User talk:WOSlinker/Archive 11

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Reactivate WOSlinkerBot Task 2?

I noticed you did an Adminbot task back in December 2018 to fix multiple unclosed formatting tag and other high priority Lint errors. I guess there are still about a thousand protected pages with Lint errors. With MalnadachBot working on other pages, I think now is a good time to renew this task and try to get all types of errors. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 08:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

I have got a list of all protected pages with Lint errors at User:ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ/protected pages with Lint errors, arranged by namespace. There are 3,483 pages as of this writing. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

I might just have a look at some of those non-user pages with my normal account when I have some time, before doing any bot work. -- WOSlinker (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

talk page messagebox replacement

Some comments:

1. I've been trying to normalize dates to one of the accepted date formats on en.wp, without the links too. Here's a couple AWB regexes that I've used recently:
   • \n\| width="48px" \|.*?(\d{1,2} [A-Za-z]+ \d{4}|[A-Za-z]+ \d{1,2}(?:th)?,? \d{4}|\d{1,2}(?:th)? [A-Za-z]+,? \d{4}|\d{1,2}\/\d{1,2}\/\d{4}|\d{2,4}-\d{2}-\d{2}).*\[\[(.*?)\|t.*?(.*?|[Kk]eep|[Mm]erge|[nN]o consensus|[Dd]elete).*?$ -> {{old XfD multi |date=$1 |page=$2 |result=$3}}
   • \n\| width="48px" \|.*?(\d{1,2} [A-Za-z]+ \d{4}).*?\[\[(.*?)\|t.*?([Kk]eep).*?$ -> to same as above.
   • \n\| width="48px" \|.*?(\d{1,2} [A-Za-z]+]] \[\[\d{4}|[A-Za-z]+ \d{1,2}]],? \[\[\d{4}).*\[\[(.*?)\|t.*?(.*?|[Kk]eep).*?$ to same.
   • (\d{1,2}) ([A-Za-z]+)]] \[\[(\d{4}) to $1 $2 $3
   • ([A-Za-z]+ \d{1,2})]],? \[\[(\d{4}) to $1, $2
   • \n\| width="48px" \|.*?(?:).*\[\[(.*?)\|t.*?(.*?|[Kk]eep|[Mm]erge|[nN]o consensus).*?$ to {{old XfD multi |page=$1 |result=$2}}
2. Try not to use {{tmbox}} if at all possible. Several replacements you've made recently have standard templates that we should try to use.

Izno (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

For example, this instead. I know it makes it harder to blanket replaces, but this is something we should get right if we can. In most cases where I've wanted to reach for {{tmbox}} there's been a standard template available. And I would strongly advise not preserving colors in most cases either. --Izno (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox operas

Template:Infobox operas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Jersey rail succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:New Jersey rail succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry

Did not notice the non-breaking space. I'm doublechecking my work now. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Duplicate lines in Module:Adjacent stations/TransAdelaide and Module:Adjacent stations/Adelaide

Hey, what is the difference between the 6 duplicate lines in Module:Adjacent stations/TransAdelaide and Module:Adjacent stations/Adelaide? Gonnym (talk) 09:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

TransAdelaide is for all the old lines and linked up to TransAdelaide. Adelaide is for the current lines and linked up to Adelaide Metro. It didn't look appropriate for me to be updaing all the articles to just use Module:Adjacent stations/Adelaide so those that were using Template:TransAdelaide color, I thought it was better to use a new module called Module:Adjacent stations/TransAdelaide since the system names were different. If you think they should be all in a single module then feel free to merge them. -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject United States/taskforce

Template:WikiProject United States/taskforce has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:06, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Algeria rail transport succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Algeria rail transport succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Go bot go!

I just wanted to say that I see you and I am impressed and grateful. Thanks for running this bot. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Thessaly color

Template:Thessaly color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:58, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Not {{bots}}-compliant

Your bot is not complying with {{bots}} directives that deny it permission to operate, as can be seen from this edit. Fix it.  — Scott • talk 16:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WOSlinkerBot 22 specifically says it is not exclusion complaint, so it doesn't have to respect {{bots}}. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

So you can just make an invincible bot that nobody can stop from screwing up a page and that's totally fine? What the fuck even is the point of {{bots}} then?  — Scott • talk 09:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

How exactly did it screw the page up? -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

You and Malnadach (who at least had the courtesy to make a compliant bot) are mangling the historic record in a misguided attempt to make up for the WMF's engineers failing to handle old font tags. There are two outcomes here: either you implement a compliant bot, or every time your bot touches my talk archives it gets reverted.  — Scott • talk 09:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

center.js

It's ironic that I should mention this to you, but User:WOSlinker/center.js is transcluding {{Sidebar\n}} right now because it lacks a {{#tag:nowiki|<nowiki>}} at the top. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

doh. I've fixed it. -- WOSlinker (talk) 07:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bgr

Template:Bgr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. George Ho (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

strict

Hello. I saw you changed module:no globals with strict :-). These are still missing: Module:Sidebar, Module:Message box and Module:Taxonbar. Christian75 (talk) 12:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

I will get to them soon. -- WOSlinker (talk) 14:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Cardiff Arms Park - a decision

A decision needs to be made on whether or not to split Cardiff Arms Park - To split or not to split. There are two options which have been agreed. SethWhales ^talk 16:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for knocking out so many of the remaining Talk pages with Fostered Content earlier today. They were the ones that weren't immediately obvious to me, or were stumping me. I appreciate your solving them! Zinnober9 (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Alternative text for infobox images

Greetings, WOSlinker! You may recall that about a year ago you kindly adjusted several infoboxes to display alternative text for images based on the alt= parameter overriding the caption. You can see our discussions about that at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 64#Alternative text for album cover in infobox and at User talk:WOSlinker/Archive 10#More alternative text for images in infoboxes. I would like to request that you do the same for the infobox-related template {{Extra album cover}}. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 22:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

I've done that. -- WOSlinker (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Excellent! Thank you. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 23:23, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Break vs. br

H:BR reads:

While valid forms without the / (such as <br> or <br >) will work properly in the rendered page because modern browsers are forgiving of malformed HTML, they can break several of the available syntax highlighters for wiki code in the editing view (mis-highlighting all text in the page after the occurrence of that tag), and so should be avoided.

Template:Break inserts <br/ >, which is proper form. Why, in Template:Symphyotrichum subg. Symphyotrichum cladogram, did you remove the call to the template and replace it with <br>? Input appreciated. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 09:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I have reverted these 46 contributions of yours because they broke syntax highlighting. Please do not do any more edits of this type, as that would be seen as WP:DISRUPTIVE behavior. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 09:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

WOSlinker, now you have removed the template {{Break}} and replaced it with <br/ > in Template:Symphyotrichum subg. Symphyotrichum cladogram. Is there a specific reason? Please respond. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 11:34, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

There's is no need to use a template for a break when the tag will do the same. I've redone the edits with the <br />. -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:38, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your change does not appear to work, as it inserts a viewable <br />. Did you check your work? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 11:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

So removing the template was for no reason but your preference, and you didn't validate that your change would work. I see you have done this to now dozens of templates, again, only with the slash in the br. Whether it is causing problems in other templates or not, I don't know. Unless there is a technical reason other than "there is no need to use a template", there is also no reason for you to make the changes. User:Mathglot? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

WARNING : stop your disruptive editing

This is a formal warning about WP:DISRUPTIVE activity. Once again, I've undone your last 45 template edits because they:

• are not an improvement to the template (no change to rendered page or to transcluded page), and thus a violation of MOS:VAR;
• are collectively a "large number of [bot-like] assisted edits" without ensuring "that there is a clear consensus that such edits are desired", in violation of WP:ASSISTED;
• represent a doubling down on previous attempts to insert your preference, despite previous complaints and reverts, in violation of WP:Edit warring;
• have caused other editors on more than one occasion to have to spend considerable effort to clean up your mess, rather than improve other articles, in violation of WP:DISRUPTION.

While none of these edits involved the use of administrator tools, nevertheless, this is a really bad look for an admin, and very likely a violation of WP:ADMINCOND, on top of everything else. What were you thinking? Please go improve some articles, instead of this pointless diddling of templates that you have no involvement with, and apparently no interest in. Further disruption of this type, and I will be forced to take you to one of the boards for further assessment of your editing behavior. Just go back to your regular editing, and this will all fade away and be forgotten. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Singlechart usages has been nominated for renaming

Category:Singlechart usages has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 60.51.86.240

A tag has been placed on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 60.51.86.240 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 01:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Former Chicago "L" stations navbox

Hello, WOSlinker! I am wondering if you can provide any insight into a navbox issue. It's described at Talk:List of Chicago "L" stations#Navbox malfunction. I just took a shot at fixing it myself, but it's beyond my extremely limited knowledge, apparently. Thanks. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 12:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

I've fixed it. -- WOSlinker (talk) 12:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. In hindsight, and if I'm not mistaken, another solution would be to leave the template the way it was before, and on the List of Chicago "L" stations page include all the sections of the template, like this. What do you think about that idea? — Mudwater ^(Talk) 12:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, that would work as well. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

If you don't object, I think I'll make those changes. Unless you'd prefer to do it. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 17:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Go ahead, you do it. -- WOSlinker (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Okay, done. Thanks again for your help. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 20:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Very late, but thanks for your work on eradicating Module:No globals from multiple wikis! I didn't realize until earlier today how many edit requests you had made on Commons. Legoktm (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Interregio-Express succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Interregio-Express succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Transclusions possibly from Template:Navbox education in Canada

In this week's database report for Wikipedia:Database reports/Template categories containing articles there are couple template categories flooded with articles. Category:Canada education navigational boxes and Category:Navigational box wrapper templates. Also the templates on those pages have unwanted content being transcluded on the template and in the articles that use them. Pretty big mess. See A. Y. Jackson Secondary School (Ottawa) and Template:OCDSB schools for an example.

I don't know if this edit of yours has anything to do with it (looks like it might) but either way I hope you can help. Thanks. --DB1729^talk 16:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Net quite sure what went wrong with the edit, but I've moved the docs to a subpage to fix it. -- WOSlinker (talk) 17:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Great! Thanks for taking care of that. DB1729^talk 18:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Bot opportunity: thumb options in gallery lines

Here's a batch of 113 pages with thumb in <gallery>...</gallery> tags. The thumb option appears on four lines on each page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

All done. -- WOSlinker (talk) 07:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Bot mistake

In Help:Archiving a talk page#Archive indexing the bot left an unbalanced <nowiki> tag that I've corrected. ZandDev (msg) 10:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate parm error in Template:WikiProject Baseball

Hi WOSlinker; there are duplicate TF_17_NESTED parms in Template:WikiProject Baseball. Earlier, there was a similar duplicate in Template:WikiProject Scotland and I entered a "Template-protected edit" request, but it took about 4 hours to be fixed. So, maybe it would be faster to notify you directly. (It's wreaking havoc on Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls.) Thanks in advance. Davemck (talk) 01:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

 Fixed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Regional-Express succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Regional-Express succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Economics/qualimpintersect

Template:WikiProject Economics/qualimpintersect has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection of Template:KMT and Template:DPP

Hey WOS, you protected Template:KMT and Template:DPP a decade ago, for being used heavily. It was used in Template:Infobox officeholder for a switch test, and caused it to be transcluded in the 100k+ articles it was used in. I've removed the test and there are under 200 "real" transclusions of each. Would you be kind enough to unprotect them? Thanks. SWinxy (talk) 00:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh and their logo subpages. SWinxy (talk) 03:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Done. -- WOSlinker (talk) 06:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

tyvm SWinxy (talk) 13:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Cricket/bchecklist

Template:WikiProject Cricket/bchecklist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Taskforce template

Hi WOS, on the Template talk:WPBannerMeta/to do list is adding support for TASKFORCE_TEMPLATE, a custom template to produce the taskforce display. I have a feeling you were involved in this. Can you tell me a little more? Is this widely used or just by one project? What changes were they looking to achieve and is that something we can add to the module? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

The feature was added for the roads projects as they wanted all the projects in one row rather than on separate rows. Template:WikiProject U.S. Roads, Template:WikiProject Canada Roads, Template:WikiProject Indian roads and Template:WikiProject Australian Roads use it. -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Tidy font link bug

Can you help with clearing out the last 3 protected pages at Lint errors: Old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags (User pages)? Gonnym (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Have you checked with Versageek if they will fix the issues themselves first? I'll do it if they don't mind. -- WOSlinker (talk) 21:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

@Gonnym I was already in the process last month, but I ran into an issue and backed myself into the corner with only having that one user's pages remaining after I'd cleared (or had cleared on my behalf) the other 2900 cases of Tidy. (Short story, I was declined on how I'd made my request, not what was requested) I had just needed a little time to figure out how to proceed. Got them done this week, so all Tidys in User space are done.

Hoping to do the same with the Tidys in Talk space, but most (~90%) are full protected. ~24% aren't on admin pages, (likely naughty sockers before Wiki had leveled protection, are former admin, or are old self protection requests-- based on what I found in clearing User pages) so those will mostly be lowerable (to EC or lower). But (~66%) of the 6343 are on admin pages, and that'll be "Fun". Slow. I'm planning on denting this section soon, just have had to take care of some other things off Wikipedia recently.

Found it interesting in my inspection of the remaining pages that for the admin pages that it's only 47 admins making up the ~650 admin pages with this error, and only 13 admins with 100+ Tidy errors to their various pages. Zinnober9 (talk) 13:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

This is pure survivorship bias. All of the pages at the top of User:Galobot/report/Pages by Lint Errors are admin-protected pages because we have fixed the unprotected pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I meant surprising that it was only 47 admin, not surprising that they are mostly on protected admin pages. That's a lot of errors and pages and I was expecting it to be about 100 admin or more. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:09, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Fully protecting talk pages is a pretty extreme step. I am surprised that there are as many as 47 editors' pages that are fully protected. I haven't looked, but my guess is that they were protected when there were different practices in place than there are today, and that mass-reduction of their protection levels would be looked upon favorably. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Refend

Please mark these edits as minor. Thanks. SN54129 12:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Huh? I'm already doing that. There may be the odd on that I missed flagging as minor but just about all are already flagged. -- WOSlinker (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

I do apologise WOS. I see on my watchlist now that indeed you have marked them as minor (everything, in fact!). Sorry about that; it's just that, I had 'Hide minor edits' activated at one point, but now that seems to have been turned off and I can't find how to reactivate it. Bizarre! And annoying, but that's in no way your fault. Perhaps it's that new skin issue. Apologies again, and keep up the good work! Cheers, SN54129 13:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Image alternative text infobox request

Hello! Could you please adjust {{Infobox comic book title}} so that it displays alternative text for the infobox image based on the alt= parameter? Yes, that would be cool. (Further reading: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 64#Alternative text for album cover in infobox) — Mudwater ^(Talk) 20:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

I've made that change. -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Brilliant. Thanks heaps! — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for all your help sorting out those parameters! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Reception

Hello, I hope you're doing well. Thank you for fixing the reception section. Could you please take another look at my article and suggest any improvements or cool stuff that I might not have included? Thank you for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/todolist

Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/todolist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Lime Green Kryptonite?

Bot missed the lime green tidy font in this edit within plankton's sig but got all the others there and elsewhere on the page. Not sure why just that one, but letting you know in case that's something that needs improvement. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

The scripts only cover the common colors. Didn't want to just work with any text as there is sometimes invalid colors used. There doesn't seem to be any limegreenn left now for the tidy-font-bug lint error. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

CFD categories

Hello, WOSlinker,

I'm not sure why but you are removing CFD tags from categories that still require action be taken with them. Most of these WikiProject members categories have to be moved to WikiProject participant categories. I'm not sure why User:JJMC89 bot III is taken so long with these page moves but I don't think the deletion tags should be removed when the categories still require page moves. But maybe you have an explanation for this that I don't see. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Liz, can you please link to a specific diff? I'm only finding removal of CFD notices from "participants" pages after they are moved, which I have been doing also. I think this is the right thing to do, but I am new at category moves. As for User:JJMC89 bot III, I think it is not acting because nobody has pasted the full list of categories at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Large, but there could be some other reason. As far as I know, the full list of CFD'd category pages is ready to be put on that list. I have been working on manually changing userboxes during the last 30 hours. There are a few hundred more to change. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

They were all subcategories of Category:WikiProject Canada participants and needed their categories updating, so rather than do two separate edits, I removed the cfd notice and updated the categories at the same time. I hadn't done the moves at that time but was going to come back and do them later on. -- WOSlinker (talk) 07:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Trucks/doc

Template:WikiProject Trucks/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Buddhism/doc

Template:WikiProject Buddhism/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Poland articles with an incomplete B-Class checklist

A tag has been placed on Category:Poland articles with an incomplete B-Class checklist indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Bot tasks

Hey, I was looking for the list of tasks User:WOSlinkerBot was approved (to find the lint related ones) and noticed it doesn't have a list. If you don't mind, could add a list of the approved tasks as it would help probably other editors as well. Thanks! Gonnym (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

I've added those now. -- WOSlinker (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Newfoundland and Labrador road transport articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Newfoundland and Labrador road transport articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Fixing lint errors tag

Hello! Thank you for your work with User:WOSlinkerBot fixing LINT errors. I was wondering if you would be able to have the bot utilize the fixed lint errors tag? Thank you, HouseBlaster^talk 01:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

I would but I'm not sure how to add the tags. -- WOSlinker (talk) 08:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Maybe the folks at WP:VPTECH would know? I certainly have no clue... HouseBlaster^talk 08:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

I believe your bot uses JavaScript, so you would add tags: 'fixed lint errors' to the edit API request, per mw:API:Edit. — Qwerfjkltalk 23:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Film/B-checklist categories

Template:WikiProject Film/B-checklist categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Canada Roads/taskforce

Template:WikiProject Canada Roads/taskforce has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Canada Roads/tfnested

Template:WikiProject Canada Roads/tfnested has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Canada Roads/tfnestedlink

Template:WikiProject Canada Roads/tfnestedlink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Popular pages stopped updating

Hi, sorry to bother but I thought you might be able to help. Recently I noticed that Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music/Popular pages was not updating properly. I asked about it here:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Community_Tech_bot#Popular_pages_not_updating

It seems that it was maybe somehow caused by some edit you made... I'm pretty new here and I don't understand how this technical things work. It's a thing that can be fixed? Or because the Classical music Wikiproject does not assess articles the bot won't be able to function again?

Thanks in advance -- Gor1995 𝄞 22:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Removing Linter errors by changing the format of pages?

I'm curious about this edit (I happened across it because the page disappeared from a report that I watch), which changed the editor's intended formatting. When I fix Linter errors, I try my best, except in egregious circumstances, to maintain the appearance of a page. What was your rationale in removing these center tags instead of replacing them with a template? Genuinely curious. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

I would have just blanked it. It's a blocked editor's page from 2009. Gonnym (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Is there a guideline or policy that supports doing so? That would be a lot easier than fixing the errors. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

While not policy or a guideline, this may help: Wikipedia:Blanking userpages of blocked editors is not necessarily gravedancing

... most userpages of blocked/banned users on Wikipedia are blanked and replaced with just administrative templates ...

—Bruce1ee^talk 16:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

I've blanked a few pages where the user has not made any edits since 2018, so over 5 years. I might have done the same to this page but it only had the center tags as an issue, so decided to remove them instead in this particular case. -- WOSlinker (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Request about a protected page

Hello, I hope you're fine.

Being aware that you protected the page from editing, I want to know if there is any possibility to edit Template:Ice hockey so I've created a navbox for the sport (you can take a look at it on my sandbox).

If this were not possible, I'd think of another name for the template. Regards, Fma12 (talk) 19:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Ice hockey is already in use as a redirect and is being used on over 5000 talk pages, so couldn't be used unless all those pages were updated first. You might just have to go with something such as Template:Ice hockey navbox. -- WOSlinker (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank, I'm on it then. Fma12 (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Table alignment

Hello, is there any technical reason why the template is restricted to the 19th column, or can this be boldly increased in the CSS? Respublik (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

There was no reason other than thinking 19 would be enough. Yes, just update the css if more columns are needed. -- WOSlinker (talk) 00:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

color:inherit

Hi, is this really necessary? The cell contains an nbsp and nothing else, nbsps are inherently transparent. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Not really, but it's clearing out page from the new lint error. -- WOSlinker (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Feminism articles using positional parameters

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Feminism articles using positional parameters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Jewish Women articles using positional parameters

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Jewish Women articles using positional parameters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Women's Health articles using positional parameters

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Women's Health articles using positional parameters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Question

Hello, why the List of prototype World War II infantry weapons was deleted, where are the prototype weapons now? And where are the secondary and special issued weapons of WW2? Mat 15:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

List of prototype World War II infantry weapons

Hello, why the List of prototype World War II infantry weapons was deleted, where are the prototype weapons now? And where are the secondary and special issued weapons of WW2? Mat KnowledgeIsPower (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Which article are you asking about? -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at MediaWiki talk:Scribunto-doc-page-header#Category:Module documentation pages

 You are invited to join the discussion at MediaWiki talk:Scribunto-doc-page-header § Category:Module documentation pages. —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Template:AMA

Hi! What does {{AMA}} stand for? Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

The template is used on a couple of AMA Superbike Championship articles and AMA stands for American Motorcyclist Association. -- WOSlinker (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Articles by Priority

Template:Articles by Priority has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

What is with this misleading edit summary fix italics, where you actually added a ref/link to Les pièces d’auto expliquées… en français! (Auto parts explained… in French!), into an article about Quantrill's Raiders, pro-Confederate partisan guerrillas who fought in the American Civil War, messing up another reference in the process? Isaidnoway (talk) 10:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

It was an error on my part with a cut and paste. The cut of the italics hadn't worked and then the paste was the last thing in the buffer. Sorry. -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Aviation/bchecklistcats

Template:WikiProject Aviation/bchecklistcats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Substitution tracking templates has been nominated for deletion

Category:Substitution tracking templates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Curious

Hi, I noticed that you've added "color:inherit" in the party colour templates in the tables in several Norwegian constituency articles recently. I've never come across this before, what does it do? Obi2canibe (talk) 11:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

It just to help with the new dark mode feature. It's better for dark mode if color is also specified when background-color is specified. The ones where I'm adding color:inherit; is where it doesn't need to be any specific color (as there is no text in those table cells), so it inherts from whatever the normal color is set to. -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll try to remember to add it in articles I create in the future :) Obi2canibe (talk) 11:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

What about Template:Party color cell? Excellenc1 (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

That has been done. -- WOSlinker (talk) 04:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Val/unitsfromconvert

Template:Val/unitsfromconvert has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive1

Greetings, since you took part in the review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mount Hudson/archive1 I was wondering if you had any thoughts on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cerro Panizos/archive1, especially the disagreement between me and David Fuchs. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

RfC link issue

Hey, i've created RfC on Kuči (tribe) talk page, but the link that is currently on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/History_and_geography is broken due to character Č.

How to fix this? People won't be able to join from this page, and i am afraid that maybe even invites to the RfC are broken due to that link. Setxkbmap (talk) 08:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

I've updated the link with this edit. Hopefully the bot doesn't change it back. -- WOSlinker (talk) 08:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I wanted to edit it myself but there was a statement that it should not be edited. I thought maybe admins would know something more, or could not be overwritten Setxkbmap (talk) 08:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

I think it's mainly a risk that the Bot will change it back or mess it up later on. Will just have to wait and see. -- WOSlinker (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

@Setxkbmap: Looks as though the Bot has just gone and changed it back now. I think you'll need to contact the Bot owner about it. I've created a rediect as a workaround so that the link works. -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!

Can we somehow check whether bot invited people to discussion correctly? I've read somewhere that bot invites random people to join discussion. Setxkbmap (talk) 09:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

If you look at the bots contributions on the user talk namespace, it doesn't appear to notify anyone for RFCs. So it must be some other bot for that. -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Great Alaskan Railroad Journeys for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Great Alaskan Railroad Journeys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Alaskan Railroad Journeys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

日期20220626 (talk) 22:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Infobox road lint errors

I see you've been active on the {{Infobox road}} talk page and seem to know the template. Perhaps you can help me with this.

I've been clearing out all the missing <p> end tag lint errors in the article namespace and I'm left with 36 road articles I can't fix. They all use {{Infobox road}} or {{Infobox road list}} templates, and those templates, plus the templates and modules they call, don't appear to use <p> tags.

The problem appears to be with the {{Infobox road}} "marker_image" parameter. For example in U.S. Route 151, "marker_image" is set to {{infobox road/shieldmain/USA|state=WI|type=US|route=151}}, and lintHint reports a missing <p> end tag. If I remove the value from "marker_image", lintHint reports no missing end tags. Yet if I put {{infobox road/shieldmain/USA|state=WI|type=US|route=151}} on its own in my sandbox, lintHint reports no missing end tags! I can't make sense of this. Can you help? —Bruce1ee^talk 13:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)  Fixed. I had a go at this one a while ago, but I was unable or unwilling to see it through. I worked on it again today, and I think I fixed it without breaking anything. I had to replace a bunch of p tags with div tags in a module subpage. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: Thanks for that. This has been bugging me for weeks. —Bruce1ee^talk 15:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Great Alaskan Railroad Journeys title.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Great Alaskan Railroad Journeys title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:User-specific file copyright templates has been nominated for deletion

Category:User-specific file copyright templates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Roses Tournament‎ infobox

Hello there,

I'm just querying a recent edit that you made, where you tagged the Roses Tournament‎ page as needing a new infobox. I am not aware of another infobox that would be a suitable replacement over what is currently used. What exactly did you think needed to be changed? Kind regards, Stuart Newmanite (talk) 12:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

It's just using a table with class=infobox at the moment. I was thinking that there may be some existing infobox template that might work or if not, sone could be created and used here and also on some similar articles. If you don't think so, then feel free to remove my tagging from the talk page. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

I replaced the table with {{Infobox sports rivalry}}, which seems to do the trick. Ping me with any questions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)