Jump to content

User talk:Simon Burchell/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16→Archive 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Castelldefels Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curtain wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of Chiapas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spanish conquest of Chiapas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 01:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Simon Burchell, I sincerely apologize for the delay, but I have completed and copied over my review at Talk:Spanish conquest of Chiapas/GA1. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments in the meantime. Great job on this article! -- Caponer (talk) 13:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks Caponer - I will work through your points now. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 13:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Please move "Mexico Valley" back to "Valley of Mexico"

Some idiot has moved it to "Mexico Valley" again. Keizers (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I've taken it to ANI, unfortunately I can't move it back because I'm not an administrator... All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of the Maya

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spanish conquest of the Maya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Legends of Hampshire

Thanks for your additions to Bramshill and support. Legends of Hampshire might be an interesting article. There you could go into detail on the numerous legends. I think detailed content on legends is OK in the right context, and certainly makes interesting reading, but in articles on architectural pieces it really shouldn't be more than a basic summary.There's nothing wrong with the sourcing in the Bramshill article, and am pretty sure the others would agree.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Doc, I hope it gets through - in my opinion, giving broad coverage to a subject includes legends/folkloric aspects. Unfortunately, some people read "ghost" and automatically thing it is a claim of paranormal, rather than simply relating the stories told about the place - and Bramshill looms large in Hampshire folklore. The publisher is a decent one, and I used that book in particular because it is from a solid series on county folklore, rather than using my collection of "Hampshire Ghosts" type titles. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of the Maya

The article Spanish conquest of the Maya you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spanish conquest of the Maya for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 18:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grolier Codex

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grolier Codex you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maunus -- Maunus (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of the Maya

The article Spanish conquest of the Maya you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spanish conquest of the Maya for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Precious again

treasures of Maya culture
Thank you for your consistent in depth coverage of the rich history and culture of Central America, conveying the spirit of its people, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (28 November 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Three years ago, you were the ninteenth recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda! Simon Burchell (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Castelldefels Castle

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Crisco. Simon Burchell (talk) 12:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of Chiapas

The article Spanish conquest of Chiapas you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Spanish conquest of Chiapas for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 13:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Spanish conquest of Chiapas

The article Spanish conquest of Chiapas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Spanish conquest of Chiapas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 16:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Patriotic Neutralists

Hello,

I have rewritten the Background section of the above to address your concerns. Your commentary on the rewrite would be appreciated.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Spanish conquest of the Maya

Hello! Your submission of Spanish conquest of the Maya at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine ✍ 21:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro de Alvarado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comendador. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
  • New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
  • TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Spanish conquest of the Maya

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Coffee. Simon Burchell (talk) 10:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro de Alvarado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champotón. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grolier Codex

The article Grolier Codex you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grolier Codex for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Maunus -- Maunus (talk) 17:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar for You!

The Good Article Barnstar
For your contributions to bring Grolier Codex to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work!  — ₳aron 21:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maya civilization
added links pointing to Phosphorous, Zapotec and Verapaz
Indigenous peoples of the Americas
added a link pointing to Garifuna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Irataba

Hi, any chance you could look at this one and comment on the peer review? Thought it might be of reasonable interest to you. Also The Tower House is about to be nommed for FA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I'll try to take a look - I am going to have extremely limited time until next weekend, so I'm unlikely to make substantial comments before then. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 07:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maya civilization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

Your work on Maya civilization is amazing. Really impressive. Do you think it might make sense to have a section on linguistic and ethnic diversity among the Maya perhaps with a map of the different Mayan languages and the time frame for their development, as well as some information about which languages are represented in the hieroglyphic writing?·maunus · snunɐɯ· 16:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

You know, I had thought about putting in something about languages, particularly the languages of the inscriptions - in the end I didn't, because I knew I had so much to cover and was worried about space. Now that the bulk of the article is in place, I may revisit the idea - it now seems like an omission. Simon Burchell (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I am sure most Mayanists wouldnt notice it was missing, but it stands out to a linguist. Also you do use some of the langauge names as ethnonyms but never give an introduction to the diversity. I think a map would be good. But it is not a big gap, and you can easily pass GA without it I would say.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 20:35, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I've dropped in a short section just before the bit about Maya writing, with map of language migration. Simon Burchell (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Amazingly beautiful article, agreed. Definitely a future FA, I'd guess though given the complexity of it and your personal knowledge of the possibilities you still want to work on it a fair bit though. If you ever want a hand in promoting something let me know. It's great to see work on the more general core articles, you too Maunus with English language. Out of the Maya sites I'd like to see more GAs I think. Glad to see my infobox and map is still in use BTW! Fancy that, me creating an infobox :-) I miss your italicized capitals for authors BTW Simon, I always thought it looked more professional but I guess the MoS lot picked up on it eventually!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Doc. Actually it wasn't MOS, it was the CS1 gods rolling out undiscussed changes to the citation templates (OK, they were discussed in some obscure corner that no-one but CS1 programmers ever reads). As a result, I've dumped use of citation templates for new articles, and will continue with the smallcaps for as long as I can... I hope to keep rolling out Maya GAs from time to time - and your infobox certainly isn't forgotten! Actually, I've been working on Spanish Conquest articles for so long, coming back to work on the pre-Columbian Maya was refreshing - I think it may have given me a push back towards producing more of those Maya site GAs. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
You may like to know of this citation template using LSA style: Template:Cite_LSA. ·maunus · snunɐɯ· 00:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Maunus, that's really helpful. I'll give the template a try, and hope it will be more stable than {{cite journal}} etc. I'm still quite annoyed at the underhand way in which smallcaps was removed from a large number of articles. Simon Burchell (talk) 08:10, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Cuello - additional citations for verification?

Frankly, I find it a little strange that, for such as a small section (Cuello#Ceramic chronology), 2 valid refs are still not enough. But be it as it may... Eio-cos (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@User:Eio-cos: Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources, particularly the 2nd paragraph of the introduction - all material should be cited. If all the text you added came from the two refs, then an inline ref should be added as appropriate. If everything in an individual paragraph cames from the same reference, then add <ref>Cited source with page no.</ref> at the end of the paragraph. If the material is drawn from various sources, then add the <ref>Cited source with page no.</ref> at the end of each sentence.
With the gradual accumulation of information on Wikipedia pages, anything unreferenced may be removed at any time. Your additions are most welcome, it is just a matter of making sure that any piece of information can be verified. If you look at most of the rest of the Cuello article, you will see that just about everything is sourced. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
I understand your concern, Simon, about everything being clearly referenced. I can only add in my justification that the links that I placed in that section are hotlinks; in other words they can be easily checked by going to Google books, for example, and finding more info. Whereas the other links that you mention are refs to books that may be difficult to find without access to a large library. All the best. Eio-cos (talk) 13:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
@User:Eio-cos:I think possibly you misunderstand me, it is not the quality of the links that are the problem; it is the amount of text that does not have proper attribution. I have copied your added text below. According to Wikipedia referencing guidelines, everything I have struck out is unreferenced and could be removed at any time, without further justification than that it is unreferenced, which would be a pity, when adding a cite would not be difficult:

Your text

The ceramic chronology of Cuello is believed to be as follows, needs cite here to cover all the phases that immediately follow

*Swasey phase: 1200-900 BC

  • Bladen phase: 900-650 BC
  • Lopez-Mamom phase: 650-400 BC
  • Cocos phase: 400 BC - 250 AD.

The earliest Cuello pottery found so far is of the Swasey type, starting at about 1200 BC.[1] The parallels to this type of pottery elsewhere in northern Belize are lacking. Nevertheless, the Bladen complex ceramics, dating between 900 and 650 BC, are already found widely throughout northern Belize. needs cite here

There's a lack of close similarity between Swasey ceramics and the early pottery-producing areas on the Pacific Coast, the highlands of Chiapas, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Thus, the origins of Swasey ceramics remain unclear. needs cite here

While the known Xe ceramics of the Pasion River drainage date from the similar time period, there are significant differences between these and the Swasey/Bladen ceramics.[2] Xe, or Real/Xe ceramics are found, for example, at Seibal in the Peten department of Guatemala. needs cite here

Your references

  1. ^ Susan Toby Evans, David L. Webster, eds, of Ancient Mexico and Central America: An Encyclopedia. Routledge, 2013 ISBN 1136801855 p444
  2. ^ Laura Kosakowsky, The Ceramics of Cuello, Belize. Cambridge Univ Press, 1998 - www.academia.edu

Thank you for your concern, Simon. In the future, I'll try to work better. Yet I'm just one imperfect man, whereas Wikipedia has millions of editors. I just hope that others will come after me and continue to improve these articles, attaining perfection. Eio-cos (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ancient Maya graffiti

Hello! Your submission of Ancient Maya graffiti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine ✍ 22:39, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Irataba

Thankyou for your input at the peer review. Irataba is now at FAC. Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

No problem - I'll see if I can find time to review. Simon Burchell (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran PR

Hi, I am Ssven2. I had recently taken this film article starring Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai to GA status and nominated it for FAC, but it was withdrwan due to WP:PUNC and MOS:LQ issues, most of which have been resolved. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving additional comments at the article's 2nd PR. Thanks. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 12:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I will see if I can find time to take a look - although I don't promise anything, since it's not a topic I would usually get involved in. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
@Ssven2:Oops - I arrived too late - dropped by today to take a look, but I see that it has already been closed. Simon Burchell (talk) 10:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
That's ok. I have opened the FAC. Feel free to leave comments there. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Castell Coch

Hi. I'd be very grateful if you could give Castell Coch a read and comment at Wikipedia:Peer review/Castell Coch/archive1. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:08, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll drop by at some point. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Simon_Burchell/Archive_14&oldid=1257491170"