User talk:SwetaReporter

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Times Internet, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contribution. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, but I read that information on the Times of India website, and it was written by me. SwetaReporter (talk) 11:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can I learn how to use a wikipidea, create page, and other info? SwetaReporter (talk) 14:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note about IMD

Forecasts usually aren't included in articles because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Additionally, adding the IMD forecast to the IMD article because the article should describe the IMD (its history, goals, missions, etc), not its forecasts. Hope this helps! Akbermamps 07:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks i thought adding their news and information is ok SwetaReporter (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm CollectiveSolidarity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shiv Sena have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 15:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i have made minor change in shiv Sena page usually people here use shri. as MR. or SIR soo i think i use this very correctly SwetaReporter (talk) 15:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not on Wikipedia. I’m sure it happens in some articles but that doesn’t mean you should add it. Doug Weller talk 18:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok i am doing basic practice can you help me more SwetaReporter (talk) 06:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ask at the WP:Teahouse. I just don't have the time, wish I did. Wish I was well! Doug Weller talk 13:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for reply :) SwetaReporter (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andheri. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Inspector Eevee (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok i am new here in Wikipedia and learning things here SwetaReporter (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Piranha (1978 film), you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 15:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwetaReporter! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Aurangabad that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When you insert new material into an article, please think about where it should go. In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopaedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Your edit to the article on Aurangabad inserted material about 2022 into a set of sentences talking about 1988. This had the effect of separating the citation for the 1988 events from the first sentence about the 1988 event.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:43, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

but this information is correct and I have attached reliable source with that SwetaReporter (talk) 09:52, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And that is why I have tried to help you, by telling you what you did wrong, so you can put it in a more sensible place, and remember not to mark it as a minor edit.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:55, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks very much :) i will remember that SwetaReporter (talk) 09:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lokshahi

The article Lokshahi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

1) References do no support content of article. 2) Does not appear to meet WP:GNG requirements for notability. 3) Cannot verify - even the listed website for the channel/company does not work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lokshahi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lokshahi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Singularity42 (talk) 16:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lokshahi (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lokshahi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SwetaReporter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aurangabad

Hello. Your recent edit to Aurangabad appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

but I have do research in books and ask help to others other also big names and they have contributed their life in news industry so how can I keep my information SwetaReporter (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a web-host for you to store your information on, and we are not interested in your reaerch as we have a policy of WP:No original research}} - Arjayay (talk) 14:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Miss World 2022

Hello SwetaReporter! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Miss World 2022, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/hyderabad/2022/aug/16/crowned-miss-india-2022-sini-shetty-gears-up-for-miss-world-2487857.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Miss World 2022 and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Miss World 2022, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Miss World 2022. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Miss World 2022 with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Miss World 2022 saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ☆ Bri (talk) 14:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is not copyright i have write some information cite news link SwetaReporter (talk) 14:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aurangabad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kandhar Fort, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nanded. - Arjayay (talk) 15:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Raigad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lokshahi

Hello, SwetaReporter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lokshahi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lokshahi

Hello, SwetaReporter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lokshahi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]