User talk:Rally Wonk

Your GA nomination of Rallying

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rallying you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 07:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rallying

The article Rallying you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rallying for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 09:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Driver articles

I have no problem accepting that I'm unlikely to win this debate, but you're being dismissive rather than constructive. I advise you adjust your attitude for future discussions. MSportWiki (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MSportWiki That's unfair. It's unanswered, so if you say this because the Icelandic driver question was a toughie for you to defend the proposal, then there is nothing wrong with my attitude. I had a constructive point about biases and believe this shows your own. Rally Wonk (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The debates would be interminable and never attain consensus", "That's wishful thinking", "I don't care" is not constructive - especially when people were actively trying to take part in the discussion. As for Guðmundsson, the outcome of said article doesn't bother me as I don't have a conflict of interest - indeed, you assuming and insinuating I lack the intellectual ability to maintain a mature debate proves my point. MSportWiki (talk) 12:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MSportWiki, OK thanks for being clear. Rally Wonk (talk) 16:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Printsport moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Printsport. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Printsport has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Printsport. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Printsport

Hello, Rally Wonk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Printsport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CIK-FIA Karting

Hi!

I just wanted to thank you for sorting out the CIK-FIA page I had begun working on yesterday. If you're interested, I have also completely re-worked the European Championship page if you would like to lend your expertise to the history and missing details. I also plan on extending this to the World Championship page, both of which had been in a relatively poor state: rife with jargon and unclear linearity between different categories. Individual category articles are also on the radar, I've already started OK and its preceding classes. The list of kart racing championships has been re-written entirely and I plan to complete all those listed in time. Mb2437 (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mb2437, thank you, it's nice to be appreciated. I was inspired by your edits. I had been improving FIA's article itself and was wondering whether to propose redirecting articles like the FISA, CIK and FIA World Motor Sport Council. But as there is interest from somebody else to put some worthy content into these, it helps show the article can be improved. I don't think there's much I can add to the other karting articles.

Just to explain why I changed the short description and intro: the CIK is only a working commission; the WMSC hold the sporting authority for decision making and the FIA is still the government body with its licensing and courts, etc. Beware that other international karting organisations exist too, FIA doesn't hold a monopoly on karting. I wouldn't say the CIK itself is therefore "the primary governing body". Although I agree it was wordy. Rally Wonk (talk) 22:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]