]). This color is also used in the Spanish wikipedia to represent the party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EchoLuminary (talk • contribs) 19:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

 Completed. To editor EchoLuminary: for the future please note that the subpage "F" that was updated is not template protected, but only extended-confirmed protected. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 19:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 28 May 2024

Description of suggested change: For the Elections in Stratford and Bow (UK Parliament constituency) it's needed to add a party. party: Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 2024) abbrev: RCP color: #d90000 shortname:Revolutionary Communist Party

Thanks in advance :)

2A02:8109:B511:9F00:4C6F:D88F:767F:A01E (talk) 13:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is incorrect. Party is not standing in this election so doesn't require this edit. Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: Not needed per Rambling Rambler. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 6 June 2024

Description of suggested change: Change the description for the Scottish Libertarian Party from "Libertarian" to "Scottish Libertarian". See for comparison "Scottish Greens", "Scottish Christian", "Scottish Socialist" etc. Thanks! Splunge Denbigh (talk) 06:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

 Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 12:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 8 June 2024

Please change color of United Thai People's Party   to   reference logo [[7]] Asdavdh (talk) 16:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 May 2024

Change: ["Independent Oxford Alliance"] = {abbrev = "IOA", color = "#702CA1", shortname = "Oxford Alliance",},

to: ["Independent Oxford Alliance"] = {abbrev = "IOA", color = "#702CA1", shortname = "",},

Rationale: While the full name obviously is pretty cumbersome, using Oxford Alliance as the shortname seems problematic as it 1) gives the impression to less knowledgeable viewers of the 2024 Oxford City Council election (and any further relevant pages in the future) that Oxford Alliance is the "proper" party name, which would be incorrect as 2) I don't believe the name Oxford Alliance is used anywhere. As far as I can tell they both identify themselves and are identified by others solely by the name Independent Oxford Alliance or IOA. Hence I believe it would be more appropriate to remove the shortname or replace it with the initialism. Hope this helps.

Cheers, CipherRephic (talk) 22:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Have started a discussion on Talk: Oxford City Council CipherRephic (talk) 21:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

"Unrecognised punctuation character" error

I saw this Reddit post where the text appeared on every single list of political parties per country, and it seems to come this module. It doesn't happen for me, and they said it was fixed when they switch to beta features to be on. Does anyone know what could cause this? ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

It does not come from this module; the screenshot in question is from List of political parties in the United Kingdom § Parties with representation in the House of Commons, and the columns where there are errors involve #expr: functions calculating percentages. Raise the issue at {{Composition bar}} which generates those, though as far as I can tell there is nothing wrong with the page or the template. Primefac (talk) 16:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

@Primefac: if you look closely at that screenshot, the error comes immediately after the text <div style="background-color: . In Template:Composition bar, you can find that in the wikitext followed by an if conditional that results in {{{hex|{{{3|#CCCCCC}}}}}}. In the articles, the third parameter is set to Template:Party color, which uses this module. So unless somehow the if statement in the composition bar template causes this, it's this module. However, as I'm not so fluent in Lua I haven't been able to track the problem further. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Well, that's egg on my face... yes, I didn't see that in the article itself is text such as {{Composition bar|16|60|{{party color|Conservative Party (UK)}}|}} which does call this module. I am still not convinced that this issue is due to this module, though, given it seems to be working for most folks (and it's not throwing errors in Category:Pages with script errors). Maybe worth a cross-post to WP:VPT. Primefac (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

More Police Officers for Thames Valley - Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 April 2024

Please add More Police Officers for Thames Valley, with color #003399, running in 2024 PCC election for Thames Valley Police Area

i.e. add this line to the parties module ["More Police Officers for Thames Valley"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#003399", shortname = "",}

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/2024_England_and_Wales_police_and_crime_commissioner_elections

https://www.westberks.gov.uk/media/58711/Statement-of-Persons-Nominated-PCC-2-May-2024/pdf/Statement_of_Persons_Nominated_PCC_2_May_2024.pdf?m=1712568166960

The color #003399 is used widely in the logo and on their website (https://www.morepolice.uk), https://www.twitter.com/@blrhc

StoveTable (talk) 03:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for now: No dedicated article for More Police Officers for Thames Valley. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done A party does not need an article to be listed in the module. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Colour shade variation request

Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Communist Party of India both are given exactly same colour which makes it difficult to distinguish between them in Wiki articles, especially tables.

e.g.) 2024 Indian general election in Kerala.

Party		Flag	Symbol	Leader	Contesting Seats
	Communist Party of India (Marxist)			M.V. Govindan	15
	Communist Party of India			Binoy Viswam	4
	Kerala Congress (M)			Jose K. Mani	1
	Total				20

Request to please change the 'Party colour' of one of them by couple of shades so that they can be easily distinguished.
Anish Viswa 06:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I agree, colours should be changed slightly between CPI and CPI(M) since they usually contest in alliance, so are often seen together in results page. C1MM (talk) 04:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Requested more than a month ago, still awaiting support
Anish Viswa 06:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit performed
Anish Viswa 05:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

 Already done Primefac (talk) 13:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 13 June 2024

Could you please add the party colour for the Progressive Change North Lanarkshire, a regional party in the Scottish unitary authority, North Lanarkshire Council. The hex value extracted from the logo of their X account is #122D42. The abbreviation is PCNL.

["Progressive Change North Lanarkshire"] = {abbrev = "PCNL", color = "#122D42", shortname = "",}

WanderingPlaywright (talk) 16:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 17 June 2024

Edit request to add the newer french political party French Future to the template. The hex value from the infobox is #EE2D34. Party abbreviation is LAF.

["French Future"] = {abbrev = "LAF", color = "#EE2D34", shortname = "",}

Epluribusunumyall (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. See Module:Political party § Updating the module for more information. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Primefac (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 27 Juni 2024 (for letter D)

1. 800080 for the Democratic-Republican Party of the United States. Purple is because the between the blue for Democrats and the red for Republicans. Radixsaurus95 (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit Request 3 July 2024

Together (coalition) recently changed its article's name to Ensemble (political coalition), it needs its colour added to its new name. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 02:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 3 July 2024

Description of suggested change: Add party "Democratic and Social Left"

Diff:

−

+

["Democratic and Social Left"] = {abbrev = "GDS", color = "#EF3034", shortname = ""}

73.169.176.209 (talk) 21:29, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 9 August 2024 on APODETI due to Inaccuracy

Description of suggested change and diff:

Flag of APODETI used during the occupation

I would like to suggest an edit change due to inaccuracy for the Timorese Popular Democratic Association.

• Its official abbreviation is not 'ADPODETI' but 'APODETI'.
• Secondly, the colors of APODETI, Purple, was not a likely a color used by the party. It was formerly purple as it was to follow the supposed flag during its last election of 2002. But by then, many have since dispute its reliability as no other source, photo, or fiber of the flag seem to have existed. With the only source formerly cited was a defunct personal html website, that has a error placeholder for APODETI's supposed flag (which was blank). It was removed from commons after deeming it unreliable and not verifiable. Now in actuality, APODETI does not have an official color, or election color. most likely a black stamp of the Indonesian Garuda. But its safe to use its original political flag during the occupation days. A red color of   #FF0000 would be recommended in this case to follow its political party flag.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaliper1 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

 Done Primefac (talk) 12:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 19 August 2024

Currently, we use the abbreviation SDKÚ-DS with a hyphen for the Slovak Democratic and Christian Union – Democratic Party. According to Wikipedia’s style guidelines and general grammar practices, the correct format for this abbreviation should be SDKÚ–DS, using an en dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-).--90.64.64.22 (talk) 13:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

 Fixed. Primefac (talk) 13:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit request 21 June 2024

Could you please add the following party/political coalition color, which is running for the 2024 Mongolian parliamentary election:

• The Civic Unity Party (Mongolia). The hex value extracted from the website of party is #0A63B5. The abbreviation is CUP.

["The Civic Unity Party (Mongolia)"] = {abbrev = "CUP", color = "#0A63B5", shortname = "Civic Unity",}

• National Coalition (Mongolia). The hex value extracted from the website of party is #066B55. There is no abbreviation for coalition name.

["National Coalition (Mongolia)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#066B55", shortname = "National Coalition",}

• Liberté party (Mongolia). The hex value extracted from the website of party is #0053A5. There is no abbreviation for party name.

["Liberté party (Mongolia)"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#0053A5", shortname = "Liberte",}

and please change name and color code for National Labor Party (Mongolia), since it has changed name into HUN party in 2022. The hex value extracted from emblem of the party is #631E92. There is no abbreviation for party name.

So, please change:

["National Labor Party (Mongolia)"] = {abbrev = "NLP", color = "#6D3290", shortname = "",},

to:

["HUN party"] = {abbrev = "", color = "#631E92", shortname = "HUN",},

Saruul 04 (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit Request 1 July 2024 – Make Independent Labor (Australia) distinguishable from Australian Labor Party

The de facto party colour used on Wikipedia for Independent Labor (Australia) is

  #ff585e

#ff585e, but this template uses

  #F00012

which is difficult to distinguish from

  #F00011

I'd appreciate this fix, thanks. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 02:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Adding icons

While I am personally against it, I thought I would get opinions as to whether it makes sense to include icons in this module. For explanation, there is currently a TFD for a group of Taiwanese political party templates which also include an icon (e.g. {{Congress Party Alliance}}) and one of the main concerns I can see about the deletion is the loss of the icon (which I find personally unnecessary but I am just one voice). We already have some scuffles over party colours, would adding icons open the door to even more edit warring? Primefac (talk) 14:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm also personally opposed to their addition. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)