Jump to content

User talk:andrybak

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25

[edit]

Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day/Header, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day/Header and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day/Header during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

[edit]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and a few words on template categorization

[edit]

Hi Andrybak. Thank you for cleaning up after my work.[1][2] For me it's often a guess as to what is the optimal way to format such things so occasionally I just copy similar code from somewhere handy.

Regarding the content category Category:Occupational safety and health: I had added that to the new template category partly because I had just got through removing it from the existing navbox cat (now a subcat) here. But also I was under the impression that it was okay to include template-containing categories in content cats based on an RfC from a while back. I dug back and found it I think here but I must have either seriously misunderstood or misremembered something because that was not the consensus at all, or I was thinking of a different discussion. Anyway, you were correct to remove it. Well done:)

Possibly a helpful note on the shortcut link: I often get the feeling that, within my edit summaries, the shortcut "WP:CAT#T" gets ignored by editors who aren't aware of what those characters point to, or that they point to anything useful at all. "CAT#T" doesn't give much of a hint as to what it's about really. The # symbol nestled among the letters is an unusual shortcut. It's quite small and sometimes I think people think it's a typo or something. Lately, in my own personal experience, it seems the full "Wikipedia:Categorization#Template categorization" gets the attention desired and it's certainly far more descriptive. Even pipe-labeling the shortcut as "Template categorization", as I've been doing more recently, is better I think...fwiw --DB1729talk 20:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DB1729, thank you. Other editors not being familiar with the guideline and possibly being confused by the shortcut is an excellent observation. I've adjusted my scripts to make edit summaries more readable. —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

On your user page you say you've publicly revealed certain conflicts. I'm wondering if you've considered linking to such public statement(s). I've wrestled with maybe similar issues, as with "I'm an ex-banker" from 2012 on my user page. I'm less active with editing currently but appreciated your help with one of my recent edits, visited your user page, and had my old wrestling brought back to mind. Swliv (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're unsure, I can recommend reading essays about conflict of interest: [3]. See also Category:Wikipedia conflict of interest editing. —⁠andrybak (talk) 08:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia GLAM barnstar templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26

[edit]

Assistance on Thai Wikipedia's main page

[edit]

Hi andrybak,

I have been working on improving the Thai Wikipedia's main page for the past year or so. Our inspiration, of course, comes from the English Wikipedia. I noticed that you have contributed to the page we based our work on, and we would greatly appreciate it if you could take some time to review our version of the code.

As we are a smaller wiki and the output from volunteer editors varies greatly over time, there is some deviation in the implementation of the FA and DYK sections. We decided not to set regular intervals for updates to these two sections, but rather to set release dates for the following month based on the content we have available in the current month. [If nothing is available to display, we show a message encouraging people to join our project as volunteer editors.]

Even after a year of working on this main page revamp, I only realized today that I have left an important technical loophole for the four pages (main/ -2 -1 +1 +2 days). It’s surprising to me that no one had noticed the broken pages until now.

My request is broken down into two specific questions:

  1. Are the templates for FA th:แม่แบบ:บทความแนะนำ and DYK th:แม่แบบ:รู้ไหมว่า in good technical shape?
  2. How can we fix the four pages (th:วิกิพีเดีย:หน้าหลัก/วันก่อนเมื่อวาน th:วิกิพีเดีย:หน้าหลัก/เมื่อวาน th:วิกิพีเดีย:หน้าหลัก/พรุ่งนี้ th:วิกิพีเดีย:หน้าหลัก/มะรืนนี้) to accommodate the two templates mentioned above? I’m thinking of passing a date parameter into the FA/DYK templates and possibly creating a single template for the main page that works with any date value (in case it’s needed elsewhere).

Thank you in advance for your time and assistance!

PS.

  1. @Patsagorn Y.: My colleague working on this project is just promoted to admin on Thai Wikipedia and this can possibly speed up our work. The progress was very slow in the past.
  2. BTW, apologies for the temporary issue with Wikipedia:Main Page/Day before yesterday. I mistakenly saved the code on the English Wikipedia instead of the intended page on the Thai Wikipedia. I reverted the change within a minute. This experience has made me realize that it's better to seek help from someone who recently edited the page for this project.

--Taweetham (talk) 05:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]