Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/August-2024

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary.


	Older Archive
	Miscellaneous Archive
2004:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2005:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2006:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2007:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2008:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2009:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2010:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2011:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2012:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2013:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2014:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2015:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2016:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2017:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2018:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2019:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2020:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2021:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2022:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2023:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
2024:	January - February - March - April - May - June - July - August - September - October - November - December
Purge page cache if nominations haven't updated.

Malabar pied hornbill (Anthracoceros coronatus) female in flight.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 11:58:12 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. FP on Commons. Received four positive and one negative vote on previous nomination
Articles in which this image appears: Malabar pied hornbill
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - a bit on the small side, but given the difficulties of catching a subject in flight from this angle, I think it's fine. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – looks okay for me _ZZ^Z 'S 23:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Malabar pied hornbill (Anthracoceros coronatus) female in flight.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cayman curly-tailed lizard

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 11:35:27 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image of species endemic to the Cayman Islands. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cayman curly-tailed lizard
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 12:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice work! Don't suppose you also got a shot of that intriguing bright red insect ( or is that just a leaf/flower?) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 10:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I try not to miss the little bugs. This one is a nymph. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cayman curly-tailed lizard (Leiocephalus varius).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viperine water snake/3

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 12:17:32 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons. This is the photo’s 3rd nomination (the second by me). It got four support votes on both its first nomination and second nomination.
Articles in which this image appears: Viperine water snake
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 12:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful background, and a good shot of the snake in its natural environment. While one might like more details, long ropey lads are hard to get fully into a shot, so that's more of a reason to have a second FP focusing on the snake's scale patterns than an objection to this one. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 10:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support but with a comment: a bit of oversharpening on its head, by the looks of things. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – third time's the charm ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Viperine water snake (Natrix maura).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Machado de Assis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 17:25:59 (UTC)

Reason: Full disclosure: I'm not sure the skintones are perfect, but that's typical of photographs of the time. In photographs of him in crowds he doesn't appear to be so dark-skinned that I'd consider this entirely misleading, and this article describes him as a "light-skinned mulatto" - I presume that last term is much more acceptable in Brazil. Still, at least to modern eyes, it's probably lightening his skin at least a little bit. They tended to put a lot of light on the faces of dark skinned individuals to try and pull more detail since the film of the time lacked good differentiation of darker colours (and probably for racist reasons as well).

That disclosure and the problems noted therein aside, for the time, this is quite a good photo. I did tweak levels to make it as unmisleading as possible. But I do believe that one should be honest about any flaws in the image when nominating.
Articles in which this image appears: Machado de Assis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Marc Ferrez, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — I see what I think is macroblocking in the mid-tones of the face. Apart from that I would be inclined to vote support; the other flaws I see are minor and derive from the photo's historical nature. Moonreach (talk) 17:29, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Moonreach: Think I got the worst of it: There was some weird damage - possibly historical retouching. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 07:25, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does indeed look better. I'll say support. Thanks for doing that. Moonreach (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm not crazy about the composition, but given that this is an historic photograph, the framing can be excused. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Machado de Assis by Marc Ferrez.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ESDPES

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 08:17:16 (UTC)

**Original** – A picture of the Gabaldon of the Eugenio Daza Pilot Elementary School in Borongan City, Eastern Samar.

Reason: Passes criteria 1 (if it passes it slightly, it can be excepted for unique images, since it pictures a rare-and-historical landmark). It passes 2, 3, and 4. It also passes 5 (see criteria 1 reason), slightly passes 6 (I can try to get a picture of the plaque, which states this), 7, and 8.
Articles in which this image appears: Borongan
FP category for this image: Category:Borongan
Creator: TheNuggeteer

Support as nominator – 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:17, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. Lacks EV. – Sca (talk) 12:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — Regardless of the landmark's significance, this image is blurry and has blown highlights. Moonreach (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think I should create another one? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 13:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I think it would be difficult to shoot a captivating image of this subject. --Janke | Talk 13:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~I think we've seen this one before. -- Sca (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]
What makes you say that? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 01:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, guess I confused it with something else. -- Sca (talk) 13:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have another good picture of this school (in my old phone which I sometimes take), I feel like I should upload it, how about you? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 02:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Napoléon (1927 film)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 00:08:09 (UTC)

Original – Napoléon is a 1927 French silent historical epic film directed by Abel Gance, starring Albert Dieudonné as Napoleon Bonaparte.

Reason: Napoléon (1927 film) is a WP:FILM/CORE article, and Napoléon entered the U.S. public domain last year. It's the best-known work by director Abel Gance, and probably of the French impressionist film movement.

Technical notes because this one was a doozy: The pillarboxing here is intentional, in the last 20 minutes there's a famous sequence where it becomes a widescreen Polyvision arrangement. The extreme length means we're approaching Wikipedia's technical limits, and only low-quality transcodes succeed so you have to select "Source" in the video player. I kept it as a single video since it wasn't released in parts and 2Mbps is still equivalent to a video2commons output. The alternative is a 4-video set of each act (higher bitrate, HD transcodes would complete, and no letterboxing on the first 3), would be great if reviewers indicated the format they'd prefer.
Articles in which this image appears: Napoléon (1927 film), Polyvision
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Abel Gance (director)

Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 00:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not that I'm going to watch the 5-hour mammoth movie, but the last 30 minutes are interesting - at least as a predecessor of Cinerama. --Janke | Talk 07:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
comment Translations qualify for copyright. Do we know their status here?©Geni (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can tell, the American Film Institute provided English intertitles for the restoration. The film's U.S. (and UK) release came in 1928, so the English-language sources for the translated intertitle text would also be public domain now. hinnk (talk) 20:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Take in consideration that the 1928 US and UK release versions had different lenghts (the US version, at less than 2 hours, was shorter and had it's intertitles rewritten by MGM). --Mayimbú (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That might explain it then. Brownlow describes having collected prior footage with some of the English intertitles and then AFI stepping in to provide the rest, with the BFI National Film Archive later reshooting them to standardize their appearance. It sounds like intertitles from the different English-language versions got combined. hinnk (talk) 08:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Carlosmarkos2345 | Talk 20:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The quality is good, despite the age of the film. The vintage look has somehow been retained without compromising on the quality. I've never voted in featured picture nominations, so I might not be qualified enough to speak on the technical aspects important here at FPCs, but I still think the nom deserves a support. Matarisvan (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Napoléon (1927).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Separate but "equal" drinking fountains

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 19:11:07 (UTC)

Reason: Per last nomination, a restored version. I'm using the title from the Library of Congress; The word negro was a lot more acceptable and polite in 1939, but it feels wrong to change the title at our end before the holding library does.
Articles in which this image appears: Discrimination, Discrimination in the United States, Jim Crow laws, Plessy v. Ferguson, Racial segregation, Racism, Separate but equal + 5
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/American
Creator: Russell Lee, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I also support a bit of sharpening. Bammesk (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bammesk: Done. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 05:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 12:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 16:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And again apologies for the delay. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
no problem. thanks for the restoration ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bad left crop was careless unless this is a crop of the original. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The original two copies show film edges there. It's possible Lee intended to crop it: can't really change aspect ratio on a film camera - but my rule is to let our reusers do any desired crops unless there's a very good reason (severe damage, very minor crops of blank areas to centre subject or lose vignetting, crop mark on image (though I tend to play crop marks by ear; hard to tell publisher ones from artist ones, and publishers of the time may be cropping for crappy halftone newspaper reproduction) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well executed photo with strong EV. It illustrates its topic well, including by highlighting just how stupid this all was. Nick-D (talk) 11:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:52, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B-Roll with 4 shots

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2024 at 00:05:02 (UTC)

Reason: When I first read the B-roll article, the process was described in text but was difficult to understand. I researched the process and created this diagram to illustrate the complex procedure
Articles in which this image appears: B-roll
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Diagrams
Creator: RoySmith

Support as nominator – RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 01:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a really nicely made diagram. I think it relies on familiarity with some concepts that the lay reader won't have, especially if they're more used to digital production. Here are some thoughts on how this might be communicated more clearly:
- "Head" and "tail" have technical meanings that aren't explained in the article and aren't obvious from the diagram.
- The dotted lines aren't explainable from the diagram alone, so if the reader doesn't know what the splices looks like, they see a Shot 2 that's exactly 5 frames long but a label that says it goes past that.
- The difference between A-roll and B-roll isn't clear from the diagram. It maybe would work better if the durations of the shots were different, or if the frames used images that would be understood as primary footage and a cutaway.
- How these strips relate to each other or the final print isn't explained. This maybe connects to the other point, where showing the exposure of the primary shots, with a few frames in between, and then a separate exposure that fills those in with a simple-looking insert to create the full version would work better.

I hope any of this is helpful. hinnk (talk) 02:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As a retired filmmaker, I consider the correct term for this image not "B-roll", but "A-B negative cutting/editing". B-roll by itself means extra footage, and the illustration is not about that. Thus, the explanation text and the image are in the wrong article. Would support the image if it were in an A-B cutting article. --Janke | Talk 11:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'm going to withdraw this. Thank you all for your comments, and especially to hinnk for providing some excellent feedback on how this could be improved. RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nom withdrawn The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Charles Marcotte

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 00:36:04 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Portrait of Charles Marcotte, Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, National Gallery of Art etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I note that the NGA's colours changed significantly between scans. This one seems to have a higher saturation point. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ingres Marcotte d-Argenteuil.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Parkman

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2024 at 00:47:12 (UTC)

Reason: High quality portrait of Paul Parkman, one of the inventors of the rubella vaccine.
Articles in which this image appears: Paul Parkman
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Science and engineering
Creator: Author unknown

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Man in suit & tie. Unexceptional NIH publicity shot. – Sca (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a useful photo that shows what this notable person looks like, but doesn't provide any indication of why they're notable. Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Scream

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 00:23:28 (UTC)

Reason: one of the most well know, iconic and well received art pieces of all time
Articles in which this image appears: The Scream, Edvard Munch, Expressionism, Modern art etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Edvard Munch

Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 00:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Carlosmarkos2345: FYI nominators do remove items at FPC urgents once urgent conditions no longer apply. In this case, several days ago once the nom got 5 votes. Bammesk (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is this the recognized 'best-according-to-art-experts' version and are the colours/tone true to life? Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are black pixels (0, in the join at right) and totally white pixels (255, white brush strokes) so it appears the exposure is spot on. However, the tone curve may be off, making the overall look very murky... Haven't seen it "live", so I can't say for sure. --Janke | Talk 10:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks under-saturated. -- Sca (talk) 12:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – It has a reliable source. The color tones (contrast, etc.) match the sample crop on the National Gallery of Norway's source page [1]. (and shot with a pro camera) Bammesk (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Colors match up with the Gallery's scan ―Howard • 🌽³³ 07:32, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 14:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Edvard Munch, 1893, The Scream, oil, tempera and pastel on cardboard, 91 x 73 cm, National Gallery of Norway.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 00:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Plimsoll

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2024 at 16:23:58 (UTC)

Reason: Quite a nice image of an under-photographed person.
Articles in which this image appears: Samuel Plimsoll
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Lock and Whitfield; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the second image in the article has more EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd agree, but there's no copy of it available at sufficient quality. (Also, it looked like this before I researched that copy of the image, so, y'know, only has EV because of the research that included this one.) Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC
Support – the other photo is too unsharp. Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Samuel Plimsoll by Lock and Whitfield.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greenfield tornado

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 03:12:57 (UTC)

Reason: Extremely high EV for one of the strongest tornadoes ever recorded, and the third highest wind speed ever measured on earth (Tornado records#Highest winds observed in a tornado). Tornado was also academically studied (Research on tornadoes in 2024#Greenfield tornado) by several organizations. High EV public domain photograph no less as well.
NOTE: The image barely fails the second FP criteria, as it is 2,048 × 1,366 pixels. However, per the criteria, "Exceptions to this rule may be made where justified on a case-by-case basis, such as for historical, technically difficult or otherwise unique images", so this is being nominated under the grounds of an exception to FPC #2.
Articles in which this image appears: List:

FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
Creator: Isaac Polanski, uploaded by TornadoLGS

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – one time event, and very nice composition. I agree with taking an exception per above. Bammesk (talk) 01:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Agree as per above; an excellent photo considering how fast the conditions were shifting. Moonreach (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question - The source credits Isaac Polanski via Twitter. His post corroborates this. However, I'm not seeing if he is working for the US Government; rather, he is a "stringer" for a storm media licensing company (Their Twitter). Are we sure that the NWS had the right to release the image into the public domain? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492:Yes. Per Template:PD-NWS on the Commons. The NWS actually has this clause stated for users submitting images to them: "By submitting images, you understand that your image is being released into the public domain. This means that your photo or video may be downloaded, copied, and used by others". One of the other tornadic Featured Pictures (File:Lincoln, NE EF3 tornado.jpg) is under the same license on the Commons as well. Tons of discussions on the Commons have determined it is valid. To not clog this FPC up, I won't link them all here, but if you want me to, I can link you several discussions on the Commons surrounding the PD-NWS guidelines. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 23:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, that works for me. Support. This is an image we'd never be able to take again, and the quality is excellent. When the creator even says that it's one of the few times he's been intimidated by a tornado, we have something special. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 02:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Greenfield IA tornado 2024.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:40, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dunnock

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 04:55:31 (UTC)

Reason: Great quality and detail, adds EV. Unanimously promoted to FP, QI, and VI on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Dunnock
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – _ZZ^Z 'S 04:55, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 11:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dunnock (Prunella modularis) 3.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle I5 skyline

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 11:13:17 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons a month ago. To replace existing FP File:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg.
Articles in which this image appears: Transportation in Seattle etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban
Creator: Dllu

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as creator. dllu (t,c) 18:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – well done (too bad the stars didn't pose for the camera). Bammesk (talk) 01:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Seattle I-5 skyline dllu.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grey-headed honeyeater

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 11:15:53 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Grey-headed honeyeater
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:15, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Grey-headed Honeyeater 0A2A3929.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:44, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red grasshawk male

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 20:56:50 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Neurothemis fluctuans
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 02:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Red grasshawk (Neurothemis fluctuans) male Phuket 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ussher's palla

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 21:07:38 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Palla ussheri
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not entirely enthused with the stem, but for some reason the ants on it really add to the picture (maybe for scale?) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 02:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ussher's palla (Palla ussheri ussheri) underside Nyamebe Bepo.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian tortoise

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2024 at 21:12:17 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Tunisian tortoise
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:41, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 02:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Tunisian tortoise (Testudo graeca nabeulensis) male Cap Bon 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Fe Church, Leyte

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2024 at 11:13:51 (UTC)

Reason: The image has a high technical standard, with no "graininess" or anything like that, I don't know about criteria 2, considering the picture has a resolution of 1,126 × 2,000 pixels. The picture also passes criteria 3, considering the picture is good-looking (according to me). The image has a free license, the description is verified by a source, and the description is also useful in describing the church. The image also does not have digital manipulation considering.
Articles in which this image appears: Santa Fe, Leyte
FP category for this image: Architecture
Creator: TheNuggeteer

Support as nominator – 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 11:13, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Indistinct foreground, crooked orientation. – Sca (talk) 12:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per above, also only 1126 px wide. Looks like there are fingerprints on the lens of the phone. --Janke | Talk 16:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; per Sca. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose – This is a bad nomination _ZZ^Z 'S 03:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To give TheNuggeteer credit, they clearly went through the checklist and tried to satisfy the requirements. I also think a professional photograph taken inside this building could easy drum up enough support to pass; the choice of subject was good. That said, I see a number of flaws that prevent me from supporting this one: Streaking in highlights, low resolution, muddiness in mid-tones, and less-than-ideal framing. There's also no good target article for the church, just one for the town it's in. For these reasons, I also oppose. Moonreach (talk) 15:22, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @TheNuggeteer: There's a great tool on Commons called CropTool. If you have a picture like this but want to adjust the size to remove the umbrella at the bottom, it can be very useful. hinnk (talk) 08:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, cropping an already small image kills its chances here...--Janke | Talk 18:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kinemacolor coronation drill

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 16:33:38 (UTC)

Original – A Kinemacolor film taken at Reedham Orphanage in Richmond, London in 1911, in which the orphans perform for guests. The film demonstrates both the capabilities and limitations of the Kinemacolor process, which supported two colors rather than the three used in modern processes, and displayed them through sequential, alternating frames.

Reason: Lively demonstration of the Kinemacolor two-color film process, an important milestone in the history of color photography. Apart from imperfections in the original, this is a very good transfer. The frame rate is at or near real-time (often a problem with showing films from the hand-cranked era) and in HD. The source at the Internet Archive (1) says these are the original colors plus a white-balance pass. Kinemacolor was also a sequential color system, which is why some movement has anaglyph-like effects to it.
Articles in which this image appears: Kinemacolor, Reedham Orphanage
FP category for this image: Photographic techniques, terms, and equipment
Creator: Uploaded to Wikipedia by Cesias7 from a copy at the Internet Archive, where it is credited to Natural Color Kinematograph Co., Ltd.

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting example of pre-Technicolor movies, amazingly little color strobing in the fast-fluttering flags! (Partly because the red and blue registered only on respective frames...) --Janke | Talk 17:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This does seem to have the frames blended, inasmuch as pausing it in any given place still shows both colors. I checked our copy against the one on the Internet Archive and found that it's the same there; both are 25 fps. While I would have liked to see a version that preserved the sequential color, I'm not sure that would have been possible. I also don't think it would have made a difference as far as the strobing goes. Since a small period of time elapses between the color changes, there's no version of this where the colors would have lined up perfectly. That's an unsolvable problem akin to reconstructing a single frame out of interlaced video - you can get close, but never exact. Although the bitrate of the Internet Archive copy is higher, and maybe we should upload that one just to have it, this is otherwise about as good as it gets. Moonreach (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excited to see this getting nominated, I was just looking through this article last week after going through some predecessor films by William Norman Lascelles Davidson. We only have one other HD example of Kinemacolor, and this video does a much better job of showing how it captures different kinds of motion. hinnk (talk) 19:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And the sweet peas appear to be shot from a theater screen, hand-held, with a spectator blocking the lowest part of the frame - so that one is definitely not FP material... --Janke | Talk 06:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my god, I didn't even catch that part. I was wondering why they were shifting the image down in the middle of the video. hinnk (talk) 08:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha, yeah. I realized about 10 seconds in that I was looking at the back of someone's head and wondered if I should say something. Moonreach (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's more Kinemacolor than just this film, for example on archive.org (a quick sidenote: almost all of these films weren't digitized in HD, including this one - I can't remember why I uploaded it at such a high resolution) Cesias7 (talk) 10:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The IA version is at the same resolution, were you also the uploader there? Considering the alternative examples all seem to be watermarked or super compressed, I'd be fine featuring this even if it was upscaled. hinnk (talk) 22:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I uploaded them to IA. This film, the shortest of them all (7 seconds of footage repeated 3x), is the only one which was digitized in HD. The others are all 720x576, except for a few scenes in the Delhi Durbar, which are even lower quality. Cesias7 (talk) 08:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shame it's watermarked, that's a fun piece of footage. I like seeing candid moments from long ago. They make the past feel more real. Moonreach (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carlosmarkos2345 | Talk 08:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Coronation Drill at Reedham Orphanage 1911 Kinemacolor.webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battleship Potemkin

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2024 at 19:50:29 (UTC)

Original – Battleship Potemkin is a 1925 Soviet silent film directed by Sergei Eisenstein. It dramatizes the 1905 Potemkin uprising.

Reason: Battleship Potemkin is a WP:FILM/CORE article on our List of films voted the best. This video is from a 2005 restoration of the original Soviet version, which reinstated the intertitles and shots that had been censored in later international releases.
Articles in which this image appears: Battleship Potemkin
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Sergei Eisenstein (director)

Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question — Where are the subtitles sourced from? I'm worried they might be separately copyrighted. Moonreach (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Russian intertitles are from archived prints (derived from the original Soviet release), and the translated English subtitles I grabbed from this version. If there are any issues, the alternative would be to use Mosfilm's translation (on Commons and YouTube). It's only ~150 titles, so it wouldn't take long to do. hinnk (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll support, then. I've scrubbed through the film and everything about it looks good. Moonreach (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Matarisvan (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Battleship Potemkin (1925).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:10, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Kid

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 17:03:42 (UTC)

Original – The Kid is a 1921 American silent comedy-drama film written, produced, directed by and starring Charlie Chaplin, and features Jackie Coogan as his foundling baby, adopted son and sidekick. This was Chaplin's first full-length film as a director. It was a huge success and was the second-highest-grossing film in 1921. Now considered one of the greatest films of the silent era, it was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress in 2011.

Reason: one of the most well know Charlie Chaplin films ever, also, this has earned a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes
Articles in which this image appears: The Kid (1921 film)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Charlie Chaplin

Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - of course! --Janke | Talk 18:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support hinnk (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. It's a masterpiece indeed. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Moonreach (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:The Kid (1921).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:19, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucie Delarue-Mardrus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2024 at 18:50:59 (UTC)

Reason: A really nice portrait - just out of (American) copyright this year - and a huge upgrade on the old lead image. Biggest flaw is the 1920s retouching, which I've done what I could with.
Articles in which this image appears: Lucie Delarue-Mardrus +1
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Henri Manuel restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 13:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ — It has good composition, but up close pretty much everything is slightly blurry (except the underside of the chin, oddly) and the face seems to be nothing but airbrushing. Moonreach (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, the business is pretty normal for this era at this scale. As for the nderside of the chin... That's down to the 1928 image retouching. I don't think it really affected the chin shape much, and the face as a whole - other than some scratches on the cheek - didn't seem abnormal for the era. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 13:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, so it should be considered a kind of era-specific limitation, akin to scratch marks? I can see that. I'm not enthusiastic enough to support this, but I'll strike my oppose. Moonreach (talk) 20:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lucie Delarue-Mardrus by Henri Manuel.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:21, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Greenfield tornado damage

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2024 at 18:30:37 (UTC)

Reason: Passed all of the criteria & is a high-quality (4,000 × 3,000 pixels) photograph of some damage from the 2024 Greenfield tornado
Articles in which this image appears: 2024 Greenfield tornado
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
Creator: ChristopherRiske (Wikimedia Commons User)

Support as nominator – The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:30, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca: I just copied and pasted the image’s original caption in the nomination’s caption. This image is used in the “aftermath” section of the tornado. I may be looking at this through the lens of something who understands weather, but the tornado was very narrow (discussed in the article) and it seems clear where the worst damage path is in the photo. Could you maybe explain what exactly is “not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers”? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 14:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well executed drone photo that clearly shows the destruction this tornado caused to houses. Nick-D (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Blind leading the Blind

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2024 at 11:22:56 (UTC)

Reason: High quality Google Art Project scan of the Renaissance painting with excellent EV in a FA.
Articles in which this image appears: The Blind Leading the Blind
FP category for this image: Paintings
Creator: Pieter Bruegel the Elder/Museo di Capodimonte

Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support; and this painting also by Aersten is a FP. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I am neutral on voting. The source link says "This painting is an old copy of the original kept in Naples at the Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte". I assume the original painting is the infobox image in This version of the article. I think the fact that the nom image (which is currently the infobox image) is a "copy of the original" should be stated in the article (and on the file page). Bammesk (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – The wording "old copy" is confusing. Often, an artist made several versions of a painting (e.g. Munch's Scream). If this "copy" can be credited to Bruegel, I'll support. --Janke | Talk 06:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Legacy section of the article has a paragraph on copies, and no mention that "Bruegel the Elder" did a copy. It says his son "Brueghel the Younger" did a copy around 1616 (the father died in 1569). This source says the nom version was done by the son (I am not sure about the reliability of the source though). BTW, the original [2] and the copy [3] have differences, for instance see the lower left corner. Bammesk (talk) 01:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

White-bibbed babbler

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 10:09:27 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: White-bibbed babbler
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: JJ Harrison

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 14:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 14:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – TheWikiToby (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:White-bibbed Babbler 0A2A3060.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2024 at 10:17:04 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Has stuck (previous nomination was premature).
Articles in which this image appears: Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History
Creator: David Adams

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Old news. – Sca (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Glad to see this get nominated. It's one that I wanted to nominate myself back when the event was current, but the guidelines were to let the article stabilize, and at some point I forgot about it. Moonreach (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Old news, for sure, but quite an extraordinary incident. --Janke | Talk 06:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 14:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Wreckage from Key Bridge Collapse (240326-A-SE916-9511).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nosferatu

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Aug 2024 at 05:07:11 (UTC)

Original – Nosferatu is a 1922 German silent horror film directed by F. W. Murnau. It is an unofficial adaptation of Bram Stoker's 1897 novel Dracula.

Reason: Nosferatu is on our WP:FILM/CORE list and remains one of the best-known silent films. For many years it was officially pulled from circulation (as an unauthorized Dracula adaptation), but it's since been restored by the Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau Foundation.
Articles in which this image appears: Nosferatu
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: F. W. Murnau (director)

Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 13:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 13:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 04:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:32, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nosferatu (1922).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P. L. Travers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 14:33:14 (UTC)

Reason: Quite a nice image. I've sharpened it slightly, removed dust and scratches, and fixed some localised browning.
Articles in which this image appears: P. L. Travers and a few new additions and minor pages.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers
Creator: Unknown photographer, restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 14:33, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I have some of the same technical quibbles with this as I did with the portrait of Lucie Delarue-Mardrus, from a few days ago, but the fact that you can see the film grain convinces me that the soft areas are authentic to the source photograph rather than a reproduction shortcoming. I have one suggestion: remove a bit of hair that got on the negative around the dress's waist area if you think you can do so cleanly. It's the only thing I see that you missed on your otherwise very thorough restoration. Moonreach (talk) 18:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Think that's a hair? I was torn between that and some sort of buckle. Kind of leaning, like, a metal loop holding the flowers on, but... Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We may be looking at different things. I'm looking at a very thin, irregular white line that curves through a sort of flower design at the waist. If you still think it's part of the costume then leave it; it's not a deal-breaker either way. Moonreach (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonreach: Just to note, while looking at it, I spotted a couple more specks and got them. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 19:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 20:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 04:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:P.L. Travers as Titania in a production with Alan Wilkie.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12P Pons–Brooks

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2024 at 17:22:07 (UTC)

Reason: Meets the FPC critia. High encyclopedic value since it is our best image of 12P/Pons–Brooks and its going to be difficult to get a replacement since its not due back until 2095. Green colour is due to diatomic carbon and is common in comets despite the media getting rather excited about it at the time.
Articles in which this image appears: 12P/Pons–Brooks
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creator: Nielander

Support as nominator – ©Geni (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 18:24, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – LGTM _ZZ^Z 'S 18:18, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 19:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 20:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 09:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pons brooks.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fishing boat at Bukit Chendering 1962

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 00:13:21 (UTC)

Reason: This is the first time I've nominated at FPC so I am not very familiar with the criteria. I've reviewed them and the only one I'm uncertain about is the resolution, but since this is a historical picture and there's no way to get a better resolution image, I think this qualifies. It's currently only used in one article, in the Bahasu Malaya Wikipedia, but I don't think that's a criterion.
Articles in which this image appears: ms:Nelayan
FP category for this image: History
Creator: Don Christie. I am Mike Christie; Don was my father.

Support as nominator – Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Unfortunately, the main subject is quite blurry; the focus is on the foreground water. I think this photo's chances are non-existent here, especially since it is not used in any EnWiki article at all... --Janke | Talk 08:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll take your word for it. How do I withdraw the nomination? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here, I'll do it for you. Incidentally, I do like this picture, it's just a shame about the focus. Moonreach (talk) 15:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. Moonreach (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flower of one Succisa pratensis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Aug 2024 at 16:59:12 (UTC)

Reason: Sharp stacked photo (FP wikimedia)
Articles in which this image appears: Succisa pratensis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: Famberhorst

Support as nominator – Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Caption? – Sca (talk) 01:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know exactly what you mean.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Description added.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot to fill in a caption when creating the nomination, so you'll notice there's some placeholder text beneath the image. hinnk (talk) 05:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your explanation.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 19:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing vote --_ZZ^Z 'S 22:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cethosia biblis

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2024 at 09:27:42 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons two months ago. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Cethosia biblis
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Atanu Bose Photography

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Caption? – Sca (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 14:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn vote --_ZZ^Z 'S 18:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gray catbird

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2024 at 09:40:09 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Gray catbird
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Rhododendrites

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Caption? – Sca (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 14:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – TheWikiToby (talk) 01:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good EV and high quality --Tagooty (talk) 04:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gray catbird (85315).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battleship Potemkin (poster)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2024 at 11:44:11 (UTC)

Reason: a great poster for a great movie
Articles in which this image appears: Battleship Potemkin, Russian battleship Potemkin, Culture of Russia, etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Unknown

Support as nominator – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blocky at full resolution, looks like it's been upscaled from a much lower resolution. hinnk (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per hinnk. The poster itself is good, though; I'd support a higher-resolution alt. Moonreach (talk) 14:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per hinnk. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Ivan from the ISS

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 14:15:18 (UTC)

Reason: Ivan was a major hurricane and news story in 2004. This is a good shot of a cyclonic eye from above; I believe the parts of the ISS you can see make for an interesting juxtaposition. While the file has some imperfections at full magnification, remember that it's a 20-year-old digital photo. I tracked down and uploaded NASA's original version (minus the white bar at the bottom with the number string) so we could have the best quality copy. If it passes, this would be a good candidate for featured picture this September 11th, since that will be the image's 20th anniversary.
Articles in which this image appears: Hurricane Ivan, Meteorological history of Hurricane Ivan
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather
Creator: "Edward Fincke, Expedition 9 Crew, International Space Station, NASA"; originally uploaded by Dodo, reuploaded by me, Moonreach.

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 14:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Panels from ISS obscure much of image. – Sca (talk) 12:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per Sca. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The fantastic Scolopendra gigantea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 04:21:09 (UTC)

Reason: The picture is of good quality and depicts the centipede well. Although one of its sides appears to be shaking/in motion. I also went for this because I originally wanted to do Chandelure, but its picture is owned by Nintendo, of course, so I couldn't, so I decided to do something else, and I thought of doing the Scolopendra gigantea!
Articles in which this image appears: Scolopendra gigantea

Largest and heaviest animals User:The High Fin Sperm Whale/Fact of the day/Archive User:Dronebogus/Basement

FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: berichard (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Berichard)

Support as nominator – ILike Leavanny (talk) 04:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Striking vote: User does not meet the voting criteria (7/100 edits)

Strong oppose Image is of low resolution, low size, and low quality. Head suffers from motion blur, subject is partially cropped off, parts of the subject is too dark to see, parts of the animals are out of focus, and the detail is too low. (fails criteria #1, #2, and #3). There are better photos of this insect on the web. – _ZZ^Z 'S 04:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looking closely I did notice that it was a little blurry. You are right about the motion blur at the head and the heavy shadows. I think I agree with you. Sometimes I don't understand things well and when I think I do, the picture ends up being out of focus.

Lucy LostWord 16:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Spielberg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 17:49:22 (UTC)

Reason: high quality picture used as lead; famous personality
Articles in which this image appears: Steven Spielberg, Critics' Choice Movie Award for Best Director, List of Phi Kappa Phi members, David O. Selznick Achievement Award in Theatrical Motion Pictures
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Martin Kraft

Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Routine shot of famous person. Meh. – Sca (talk) 12:07, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 15:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a generic studio type portrait and gives no indication at all of why the subject is notable. As such, while it's a useful photo it's not of FP standard. Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel sometimes like there's a double-standard on photos of famous people. Old photos, especially those in black and white, never seem to face this particular challenge, even though their compositions are otherwise often similar. Moonreach (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's largely due to the relative rarity of photos before the modern era. Spielberg must have been photographed on film sets and at movie-related events on many thousands of occasions. Nick-D (talk) 22:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I don't doubt they exist, is it a fair comparison to make if none of them are free use? I went through all the photos in the Commons category "Steven Spielberg by year," and the only high-resolution one I found that sort of shows what he does for work is this. The fact that Spielberg is still alive and a better photo could be taken of him is technically true, but it's also hypothetical. Moonreach (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The resolution is low 1,471 × 2,205 pixels for a 2023 photo, it borderline fails FP criterion #2. The camera has much higher resolution. Otherwise a nice portrait. I don't agree with the "indication of notability" argument. It would be a plus but it's not a requirement. Bammesk (talk) 02:26, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Woodbury Langdon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 00:15:00 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Woodbury Langdon etc.
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: John Singleton Copley

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 17:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though I had to add the source of this version of the file to the image page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 07:45, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:John Singleton Copley - Portrait of Woodbury Langdon (1767).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chair

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 00:40:50 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Chair, Furniture
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others
Creator: Thomas Chippendale; photograph by Pharos

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:40, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The covering is not authentic - neither to Chippendale nor to the period. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
how can a chair be inauthentic? it looks like a chair to me ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please re-read what I wrote. The covering is not authentic. Chippendale did not upholster his chairs in bright studded leather. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shinku La

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 18:46:29 (UTC)

Reason: good quality image of the Himalayan pass, recently featured on commons
Articles in which this image appears: Shinku La
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Tagooty

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 18:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support @UnpetitproleX: Thanks for the nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – DOF – Large foreground blurry at full rez. – Sca (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sca: The line of footsteps from the lower left diagonally towards the lake is fairly clear, and texture is visible in the foreground snow. The road and peaks in the distance are sharp. Shot at f/16, I think the DoF is adequate given the scene. --Tagooty (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. MER-C 17:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 00:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - About what I'd expect from f 16 at full resolution (and that is some resolution, especially compared to my old EOS 60D). Snow is handled very well. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Frozen Lake Shinko La Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 00315.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redtoothed triggerfish

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 17:52:28 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons last month. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Redtoothed triggerfish
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 17:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good EV and image quality --Tagooty (talk) 03:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 14:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 09:31, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pez ballesta de dientes rojos (Odonus niger), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-25, DD 23.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chrysaora hysoscella

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 17:58:13 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons earlier this month. Headline image.
Articles in which this image appears: Chrysaora hysoscella
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Cnidaria
Creator: Luc Viatour

Support as nominator – MER-C 17:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Needs a better caption (none in the article) explaining what is seen - is that prey, or what? --Janke | Talk 10:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man with a Movie Camera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 21:36:06 (UTC)

Original – Man with a Movie Camera is a 1929 Soviet documentary film directed by Dziga Vertov.

Reason: Man with a Movie Camera is a WP:FILM/CORE article listed in the documentary and Soviet sections of our List of films voted the best. This version of it has less physical wear than other copies and never got cropped to fit a soundtrack on the film strip.
Articles in which this image appears: Man with a Movie Camera, Dziga Vertov
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Film
Creator: Dziga Vertov (director)

Support as nominator – hinnk (talk) 21:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 15:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question - What's the source on the English-language subtitles/captions? May have licensing implications. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're from File:Man With A Movie Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1929).webm, but retimed for this video. The film doesn't really have intertitles, so the closed captions are limited to like 4 sentences from the opening titles and a few short phrases that appear on signs. hinnk (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You mean File:Man With A Movie Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1929).ogv? I noticed that there is a dearth of text, but the explanation of the film's conceit at 1:00 is long enough that new copyright could have been attracted for the translation. The Internet Archive does not give a source for their digitization (the source of the .ogv), and so I can't see where the closed captions come from.

That being said, I'm leaning toward the view that the one screen of text is de minimis in an hour long film... Support, with that note. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, not that one. In the TimedText page creation you can see it was copied from the timed text for File:Man With A Movie Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1929).webm.en.srt. I just noticed that one has the original Russian as well, so I've done some fixes and rewording based on machine translation. hinnk (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 18:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Человек с киноаппаратом (1929).webm --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset on Pluto

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 20:26:17 (UTC)

Reason: Iconic, unique photo of Pluto taken by the New Horizons probe in 2015. It's just under 1500px on the short axis, but I tracked down NASA's official version and that does seem to be the resolution it was imaged at. Already a featured picture on the Indonesian language Wikipedia.
Articles in which this image appears: Atmosphere of Pluto, Pluto
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creator: NASA's credit list: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute. Uploaded by Njardarlogar

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent quality and EV, size is reasonable given the distance it took to reach here. I was pleased to see that the article details the layers of haze - that's enough for a blurb on its own. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – on the image page, the source link is dead. I added an archive link. FP criterion #6. Bammesk (talk) 02:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Moonreach (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and excellent EV. --Tagooty (talk) 03:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – _ZZ^Z 'S 04:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 10:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:MVIC sunset scan of Pluto.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]