User talk:Wikiknol

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiknol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The Sextuple, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 17:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Sextuple

The article The Sextuple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NEO, this neologism is not notable enough, only one team in the entire world has achieved this record, so there is no need for this article now. This information can be paraphrased and placed into the article for Barcelona FC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. > RUL3R^>trolling_>vandalism 17:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Expert witness, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Expert witness was changed by Wikiknol (u) (t) deleting 11744 characters on 2010-07-24T09:23:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Expert witness a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Judicial expert. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Burma do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SWH^talk 14:18, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SWH^talk 14:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Htoo Group of Companies. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SWH^talk 14:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aurolithic Civilization

The article Aurolithic Civilization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fringe theory.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 14:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hristo Smolenov

The article Hristo Smolenov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fringe theorist, does not meet WP:PROF, WP:NBIO or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Joe (talk) 14:46, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost Aurolithic Civilization listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Lost Aurolithic Civilization. Since you had some involvement with the The Lost Aurolithic Civilization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Doug Weller talk 07:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Peter Deunov

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://mentalfloss.com/article/21978/how-one-man-saved-bulgarias-jews or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services

Hello Wikiknol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 12:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services

The article European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Industry organisation lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ivan Parvanov Petrov

The article Ivan Parvanov Petrov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ivan Parvanov Petrov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ivan Parvanov Petrov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Parvanov Petrov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]