User talk:TrimmerinWiki/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Canastota has been accepted

SS Canastota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 05:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

external links are not allowed in the main body of the text

In Wikipedia, article, you can only add a URL (that is, a link to outside of Wikipedia) in certain situations, such as:

• in citations
• in the External links section (see WP:EL for the relevant policy)
• in fields of tables and infoboxes that specifically request a URL

So your external links to the ships Riviera and Manuka have been replaced with Wikipedia red links (meaning links to a Wikipedia articles that hasn't been written so far). Kerry (talk) 06:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Trove newspaper citations

Hi, great work on SS Canastota. I notice that you appear to be doing something the "hard way" when it comes to citations. For example, you have added a citation to

The Mercury (Hobart), Wednesday 18 August 1915, Page 4

in relation to the hydro-electric power station. Now I am guessing you are probably finding these newspaper articles on Trove. If so, there is a much easier way to cite that newspaper article. So when you are looking at a Trove newspaper article which is

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/10425586

for the citation in question, look over on the left-hand side and there is a tool bar. By default it will show you the "A" view, but if you click on the "i" in a circle above, and then left-hand window should show a heading called "Details". Scroll down to the bottom of that list and you will find the pre-formatted Wikipedia citation

{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article10425586 |title=THE HYDRO-ELECTRIC SCHEME. |newspaper=[[The Mercury]] |volume=CIII, |issue=14,178 |location=Tasmania, Australia |date=18 August 1915 |accessdate=13 February 2018 |page=4 |via=National Library of Australia}}

Just copy that (don't worry if you can't understand it) and use it instead of typing in "The Mercury (Hobart), Wednesday 18 August 1915, Page 4" and this is what you will get

On her first voyage to Australia as the 'Canastota' in 1915, she carried transformers and components for power lines associated with the Waddamana Hydro-Electric Power Station in Tasmania.

References

This is a much easier-for-you citation to create and it is a much more useful citation for the reader, who can now click on the link and be taken straight to the newspaper article to read it. (It's win-win!) Try it. If you have any problems, please don't hesitate to ask.

Note these pre-formatted citations are available for all Trove newspaper articles, but also for everything else in Trove such as books, journals, pictures, maps, etc -- only for these other types of things, you look for the button "Cite this" instead of "i" in a circle. Kerry (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Wow, those citations are looking very impressive now! Great work! Kerry (talk) 15:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

on Fitzroy, you seem to be still hand coding everything the hard way, no links to papers, date formats ... Dave Rave (talk) 09:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Falls Line (Shipping Line) has been accepted

The Falls Line (Shipping Line), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 17:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyman D. Foster has been accepted

Lyman D. Foster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ellis Stanley Joseph has been accepted

Ellis Stanley Joseph, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello TrimmerinWiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Coastal coal-carrying trade of New South Wales have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sixty-Milers (Ships) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sixty-Milers (Ships). Thanks! Jessamyn (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sixty-Milers (Ships) has been accepted

Sixty-Milers (Ships), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jessamyn (talk) 01:34, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coastal coal-carrying trade of New South Wales has been accepted

Coastal coal-carrying trade of New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 00:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Coastal coal-carrying trade of New South Wales) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Coastal coal-carrying trade of New South Wales.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Not a bad article!

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

1l2l3k (talk) 11:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TrimmerinWiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wool Road (New South Wales) has been accepted

The Wool Road (New South Wales), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chalybeate Spring at Mittagong, New South Wales (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Chalybeate Spring at Mittagong, New South Wales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Chalybeate Spring at Mittagong, New South Wales, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mgbo120 (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, TrimmerinWiki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mgbo120 (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

• Naming conventions generally exclude ‘The’ in titles, and I can’t see there is sufficient rationale in including it at this stage. I can understand however if you feel it should be the singular ‘Spring’ rather than the plural ‘Springs’. Given there are two other articles, Chalybeate Springs, the standard approach is to include the location. Whilst there are other Chalybeate Springs in New South Wales the others do not have articles at this stage. If articles were created for those then you would differentiate them by their locality names. Dan arndt (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caloola Club (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caloola Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Caloola Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chalybeate Spring, Mittagong has been accepted

Chalybeate Spring, Mittagong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lal Lal Iron Mine and Smelting Works has been accepted

Lal Lal Iron Mine and Smelting Works, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 09:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Fitzroy

about time somebody fleshed it out rather than deleting empty sections
ta for that Dave Rave (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

where's my Infobox ? thinking Factory Dave Rave (talk)

keep your dates dmy Dave Rave (talk)
where are your trove cites coming from ? trove provides the cites with dates correct, are you manually editing them to yymmdd ? Dave Rave (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

not being (too) rude, just inquisitive … where ? do you get your trove cites ? I'm curious as they are outdated, and not well constructed, they're good and are working, but the dates are all yymmdd when they should be dd-mon-yy and trove does provide them in the correct format.

so, curious ?

also, the extra line I put in for use dmy dates is apparently working, wonder when that happened, all your 'bad' dates look okay with that line in. Dave Rave (talk) 15:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

18th July, waiting, not angry, just really curious ... what trove links are you using and what are your preferences ? Dave Rave (talk) 06:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

can you post a trove URL from where you get a link ? I don't see a settings option on trove
example your cite v mine from the same given link

{{Cite news|url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article112450756|title=Alfred Lambert.|date=1897-06-09|work=Bowral Free Press and Berrima District Intelligencer (NSW : 1884 - 1901)|access-date=2019-07-04|pages=4}}

v

{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article112450756 |title=Alfred Lambert. |newspaper=[[Bowral Free Press And Berrima District Intelligencer]] |issue=1205 |location=New South Wales, Australia |date=9 June 1897 |accessdate=20 July 2019 |page=4 |via=National Library of Australia}}

dates are dd-mon-yy and newspapers are linked, again, still, just asking Dave Rave (talk) 04:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

are you using an edit bot that is getting the links for you ? Dave Rave (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Dave, Thanks for your example. It clearly shows that there is a difference in the way the references that I make are being made, and your way. As well as the date difference, there your way is also embedding more information. So, to help expose what I am doing wrong, I will walk through exactly what I am doing, and perhaps that will expose the issue. 1. I find the article I want to cite in Trove. 2. I copy the URL from the address bar of the browser. (For your example above this is https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/112450756 ) 3. I then hit the Cite icon at the top of hte page, and the cite box pops up. 4. With the cite box in 'Auto", I then paste the above URL into the one blank space that appears, and press the Generate button. 5. I then press Insert to insert to on-line citation. BTW, I may or may not be logged into Trove as a user when I do the above. Let me know what you think. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

ok, I see why then. 1 go to the article. 2 click the little tab on the left at the top, info details, 3 bottom section is Wikipedia citation
Often requires trimming or link checking for papers Dave Rave (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

your 3&4, cite, auto, where is that ? I see cite, with a Templates named refs error check, drop down the templates, cite web. Dave Rave (talk) 06:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

@Dave Rave:Dave, Thanks for that. I have unfortunately made many hundreds of citations, without using the Wikipedia citation from that info drp-down on Trove (since it seemed to work OK). I will start using the specialised wikipedia citation information from now on ... never too late to be correct.

your cites are fine apart from they all have the dates in the wrong format, but that is. Less a prob now that the Use Dates option works.Dave Rave (talk)

When I talk about cite box in Auto, I am getting there by clicking on the "Cite on the top bar of the Wikipedia article, when it is in "Edit". The pop-up box that comes up is called 'Add a citation' and it has three tabs 'Automatic' Manual' and 'Re-use'. My 3 & 4 above are talking bout what happens with the 'Automatic' tab. I was just cutting and pasting the Trove URL into that box, because it offers URL as one of the optional entries (others are ISBN, etc. .... or as I see now 'citation'). Hope that this explains it. I assume that I should have been pasting the Trove Wikipedia citation into this box. --TrimmerinWiki (talk) 07:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I get not pop up box n I click e the te options en der earth with a drop down elector. Whbrowser are you in s my next option ... Dave Rave (talk) 22:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

you must be using an edit addon plugin Dave Rave (talk) 04:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

@Dave Rave:Dave, I am having trouble understanding your concern. The 'pop-up box' is just what appears, when you (or I) click on the 'Cite' part of the bar across any Wikipedia page when the page is in edit (not edit source, edit). All I have been doing incorrectly in previous citations from Trove that I was using the url of the Trove page, not the Wikipedia citation provide on the Trove page. I am not using an 'edit add on plugin". I have changed to using the Wikipedia citation from now. Hope that this answers your concern.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I think I may have found an answer, are you hard code editing or using the VisualEditor ? Dave Rave (talk) 05:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dave Rave:Dave, I am overwhelmingly using visual editor but, very occasionally, I do use the source editor when it is easier to do what I need to achieve.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

that's the prob, I only just found it yesterday for a table edit, and using the cite option, pasting a trove ref in auto gets filled in with yy-mon-dd date conversions, if you use the manual option it doesn't do the date translate which are correctly supplied from trove already. Dave Rave (talk) 08:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

A page you started (Lal Lal Iron Mine and Smelting Works) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Lal Lal Iron Mine and Smelting Works.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caloola Club (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MJL was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Caloola Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Caloola Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:35, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Enoch Hughes has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Enoch Hughes. Thanks! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enoch Hughes has been accepted

Enoch Hughes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Onehunga Ironworks has been accepted

Onehunga Ironworks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bogolong Iron Mine and Blast Furnace has been accepted

Bogolong Iron Mine and Blast Furnace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: British and Tasmanian Charcoal Iron Company has been accepted

British and Tasmanian Charcoal Iron Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating British and Tasmanian Charcoal Iron Company.

User:OxonAlex while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

An excellent article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|OxonAlex}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caloola Club has been accepted

Caloola Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Fascinating

It seems that the reviewers of your articles know absolutley nothing about local context of your articles, and yet you have got some substantial good quality contributions there. By the time you go from the Tasmanian item to the Western Australian one - your lead paragraphs are improving. One big problem for writing about places you clearly have been nowhere near is the paucity of links. The Tasmanian article could deserve a few more if you looked back at it. The hidden story of the Western Australian one - is the total lack of anything about the railway system that supported the transport. You must be commended on your substantial effort in creating articles in areas that many current editors seem very short on - subjects and locations otherwise neglected. Well done for that. JarrahTree 23:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Also SS_Canastota is clearly worth taking through into the GA FA process for one of the higher quality Australian maritime history articles - you should investigate the possibility. JarrahTree 23:53, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

waiting around for editors who probably know nothing about the subject or the context is a bit tedious, I would have put Ilfracombe Iron Company up in main space without hesitation myself... I know there are advantages in having a breathing space available, but the quality of your new articles are far the most substantial and correct MOS and compliant with WP:ABOUT in the new edits in the Australian for a very long time (ie not simply lifted from material outside and dropped in) - if there was an oz award for substantial new contributions that benefit the oz content - youre a definite candidate... imho of course JarrahTree 02:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Thanks for the feedback and complements. I only tackle subjects that are either not well known now, or are slipping from public consciousness. I also like to form linkages between existing topics and the ones I am writing about. That's probably why my efforts occur in 'spurts', as I develop some new subject interest, or I get tired of 'Wikipeding' and do something else for a while. SS Canastota was my first article. A relative of mine was one of those lost on that ship and I remember being told about it by my grandmother, when I was quite young. So, eventually, with some time on my hands I researched it and, at the end, had lots of material; then I thought, "What do I do with all this?". The answer was to get involved in Wikipedia. Regarding the Draft / Review process, I do appreciate the breathing space it gives for final tidy-ups and additions, and I suppose that I approve of the concept that the process is moderated in some way. There would be nothing worse, for example than to put up a superfluous article - if there is already something better there already - and I appreciate the help with categories, etc. that some of the reviewing editors provide. I do try to comply with what Wikipedia is about, and I am still learning! TrimmerinWiki (talk) 03:21, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

so much for straying away into real life and away from wikipedian talk and article space for a while, I hadnt seen this response until today.. thanks for replying and going to the effort of explaining. JarrahTree 00:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fitzroy Iron Works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitzroy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

@DPL bot: Yes, I agree that I should not have made that link. I did not realise that it was a disambiguation page as the list under the heading "As a surname" lists the people in the family that I was referring to in the Fitzroy Iron Works article. I have fixed the issue by linking to an article on one of the members of the family.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 10:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wundowie charcoal iron and wood distillation plant has been accepted

Wundowie charcoal iron and wood distillation plant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ilfracombe Iron Company (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Ilfracombe Iron Company may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ilfracombe Iron Company has been accepted

Ilfracombe Iron Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hughesdarren (talk) 12:43, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

you really need

someone to walk you through the GA and FA process - https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Coastal_coal-carrying_trade_of_New_South_Wales is well out of the range of the average punter here, and well above standards of GA - it is FA standard. To not promote such material is criminal negligence imho. if you dont find someone, we need to see to find someone prepared to assist... JarrahTree 12:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

oddity - the bogolong article had industrial as a project tag - its a music project... JarrahTree 12:48, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Thank you for your complements. Good to hear that my efforts are worthwhile. I am doing this for personal satisfaction and happy if some others do not recognise anything special in my articles. Not sure what you meant by bogolong being 'musical' as it is about C19th industry. BTW, one thing you might be able to advise me on; I have had a draft on the Tamar Hematite Iron Company in the system for over 6-weeks (it actually pre-dates the Wundowie and Infracombe articles), but it is still sitting there as a draft. Any reason that you can see for that? TrimmerinWiki (talk) 22:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Probably not explained very well - when you create articles and put them in main space, there are some editors who allocated projects tags to the talk page - somehow industrial must have looked good - pity it's nothing to do with industry - but actually is a designated music item: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial - dubious, dubious... As for any draft - you are welcome to move to main space - you dont need to sit around for the process, you are an accomplished editor by now, in most cases editors who check your work are probably totally ignorant of your subject and geographical context - go for it! JarrahTree 00:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stone Fleet (New South Wales) has been accepted

Stone Fleet (New South Wales), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

the above is just the form notice--but I want to say personally that you are doign exceptionally good work here. in our most important role: writing high quality articles. As JarrahTree suggested, you ought to check how to submit your work for upgrading to good articles, and then to featured articles.

And as he also suggested, there's no need at all to use Draft--your work is far above the level where it needs reviews at AfC--we need to concentrate there on the people who need help with their articles. . DGG ( talk ) 06:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

well done

just a note about the context of project tags on the talk page - always worth checking similar articles for clues to help place the article with the projects most relevant - well done another article well above 'average' standard for Australian new articles, keep up the good work - it is inspiring that you make the effort for the Australian project... JarrahTree 06:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

and, while we're at it:

If you have the time, you're ready to begin helping others--let me or JT know how we can help you get started at this. Possibly one of the ways (although it is something I personally have never had the time to engage in it here ) is helping with GA and FA reviews of other people's articles. One of the most excellent things in the world is to teach others; as a teacher all my life, my greatest satisfaction in my pre-WP profession and in my 12 years at WP, has been the people I've encouraged who are now doing better work than I have ever been able to do. DGG ( talk ) 06:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy ('Dot') Butler (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorothy ('Dot') Butler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dorothy ('Dot') Butler, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: Thank you for reviewing this article so quickly. It has been my (bad?) habit to submit a draft and still keep adding to it, while I wait for the usual inevitable delay in reviewing it to 'time out'. I did so this time and so left of much of the sourcing of the article, but your review was so fast! I have rectified that issue now. I would also add that - unbelievable as her achievements may seem - the history of Dorothy (Dot) Butler is 100% authentic, and she really does need to be included in Wikipedia.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 02:43, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Butler (bushwalker) has been accepted

Dorothy Butler (bushwalker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Andy Dingley (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: McKenzies Bay has been accepted

McKenzies Bay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mackenzies Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Suburbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TrimmerinWiki

Thank you for creating Hay Bridge, New South Wales.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 02:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Have you considered a separate article about the Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker? You appear to have more experience (and more recent experience) with article creation than I do, but it appears that the image would be much more acceptable if it were in an article where it was clearer that the image's "... presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding."  ★  Bigr Tex 01:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@BigrTex:Thanks for your comment. I put all I know about the Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker into the existing article; there is not much to find unfortunately. I suppose that I could add something to the existing Blackwattle Bay article, but in relation to a topic the photo does fit where it is now, illustrating the (former) coal port facilities of Sydney Harbour. Regarding the sourcing of this photograph, I went to a lot of trouble to get it. I even had permission from the owner of the Reproduction Rights (Sydney City Council) to put it into Wikipedia, with their instructions on how to load it to Wikipedia. But, I thought I would do the right thing and use the non-free licence tag, because there was some doubt about the context in which the photograph was originally taken and the photographer was a known person. I was being conservative. Now I know the trouble unleashed by using the non-free tag, I won't ever go down that path again. However, I must point out that the criterion that is suggested as the reason for a deletion is a subjective one. Why not just leave it to the reader to see if the photograph assists their understanding of the topic? It seems to meet the other non-free criteria, and nobody so far has said that it does not. There are no 'free' images - hardly any images at all in fact - of this facility, as a going concern, that I have found; if there was one I would have used it.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 23:18, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I've struggled for a few days with how to respond, because it feels like you know the answer. It starts with the third of the Five pillars, that we are working to build a free encyclopedia. It then extends to Resolution:Licensing policy, a decision from 2007 limiting us to only hosting free content, and our Exemption Doctrine Policy (Non-free content criteria) about the limited conditions under which we are willing to host non-free content. As one of the top 3 websites in the world, we are a target for lawsuits if we don't have the appropriate licenses on our content which another website might not need to worry about.

I appreciate the effort that you went to in order to attempt to obtain a release for this image, but it is not clear to many people how it "significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic", Coastal coal-carrying trade of New South Wales. That is subjective, but that is why we discuss it at Files for discussion, in order to discuss and find consensus. The only solution I have would be that it would be pretty obvious how it would increase reader's understanding of Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker if there were such an article.

Again, I appreciate the effort that you put into articles and images. Thank you for your service. I hope you'll keep it up. Let me know if I can be of assistance with images, anytime.  ★  Bigr Tex 02:12, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

@BigrTex: Thanks for your response. I take your point and I will have a go at putting together an article on the specific subject. Once again, thanks for your time and thoughts on this subject. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

@BigrTex: Well it looks like the file has now been deleted. So, that is that. I have learnt that attempting to use the 'non-free' licence is so fraught with difficulty that I personally will never go down that path again. As luck would have it I found a free image of a nearby wharf and bunker (Howard Smith) at Blackwattle Bay, albeit not the same wharf and bunker that was shown in the file in question (Jones Brothers). So, the article ends up with a picture of Blackwattle Bay after all.--TrimmerinWiki (talk) 21:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackwattle Bay Coal Bunker, Bridge Road Glebe, 1970s SCC Archives A-0034658.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Hoskins has been accepted

Charles Hoskins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Cardozo has been accepted

Henry Cardozo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: Hi, Henry Cardozo is not my article. The only one that I put up recently is Charles Hoskins.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 21:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Joadja

not to distract you from your recent focus, but, as I still have no answer for your Trove refs and maybe the Joadja mine is worthy .... Dave Rave (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joey Chua (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joey Chua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joey Chua, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@MapleSoy: @KylieTastic: Please note that I am NOT the author of 'Joey Chua' nor am I the author of 'Henry Cardozo', another recent AfC. Why am I being associated with these AfCs. They are NOTHING AT ALL to do with me!TrimmerinWiki (talk) 07:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

• Hi TrimmerinWiki it appears in both cases an IP editor has for some reason has submitted these in your name (see [1] and [2]). They added your username so the tools automatically posted the notes back to your page. So sorry about that, I'll leave a note for them. Cheers and you can obviously remove deceptive notes as you desire. Cheers, keep safe KylieTastic (talk) 08:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

@KylieTastic: Hi, thank you so much for intervening and helping with this issue. I was unaware that my username could be abused in this fashion by an IP editor. Still we live an learn; I guess the usernames are easily visible and so can be misused. It is possible that the editor concerned saw one of my newer articles go through AfC and decided to stay completely anonymous while appearing to be a 'transparent' user (me). Thanks again; very much appreciated.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

• Frankly so far this users behaviour is odd, mostly trying to get a non notable artist accepted (Draft:Kadda Sheekoff) and then a random set of submissions. I would guess they copied one of your submissions, this one as the time is identical, they then later submitted others at the same time but different user like this. Why they did this is anyone's guess, but hopefully they have moved on from using your name, even if they haven't stopped trying to get there article approved. Have a good weekend KylieTastic (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Larmer has been accepted

James Larmer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eternal Shadow Talk 20:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Sorensen (landscape gardener) (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QueerEcofeminist was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Sorensen (landscape gardener) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul Sorensen (landscape gardener), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 06:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Sorensen (landscape gardener) has been accepted

Paul Sorensen (landscape gardener), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noahfgodard (talk) 20:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canbelego has been accepted

Canbelego, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 19:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canonba has been accepted

Canonba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 14:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobadah has been accepted

Bobadah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 14:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hermidale has been accepted

Hermidale, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:18, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilgunnia has been accepted

Gilgunnia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Allen, New South Wales has been accepted

Mount Allen, New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~SS49~ {talk} 13:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Drysdale, New South Wales has been accepted

Mount Drysdale, New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Numeralla has been accepted

Numeralla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 05:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bumbalong has been accepted

Bumbalong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 11:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joey Chua

Hello, TrimmerinWiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joey Chua".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 23:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

@Eternal Shadow: Just to make it absolutely clear, this 'Joey Chua' draft was not my work but was made by editing one of my draft submissions, deceitfully using my identity without my knowledge or (of course) my permission. I welcome the deletion of 'Joey Chua' but am saddened that it is still being associated with me. Be gone Draft: Joey Chua! --TrimmerinWiki (talk) 20:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Canonbar has been accepted

SS Canonbar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 05:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Currowan

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 02:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hi TrimmerinWiki! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Moruya, New South Wales that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 13:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Dawnseeker2000: Thank you for your message. I will be more observant of the 'Minor edit' definition in future. My mistake, as upon reflection I can see why the definition is as it is. Once again, thanks for pointing this out.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dalmorton

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 03:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Ryrie

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 07:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Little River, New South Wales has been accepted

Little River, New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

In the future, please use AFC comments for comments, or put them on the draft talk page. But I will remove the comment. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corn Trail, New South Wales has been accepted

Corn Trail, New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Australia–Victoria border dispute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Corner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

This has now been fixed and the article has the correct link.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 06:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kangiara has been accepted

Kangiara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John McKenzie (colonial settler)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

You removed a redirect after asking me to to move the article, creating considerable confusion.--Grahame (talk) 00:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Grahamec:Hi, sorry if I did something wrong. What I did was to remove a link to 'John McKenzie (colonial settler') from the page John Mckenzie (disambiguation) and add a link to 'John Mackenzie (colonial settler)'from 'John Mackenzie (disambiguation)'. Is that the cause of your issue? I did this after you moved the page, because I thought that the disambiguation should follow the new article title. Once again my apologies for any trouble caused if it is due to my misunderstanding on how the redirects are implemented.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 06:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

The change to the link at John Mackenzie (disambiguation) was OK. The problem was that when I moved John McKenzie (colonial settler) to John Mackenzie (colonial settler) this created a redirect at John McKenzie (colonial settler), which you subsequently undid and then edited it, so there were then 2 similar articles with similar names.--Grahame (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

No harm done. Keep up the good work.--Grahame (talk) 12:54, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost River, New South Wales has been accepted

Lost River, New South Wales, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 11:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Bowen (colonial settler)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 04:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Dumaresq (colonial settler)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 13:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tuggeranong railway station has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tuggeranong railway station. Thanks! Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

@Eastmain: Thanks for your comment. I have added "Old Tuggerannong Road" to the address. Adding a property name and street number does not make much sense as the station is of course on railway land and not the nearest private property. Hope this makes it clearer where the old station was/is. It is basically where Old Tuggeranong Road (no longer open as a public road) crosses the old railway line. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 03:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coolringdon has been accepted

Coolringdon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Proposed site for the federal capital of Australia

A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed site for the federal capital of Australia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Thank you for requesting speedy deletion of this category. I created it but then realised it was a mistake to have done so. That is why it has nothing in it. If I could have undone the creation of the new category, I would have. So, I support deletion of the category.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Letchworth railway station (New South Wales)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 06:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuggeranong railway station has been accepted

Tuggeranong railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 02:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Colinton

you upgraded bridges from three to four, if you manage four you can go higher, do you have a noted list of bridges so far ? Dave Rave (talk) 04:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

@Dave Rave: I am only counting large bridges that I know about on the line between Michelago station and the far side of Bredbo River. I added an extra one for the bridge across Michelago Creek, when I found that it was south of the station at Michelago. So, the four are, north-to-south: Michelago Creek, Ingalara Creek, Colyers Creek, and Bredbo River. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 07:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

the ref to large would be to the significantly large, the ones that match the four in the New England. I agree that Michelago and Colyers are large enough, but they're plain trestles, you're missing the really obvious large bridge at Numeralla, and there's another trestle at Cooma Creek. And the rest on the continuation section after that ... Dave Rave (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

@Dave Rave: Hi Dave, yes I am missing those other bridges (Numeralla and Cooma Creek), but that is intentional. The article is about Colinton, and the civil engineering works mentioned are only those that would have been relevant to the large construction camp that was located there. The other bridges would not have been relevant to Colinton. that's why I did what I have done.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 01:29, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

ah yes, local content, ok Dave Rave (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil Hoskins

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stewart Ryrie (colonial settler)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 04:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahkoolma

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 07:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Tree Hill (Australian Capital Territory) has been accepted

One Tree Hill (Australian Capital Territory), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Australian Iron and Steel Company

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 09:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of 19th-century iron smelting operations in Australia

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cunningar has been accepted

Cunningar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg Greg has been accepted

Greg Greg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 09:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

dead citations

you don't remove stuff, you mark it dead or you find another or better still, an archive link Dave Rave (talk) 02:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

@Dave Rave:Fair enough advice, Dave. I should have replaced the citations (ones that I put there myself BTW) with something current or archived. Thanks for providing the archive link to the hockey club. That is a good start.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 20:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

one of the others has a current searchable, cricket i think, and one other an historic, they're not really critical for the story, but if there's a link there's a possibility it may be found later, if the link is gone I won't know to look for it. Dave Rave (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Oldrey has been accepted

William Oldrey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hawdon (colonial settler) (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ArsenalGhanaPartey was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Hawdon (colonial settler) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Hawdon (colonial settler), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 14:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hawdon (colonial settler)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 01:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Sandys Elrington

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 01:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

worth knowing

your editing and contributions to australian content are in fact the most thorough and comprehensive set of edits by any editor in the last ten years according to me - so why you subject yourself to uninformed and limited perception processes? feel free to vent on or off wiki anytime - thats part of being in this damned colander/seive

as for a vast number of editors, they have no idea what they are looking at, its always good to have one that might have a clue... JarrahTree 06:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC) @JarrahTree: Thank you for the encouragement. I enjoy editing as a bit of an escape from Real life; some of this stuff can become really involved. I like the idea of uncovering and learning something new, and doing something with that new information. Of course, after a while, it can become a bit of a hard slog, in which case, there is always plenty waiting to be be done back in real life.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

hmm - real life has its problems, trust the 1,000 year event waterline is nowhere near your point of perspective upon it. I could rabbit on about here and real life endlessly, better leave as is... JarrahTree 09:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Well, it has happened again, see section below. Some person that has created an article, amongst others. on the Bombay Football Club has rejected my draft on Torbane (see section below). At least I would hope that if rejection comes, it be rejected by somebody from the relevant Wikipedia Project. And, the reasons given for rejection are not valid at all, but surprisingly similar to an earlier rejection of someone else's article last November. I know that you have warned me, but this draft has been on the boil for quite a long time, and so it started well before I had learned my lesson, about drafts and random reviews. I also had a change that I made to Commonwealth Oil Corporation (removing the redirect) reverted, with the history on the article's talk page. (I have not given up on that one). Sure is frustrating.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Torbane, New South Wales (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Torbane, New South Wales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Torbane, New South Wales, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Torbane, New South Wales

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahame (talk) 02:01, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Stewart Ryrie, Junior

Hello, TrimmerinWiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stewart Ryrie, Junior, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:13, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

arrgghh

dont forget the categories and talk page gizmo's - vip! JarrahTree 03:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Will do, just fitting the edit in between some other things today. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 05:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stewart Ryrie, Junior has been accepted

Stewart Ryrie, Junior, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RPSkokie (talk) 07:43, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TrimmerinWiki

Thank you for creating George Francis Davis.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)