Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 September 30
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 29 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | October 1 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 30
[edit]02:44:19, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Drapery24
[edit]
Apologies in advance for such an elementary question, but how do I resubmit my submission? I don't see a resubmit option in the "Read" or "Edit" or "View History" tabs. Any help would be much appreciated.
Drapery24 (talk) 02:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Adding {{subst:submit}} will submit the article, it doesn't appear it's been reviewed or submitted before. -- Kethrus |talk to me 03:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- It seems you've removed the old submission reviews and comments, I've readded them. Please don't remove them in future as it helps reviewers help you and review your article. -- Kethrus |talk to me 03:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
06:36:00, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Amiromania
[edit]- Amiromania (talk · contribs)
Dear Wikipedia team,
How are you?
I tried to create an article as objective as possible. I included only facts about the company and tried to avoid any promotional undertone and provide as many unbiased external news article in English to prove that the things mentioned are unbiased facts.
I would really appreciate if you could point out the specific lines you find problematic, because I went over the article several times and could not find anything in it that is promotional and not a fact.
Best Regards, Amiromania
- Pinging Onel5969. (They declined it, usually contacting the reviewer on their talk page is best). -- Kethrus |talk to me 08:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Amiromania: I have left a comment on the draft. Whether this is what was in the other reviewer's mind or not, that would have been part of my own review had I reviewed it at the time. Fiddle Faddle 09:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- As usual, Timtrent, you are spot on. Onel5969 TT me 12:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Amiromania: I have left a comment on the draft. Whether this is what was in the other reviewer's mind or not, that would have been part of my own review had I reviewed it at the time. Fiddle Faddle 09:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
09:52:43, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Gridcitydivision
[edit]Hell, I am really struggling to understand the referencing requirements for notability. I am setting up a page of our sports team and have so far referenced both our website and the ranking website where are matches are recorded and we hold a European ranking position. Should I be looking to include link to past facebook events or a link to what roller derby is? Gridcitydivision (talk) 09:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Gridcitydivision: Chances are the team isn't notable. See WP:42, the sources must be independent of the subject. Also see WP:COI (as you're affiliated with the team). -- Kethrus |talk to me 10:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've left a comment on the draft which ought to clarify matters. Facebook and other user edited sites do not qualify as references. After digesting the comment please ask any additional questions. This section is a great place to put them. Fiddle Faddle 10:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
182.73.205.80 (talk) 10:07, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. If you would like to start writing a new article, please use the Article wizard. If you have an idea for a new article, but would like to request that someone else write it, please see: Wikipedia:Requested articles. I hope this helps. (No question/message) -- Kethrus |talk to me 12:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
10:51:14, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Jie2shen
[edit]
I just did not get the point, because I viewed several published pages about different journals. On those pages, similar citations were used like that of this page. Please explain the difference between my page and the following published pages: (1) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_International_Journal_of_Psychoanalysis (2) https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/International_Journal_of_Comic_Art
Jie Shen (talk) 10:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Accepted Fiddle Faddle 09:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
13:10:36, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Adityaaravind
[edit]
I have submitted the article but the reviewer says I have submitted blank content. When I click"Submit your draft for review", the page is showing blank content. Kindly help resolve this problem.
Adityaaravind (talk) 13:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Adityaaravind: I'm guessing you're referring to User:Adityaaravind/sandbox, SwisterTwister blanked it (WP:TNT) and suggested you start over (which indicates the article was really bad and needed to be rewritten). You then submitted it for review (while it's blank), which resulted in Timtrent declining it. -- Kethrus |talk to me 13:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
13:45:49, 30 September 2015 review of submission by Legog
[edit]
Dear Sirs,
I submitted the edited article on C.T. Jasper couple weeks ago, is it normal that it takes so long to be reviewed? Or should I maybe move it somewhere? Will be very grateful for advice.
Thank you in advance.
Best regards, Legog Legog (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Legog: It usually takes up to 20 days to be reviewed. Sometimes it can take less time, and sometimes it can take more. Please be patient. -- Kethrus |talk to me 13:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
19:44:34, 30 September 2015 review of submission by 63.153.3.37
[edit]- 63.153.3.37 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
63.153.3.37 (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
My submission was rejected. Will it be bad if I edit and try again? Does that make it more likely that I will be rejected the second time?
- @63.153.3.37: If you continue to edit it and make it better so it meets the standards, it will not be rejected even if it's been rejected before. -- Kethrus |talk to me 00:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- The process is iterative. This is what it is designed to do. It was not 'rejected', simply declined as failing to meet some standards. The only thing that prevents eventual acceptance is not passing WP:GNG. Please enjoy working on it some more. Fiddle Faddle 10:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)