User talk:Slo44

Slo44, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Slo44! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Slo44/Mener

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Slo44/Mener. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EDM fan 2 (talk) 22:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pedestrian (disambiguation) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pedestrian (disambiguation) was changed by Slo44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957561 on 2022-08-30T11:25:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Slo44/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Slo44/sandbox. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Slo44/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Dash Image

Is there any way that I could get a Rainbow Dash image on Wikimedia Commons? slo double 4 (talk) 23:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since Rainbow Dash is a copyrighted character, Wikipedia cannot host images of her without permission from the copyright holder (Hasbro) unless there's a fair use justification. The Twilight Sparkle page for example hosts an image of Twilight Sparkle which may only be used on that article and nowhere else, but Rainbow Dash does not have a Wikipedia article. Vanilla Wizard 💙 08:57, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Thanks! slo double 4 (talk) 15:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roblox Studio (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

Building on the comment left by DoubleGrazing my feeling is that there is a case to merge this into the corporation's article, but that it has no ability to stand alone, certainly at this point.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Roblox Corporation. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Slo44/Roblox Studio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:16, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the Features and Notability sections of the article, how could I make the page's content sufficient enough to be eligible for an article of it's own? slo double 4 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roblox Studio (2)

Hello, Slo44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roblox Studio (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Slo44/Roblox Studio (2)

Hello, Slo44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Slo44/Roblox Studio (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]