User talk:Simon Burchell/Archive 13
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Simon Burchell. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 19 |
Tyrian purple
As you can see on my talk page at User talk:Dougweller#Olmecs, we have a new editor who doesn't understand our attitude towards sources. I don't know what will happen about that, but the recent edits at ATyrian purple suggesting the Phoenicians went to Mexico are a problem. Can you help? I suspect there are two issues - handling the 1909 Zelia Nuttall source which it appears no one has seriously discussed and some OR in the rest of the edit. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late response. I'll see if I can take a look when I get a spare minute. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Clearbury Ring
On 30 July 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clearbury Ring, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although Clearbury Ring, a hillfort near Salisbury in southern England, dates to the Iron Age, a paleolithic hand axe was found there? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clearbury Ring. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 14:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 7
Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
- TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
- Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
- Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Manche Ch'ol
The article Manche Ch'ol you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Manche Ch'ol for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
A well deserved barnstar from an admirer of your contributions! I was originally working on articles related to New Spain a few years ago, but never got back into the swing of gathering all of the necessary sources that I could have potentially used (because of my lackluster Spanish)! Your contributions to the Spanish conquests of various Mesoamerican regions (Petén, Guatemala, and the Yucatán) are extensive and informative, and almost makes me want to create a New Spain badge just for your work! It's inspiring, and definitely appreciated! LeftAire (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks! Simon Burchell (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
RE: Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! I was perusing your User page and noticed that you occasionally upload pictures of Mesoamerican sites. Do you, per chance, have any images of stelae at Piedras Negras? Weird question out of left field, I know, but I can't seem to find any in the Commons. Thanks again!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have not (yet) visited Piedras Negras - I did have a look for photos on Flickr a few years ago but didn't find much, I'll have another look on the offchance someone has uploaded something new. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- No worries! Thanks for the response.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:09, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Question about Maya glyphs
Sorry to bug you again, but you seem like a person who might be able to answer this question. I've started to make some vectors of glyphs, mostly for the kings of Piedras Negras. I'm using Illustrator, and I'm kind of new at it, so some of the lines are coming out a little funny. Is there a sort of margin of wonkiness that is accepted, or should I just start over? The two I've uploaded are of Ha' K'in Xook and K'inich Yat Ahk II. Can glyphs be uploaded under public domain since they could technically be considered "fonts"?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- I've had a look at the two you've done and they look fine. I've uploaded a few placename glyphs myself, and I think they can be released PD, although I'm not particularly clued up on the intricacies of CC licenses. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll just go with it and see what happens.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 13:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manche Ch'ol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Sedgehill and Semley
Thanks for correcting my mistake in Castle Rings, Wiltshire. Consequently I undid my edits on the two village pages (Sedgehill and Semley) so you got three for the price of one! Wire723 (talk) 18:39, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- No problem - apparently they were separate parishes once, but were merged. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Xibalba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ''Xibalba''' {{IPA-myn|/ʃiɓälˈɓä/}}), roughly translated as "place of fear",<ref name="NACS">{{cite web|url=http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Cross dyke
I'd be grateful for a reference that explains how a cross dyke can be shown to serve the function of a boundary line without serving as a defensive earthwork. You clearly have much more knowledge of relevant fields, but the references in Cross dyke don't give an explanation that overrides my understanding of military technology and I haven't found an independent reference that improves on them. If I were looking for a way to embody the concepts of Ringwork and Spur castle with early Iron Age technology, I'd build something that would look a lot like a cross dyke; the other explanations seem to lack an explanations of why they were across ridges, why they were of relatively short length or both. I'll admit to being completely baffled by "pit alignments", although, being perhaps less effort to make, they seem to fit the boundary line explanation better than cross dykes, per se.--Wcoole (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- It was not easy finding references for cross dykes and I'm quite please I managed to get as much into the article as I did, I think they are very much under-studied. Unfortunately, as far as I have been able to determine, the material just isn't there to go in depth on how a cross dyke may serve as a boundary without being defensive. Of course, it doesn't help that there are a multitude of different names for the feature, and many that have been classified simply as linear earthworks and suchlike. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 09:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of Yucatán
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spanish conquest of Yucatán you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
reassessment maya religion
Simon, since there are now many references to sources throughout the text, wouldn't the maya religion article deserve a B-status? 86.87.32.141 (talk) 10:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I've reassessed it. There are still a few paragraphs and subsections that are lacking references, but it certainly seems to be reasonably comprehensive. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 8
Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
- Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
- New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
- Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Wow Mr. Burchell. Your contributions are absolutely awesome! Keep up the amazing work. :) Xochiztli (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks! Simon Burchell (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of Yucatán
The article Spanish conquest of Yucatán you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spanish conquest of Yucatán for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Spanish conquest of Yucatán
Hello! Your submission of Spanish conquest of Yucatán at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Spanish conquest of Yucatán
On 3 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Spanish conquest of Yucatán, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that although a battle near Mérida in 1546 established Spanish control in the north of the Yucatán Peninsula during the Spanish conquest, the last Maya kingdom in the south did not fall until 1697? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Spanish conquest of Yucatán. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
- DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
- Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
- Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
- British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
- Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
- Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
- JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spanish conquest of Chiapas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiapa de Corzo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Hey Simon! I've addressed the comment you made to the above DYK nom. Could I trouble you have another look please? Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 11:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spanish conquest of Chiapas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tezcoco and Cholula. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
A question
Hello Simon, I came across your name quite by chance and I have not had the pleasure of talking with you before. Sometimes I help out at the Teahouse and since I am a translator myself, I often help other non-English editors. I have no idea how you like to work, and I hope you don't mind me asking. Some time ago I came to know a new editor who has a special interest in writing articles about Guatemala (such as Italian immigration to Guatemala, German Guatemalan, Demographics of Guatemala, etc.) For a newbie, he has a good grasp of how articles are done but he needs help with his English. I have suggested that he might team up with someone who understand Spanish, but is more fluent in English than he is, someone who can correct the language in his articles. I help him with the things he has to learn about editing, but I only speak a little Spanish and have almost no knowledge about Guatemala. Would you be interested in helping him out with the language in the articles? He's a quick learner so I only think he needs a bit of help now at the start. You can find our conversations on my talk page. All the best, w.carter-Talk 19:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, no problem - I can help out as time allows. Who is the user? Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 10:05, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
- Many thanks, the user is Halias 23 (Hola Halias! :) Another one of these "talk page-link-things"). I think the best thing would be to start correcting and cleaning up the language in some of the articles he has already created like the ones I mentioned above. Cheers, w.carter-Talk 12:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Domingo de Vico
On 1 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Domingo de Vico, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that 16th-century Spanish friar Domingo de Vico was sacrificed after scolding an Acala Ch'ol ruler over how many wives he had? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Domingo de Vico. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Cas. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
- Elsevier - science and medicine journals and books
- Royal Society of Chemistry - chemistry journals
- Pelican Books - ebook monographs
- Public Catalogue Foundation- art books
Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Mass Message tool to the Book & Bytes recipient list.
Happy New Year!
Dear Simon Burchell,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
Books and Bytes - Issue 9
Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
- New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
- Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Spanish conquest of Chiapas
On 9 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Spanish conquest of Chiapas, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during the Spanish conquest of Chiapas, frequent changes in colonial administration left the early conquistadores vulnerable to native rebellion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Spanish conquest of Chiapas. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 12:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Adam Matthew mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
HazelAB (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Grolier Codex
Hello, I am following up on the name of Dr. Josué Sáenz who is cited in the Wikipedia "Grolier Codex" [1] article. (Please pardon my lack of knowledge on Wikipedia coding. I am a Wikipedia newbie and still learing.)
It is a very common mistake to confuse the Spanish names "Josué" and "José". They are not the same name. The Spanish "Josué" is the English equivelant of "Joshua" and the Spanish "José" is the English equivalent of "Joseph".
Dr. Josué Sáenz was the President of the Mexican National Olympic Committee during the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City. You can see the spelling of his name throughout this article "The Organization" produced by the Organizing Committee of the Games of the XIX Olympiad [2]. He was also the former Director of the Ministry of Finance of Mexico. His father was the archaeologist César A. Sáenz.
I suggest you check your cited references related to the name of Dr. Josué Sáenz:
Baudez, p. 70 (correct spelling)
Milbrath, p. 51 (correct spelling)
FAMSI: "José" is incorrect, "Saenz" is incorrect. The author, Randa Marhenke (I know her), of the FAMSI article has been notified about these errors and they will be corrected.
Yates: "Josué" is the correct first name. Last name without accent may be a matter of style, but for scholarship please consider the name as spelled by the name holder (we know Dr. Josué Sáenz).
Thanks for your dedication to Mesoamerican studies and the body of work you have created on Wikipedia! ACMelendez (talk) 00:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to write! Last night I quickly checked FAMSI, rather than digging out Arqueología Mexicana or another article - I almost changed back the established WP:ENGVAR spellings, and left in Josué Sáenz as you had written: FAMSI was obviously the wrong source to do a quick check against. I've checked against the other sources and you are, of course, correct. I can't believe I hadn't spotted it when writing the article! Accenting is fine for Spanish names on Wikipedia, and I will change reinsert Josué Sáenz. Best regards, and thanks for correcting my mistake. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- While I am new to Wiki editing, it has been for some months now that I have not had time to set aside to add to the Grolier Codex Wikipedia entry. I have seen that the article is being reviewed and am wondering if the article is being reviewed what happens if someone would like to add edits or comments? Some of the questions that have been raised especially about the references discussed related to Baudez and Grube - I have them here in my library, along with many other primary sources which could be added to this article. I would like to be helpful in process but need help in the coding for references and notes. I look forward to hearing back from you. ACMelendez (talk) 15:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply - all comments during the review should be entered on the review page. I will be revisiting the article, and review page, shortly. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- While I am new to Wiki editing, it has been for some months now that I have not had time to set aside to add to the Grolier Codex Wikipedia entry. I have seen that the article is being reviewed and am wondering if the article is being reviewed what happens if someone would like to add edits or comments? Some of the questions that have been raised especially about the references discussed related to Baudez and Grube - I have them here in my library, along with many other primary sources which could be added to this article. I would like to be helpful in process but need help in the coding for references and notes. I look forward to hearing back from you. ACMelendez (talk) 15:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)