Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblock templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 07:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging with Template:Unblock

Reason: To simplify usage of the template, merging the templates would make it easier to maintain and easier to use. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 19:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only 2 bluelinks, which is not enough to justify a template, especially when the 2 links are being used for completely different parts of the template (one is for an active club, other is for defunct club). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:28, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Orphaned after recent deletions of related unused templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa. Primefac (talk) 07:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa with Template:Islamic structures on the Temple Mount.
These two templates cover the same topic; the "Islamic structures" navbox mostly overlaps with the larger navbox. Onceinawhile (talk) 21:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Not sure. This template is not tightly confined to Islamic structures, but instead contains lots of fluff (a problem in its own right) - might it not be better to simply preserve one template as the host for strictly Islamic structures, and the other for more general material (which is what the template here appears to be)? Iskandar323 (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: While a merge can be made, the end title will have to be worded as such as it won't be "Islamic" only. A lot of the entries at Template:Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa are Jewish related and not Isalmic. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).