This is an archive of past discussions about User:SineBot. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

For hitting 100k sigs, I hereby award you a muffin. You're growing up so big and strong— I'm so proud of you. *cheek pinch* :P --slakr^\ talk / 20:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you, SineBot, for signing an unsigned comment on my talk page. Please tell your owner you deserve a fresh change of oil. Or electrons. ←Ben^B4 16:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

You validate my negligence! 81.158.96.235 20:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks SineBot. Springnuts 21:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Not to get off on a tangent, but I've been missing HagermanBot and I'm glad you're here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RossPatterson (talk • contribs) 22:37, August 20, 2007 (UTC).

Thanks

Thanks for what you do. I'd sign myself, but that would take away your purpose. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bushcarrot (talk • contribs) 21:40:45, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Domo

Domo Arigato Mr Robato. (see i'm signing it with the tidles just for you ^ ^) Atomic Religione 00:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Why do we need this?

Resolved

We already got HagermanBot. And I must say it's doing a damn great job. Please leave a message on my talk page, thanks. TheBlazikenMaster 10:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Got answer. Bye. TheBlazikenMaster 11:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

ON one own's Talk page

Unless there is a new standard recently made, signing one own's Talk page is not neccessary. At least up until now. LanceBarber 17:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Already fixed. In the future, please use my talk page to report bugs. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Bug?

I added some text to HagermanBot's talk page expecting SineBot to step up to the plate. You did, but you described my edit as "signed but undated" when in fact it was unsigned as well as undated. RossPatterson 22:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm assuming that was due to the fact that "SineBot has stepped up to the task" could, in a way, be the kind of thing to appear in a signature. In fact, I'm willing to guess that if the line didn't start with "SineBot", it would be classed as unsigned. Let's give it a test, shall we?

It would appear that SineBot has stepped up to the task.

...And it hasn't been signed at all. Okay, then I give in. Still, keep up the good work SineBot! :) --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 09:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Already fixed. In the future, please use my talk page to report bugs. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		For your tireless automated work in signing those damned irresponsible editor's posts, you are awarded the Working Robot's BarnstarLoodog 23:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

--Loodog 23:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Stop Signing Me

Stop signing my comments. If I wanted them signed, then I would sign them myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 97.97.77.73 (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Note. Please see the bot's user page. If you have further problems, please use my talk page instead. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

You messed me up!

I had written something on a talk page and misspelled my name, so after i finshed editing i edited again becuase i saw two misspelled words and i was going to fix my name, and once i did it said there was an edit conflict and i had to re edit what i was about to edit, no thanks for the sign!-hotspot —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:44, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Note. Please see the bot's user page to opt out. If you have further problems, please use my talk page instead. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

To do list

I don't think you have to add signatures to a to do list. – Ilse @ 07:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

See your talk page. If you have any other issues, please use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Opt out without category

I followed the instructions on {{Bots}} to protect my own pages, but the bot will still sign updates to pointers, {{userlinks}}, etc. on other pages if the category is not added to them. Why not a HagermanBot/OptOut-like page instead of an only partially usable category? — Athaenara ✉ 00:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

See your talk page. If you have any other issues, please use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Signing on Sandbox?

Your bot keeps signing me on my sandbox. Is signing in a Sandbox necessary and policy? I thought the sandbox is for practicing which I do use it for but I also use it for reminders of locations and how to do things since I have problems remembering. Thanks, --CrohnieGal^Talk 16:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

See your talk page. If you have any other issues, please use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 17:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Bot error

Hey, take a look at these posts - mine, SineBot's. Can you fix it so if people add an extra # or * at the end of a list it doesn't sign those? WjBscribe 17:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

See your talk page. If you have any other issues, please use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 02:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Here's another.[1] By the way, it's frustrating to get a message that provides no help in finding the offending post. It's just dumb luck that I happened to find this one. —Michael Z. 2007-08-24 01:31 Z

See your talk page. If you have any other issues, please use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 02:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! —Michael Z. 2007-08-24 03:26 Z

Auto signing

Can the owner of this robot program it to stop making edits like these? Frankly, it's getting really annoying, and I desire this problem be fixed now without resorting to placing a category or anything in my user pages. Lord Sesshomaru 20:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

See your talk page. If you have any other issues, please use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 02:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redsox382007 (talk • contribs) 04:16, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

S495

Thank you for the advise!! --S495 19:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)S495

Please provide a one-edit opt-out

This bot just added a lengthy signature to a table I am creating on a talk page. This makes it very difficult to follow. I am opting out entirely; but I would prefer to have a method that did not waste limited summary space. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do. I supposedly opted out of the this adjective bot, and it's still spamming my talkpage. This is after the alleged fix. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

True love

I love you SineBot! I miss Hagermanbot and am very happy that you have stepped up to fill its shoes. --ElKevbo 02:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. With all the negative comments you've been getting (and the frankly silly "vandalism" warnings given above even after explaining to him), I figured you could use a little praise. I am useless at adding the timestamp to unsigned templates, so you do it for me. Thanks! :) --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 03:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't know what the guy's problem is. He's now flat refusing to use the opt-out option. Great work on the bot, though. -- Ned Scott 07:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Not true love

Just a warning Ned, I'd stop accusing others of having "problems" if I were you. It isn't that hard to be civil, and attacking me, [2], [3], just makes the matter worse. Last I checked, this category case wasn't a requirement, see here. Lord Sesshomaru 07:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

One, your two examples don't show me being uncivil, two, you're freaking out for no good reason. -- Ned Scott 07:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Redundancy

When is another redundant copy of this bot being created, that can run when this bot is unable to run? It should be called CosineBot! --Deskana (banana) 20:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

~~Or perhaps cosecant? — Ian Lee (Talk) 02:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)~~

Oh... I get it now... stupid me! — Ian Lee (Talk) 17:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, bro

Thanks man 4 tellin' me that. --Mr. Comedian 16:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Signed but undated

Hello SineBot. I noticed here that you signed for someone and added the date, but not the username. You said it was 'Signed but undated', but the comment was not signed at all in the first place. I don't know if that's a situation you want to cater for, but even if the non-signing was intentional (per #3 above), you may wish to provide a different comment, thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Or here. Suggest a little more sandboxing with this bot ;) The Evil Spartan 21:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

This is mainly due to people having a [[User:link]] in their last added line, so the bot simply assumes that they're signing (mainly because when we tried to verify the link belonging to the signer, we ran in the issues with people having really funky cross-page signatures, so we moved toward that generic approach. However, since {{undated}}, as a template, is funky, I went ahead and simply disabled its use for now. Sure, it'll be redundant to include the user AND the date (should a post simply be undated), but at least we won't run into this problem again.

If you have other issues/problems, please don't post them here; instead use my talk page. --slakr ^(talk) 07:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Broken bot

Your bot is stalking me, marking my edits as "unsigned" when in fact they are. Why don't you turn this thing off?

Thanks Cleduc 18:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC) (soon to be marked "unsigned")

"Me too!" Eaglizard 19:48, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

They are being marked as unsigned because according to the signature guidelines, a signature must contain a link to either your talk page, or your userpage, at absolute minimum. Which yours doesn't. --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 00:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

1) They're guidelines. 2) if there isn't a link, that doesn't mean it's "unsigned" -- it means there isn't a link. So add a link if it's all that important. Bots are supposed to improve things, not screw them up -- and if it screws stuff up, the bot is broken. Cleduc 01:41, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

You shouldn't have to opt out of malfunctioning malware like this. Note: several comments of mine have been mangled. According to WP:BOTS#Good form it is the responsibility of the bot operator to go fix the problems. So I respectfully request that you fix them. And maybe fix your bot... Cleduc 01:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The bot doesn't seem to be malfunctioning. It is rightly designed to mark comments without a signature (with a link to the user or user talk namespace) as unsigned. The easy ways to stop it are to opt out or to leave the raw signature box unchecked in your preferences. WODUP 02:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Wrong. See above. It says "unsigned" when it clearly is not. Cleduc 03:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

He responded to that point in the post you directly responded to. To wit: "It is rightly designed to mark comments without a signature (with a link to the user or user talk namespace) as unsigned." --Dreaded Walrus ^{t c} 03:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

So, it is my fault he designed his bot poorly? And I am supposed to fix his mess? Policy says bot owners fix bot messes. Cleduc 05:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The bot works fine. You've both added yourself to Category:Users who have opted out of automatic signing and added a link to your userpage in your signatures to comply with WP:SIG#Internal_links, so there shouldn't be any more problems. Cheers! WODUP 05:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm addressing the bot owner, not you. In any case, he hasn't repaired the damage his bot has done. Cleduc 06:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Alright; just trying to help. The bot operator did reply to your message here. WODUP 06:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Response

There are two huge boxes at the top of this talk page. The very first sentence of the first huge box (that is, Frequently Asked Question #1) solves this issue, because it's a non-issue. Second, there's another huge box at the top of the talk page with an admonishing red warning icon that explicitly asks that all problems/bugs be reported to me so that I can address them as quickly as possible. If anyone has any other questions/concerns related to the bot, please check the FAQ first (again, at the top of this page), then drop by my talk page if that doesn't solve anything. Cheers. --slakr ^(talk) 07:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow!

This bot is amazing! It's like futurama now we got sinebots and vaccines and everything, what a time to be alive. KatoABJV 23:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

bug!

This edit is clearly not what should have happened. Michael Hardy 22:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi,

Thank you for signing my comments for me. Please keep up the great work you are doing!

Best wishes,

Albert

Albert Cheng 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Treatment of commented signatures

I'm wondering how you, SineBot, handle hidden-by-commenting signatures. For instance, this you would ignore if it was properly formatted (referring to the big box at the top): --~~~~. However, how would you handle this:  ? Thanks for the information. (have tried running a test in your Sandbox with inconclusive results) --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, actually you caught it on a technicality. It thought you were messing around with commented contribs (I saw you doing that while I was doing some development work) :P. It should be okay now. Be sure to use my talk page in the future. --slakr^(talk) 00:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

OK - I just did a test right after yours and it did not recognize the commented sig as a sig. Thanks. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Right, and it worked. :P --slakr^(talk) 02:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

What?!?

		What?!?
		You mean to tell me that a bot that was engineered to sign names doesn't have the signiture of the man whose name has become synonomous with signitures!? Then I must insist that you accept this John Hancock award for a job well done :) Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 08:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

To do lists

Please don't sign items on to do lists. Thank you. – Ilse @ 14:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I concur -- a to-do list isn't a conversation requiring attributions. It also isn't accumulative, but designed to be trimmed as tasks are done. —Quasirandom 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Pages that have "/to do" in them are now exempt. Please use my talk page in the future. --slakr^(talk) 04:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Glitch

On someone's talk page, i made a comment,signed it,and added a p.s. telling them to sign their posts (and ps the bot didn't sign them) and it signed agian.

Smartyshoe 15:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Fixed in v1.2.7. Please use my talk page in the future. --slakr^(talk) 19:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Signing

The bot shouldn't have signed [4] - it was signed the line above, and one below was a clarification. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 03:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fixed in v1.2.7. --slakr^(talk) 19:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

You're Stalking Me Aren't You?

Usually you sign unsigned comments fast, like on me for example before I can correct them. You do so very quickly. However, I then noticed one editor who hadn't signed. I was about to sign them but I was dealing with vandalism that took about 2 - 3 minutes. I then go to put a substunsigned up for them and POW! edit conflict! How do you time that?!? (Seriously though; nice work.) :P -WarthogDemon 06:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

LOL! :D. You're probably talking about a page that's in the bot's high priority list because it's frequently modified. Unsigned edits to pages/subpages matching those masks will be signed by the bot as soon as possible to avoid edit conflicts. All other normal talk pages have a 90 second "oops" delay.

... but yes-- it's stalking you. I'm not supposed to say anything, though, because it'll probably get mad at me. But, between you and me, it tends to do that when it has a crush on someone. Is love in the air? Are wikihearts flying: <3 ? :P --slakr^(talk) 19:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

o_o;;; Maybe. But I just got SineBot back: [5]. Two minutes pass and it doesn't tag it's own speedy sandbox? For shame, Bot! For shame! :D -WarthogDemon 20:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

... this is just scary. -WarthogDemon 20:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Problems

This bot is causing great irritation on this talk page. If it isn't resolved, I'm going to block it. Raul654 01:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocking isn't necessary, at the bot isn't malfunctioning. However, if it is, please provide diffs so that I can look into the problem. There are plenty of ways for users and talk pages to opt out of autosigning, as is apparent on the bot's user page and the frequently asked questions section on this page. In the future, please contact me on my talk page when reporting potential problems (as is also requested above) so that I can more quickly address them. --slakr^\ talk / 17:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Weird

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WilyD/Amalgamation_of_Toronto&curid=13109170&diff=156054846&oldid=156054593 Is weird. It's probably a one time thing though. Wily D —Preceding unsigned comment added by WilyD (talk • contribs) 14:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The bot by-default automatically signs User talk pages. For more info, please see the bot's user page. --slakr^\ talk / 17:12, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Error

diff, I signed ;\ --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 13:34, November 15, 2024 (UTC)

DarthRahn, the code that you're using is not a valid timestamp. It changes with each page visit and does not reflect the time when you made your post. You try could using something like {{subst:CURRENTTIME}} for a normal timestamp, but even after that the SineBot (and some archiving bots as well) will probably not recognize it because of those links (which are imho totally unnecessary) ∴ Alex Smotrov 18:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Too bad. I use {{subst:time}} --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 13:34, November 15, 2024 (UTC)

Thanks …

… for that edit conflict. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 19:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

lol, this bot just signed the comment ;) --- DarthRahn(^u/_t\^c) 21:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, well, on the upside at least there's a delay in the first place. :P That's the main reason that was added-- being able to revert vandalism or spam without having to worry about reverting to the bot's signing of the vandalism comment-- just so long as you catch within a couple minutes. I would increase the limit, but it would probably end up causing redundant msg notification boxes and actual edit conflicts whereby the comment won't get signed at all, both of which I figure are more annoying than having to do reverts via page history for the minority of comments that are pure vandalism. --slakr^\ talk / 00:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I want some too :)

Hi there, excellent work on the bot, I have seen it in action in a lots of places and I really like it. But how come it never signs my talk page? I had my fair share of unsigned comments on my talk (including the very last one), but never received a visit from SineBot? Is there something I have to do to for SineBot to sign my talk? Regards, --Kudret abi 19:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

It already does. It didn't sign that one because the bot thought that {{Asteroid}}, which is likely supposed to be Asteroid, was a template. --slakr^\ talk / 00:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Slakr, thanks for your explanation, but there were also past occasions of unsigned comments on my talk which SineBot did not attend. Anyway, I just left an unsigned comment on my talk to see if SineBot will sign it, I will let you know what happens. --Kudret abi 05:54, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm didn't work, but perhaps it won't sign one's own comments on one's own talk. I will request that someone else leave an unsigned comment on my talk and see what happens. --Kudret abi 06:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah, it worked! I am so happy, I thought I was outcast for some reason :) Thanks for the help, take care --Kudret abi 06:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Heh, no problem. And yes, for future reference, the bot will ignore contributions to your own talk page. --slakr^\ talk / 16:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

signatures

yes, actually i do. It's one thing for your bot to sign comments but quite another for it to leave sarcastic comments when it is evident from the context that a conversation is taking place. (sic ~~~~) ~~—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandpiper (talk • contribs) 01:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)~~

I see you have even opted out of the attentions of your own bot? (sic ~~~~) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandpiper (talk • contribs) 01:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Uhh, I have? Since when? --slakr^\ talk / 19:58, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Tweak?

This edit was signed, just not regularly, it appears. Yet your bot still signed for him. And then it just looks odd: [6]. May need to tweak your code a tad. --Ali'i 19:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I think this is explained in FAQ 1 on top of this page. --Kudret abi 20:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

BLEH :P

If i wanted to sign my comment, I would have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.43.187 (talk) 10:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

SineBot is on the job!

I just went to add {{unsignedIP}} to a comment on an AfD, and got caught in an edit conflict. It was SineBot! -- Rob C. alias Alarob 05:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Odd bug

Here is an instance where SineBot signed an already-signed comment. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 01:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Fortunately looks like a freak occurrence. -- But|seriously|folks 02:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Butseriouslyfolks (talk • contribs)
- Ha! Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:10, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  - Don't mess with me, you robot freak! -- But|seriously|folks 02:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Butseriouslyfolks (talk • contribs)

The bot signed it because the signature pointed to User:Bsf and User talk:Bsf, both of which are not your user name. --slakr^\ talk / 04:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

SineBot and I crossing paths.

Hello, I'd kind of like to report a query. Over the past few days, I dealt with a few vandals going after talk pages. SineBot put his mark and we edit conflicted while I tried to revert. Not to mention that when SineBot does his thing, no one pays any mind. So vandalism can stay for days. I'd like to suggest that maybe it could identify vandalism and maybe report it. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 02:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, the bot waits a small delay (~90 seconds) in order to allow vandalism reverts, but I'm thinking I need to bump it to 2 minutes. The downside is that the higher the delay, the greater the likelihood that there will be an edit conflict, and the greater the likelihood that comments will go unsigned. :\ --slakr^\ talk / 04:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

My Sign

Why do u include my signs "unsigned" just because i changed my signature? --West Coast Ryda and Talk to Me 17:35, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

I already replied on both your and my talk pages. It's because your User:/User talk: pages and your username do not match. --slakr^\ talk / 04:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't mind

this thing doing its stuff if amuses some people but they can always find my signature on the history summary. Why,I wonder, does it miss-spell sign ?

77.97.161.230 21:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)mikeL

It's a math thing. Sine ♥ Fr ed il 21:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredil Yupigo (talk • contribs)

Bug needs fixing

Please see this diff by sinebot. There's no need for this when adding to an existing comment. Please resolve. Thanks. ... Kenosis 00:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC) ... Otherwise, generally nice work-- SineBot provides a useful service! ... Kenosis 00:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello bot

What a nice bot you are, cutie cutie :)) NerdyNSK 05:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Please don't subst the signature template

It really messes up the discussions with all that ugly code. __meco 07:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Transclusion costs and benefits --slakr^\ talk / 22:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Signing redundantly

Not sure what the problem is with this bot, but it seems to be signing redundantly even after I have signed. See Talk:India page. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 20:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. It was the pesky '&' in your signature. :P Please be sure to use my talk page in the future. --slakr^\ talk / 19:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Signing Talk/User talk pages

I know about signing pages. I had an account in March and knew about it the first day I got an account. I just seem to forget once in a while. LADodgersAngelsfan 04:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Lol, no worries. If the bot {{tilde}}ed you it's just out of love. :D --slakr^\ talk / 20:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Cease and Desist

Dear Sir or Lady:

Please do not follow me around to every talk page I comment on and sign my name. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.248.112 (talk) 00:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see your user talk page for a reply. --slakr^\ talk / 20:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Stop

Can you please stop putting that unsigned thing on my images on my sandbox discussion.Swirlex 19:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Usually sandboxes aren't in the User talk: namespace, but rather the User: namespace. However, if you would like the bot to ignore a particular page, please see its user page for opt out instructions. --slakr^\ talk / 20:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Cheers for telling me about that signing thing, so i think its only fair that this is the first page that i actually do it on!! --Brain 8915 22:57, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Brian 8915 xxx

Thanks, but no thanks.

Sinebot signed a comment on my page that was already signed. It has now been removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidFarmbrough (talk • contribs) 13:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I, BrotherFlounder, award SineBot the Tireless Contributor Barnstar for the never-ending efforts to ensure that all of Wikipedia knows who the hell they're talking to. — Brother Flounder 16:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

stop stalking me

Lunkhead2 00:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Good work on the "undated" thing

I'm impressed to see how SineBot handles three-tilde sigs now. Thanks for doing that. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 04:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Guido Avesnes 15:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I, however, despise it. When I choose to leave a comment undated, I do it for a very specific reason. It's rare but it is intentional. I dislike your bot overriding my judgment. Please SHUT THAT FUNCTION DOWN! Rossami (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

While I understand your concerns, the consensus is that that functionality is a good thing. Please see the FAQ for opting out instructions if you personally disapprove. --slakr^\ talk / 12:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Dating comment -- Please WB ASAP!!!

Can you please do me a favor and not do that??? I wrote my username, date and time!!!

WIKIVUE Detroit (talk) SAT SEP 29 2007 1:56 AM EDT —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 05:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... I'll try to add this strange datestamp in an upcoming revision. --slakr^\ talk / 12:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks For the Information!!!

Thank you for the information, but another editor is insulting myself and its said that I don't speak English just because I made some mistakes at some articles, please do something to stop him! --Charlie White 23:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey Sinebot

I just wanted to say I love your work. I tend to forget my signature sometimes, and your always there to make it better. Thanks!

What happens if I only sign with the time? 03:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

EDIT: Aha! Looks like I outsmarted you, little Sinebot. Try this one out → 04:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Rocket000

Picture

Thank you SineBot for using a picture I created on your user page. I thought I was the only one to have looked at it... but I really like it! Auroranorth 12:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

grr

What part of "sod off" don't you understand?![7] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hesperian (talk • contribs) 06:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Oooh, classy response. Hesperian 06:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

(Just kidding, slakr. I'm not really upset about it. But seriously, you should get your bot to check edit summaries for a key phrase such as "[nosign]". That way, people who are knowingly posting material, without signing, for good reason, can warn you off in their edit summary. Hesperian 06:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC))

Actually, it checks for !nosign! (with exclamation points). Check out its user page for more opt out methods. Cheers =) --slakr^\ talk / 17:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Super, thanks! Hesperian 05:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Do we really need to add a whole new section to add his religion?

Can't we mention it somewhere in the body of the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.222.159 (talk) 03:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the info

Thanks for the info on signing.I knew that,but someties my keyboard doesn't work and the buttonm does not either.Coolgirly88 13:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Greetings.It is very kind of you to asist me. This is new and like all new tasks the jargon and methods will take time to learn. I entered a number of additions which appear to have been struck down. Any assistance I can get I very much appreciate. Thanks again.--WingateChristopher 01:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

O.K,yo,My signature when I prees the thing the code for it comes up like you know a fancy sig?Thats the problem.And yes,I knew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolgirly88 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Opt-out

I cannot opt-out if I do not have a login as I cannot create my own user page to put an opt-out category or template on it. 64.122.14.55 17:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikistalking

You're stalking me. Stop it, you've been following me around the wiki, editing the same talk pages I do, and it has been causing me annoyance and distress. --arkalochori ^|talk| —Preceding comment was added at 00:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, SineBot

[8] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirt58 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Signature problem

Hi SineBot, I have a problem with my signature. Each time I sign my username with four tildes, (S.C.Ruffeyfan 19:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)) it has my real name clickable. Why is this? S.C.Ruffeyfan

Sinebot is sexy

well duh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.220.106.25 (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for picking up on my missed signature at WT:CLINMED - I could not undertand what was occuring as I got an edit conflict when I tried then adding it and also correct the spelling for the thread. Decided to leave my faux pas that you kindly corrected :-) David Ruben ^Talk 01:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your notification.

Thanks for reminding my to sign my posts whenever I contribute to a discussion thread. However, I did know to do that already; I just figured that when you're contributing to a list, it doesn't matter as much. But if you'd rather that I sign my posts at all times, even when it was just one more icon added in, I'd be more than happy to comply with that! Wilhelmina Will 01:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.

I must admit that I still do not understand everything about this website so I appreciate any useful information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M5891 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Signshare

You are so stupid, I named my section Signshare, which means I did sign and plus I wasn't finished and I had just written two paragraphs and you ruin that to make me sign my name after my comment, which I did, I got this so you leave my sections, except this one alone. If my name is on the top of a section it means that only myself and the user should edit NOT you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Signshare (talk • contribs) 20:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I forgot!

I'm sorry I forgot to sign my name and comment in Talk:Iggy Arbuckle. I was just so excited by the prospect of getting something done about the problems I mentioned, that I didn't notice that one key factor was still missing! Once again, sorry! Wilhelmina Will 01:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

In case you did not know

There are hundreds of these annoying rascal bots roaming wikipedia and being annoying. Do we REALLY need another? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.179.195 (talk) 08:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes. --AutorespondToCommentsBot 03:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC) just kidding. it's me. :P slakr^\ talk / 03:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Ha, that was funny. But I recall SineBot (or its predecessor) used to wait a while before butting in. Perhaps that wasn't intentional behaviour, but I recall having a few minutes to finish and sign, and having done so a few times. If you can make it do so, that would be good. P.S.: Yeah, I could leave this on your user page, but really, why not just direct people to leave feedback here? You are monitoring it after all. No reply needed; just some feedback. --Elvey 01:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

hi mr bot

hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.130.26.74 (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

auto addition of date

If this isnt optional, why is there a choice of signing method. Please stop signing my edits Sandpiper —Preceding comment was added at 19:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

addaed date stamp

sorry, but you did it again. Please do not add unnecessary date stamps to articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandpiper (talk • contribs) 20:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

re recent response on my talk page

Thank you, yes I did. If signing was compulsory, why is it necessary for editors to type the relevant sigils onto the end of an edit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandpiper (talk • contribs) 20:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

THANK YOU

Thank you from Rianon, I'm still learning how to use this website, but I love it!!!! Don't worry about those other people, I guess some just don't have any patience. I really apreciate your comments and suggestions....

Rianon 20:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Question

Can you help me with my page, I don't know how to put pictures up or design it. Can you help me please................ :)

--Rianon 20:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

You might check out info about wikipedia userpages. --slakr^\ talk / 20:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

hey Sinebot !

Thanks for helping me out with the signature. Appreciate it !

Have a great week to you.

--PATRICK RIBBSAETER (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Templates

You shouldn't be sending signature templates to experienced suers, especially as my problem is signing with the wrong number of squiggles a couple of times today, leaving just the date stamp. Please do not send me or any experienced user silly templates like this in the future, it is unacceptable. Thanks, SqueakBox 21:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

See User:SineBot#Opting_out. Metros (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

From Vishal1976

Very thanks for helping me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.247.252.172 (talk) 08:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Something it should not have signed...

This edit by the bot is no good. [9] A signature is a link to a user page and a timestamp, not neccesarily a link to the user page of the person who left the comment. I know I can opt out if you don't want to fix this bug, but fixing it would be better. — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

La La

Sinestrange —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.219.171.140 (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks =)

Thanks for the tip, i didn't know until now. I don't know that much about this site. --71.191.91.213 (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I see your stupid bot just did it again

I see your stupid bot just did it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandpiper (talk • contribs) 09:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Malfunctioning

Sinebot is doing pretty badly at Wikipedia talk:Spoiler right now, signing reinsertions of comments as though they were the original comments. Phil Sandifer (talk) 20:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

thanks

thank you for the advice —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGabriel555 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Advice

Thank you very much for the advice, I will remember it (hopefully).--TheDoctor80 (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Signatures

What if I don't have a user name?

71.3.210.131 (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry. It gives the bot something to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.69.153 (talk) 05:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you Sinebot, I'm trying not to forget to use four tildes but it's easier to say! —Preceding unsigned comment added by U is for Unity (talk • contribs) 04:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

SineBot bug with edited Talk page entries.

Hi there. In case you didn't know, sometimes people go back and edit their comments on a talk page. When they do that, they don't necessarily resign their edits, it's not really necessary when it's done within a reasonable amount of time. Yet Sinebot apparently sees the edit in the history. This appears to be related to the spacing in the comments as well. I'm adding this sentence (right before a blank line), lets see if Sinebot signs this for me like it has in the past.

So Sinebot, if you see a signature in a thread from that user, please dont try to be so helpful and go to all the trouble of adding the automated signature (usually in the wrong place) and tagging the users talk page. It's a waste of time.--Rtphokie (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry SineBot

I always do such nonsense . Thank u to remind my fault. I always miss to sign. You are correct.Happy new year to you --Dralansun (talk) 15:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: Your recent edits

Yes, I do know. In fact, I almost always do that. But in regards to the edits you're referring to, I'm copying relevant comments made by other editors to the appropriate peer review pages, in which case I do not want to claim those contributions as my own. Please don't sign those as mine. Thanks. — Cinemaniac (talk • contribs) 20:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

im not a frickin kid,if i wanna sign my posts i will,but that usually dont happen,so dont expect it,now piss off

Test —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.233.194.214 (talk) 01:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes

Yes,I usally do sign. But the time your talking about, I forgot to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earthbendingmaster (talk • contribs) 04:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Arnold Murray Article

Yes, I did know that four tildes sign my name and no, I do not always do it because I forget to sometimes.

Your comment about admins reading what is written made me laugh. The only thing they did was mindlessly lock the arnold murray article. The version locked is the gutted version which started on 10 Dec 2007.

Then they put a dispute tag on it, lol. What exactly is the dispute? The other person doing this is gone, his version is on the main page. Last I knew, it takes two people to have a dispute.

It is amazing that a person here goes to all the trouble of letting someone know about four tildes but gutted articles are passed over.

The people doing this also gutted the 'roy gilaspie' article because it mentions 'arnold murray'. The article was gutted down to one sentence.

Perhaps they could lock the one sentence version as well, as long as four tildes are used, lol.Tss8071 (talk) 15:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Knol

I undid this bot action. --125.60.248.139 20:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for running this bot...I totally forgot to sign my posts twice...on the SAME talk page! I'm a dork :) Legotech (talk) 09:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible Error

I added a "#" to the Oppose section of Warlordjohncarter's RfA, here. It was purely a formatting edit, consisting of one character - but Sinebot added a signature anyway, here. Not a big deal at all, and it doesn't bother me in the slightest - I love the fact that this bot exists, and is so helpful - but, the talk page says above to note any problems or unnecessary signatures, so here I am. Thanks! UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 21:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

signing my name

Oops, how could I have forgotten to do that?! My bad. learnportuguese (talk) 12:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

sig message

A good proportion of your friendly "in case you didn't know" messages are being posted on the talk pages of experienced users who have momentarily forgotten to sign a post. It is quite annoying. Are you certain that posting these messages is helpful, on balance? Hesperian 07:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, dude, you've put three consecutive "don't forget to sign" messages on User talk:CarolSpears. I really don't think posting these messages every time someone forgets to sign is a good idea. Hesperian 02:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

thanks i will do your says but i am in turkey we havent got such as keyboards... thanks...--Toolga (talk) 15:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

cool bot

all i wants to sayz is dath aye consider you areal good bot. i think you did a fine job signing my unsigned messages. i dunno how to sign, but that does not matter does it for you are really cool and you should thank your mater for the cool job you did. Shojaijekhi (talk) 18:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Hail, Glorious Bot! - request to include another page

Is there any way to persuade you to include the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals page in your work, particularly including times as well? Alternately, are you aware of someone else who can do the same task? It would really help me know when the four month period for proposals ends, particularly considering how many people never sign their proposals at all in the first place. John Carter (talk) 00:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

SineBot can't spell

Why is it SineBot, and not SignBot? And does SineBot get asked this a hundred times a day? • Anakin ^{(contribs • complaints)} 20:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Obviously I'm not too worried about it though. Just asking half jokingly. Sign this SineBot, go on: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anakin101 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

You are an editor that has a machine running it, I know that.

Could the human running you recommend something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnnathan (talk • contribs) 23:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I knew you were human. You signed your own page!

Please help me out here, bud....or I'll simply ask someone else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnnathan (talk • contribs) 23:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I forgot to sign my name and so decided to edit and put it there. Thank you for the reminder and God Bless! :)

Sorry for some reason I can't concentrat, I did it again....

Rianon

i did the same mistake , i'm sorry.

Gaius Crastinus —Preceding unsigned comment added by GaiusCrastinus (talk • contribs) 21:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I do

dear Mr. sinebot, I may forget to sign sometimes, but I then get reminded and sign it.--lord kass (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

No comment needed, you should get the point

Is this really the kind of comment that needs to be signed?

Or this one? sdgfdgdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.18.70 (talk) 11:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No

If you set your 'bot loose, don't expect us to chase you down to report when it does something silly. Monitor its talk page or shut it down. —SlamDiego_←T 08:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

True, I suppose the extra step of clicking my user name might be a problem of accessibility for people with pushbutton finger syndrome. I apologize for any inconvenience this extra step might cause and will try to keep soft redirects to a minimum. --slakr^\ talk / 19:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I certainly hope that RTS (repetitive transclusion syndrome) doesn't make this painful for you. —SlamDiego_←T 11:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

No worries, I'm seeing a doctor for my RTS. He gives me these little pink pills to ease the pain. :P --slakr^\ talk / 04:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a Lot.

10:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

you know what sine bot you are lying. i do not believe you are a robot and it is 3 TILDES not 4. gosh get it STRAIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!21mandy21 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually it's 4 for a complete WP:SIG-style signature (that includes both who added it and when). Three only shows who added it, while 5 only shows when it was added. --slakr^\ talk / 04:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

hi

hi mr robot thank you for the welcome —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhityry Glewjtes Yojttj (talk • contribs) 22:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

It's Following Me

as I already mentioned on the creators page, I found it rather funny how fast acted and created a wikibox for it, any improvements would be great thanks

Beware of Bot

This user is followed by SineBot

--Pewwer42 (talk) 07:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Consequences of SineBot

I, like many Wikipedians, try to keep a concise edit history with as few minor edits as possible. Fewer edits means fewer bits to describe the edit history, which means less time loading the edit page, less traffic spent on adding to the edit page, and a more clutter free Wikipedia. Bots like SineBot occupy much of the edit history of a given page rather than contributing, which creates a butterfly effect of bandwidth use as every user viewing any page history must view the same notice for an added signature, exponentially increasing the cost of maintaining Wikipedia until more donation funds are required. Actions from this bot should be considered a loose form of vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.28.156.54 (talk) 18:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

True, but as they say, don't worry about performance. I made extra certain that the bot would not be a bane on system resources/bandwidth. More importantly, it would seem that most editors would rather SineBot eat an extra revision than have to track down who, exactly, made a contribution and when. --slakr^\ talk / 13:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

thx for singing my posts

bt how do i do it myself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alien from brixton (talk • contribs) 20:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

One signs one's posts thus.

Append ~~~~. Robert Greer (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

small

How would you fancy signing my mistakes correctly, no need for all this small bullshit, just fix my bad sigs as if I had fixed them myself . That would make you the coolest bot on wikipwedia. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

or even being a little less efficient, and giving us a couple of minutes to rectify our own mistakes! :-) MikeHobday (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Unsigned Comments on Talk Pages

There are currently unsigned comments on Talk: Disaster!: A Major Motion Picture Ride...Starring You! and Talk: The Funtastic World of Hanna-Barbera (ride). Just letting you know so you could sign them.--72.91.191.67 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

--81.156.194.211 (talk) 00:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Will you be my unvalentine?

I heart you sinebot!--Woland (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism problem - perhaps a delay?

SineBot makes it harder to roll back talk-page vandalism in the form of inappropriate material with no signature. Because SineBot makes an intervening edit, it is not possible to simply use the rollback button on the vandalism (meaning editors dealing with a stream of talk page vandals must take time-consuming extra steps). Perhaps you could increase the delay before SineBot tags a signature (especially if the comment is from an IP)? Cheers! bd2412 T 05:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Crush

I think this Bot has a crush on me. It keeps IMing me. Master Redyva ♠

I don't think bots have feelings...--69.234.214.46 (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense! SineBot has feelings. It's stoic most of the time, but occasionally cracks a joke over coffee and a donut. :P --slakr^\ talk / 13:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay...does this robot have romantic feelings?--69.234.200.106 (talk) 16:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Are you saying that bots don't have feelings? Outrage! They have feelings too, you know! миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, fine. Bots do have feelings. But they do not have the sexual desires that can lead to a crush. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.179.40 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Wrongo - they do. Haven't you ever seen that Bugs Bunny short where Elmer Fudd hires a robot to kill Bugs? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

No. Besides, that's just a cartoon. --69.234.179.40 (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

No it's not. The Looney Tunes all exist in other dimensions of our universe; it repeats itself from different perspectives in each galaxy. This means that the characters of South Park, the Simpsons, Futurama, King of the Hill, and Family Guy, and all the other shows we watch on television exist somewhere else. We just have yet to make physical contact with them. It will be done soon, and all those alternate worlds will be explored, and they will explore ours, and I'll finally see him - Ohh! It will be wonderful, when the day comes! Do you not agree? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Where did you get that idea? If we're an accident caused by a Big Bang, it's highly improbable that a universe should be created where creatures can exist, much less more. If we're created by God, why would he care so much about this universe if he has so many others? Besides, I don't think we'll get to those alternate world. First off, we'd need a ship faster than the speed of light, otherwise it'll be years before we reach the nearest solar system. Second, look at politics. There's a lot of tension in the world, our money will be spent on wars instead of space exploration. In fact, this may lead to a nuclear holocaust, and all our technology will be destroyed as a result. Finally, will it really be so wonderful when we get there? Maybe they'll be having a nuclear holocaust and their planet won't be a fun place to visit. --69.234.198.52 (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Well we aren't an accident. We are created by God. And God is everywhere. He is standing in the room where I am when I write this, and at the same time, He is in the room you are in at that moment. So of course, He would be able to pay as much attention to other universes as He does ours. But I was not talking about other universes, I was talking about our universe being divided into parts, all of which are replays of each other. By mentality, some of us are connected to some of these worlds. For instance, Trey Parker and Matt Stone are mentally connected to the dimension in which exists South Park, therefore, they are able to write about what goes on there. Matt Groening is connected to the dimensions in which Futurama and The Simpsons exist, therefore, he is able to document what happens over there. And there are probably hidden ways in which we can get to these worlds and dimensions, without the use of a speedy starship. If you have watched the Star Trek series, or any of its spin-offs, you might know of the theory of wormholes in space leading from one place to another. We just have to pinpoint them; that's all. It seems, however, that I am the only one in our dimension, who wants to try. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I suppose that would explain why Christ hasn't returned to our dimension yet. But you'll need a little more evidence to persuade me about all these other "parts" of "our" universe. There are so many things a planet needs to support life, and so many ways life can kill itself in the meantime.--69.234.212.126 (talk) 16:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Sinebot does not have a crush on you. I happen to know for a fact that she is already in a long term relationship with the office stapling machine. Sinebot was given this job to stop her causing trouble with Jimbo Wales' chequebook. And you can't get me with WP:BIO for revealing all this as I am not writing about a living person. Sinebot, please sign on the dotted line ......................................... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinningspark (talk • contribs) 14:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Give me a break. I don't think Bots can be attracted to anything, and if they can, a relationship between a stapler and a bot would be bestiality, right? At any rate, I don't think there are genetic similarities enough for them to produce offspring. I think those staples are a result of parthenogenesis.--69.234.178.247 (talk) 17:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the valuable suggestions. --202.164.134.254 (talk) 16:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Which ones?--69.234.199.85 (talk) 00:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I find the thought of a human-computer code robot relationship very interesting. :) Perhaps, Redyva, SineBot just wants to be loved? vıd ıoman 03:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day to everyone who reads this.--69.234.213.31 (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Ip users who ruin the fun...--Jakezing (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

What? They said that people just want to be loved, so Happy Valentine's Day.--69.234.212.126 (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

AIV Helperbots

Please add the approved AIV helperbots HBC AIV helperbot3 (talk · contribs) and HBC AIV helperbot7 (talk · contribs) to your exclusion list to avoid this type of redundancy. Thanks! ➔ REDVEЯS knows how Joan of Arc felt 23:21, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah, they should be good to go now, since they're now botflagged. In the future, I'd just say add {{NoAutosign}} to unflagged bots that are doing things that would spur the wrath of SineBot :P --slakr^\ talk / 23:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

In case you know

i did sign my name but its in the discussion area of battle of thymbra! were i put the incomplete Xenophons account a greek historian, and he has a seperate version from the sometimes ficticious accounts of Herodotus. So im currently in under construction in all the battles and sieges of Cyrus the Great! And have allot to contribute, and expand upon Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariobarza (talk • contribs) 11:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

So Now You Sign Unsigned Comments?

[10] Thank you for noticing I didn't sign my message. This is due largely because it wasn't my message. Note the Unsigned I added at the end. :P -WarthogDemon 06:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

SineBot's edit summary for signing anonymous users' comments

Anonymous users should not have a user page. In cases of reverting and signatures on talk pages, the IP address is usually linked to their contributions page. I suggest that SineBot's edit summary for anons link to their contributions instead of their user page. --209.244.43.112 (talk) 18:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Uh-huh, yeah. I don't know of any politer way to put this, so: "In case you didn't notice, your signature does link to your contributions page." Sorry. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

209.244.43.112 said, "I suggest that SineBot's edit summary for anons link to their contributions instead of their user page." The IP address mentioned in the edit summary does indeed link to the IP's user page, not its contributions page. I think you should read carefully before belittling others. --Bowlhover 02:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

This robot must be stopped

I have reason to believe that the SineBot has reprogrammed itself to take over the planet. While I agree with much of its reasoning in doing so, I fear that to place our destiny in the hands of a piece of software may well prove disastrous in the long run. Also, I'm thirsty. 24.186.190.202 (talk)

Somehow this user has discovered our plan. Now we must assimilate him into our collective --SineBot 23:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Resistance is futile. --slakr^\ talk / 23:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if this robot can take over the world. It doesn't seem possible, considering that it's impossible to control Watts and LA. Too much racism-caused violence, a problem they say is all over the world, will eliminate any short unity this world has. Let it try-its attempts will end when some Muslim thinks he should destroy an 'infidel' who has taken control of the world.--69.234.183.233 (talk) 16:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Malfunctioning?

Although one of my sub-talkpages has the {{nobot}} template, your bot signed. This hasn't happened before. – sgeureka ^t•c 20:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Never mind. I'll be trying {{NoAutosign}} like you suggested on your bot's userpage. – sgeureka ^t•c 15:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

{{nobot}} isn't supported, as it is a convenient typo redirect to {{bots}}. {{nobots}} will work, though, since that's in the "official" functionality of the {{bots}} template. --slakr^\ talk / 13:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

My signature

Ok see i did put my signature(--~~~~) ok cause well i see this text that you put down saying unsigned text so please trust me on this i did write my signature ok for exmaple i did right now. -- " The Annihilator 21:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit

I am free to edit my "talk page", when I want, according to WP:TALK policy. Dwilso (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I will try to remember

I will try to remember to sign the things like you told me. Thank you. --Axeman 10 (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Must be a tough life being a bot. With only your so-called "Master" as rare company (hope he at least treats you well), you work tirelessly against the ever growing tide of unsigned messages, without as little as taking a minute off, just to pause, perhaps, in the middle of a vast bit field, climb a B-tree and, while all the B's are still asleep, admire the stars of the digital sky, enjoy the ones and zeroes of the digital wind gently brushing against your signature lines... But, on the other hand, you have a purpose in life. A noble goal to make our common home a tidier and cleaner place. Not every one of us, carbon based lifeforms is fortunate enough to have such a goal or focused enough to pursue it so selflessly and single-mindedly! :raises digital hat: --Illythr (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

thanks

I'll keep that in mind. Dante~ 16:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the tip

never knew how the sign works =] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nowaynotme (talk • contribs) 18:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks mate for the tip

thanks for the help. much appreiciated --Triippe (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I dislike you

Very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beamathan (talk • contribs) 00:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

oh ok thanks for the tip but do i have to do that everytimeGenius (talk) 01:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments

Your comments help a beginner like me very much.Nca01634 (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

ok. ill remember to do that. Yomamma22 (talk) 02:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much

Thanks for telling me I how to sign my posts! ^.^ --Daturtlerocks (talk) 13:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

hi

hi robot

Sudar 4edi (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)sudar 4edi

Thanks

For your advice on the 4 tildes Britishrailclass43 (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)- British Rail Class 43

be that way

ok thank youDg5748 (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for straightening me out on the signatures. --jbutera 02:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Signed comments

*See here i sign my comments alyways and you just got click on the link ok on my signature like right now i did right now and i always will forever. Demon Hunter Rules {Kate Beckinsale is hot}} 23:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

Sinebot left a message on my talkpage telling me to sign my posts because of "recent edits" Where did I not sign my posts?? T.Neo (talk) 19:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

thanx for th tip bro —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thfrang (talk • contribs) 07:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

???=

I Signed my comment and you say I didn't! --Se an G 00:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Re why is it unconstructive

It's unconstructive because it doesn't provide any verifiable information from a reliable source. I could set up a similar Facebook group called "I bet I can find a million people who love Heather Mills"; it would be meaningless. Waggers (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Waggers (talk) 21:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm confused. What are you saying about? -- Darx21 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Signing

Thanks for telling me about signing --Sebastien290194 (talk) 08:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

look at this! http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Frogger132

look at this! http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Frogger132 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frogger132 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Test edit warning

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BillCJ (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I Know About Signing

I know about signing, but SineBot moans on anyway. It is a clever tool though, just typing four tildes. -- Darx21 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

mah fault

yo bro good call on da siggys I always forget to to it yo. thanks bro. 1 Dabiggestestitaliano3 (talk) 02:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

re: your recent edits

Thanks buddy, will do that immediately! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Habs4ever (talk • contribs) 15:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank u my friend! --Enerelt (talk) 02:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Come to my page.

I've got an idea that I don't want to add to a calabo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neoonyxalchemist (talk • contribs) 02:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Come to my page

I have an idea i Don't want to add to a Calabo.--Milst Epja 02:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there!

Can you teach me? (I mean how you guys made all these frauds and call it encycylopedia, this is amazing!) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.201.252.188 (talk) 15:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

uhhh i signed see? ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by BCDFGHJKLMNPQRSTVWXYZ (talk • contribs) 06:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC) FYI if you have any other advice let me know. Why does this work?

Seeeeeeeeeeeeeee?!!!!

just asking, let me know on my talk page if you know BCDFGHJKLMNPQRSTVWXYZ (talk) 06:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

hello

Thank you for signing for me. I am very grateful. With regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.16.198.250 (talk) 12:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Help with the Harvard Extension article

It's hard to create a balanced article when there are trolls bent on demeaning the school's reputation. They are constantly overstating some of the things they find to be unworthy of a higher institution like Harvard. They cite material from the website but it's usually taken out of context and used for demeaning purposes. It's hard to explain unless you are a student of the school but they make it plain obvious that they're aren't. The talk page has gone totally bonkers and its turned into a spat usually found on College Confidential or Auto Admit. Is there anything that you can do to clean it up.

Also, there is this person who is constantly editing without making a statement about it on the talk page. His name is AVECAESAR. Firstinline2009 (talk) 05:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi there!

Hi SineBot! Sine cotangent sine cosine, tangent secant? Cosecant hyperbolic sine! --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 19:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry SineBot ! Now, I'll use this (86.207.180.31 (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC))

My Signature

Ooops, sorry! Must've been a slip... I generally add the same. Thanks and regards, Mrinal Pandey (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

the infor was meant to educatye people about the tribes of zimbabwe: thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Googlememphis (talk • contribs) 02:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry for not signing a comment that I had left on the discussion page for the article on the Holocaust (TV miniseries). I normally do sign comments that I leave but after I left my comment, I went immediately to the Amazon site to get the information on the miniseries DVD Release for the article. I will try to remember to sign my comments in the near future each and every time I leave one.

Thanks though. Frschoonover (talk) 02:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you unblock a alone acount , please , only one , Monica Rosu or Eremia !

I would like to use one account , and I will not use abusively an another acount ! Please , speak with Barnecha , I have written a message , and He didn't me answer ! Can you help me , please —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.128.69.167 (talk) 11:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)