Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 4

January 4

Template:Asian Winter Games Bandy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Asian Winter Games Bandy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary, as the event has only been held once (and likely won't be held anytime soon either). Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No navigational use. Jellyman (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scratch Perverts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 12 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Scratch Perverts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unblocked

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Unblocked (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Same rationale as this TfD which recently closed as delete. Wholly redundant to {{Unblock reviewed}}, as this is just a hard-coded instance of that template. This template should be substituted and deleted. It's intended to be substitute-only already, according to the documentation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

• Keep as a harmless and useful time saving wrapper for unblock reviewed (that automatically includes a pro-forma 'reason' and selects the 'accepted' parameter), intended to be substituted when unblocking for self-evident reasons already present on the talk page. Unless we have started running out of template space? –xeno^talk 15:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
  
• KEEP Per above. --Brynda1231 [Talk Page] [Contribs] 05:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox EN Standard Details

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 January 19 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Infobox EN Standard Details (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).