User talk:X750/Archive

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schicksalsmelodien (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schicksalsmelodien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Schicksalsmelodien, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 12:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Obama gaming! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 12:24, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

@Bilorv:Hello, I have read the wikipedia article regarding notability requirements & I have found reviews by German music magazines/webzines & chart statistics. If I were to insert those into the article, with the appropriate boxes tempalates etc could the article be put up for review again? Cheers Obama gaming (talk) 12:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Obama gaming, and the careful consideration of the details I pointed you to. As I see you now have added the chart statistics, I've taken the liberty of re-submitting the draft on your behalf and accepting it (it now shows notability is met). Any magazine/webzine reviews you have found would be great in improving the article further. Thanks! — Bilorv (talk) 14:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schicksalsmelodien has been accepted

Schicksalsmelodien, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 14:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Tirzepatide

Hi Obama gaming I hope I've helped with the draft (as a chemist, not a drugs expert, I've got no more to contribute presently) but I have one comment. You say "tirzepatide exhibiting much larger reductions (around 2% more reduction depending on dosage) in...." The reference is way beyond my full understanding but are you sure that 2% is "much larger"? Perhaps this needs expressing in another way to be clearer? Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

@Michael D. Turnbull:Hello Mr Turnbull, thank you for your message. I say much larger, this is all relatively speaking. In the study results on a dosage basis (5mg, 10mg, 15mg) tirzepatide has glycated hemoglobin baseline reductions of -2.01%, -2.24% and -2.3% respectively. Compared to semaglutide, which had -0.15% (95% confidence interval -0.28 to -0.03), -0.39% (95% CI -0.51 to -0.26) and -0.45% (95% CI -0.57 to -0.32). Relatively, this is a thirteen-fold, five-fold and five-fold increase in glycated hemoglobin baseline reduction. The 5mg statistic is particularly interesting too, since serious adverse effects were reported in 5-7% of patients who received tirzepatide vs 3% for semaglutide. I would like to think that is a "large" increase, even if visually it is insignificant. It's also interesting to note other diabetes type 2 treatments rarely have a >1% glycated hemoglobin baseline reduction, so I think saying much large is justified, however I think it should be reworded to "exhibits greater reductions". I appreciate your input, I am by no means an expert in this field, this journal submission actually popped up in my weekly Lancet online-first email & it seemed bizzare such a promising diabetes type 2 treatment didn't have any documentation. But yes, I do think I should be more concise. Obama gaming (talk) 11:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

That's fine, I'll leave it to you to express it as clearly as you can. Note that WP has standards for articles on medicines (linked at WP:MEDRS) which are very stringent and usually require secondary sources, not just claims by those who conducted the trials. Hence I think you need to be careful to note this is an experimental drug, not an approved one, and be cautious in interpretations. I recently contributed to molnupiravir, where this sort of issue arose. Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I was thinking the same. I don't want to present it as some "miracle drug", and obviously need to adhere to strict neutrality. Thank you for linking the article, I will edit the description to state that it is experimental & introduce information about it's phase trials. Do you think my sources are good? I've only included a single primary source I believe (from the lilly company or whatever they're called, albeit adapted), and I have a post-hoc analysis I intend to use for it's mechanism of action too. Cheers Obama gaming (talk) 12:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

The Chemical Review article I added says on p907 that the compound is a "Synthetic form of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor dual agonist", so that's fine as a secondary source for the moa: although their only reference is Lilly's Mol Metab paper. I've searched all that RSC review for mentions of tirzepatide and p 906-7 is all there is (which is enough!). I'm a member of the RSC and have full access to everything normally behind their paywall. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Your contribution in priceless, thank you very much. Obama gaming (talk) 20:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Addendum - I couldn't find much information about its synthesis, could you? I emailed their tirzepatide spokesperson about potentially obtaining information about it but I suppose if it's not available in public domain it's probably patent pending.Obama gaming (talk) 20:29, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

I intended to take a good look today for recent patents filed for tirzepatide. Pubchem usually lists these but is currently lacking that information. Given the normally long times between invention and Phase 3 trials, I'd expect there to be a filing — although probably not yet granted. Whatever I find I'll include in a chemistry section in the draft (compare my additions to molnupiravir). Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Actually found quite easily. see this webpage of Google Patents. Note in particular at the end of the main text (TLDR) there is a citation to US20200023040 which will be the relevant patent I need look over for chemistry. Note also the "non-patent citations" which includes several references that would be worth you casting an eye over: Bastin doi=10.2147/DMSO.S191438 looks particularly relevant. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:32, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

The key first patent is this one, US9474780 and, as I would expect, the synthesis was by solid phase peptide chemistry. Tirzepatide is Example 1, I think. Not much worth including in the draft but I'll add the reference and a comment with links to the relevant technology. Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

This link is a what I think a relevant study but unfortunately I don't have access to it. Do your perceive this to be relevant? Again, thank you for your contribution. Obama gaming (talk) 11:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, excellent spot which I've added to the article. It's relevance is clear from the abstract, so no need to actually access it. Please stop thanking me for my additions, that's becoming embarrassing! Mike Turnbull (talk) 11:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Rightio, noted. Obama gaming (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Obama gaming! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Uploading an image for a novel drug, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Perfect Cult.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Perfect Cult.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Perfect Cult (album) has been accepted

The Perfect Cult (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Obama gaming! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need help with convert template, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The Deathstars album

I wanted to reply here so that the other guy's talk page didn't get cluttered @Obama gaming: Press releases are good, but reviews are hit-or-miss since many review websites aren't reliable and are unknown. But referencing the liner notes is also fine. Most people, I've noticed, have been using a generic "AV media" template. For example...

The Downward Spiral, this is one of the references................ "The Downward Spiral (CD liner notes). Nine Inch Nails. Interscope Records. 1994. p. 28. 92346-2."

Metallica, this is one of the references................ "Metallica (liner notes). Metallica. Vertigo Records. 1991. 510 022-2."

The Torture Technique, this is one of the references, as seen when editing................ { { cite AV media notes |title=The Torture Technique |title-link=The Torture Technique |others=Sister Machine Gun |year=1994 |type=booklet |publisher=TVT/Wax Trax! |location=Chicago, Illinois } }

They didn't include any links to actual images and they're treating liner notes like as if it was a novel or book instead. I personally would rather link directly to an image of the booklet. It's easier for people to verify it because, usually, scans of a booklet doesn't lie, like what I've done here:

Mostasteless................ { { Cite AV media notes |title=Cryptic Collection Credits (Mostasteless songs' recording dates) |url=https://www.discogs.com/release/2465263-The-Cryptic-Collection/images |access-date=May 15, 2021 |type=liner notes |publisher=Psychopathic Records |id=PSY42102 } }

So at this point, it's all based on context. Are you able to figure out the details/individuals of Deathstars' album through a reliable review or website? If not, second-guess and ask if it's really that important to the article? If it is, then yeah, fall back on the liner notes. So long as you're using one of the two methods I described above. Xanarki (talk) 04:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Understood. @Xanarki: Here is the "official press release" that I used, and what I do for these slightly lesser known albums is that I open roughly 5/6 websites, and cross-reference information about the album, and go with the most used information, e.g if someone says song is this long, but four others say its this long, I go with the latter. Its arduous but I love these albums & artists so I think it's worth it. Another nice method for checking song credits is going onto spotify, right clicking a song & clicking show credits, and it can tell you a little about the song. But I find CD information the most useful, especially the artist's domestic market release (EU/Sweden, Germany etc) example 1, example 2 & example 3. Example 1 is this the album this talk page references, the second two pictures are for Schicksalsmelodien, another page I wrote. Deathstars did have a minor lineup change too, and this review actually sums it all up quite nicely. Obama gaming (talk) 07:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah that review did a great job of covering all of the bases. I personally would use that plus the liner notes. Paired together, it makes for a great source. Also just a heads up with Spotify, a lot of artists have different streaming contracts, and some of them sold/forfeited/combined their publishing rights. Also, many times, older songwriters don't realize or care that their songs are posted, and so their names don't get listed.

FYI, if you're gonna reference images for the liner notes and booklets, the best way is to take the page's URL, and simply add /images at the end of the URL:

https://www.discogs.com/release/2465263-The-Cryptic-Collection [1] leads directly to the page, and someone would gladly take this down quickly, as you've probably noticed lol.

https://img.discogs.com/WFs9wDeNqEfkcmdKql2GkkDDHF0=/fit-in/600x200/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-2465263-1563621835-9766.jpeg.jpg [2] leads directly to an image, kind of like what you did in your paragraph above, but since it has browser-based formatting and it's a long URL, there's a very good chance that this URL won't work in a few weeks or even days.

https://www.discogs.com/release/2465263-The-Cryptic-Collection/images [3] leads to all of the images on one page without the pop-ups or overlays. I actually figured this out on my own, because there's no way to access this page except by manually typing in /images after the album's name (I kept right-clicking and copying URLs with no luck, then I tried typing in /images manually, and it works every time).

Here's what the link to Eisbrecher would look like: [4] https://www.discogs.com/release/16112110-Eisbrecher-Schicksalsmelodien/images

You seem to have a good grasp on everything though, and you know what makes sense and what doesn't. That type of common sense is excellent for Wikipedia. Xanarki (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Cheers mate, thanks for the info. Really helps. I am thinking of creating documentation for the band Feuerschwanz, and its related albums so you can check in on those if you'd like. It'll probably be under my username & once it's done I'll move it into article space when it's ready. Obama gaming (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chemistry (journal). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!

Hello Obama gaming, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Happy editing, Yeeno (talk) 🍁 06:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bastard (Stahlmann album) has been accepted

Bastard (Stahlmann album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:AndrewJeffcoat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AndrewJeffcoat.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: There is nothing within the free domain of him, this image was actually purchased from the BW Media website by someone close to me. Does this not satisfy the "no free equivalent"? I was under the assumption if there's nothing in the public domain then there's nothing stopping me from uploading this. Appreciate your help Obama gaming (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

It is not sufficient that a free image cannot be found, it must also be the case that a free image cannot be created. From the non-free content guidelines, "Non-free content should not be used when a freely licensed file that serves the same purpose can reasonably be expected to be uploaded, as is the case for almost all portraits of living people." -- Whpq (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: Would you rather me take a picture of him myself? I can do that Obama gaming (talk) 02:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

That is your choice. If you choose to do so, the image you upload must be freely licensed. -- Whpq (talk) 02:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Yeah alright I'll do that then. So what, do we just delete the photo for now or what? Obama gaming (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the image shoudl be deleted. You can add {{db-author}} to the file description to request it be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 02:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Roger Obama gaming (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your promt action on tagging the files for deletion. Copyright, and non-free content rules can be very confusing. Media Copyright Questions is a good place to ask for help if you are confused on licensing and nonfree content for images and other media. -- Whpq (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Cheers dude, and yeah I've run through the non-free stuff on all the other thing's I've uploaded Obama gaming (talk) 02:39, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:RuckaRuckaAli.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RuckaRuckaAli.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it or an alternate version. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

• This post refers to Template:Eisbrecher, and the links in a navbox should only refer to existing articles. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi X750! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Italicisation on title?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi X750! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, SS or ß?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi X750! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Linking a YouTube video?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

McLaren MP4-18

Greetings. Just an apology for my very hasty edit summary, not knowing that the article was still under construction (hopefully?) and awaiting a GA review—I only realised that at the talk page. Best of luck in getting that GA passed, as the car is an interesting slice of McLaren history. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Mac Dreamstate, no problem. I appreciate your honesty, quite frankly I'm still adding stuff and I suppose the odd spelling mistake does slip by me (who spells Mercedes with four e's?). I'll try revise & improve the grammar, so yeah, fingers crossed & hopefully my first GA goes well. X-750 _{I've made a mistake, haven't I?} 22:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

@Mac Dreamstate: sorry to bother, but I've given a crack at copyediting the article. Give it another geeze & see what you think. Appreciate your time. You're right too, I thought it was criminal such a slice of McLaren history had such a crap article for it. Distasteful, if you ask me. X-750 _{I've made a mistake, haven't I?} 23:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

I gave it a quick bash whilst retaining most of your content (save for a few reworded sentances, new paragraphs, some linking, and getting rid of "&" for tone). No sources were changed whatsoever, as those were excellent and in abundance. If it doesn't eventually pass for GA, I'll be surprised. Go forth! It's even more detailed than, say, the MP4/4 article in terms of actually discussing the design itself. I'd love to see the same treatment for the MP4/14 and MP4/15, which are also criminally sparse for such important cars. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Mac Dreamstate Thanks a lot mate, highly appreciate it. I'll give those two articles you mentioned a quick whirl. I'm kind of surprised Häkkinen's title winning car doesn't have a decent article, but I'll see what I can do 😀 X-750 _{I've made a mistake, haven't I?} 20:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi X750! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citing sources via the Wikipedia Library?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi X750! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Creating a template?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

G Herbo

Hi, i've restored the G Herbo discography page because at 30,000 bytes it's large enough to justify a split in my view, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

If you insist, Atlantic306. I don't have much experience with page splits. X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 21:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

just pinged you in the Mrbeastmodeallday ANI as requested

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Obama Gaming :) Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 09:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Holy shit it's Saucy X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 09:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Something's odd, there

This is gonna seem weird. But, I'm kinda getting a sense that the two combating editors at WP:ANI, may end up being the same individual. GoodDay (talk) 06:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

If that is the case, GoodDay, it will be an ANI thread fpr the ages. Perhaps goes into one of those Wiki trivia pages. Ill tell you my personal feeling, I've talked to TheCurrencyGuy on his talk page, and I'm gonna tell you my raw thoughts. There's definitely some meatpuppetry going on, but to whom to delegate the meatmaster, here's what I think:

• One of the users has told his buddies on some sort of online platform, hey, vote on the move.
• I say this because one IP geolocates to San Francisco, the other London. Looking at TheCurrencyGuy's contribution history, and his spelling variations, its clear he is British. Or at the very least, European, as his various edits to Germany related articles such as aktiengesellschaft.
• What makes this really complicated is the fact that there could be two ulterior motives:

• Gangam style is trying to frame TheCurrencyGuy for sockpuppetry (which does not seem unlikely given his agenda against him)
• Or that indeed, TheCurrencyGuy is a sockpuppet. What I am confused is about is why he would be doing this at what appears to be like 6am local time, unless he is American (which still wouldn't make sense because that would've been at 2am ish)

I guess only the CheckUser can tell us the truth, but as of writing OGP has been blocked for a week. Observing his edit habits, I expect I a tirade or lengthy polemic on his talk page to be imminent. Apologies for such a long read, this is quite possibly one of the most difficult things I've come across in my wee little years on this project.

His point about Franz Ferdinand was pretty funny, I gotta admit too. X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 09:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

As of today, OGP has been indeffed, GoodDay. How bizarre, how bizarre... X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 22:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Well, something was gonna break, one way or the other. GoodDay (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

True. Have a good day, GoodDay. Maybe check out this XKCD comic if you'd like. X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 22:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

It is indeed a bewildering situation. The way OGP pounced on the "sockpuppetry" story and started spreading it around is very suspicious to me, as if it had been planned.... but that's just my idle speculation. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Having observed this saga and having cast a vote in the move discussion, I really feel like this whole thing belongs in Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars or something similar. 68.43.231.28 (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

User:Battleofthebands2004 seems to be a sock of OGP, he messaged me out of the blue for unknown reasons. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 23:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

You're not wrong, 68.43.231.28, it's definitely one of the weirdest things I've ever seen. In light of the new revelation by TheCurrencyGuy, I am highly suspect that OGP is the meatpuppet master. It's almost sinister how meticulously (or not savagely) this was planned. Meatpuppetry however, is much harder to spot than sockpuppetry due to CheckUser only being able to distinguish accounts that are technically related. The spreading around bit is what particuarly strikes me too, he wrote it almost like a news article: "Breaking News: User:TheCurrencyGuy suspected of sockpuppeting?" Rather libelous if you ask me... I also have a hunch on the grounds of WP:CIR where OGP is not mature enough to understand that Wikipedia is a place with rules, and that they are steadfast. No exceptions, no buts or ifs. He was half-right in saying perhaps it is not the place for him, however he's half wrong in the fact that he can change his behaviour. Redemption is difficult but not impossible. X-750 _{Rust In Peace... Polaris} 00:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you for keeping cool! :D Sprucecopse (talk) 10:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of McLaren MP4-18

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article McLaren MP4-18 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of McLaren MP4-18

The article McLaren MP4-18 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:McLaren MP4-18 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of McLaren MP4-18

The article McLaren MP4-18 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:McLaren MP4-18 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, X750. Thank you for creating Koenigsegg CC850. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

@SunDawn: yeah anytime mate no worries X-750 _{List of articles I have screwed over} 08:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:12 Hours of Mugello

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:12 Hours of Mugello, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Picasso PS-01

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Picasso PS-01, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Balstilimab

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Balstilimab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Botensilimab

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Botensilimab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Removal?

Was this edit just to remove deletion notifications to be considerate to Lugnuts? I thought such notifications were helpful, since they let me know what articles to look into to save from being deleted. Silverseren^C 01:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for the late reply Silver seren, yes it was. He is currently banned, so these notifications aren't particularly useful to him. If you want to keep track of what articles to save you can pop on over to WP:AfD and WP:RfD. Judging by your userpage though, I'm sure you're more than aware of those. Hope this helps. X-750 _{List of articles that I have screwed over} 20:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Avdoralimab

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Avdoralimab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you

Appreciated your message. Any WP editor with a personal feature titled "Articles I've Screwed Over" has to be a good soul. Best to you. Mason.Jones (talk) 16:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Anytime, Mason.Jones. A little self-deprecative humour never hurt anybody. Cheers for that, & may life treat you well. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 02:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ferrari 499P. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Liz I wrote the article entirely. What are you talking about? I didn't move it from anywhere. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 01:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, X750,

An editor moved this article to Draft space. The correct action to take, if you disagree with the page move, is to move the draft back to main space, not to cut and paste content back into a new main space version. Right now, we have two versions of this article, one in main space and one in Draft space.

It's fine if you object to a draftification, just move it back, but please do not create a second version of an article. That's all that this message was about. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Liz, I understand your message & I've read WP:CUTPASTE, but I just want to say I didn't disagree with the page move, I wholly wrote the article myself. The only similarity we have is the first sentence, and that's just the way I write motorsport articles (see Porsche 963). I don't wanna get into trouble, but I'm just saying no cutting and pasting took place. I had the "Create Ferrari 499P" page open before Pete had even created his draft, so the notice displaying the fact that there was a draft didn't even pop up. Why did I publish my article two hours after his draft? Because I made & ate breakfast. I hope you AGF. Thank you. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 02:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Formatting

You ask about formatting chemical names. It depends what editor you are using. For the visual editor: to get superscript text highlight and press ctrl-. For italic, highlight and press ctrl-i. For subscript use ctrl-, If you use visual editor and copy formatted text, you can paste it in to keep the format.

If you are using wikitext editor use html tags, for example 0^0,1 ''N'' or ₂ giving 0^0,1 N or ₂. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Sure, I get that. But how do I know which numbers to super and sub script? Thanks, Graeme Bartlett. Congrats on the rugby league win too. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 21:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Look up the PubChem CID entry, and under IUPAC Name they will have it formatted. ChemSpider can also have an English name entry like this. They should have links from the chembox, or you can search the respective websites with a name or SMILES string. (I played no part in the rugby league win! But thanks for the good news for my country's team.) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett Cheers mate. Another question while you're here, if I'm drawing rhodium(ii) hexanoate dimer's 2D structure, should I follow the diagram at PubChem CID 24845992 or follow the diagram at PubChem SID 24871744? TIA. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 21:27, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Well the first is more realistic to represent a dimer, but the diagram is untidy. The second fails to show half the rhodium-oxygen bonds, and so does not represent it as a dimer, it just shows two of the formula. But it is neat. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

@Graeme Bartlett Which one then, would you include if you were to write an article about the substance? Both, perhaps? X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 21:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

There can be many possible IUPAC names. I like to include one with the "cyclo" and bridge numbering, but another name formed by naming fused rings can go under other names. Some like to only include a PIN, some sort of preferred name. I would not include two similar constructed names unless they are both in use in literature. The purpose is education, so if an extra name variant adds nothing for our readers, no need to include it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, X750. Thank you for your work on De Tomaso P900. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, X750. Thank you for your work on Praga Bohema. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi X750, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 22:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

@Schwede66: chur whanau X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 22:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Haha, didn't even recognise you as a fellow Kiwi. Now I do! Nobody outside New Zealand will understand what you've just said :-) Schwede66 22:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Anytime Schwede66, Merry Christmas & ngā mihi o te tau hou. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 22:16, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:1981 1000 km of Nürburgring

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1981 1000 km of Nürburgring, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercedes-Benz CLK LM

The article Mercedes-Benz CLK LM you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mercedes-Benz CLK LM for comments about the article, and Talk:Mercedes-Benz CLK LM/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 21:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Vandalisms

Are you kidding? What are these actions: [5], [6], [7], [8]? Why are you reverting my edits without any comment, explanation, discussion, especially these first two with objective sources provided? Actions like these are pure vandalism, is registered guy with "good articles" in portfolio acting so poorly and low, really? Seems like you overestimate your role, thinking if somebody is unregistered means you can treat their imprint like trash. You're wrong, dude. 83.21.101.90 (talk) 13:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

You have a point some of the time, some useful information you contribute is being removed.

However, you cannot cry 'pure vandalism' when the community disagrees with you. Particularly regarding 7 and 8 (Cars introduced in 2022), several users now have disagreed with you but you disregard them and their reasons, and you carry on edit wars like it's a winnable game. Behaviour like this tends to irritate users and you alienate yourself and your other contributions.

Cease with the name calling and improve how you to talk to people, ("admins should watch you", "Seems like you overestimate your role", "kid won't be a judge of everything", "nah" etc...), assume good faith and understand the concept of community, democracy and how decisions on content are made. Else, take some time to consider why you are here because Wikipedia is not a winnable game and doesn't belong to you. Rally Wonk (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

83.21.101.90, if you could please demonstrate the consensus formed that those categories apply to production cars only, only then I shall accept I am wrong. Until then, we will remain with the status quo. I will also take no further action until your report at the administrator's noticeboard is concluded. My good articles also have Cars introduced in XXX year, and yet they are not road cars. So, clearly, the reviewers seem to disagree with your viewpoint too. Your edit to Cupra Terrmar was with a supbar source, I'll superseded it with a better one. Your edit to Neta 01 is not consistent with the Manual of style regarding tense (MOS:TENSE). 7 is just plain wrong. Same with 8. For someone demonstrating such knowledge of the innards of Wikipedia I would've been inclined to think consensus and the MOS would be familiar now. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 23:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy new years

	Happy New Year!
	Hello X750: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Mercedes-Benz CLK LM

On 8 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mercedes-Benz CLK LM, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (pictured) won every single event it entered in the 1998 FIA GT Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mercedes-Benz CLK LM. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mercedes-Benz CLK LM), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the article, great quality! It's also featured on Portal:Germany.

Precious

racing cars

Thank you for quality articles about sports racing cars such as Mercedes-Benz CLK LM, Koenigsegg CC850, and McLaren MP4-18, for your first article, Schicksalsmelodien, and your latest up to now, Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX, for "you have a point some of the time", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2798 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Viele danken, Gerda Arendt. Means a lot to me. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 19:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Gerne! Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR

The article Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR for comments about the article, and Talk:Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 19:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX

The article Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX and Talk:Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX

The article Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX for comments about the article, and Talk:Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 03:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX

On 23 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX (pictured) traveled more than 1,000 km (621 mi) from Sindelfingen to Cassis on a single charge with energy to spare? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,914 views (1,326.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR

On 30 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1998, the Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR received the Guinness World Record for the most expensive production car? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,576 views (649.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Take a step forward

Hi, X750, thanks for your comment, especially on user talkpage. But I still strongly advise you to mute this user from wikimail. They may stop on-wiki but they may send you some emails with legal threats cross-wiki. I have a terrible experience when they told me they are cooperating with government. Lemonaka (talk) 01:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Apologies to hear you have had trouble dealing with this user, Lemonaka. They can choose to email me; I will simply trash them. They can "co-operate" with their government, whatever that means. All it gives me is more evidence that my support should perhaps be changed to a strong support. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 02:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh, BTW, having heard that you are a mainlander, I'm inviting you to Chinese Wikipedia. My Chinese is too rotten to contribute there. Lemonaka (talk) 03:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Really, mine is not flash either. I am fluent in speaking, but I can barely write; let alone read. I cannot contribute in a manner that would be considered appropriate for a primary schooler, let alone a neutral Wikivoice. However, I appreciate the sentiment, Lemonaka. Best wishes. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 07:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:X750/Botensilimab

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:X750/Botensilimab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine

Please consider joining our informal, low-key contest about adding citations to articles: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Wikipedia/WikiProject_Medicine_reference_campaign_2023?enroll=qyoufwds If you sign up, it will count your edits retroactively from the beginning of January (when we started), so there's no penalty for joining late. Last I checked, the leader had only added 41 citations (I believe the same source used multiple times counts multiple times, not just once), so winning is within reach for anyone. WhatamIdoing (talk) 06:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out WhatamIdoing, I think I'll sign up. Cheers. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 07:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Yay! WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 March newsletter

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
• Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
• FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
• TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
• Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Alright, something happened with the archiving of the ANI threads. I guess you're the blame for it! ;) Tails Wx 01:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Avdoralimab

Hello, X750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avdoralimab".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

March-BMW M1/C

HI X750,

I see you've nominated my article for deletion. If there is any extra information you can find to improve the page, that would be great. If you think it would be more appropriate, could I propose a move of the article information from this page to the Motorsport section of the BMW M1 article on Wikipedia?

What do you think?

Thanks. Davism0703 (talk) Davism0703 (talk) 16:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out Davism0703, please see Wikipedia:BURDEN; it is not my duty to provide sources, nor do I plan to do so. I had contemplated creating the article myself a while back, but it does not pass GNG. Even if you did merge it into the M1's page, you need far better sources that what is present in the article. It is not the question of whether you have rnoughinformation, it is the question of whether the spurces are strong enough to confer notability, which is currently very weak. Best wishes. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 18:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Economy of North Korea

Hi there! I just wanted to touch base with you directly. I am sorry if something isn't right, I only copied information directly from already used sources. (CIA world Factbook, WorldBank). Which by the way are sources we use for almost every economy article.. please let me know what isn't right.

Thanks so much! Canada18 (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

No problem, Canada18. You introduced redlinks to the infobox, you also put Suriname as a main trading partner even though it only accounts for 6% of trade. Doesn't seem "main" in any way shape or form. We don't need every single relevant statistic duch as youth employment either, we can detail that in the wrticle later if you wish. The problem is not the source, however, it does seem odd that estimates for external debt vary by more than ten billion USD. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 18:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

I think adding Suriname as a main trading partner is debatable as it’s the only other trading partner that the CIA is aware of.. Plus we add countries with less share of trade on other economy articles. I agree it’s difficult to find reliable financial information but the same could be said for the existing data, the only information we have to rely on is from the CIA world Factbook with respect to gross external debt... Why can’t I update it Canada18 (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Also I’m sorry for not fully understanding redlinks I will familiarize myself better going forward Canada18 (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

You can update it if you want. It just seems odd that two different agencies have a discrepancy of more than ten billion dollars. I still disagree with your Suriname point, unless there is a manual of style guideline regarding this, 6% still seems terribly small. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 18:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Up to speed I see what you mean, and you are right they are very different. CIA and WorldBank, both have different figures in terms of gross external. I have no idea which one is more favoured. I reverted my changes but I want a more open conversation on this I’ll prepare all of the sources and information we have on the economy and open talk page for it. Thanks so much for your fast replies Canada18 (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

You may request a Wikipedia:Third opinion if you wish. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 19:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh nono, X750, Thank you for the link, I meant I want to open an instance on the Economy of North Korea's talk page. I just need to get all the sources and info together, and then it will always be there. It's all good! And again, I really appreciate you replying so quickly! Canada18 (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Don't worry about it mate. See if you can form a consensus on the talk page. Best wishes. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 20:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks bro, I appreciate you Canada18 (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

• Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
• Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
• Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
• BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
• FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on General Motors LS-based small-block engine

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page General Motors LS-based small-block engine, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persistent stapedial artery

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Persistent stapedial artery you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Persistent stapedial artery

The article Persistent stapedial artery you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Persistent stapedial artery for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:1981 1000 km of Nürburgring

Hello, X750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1981 1000 km of Nürburgring".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurizio Reggiani has been accepted

Maurizio Reggiani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 06:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 July newsletter

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
• Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
• Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes.... I have nominated an article... a few... none of which have been reviewed bar one which was autofailed due to my sheer lack of experience in said subject... lovely... makes my efforts feel very appreciated 👍 X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 09:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chaparral 2F

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chaparral 2F you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eurohunter -- Eurohunter (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BMW Z18

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article BMW Z18 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eurohunter -- Eurohunter (talk) 19:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:UFCW Local 1776 v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Hello, X750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UFCW Local 1776 v. Eli Lilly and Co., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chaparral 2F

The article Chaparral 2F you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chaparral 2F for comments about the article, and Talk:Chaparral 2F/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eurohunter -- Eurohunter (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BMW Z18

The article BMW Z18 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:BMW Z18 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eurohunter -- Eurohunter (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

WikiCup 2023 November newsletter

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

• BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
• Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
• Epicgenius with 1518 points
• MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
• BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
• AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
• Sammi Brie with 520 points
• Unlimitedlead with 5 points

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
• Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
• BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
• LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
• Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Haere mai Schwede66, I appreciate the outreach. Just thought I'd let you know that I live in the U.S. now. Ka kite ano. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 14:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Morena. Oh, that would be quite the trip. Golden Bay is hard to get to, but from the US, that’s next level. I hope you are enjoying your life over there. Nga mihi, Schwede66 16:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Certainly am, Schwede66. College life in full swing . Catch up with you soon. Cheers. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 17:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Groß danke, Gerda Arendt. Aber ich habe keine Zeit für Wikipedia... ich bin jetzt Student. Natürlich, Zeit ist selten für mich. Beste Wünsche. P.S. Es tut mir leid für das schlecte Deutsch. Lerne immernoch. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 01:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

• Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
• Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
• Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
• MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
• Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
• Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
• Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Tony Stewart

What was wrong with the edits I made on Tony Stewart's page? Many other articles have a similar format, i.e. having headings for sections in boldface. Also, it was not very nice to call my edits "weird". Please keep a comment like that to yourself in the future. I was only trying to improve the article. If I re-edit the page, are you just going to revert the changes back again? SummeRStorM79 (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

SummeRStorM79 I don't know of "many other articles", as far as I'm concerned looking at Dale Earnhardt and Danica Patrick (both NASCAR drivers of eminence; the latter a good article too) have no formatting of the sort. The bold formatting you use only shows up in the table of contents; subheadings are automatically set in boldface per MOS:B. You are correct, I will revert your changes. For next time, please use the talk page of the subject, rather than my talk page. Please only use my talk page if my conduct is not in line with Wikipedia policy. X750. Spin a yarn? _{Articles I've screwed over?} 03:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
• Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
• AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
• Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
• BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)