Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Law and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This one has been under the radar for years. If you’ve ever been to a closing, these folks can be essential. Can we please source this? Bearian (talk) 04:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Blanked and redirected to Closing (real estate). voorts (talk/contributions) 01:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Bearian (talk) 11:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Here’s another stub that’s been unsourced for 15 years. I have friends who are members. Can you find objective references? Bearian (talk) 01:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- From an initial look, the odds of this meeting WP:NORG seem quite low. Perhaps a better result would be to create a List of bar associations in New York and merge it there? -- Visviva (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Great idea. Can you work on that in the next few weeks? Bearian (talk) 11:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I’ve taught Criminal Justice but haven’t heard of this, but I don’t know everything. Can you please help t source this? Bearian (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Do you think we should redirect this to Wiktionary? Be bold! Bearian (talk) 11:03, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Can somebody please fix the issues identified by tags? I used to practice bankruptcy law, but it's been 32 years. Bearian (talk) 04:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore
[edit]Article 12 of the Constitution of Singapore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Can somebody please help to build up this stub, and source it? Bearian (talk) 22:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Technically, this is required by law, but it's not actually a law. Is it notable? Bearian (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act#Requested move 27 December 2024
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act#Requested move 27 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 19:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
I've created a draft article on a recent ECHR ruling which has impacts on French law's interpretation of marital rape and divorce. If there is anyone who knows more about this area, I would appreciate if you could give this a look. Thank you in advance! GnocchiFan (talk) 13:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Article 14 of the Constitution of Singapore
[edit]Article 14 of the Constitution of Singapore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Here's another stub for us to source and expand. This page hasn't been updated or properly sourced in 15 years. Please, rescue it, merge with another article such as Administrative law, or go to WP:AfD. 2025 is a year of decisive action. Bearian (talk) 06:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
A question about legal categories
[edit]I've posted an informal request for comments on a very minor categorization issue at R v Elliott, an article about a Canadian case with freedom of expression elements. Editors with an interest in Canadian human rights law, or an interest in the topic generally, are invited to comment in the discussion. Thanks. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
This stub has been tagged as unsourced for 15 years, since its creation. The author has been banned as a sockpuppet, so technically it could be deleted for that reason. However, I think the kernel is useful. Can we please find and add reliable sources? Bearian (talk) 04:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- It's not a WP:G5 because the creator wasn't banned at the time of creating the article. SilverLocust 💬 04:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- It is not clear to me that this is necessarily a topic worthy of an article. John M Baker (talk) 05:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Personal and business legal affairs of Elon Musk#Requested move 31 January 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Personal and business legal affairs of Elon Musk#Requested move 31 January 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CNC (talk) 06:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
This article has not been referenced in 15 years. I used to practice this area of law, and in fact taught it a few times to paralegals. However, it's been many years. Can somebody please find and add reliable sources to this article? Bearian (talk) 03:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Article bounty: Badush prison massacre
[edit]
Hello,
WikiProject Human rights is posting its first article bounty! Using article bounties, we aim to improve vital articles about human rights. Currently, there are 2 top-importance and 49 high-importance human rights articles that are rated as stubs. Among them is the article Badush prison massacre, which is the subject of this bounty. You are receiving this message because this WikiProject is listed on that article's page. Editors who improve this article may be eligible for various rewards, or "bounties".
Bounties will be awarded for improving the article in the following ways:
For expanding the article to 500 words: The Minor Barnstar
For expanding the article to 1000 words: The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For promoting the article to GA: The Human Rights Barnstar
Criteria
[edit]- Once the article is at 500 words, if you have contributed at least 1,250 characters on the revision history statistics page, you can reply to this post to receive The Minor Barnstar.
- Once the article is at 1,000 words, if you have contributed at least 3,000 characters on the revision history statistics page, you can reply to this post to receive The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar.
- Once the article is promoted to GA, if you are the nominator, you can reply to this post with a link to the successful GA review to receive The Human Rights Barnstar.
- Contributions must be of sufficient quality. This is subjective, and the bounty coordinator reserves the right to withhold bounties from editors whose contributions are of insufficient quality.
If you have any questions about the bounty or help with the GA process, feel free to message the bounty coordinator, Spookyaki, or reply to this post. If you are unsure where to start, check out the refideas on the article's Talk page.
Spookyaki (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
List of your articles that are in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors, 2025
[edit]Currently, this project has about ~81 articles in need of some reference cleanup. Basically, some short references created via {{sfn}} and {{harvnb}} and similar templates have missing full citations or have some other problems. This is usually caused by templates misuse or by copy-pasting a short reference from another article without adding the full reference, or because a full reference is not making use of citation templates like {{cite book}} (see Help:CS1) or {{citation}} (see Help:CS2). To easily see which citation is in need of cleanup, you can check these instructions to enable error messages (Svick's script is the simplest to use, but Trappist the monk's script is a bit more refined if you're interested in doing deeper cleanup). See also how to resolve issues.
These could use some of your attention
- 1988 Canadian federal budget
- Civil Rights Act
- Heckler v. Chaney
- Human rights in Canada
- Legal pluralism
- Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors
- Legalism (Chinese philosophy)
- List of ministers of law (Indonesia)
- Mediation
- Mikhail Smirtyukov
- Missouri Executive Order 44
- Mixed Commission Court
- Mountain Meadows Massacre
- Muslim world
- National Resources Mobilization Act
- Natural person in French law
- New York City Criminal Court
- New York energy law
- Nikah mut'ah
- North American Man/Boy Love Association
- Operation Bajrang
- Oranga Tamariki Act 1989
- Order of the Coif
- Organic Law (Spain)
- Originalism
- Palestinian Citizenship Order 1925
- People v. Muybridge
- Peremptory challenge
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey
- Political offence exception
- Posadas Hospital Trial
- Posthumous birth
- Presidential directive
- Pro se legal representation in the United States
- Product testing
- Proximity of blood
- Public Service Act 1999
- Public execution
- Public law
- Purge
- Sam Sheppard
- Sampling (music)
- Samsung v. Huawei
- Samuel Romilly
- Scientific jury selection
- Secret Treaty of Dover
- Secret trusts in English law
- Senate Judiciary Committee reviews of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States
- Seventeen Point Agreement
- Sex offender
- Shakhty Trial
- Shaykh Tusi
- Shurat HaDin
- Special Criminal Court
- Spring Valley Race Riot of 1895
- Statute of Marlborough
- Strata management
- Structure of the Federal Reserve System
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Sunny Metal & Engineering Pte Ltd v Ng Khim Ming Eric
- The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
- The New Jim Crow
- Thomas G. Shearman
- Title IX
- Treaty of Fontainebleau (1541)
- Treaty of Paris (1303)
- Trial by combat
- Trial of Charles I
- Uddat al-Usul
- Undang-Undang Melaka
- Unenumerated rights
- United States Declaration of Independence
- United States v. Rahimi
- United States war crimes
- Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
- Vermont vs Hunt (1982)
- Vidovdan Constitution
- War on drugs
- Wartime sexual violence
- William Henry Melvill
- Women's suffrage in states of the United States
If you could add the full references to those article/fix the problem references, that would be great. Again, the easiest way to deal with those is to install Svick's script per these instructions. If after installing the script, you do not see an error, that means it was either taken care of, or was a false positive, and you don't need to do anything else. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Can someone please find and add reliable sources do that we can bring this up to a Start class, please? Bearian (talk) 23:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Efforts to impeach Sara Duterte#Requested move 5 February 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Efforts to impeach Sara Duterte#Requested move 5 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ROY is WAR Talk! 10:42, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Representative democracy in Singapore
[edit]Representative democracy in Singapore has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 04:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Open Access and the Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law
[edit]Was already available via Wikipedia Library, but nevertheless a helpful addition. Full announcment. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
There is a whole, lightly sourced, section on North Carolina law, of which I am unsure whether it is undue weight. Can someone with more patience than me edit this section? Bearian (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
[edit]Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Criminal damage in English law
[edit]Criminal damage in English law has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Karl Menninger maybe included in WP:Law?
[edit]Karl Menninger was an important psychiatrist who participated often in the overlap between Law and Psychology. He was also a very vocal proponent of Prison Reform, writing a book The crime of punishment. Could his biography be included in the articles of this wikiproject? User:Dwarf Kirlston - talk 18:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Just do it. Bearian (talk) 03:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Please rate: is this a start article yet? Can you find additional sources as tagged? Thank you in advance. Bearian (talk) 03:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Dan Sullivan (U.S. senator)#Requested move 22 February 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Dan Sullivan (U.S. senator)#Requested move 22 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 12:37, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Florida Parental Rights in Education Act#Requested move 24 February 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Florida Parental Rights in Education Act#Requested move 24 February 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 06:06, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Inviting discussion of titles for overview articles re: court cases involving the Trump administration
[edit]Inviting discussion at Talk:Court cases related to Donald Trump's second presidential term#How comprehensive will this article be - will it list all cases? re: the relationship between that article and an older one, Legal affairs of Donald Trump as president. Questions include whether they should be merged, or if the older one should be moved to a new name that parallels the newer one but is limited to his first presidency (or, possibly, if they should both be moved to new but parallel names). Over 100 cases have already been filed since his inauguration, involving DOGE, First Amendment issues, mass federal layoffs, birthright citizenship, immigration, dismantling of USAID, and more. FactOrOpinion (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)