User talk:Scope creep/Archive 1

Hi, just a note--Wikipedia is not a collection of source material. For that, you might want to check out our sister project, Wikisource. They already had the text of The Cornelian there, so I've deleted the version you posted here. Best wishes, Meelar (talk) 21:15, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

ART

Hello, You voted my page on Amanda Eliasch to be deleted which was a lot of work. Yet I believe you want help on Woodcarving, it would be nice if you had supported me. Amanda has many credible articles, as does woodcarving. I think that many people should be on Wikipedia. If the art world in England can support her, then you should too. Hollywood does too, they supported her artistic work. Hope you will reconsider your opinion as I have now re sorted some of it. Just not brilliant yet as codes. So give me a chance. Thanks and I will support your endeavours to get woodcarving fully recognised. Incidentally her page was up for 6 years without any criticism before. Good luck, off to check woodcarving AERATBAG (talk) 09:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)AERATBAGAERATBAG (talk) 09:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Woodcarving

I noticed that you have contributed to the Wood carving article. Please vote for Woodcarving at the Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive --Reflex Reaction 14:56, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect bypassation

Hi, I noticed that you made an edit to bypass a redirect at Pattern matching. However, WP:REDIRECT specifically forbids editing solely to avoid redirects - it introduces needsless verbiage at a net heavier load on the servers. Please bear this in mind when you are pondering circumventing redirects. --Sam Pointon 22:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake - it was adding a whole new link, not just piping. I should look at the diffs closer. --Sam Pointon 22:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tobacco Smoking

I see that you have made major contributions to the Tobacco smoking page on Wikipedia and I have a question. Do you know anything about tobacco farm subsidies as they relate to the government fight against smoking? --GoOdCoNtEnT 20:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry GoOdCoNtEnT, haven't a scobie. scope_creep 19:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

British linkfixing

Since [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland|British]] wikilinks to a redirect, wouldn't it be simpler to just make your edits point to United Kingdom? Or am I missing something? --DeLarge 22:19, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naw, I don't think so. There is 3 seperate phases of brits, most of them cover that (80%). There is also the British empire, which is in the second period. I think it would blur it. If you could identiy which articles relate to brits later than 1922, the modern era and wasn't antyhing to do with army, then you would get 80% of them, and the link could be put in there. i think 10% 300 or so, is 1700 stuff. I think this is my last disamg gaf. (scope_creep 19:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I reiterate the OP. Please stop disambigging to a redirect. Eitehr fix the link properly, or leave it as it is. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Speedy delete" call

With regards to this edit:

Please note that "non notable" is not a criteria for speedy deletion. Failure to assert notability is. For more information on when exactly to call for (as well as when not to call for) a speedy delete, refer to Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kavadi carrier 03:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. scope_creep 22:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven De Lelie

I noticed your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven De Lelie. The article Steven De Lelie now has some references. Could you please take another look at it? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_NESkimos

Could you also look at your vote on the NESkimos artical? The arguments for a keep are there, but to recap for you, 1. The artical passes one, maybe two, points, however it only needs to pass ONE. 2. Notable sources have been cited.

Thank you very much!

Sanctusorium 20:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

XPLANE

Regarding your vote for deletion: I reviewed the Wikipedia deletion policy and did not see "notable" as a requisite criteria for inclusion. I believe that XPLANE IS notable, however I petition you to withdraw your vote for deletion as it does not appear to be supported by the Wikipedia policy. dgray_xplane

AFD for Einstein's Special Theory Of Relativity

You added this Afd to the afd log, but did not actually nominate it for afd. I have removed it from the Afd log. If you wish to nominate it for deletion, please follow the steps at WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion. Regards, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 17:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update process of software deployment

In the software deployment discussion you commented that "...updating software is a nightmare sometimes. I think is needs several categories the question is what." I have added an expanded Update section with two major subcategories, built-in and version tracking. I'm not sure what you were expecting and I would appreciate your comments. John Harvey 15:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help with creating maps

Hello Scope creep,

Thanks for the contact. Thinking hard how exactly I can get across the map-making process, I think the first question I should ask should be if you are familliar with Adobe Illustrator or other vector based graphics software? If you're familliar with this kind of software I think I can communicate the process quite well. -- Jza84 · (talk) 21:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

I have replied to your comments on this AfD Please elaborate on your keep vote. Twenty Years 17:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish subversion

Hello, it would be nice if you could help out with adding the literature you've read about this topic, so that we can collaborate on the article and make it NPOV and report on this historical topic of Jewish history. Your help is appreciated. — EliasAlucard|Talk 19:53 31 Oct, 2007 (UTC)

AfDs

On November 18., you contributed to 78 different AfD debates over 9 hours, some of them several times. I admire your industry--and your remarkable range of interests--but one thing that would help us all, is that if you failed to find sources for an article, tell us where you looked so the work doesn't have to be duplicated. DGG (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Junior football

You recently contributed to an AfD for several Scottish Junior Football Association teams, you are aware that Junior football does not mean youth football in Scotland Aren't you?King of the North East 00:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually have any knowledge about Scottish football outwith the SPL or are you just another ignorant user who wants to rid wikipedia of any articles with are of no relevance to you personally?

Junior football is a very valued level of football where local communities can go along and get involved with their local team and feel like the can influence to help the local area. Please can you put any respond on my usertalk page, thanks Dreamweaverjack (talk) 04:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD edit summaries

Please use your edit summaries. Further, adding a comment either for or against is not at all a minor edit. Rather, put a summary, even just 'delete' or 'keep'. When nominators or other involved parties set the AfD to be watched, they won't see your input, jsut he bolded M. thank you. ThuranX (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

If you're going to be an AFD regular from now on, I think we all would appreciate it if you would familiarize yourself better with policy documents. For instance, "hail to the speedy" is really unnecessary and misleading when articles are not eligible for an actual speedy deletion. Speedy is not for getting rid of stuff you don't like faster. Also, when making arguments about notability, try to generalize a little less and invoke policy a little more. We're not asking for your opinion of the person, we're asking for your evaluation of the article and its conformance to guidelines. Thanks! --Dhartung | Talk 19:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Is this a typo?. Regards, Rudget.talk 19:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its a really scrappy article, but I think we should keep all schools. If we keep, the article needs updated, rewritten and probably wikied. Could you please refer to actual policy rather than WP:ILIKEIT?Ga rr ie 02:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Motherwell

My edit summary says it all. What was the purpose of adding a hash mark? - Dudesleeper · Talk 23:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And removing birthplaces from intros because they're mentioned in infoboxes isn't wise. Apart from that, your edits are going swimmingly... - Dudesleeper · Talk 16:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To create a talk-page archive page, you'd go to User talk:Scope creep/Archive 1 and create the page, then move (copy and paste) the material you're archiving to the new page. Remember to make sure the archive appears as a discussion page (which, if you follow the link I gave, it will). - Dudesleeper · Talk 21:18, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Farrows and The Rig Rompers

Just wondering... how do you see this as nonsense? It's not nonsense to me... it's just not notable. B 110 _{communicate (that means talk)} 03:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cross posted from In Vento talk page

Speedy deletion contested

AERATBAG (talk) 12:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)User:Aeratbag/talkAERATBAG (talk) 12:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)I need help over Amanda Eliasch. I and another put a lot of effort into the page, which is our first. She is a poet, writer and won many awards for her film. I think it is therefore surprising that she is up for deletion. Wikipedia covers many topics and it is egalitarian. I am sure you would agree. I would therefore be appreciate any help getting the article correct I should think that reviews in the New York Times, Village Voice, New York Observer, New York Sun and The New Yorker would establish notability! Robert Greer (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cross posted from Robertgreer talk page

Cross posted from In Vento talk page

Hi, no it does not. Read WP policies regarding the matter. It is clearly not notable. scope_creep (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has been previously debated and resolved in favor of pages similar to In Vento

Please read the (much too) long debates on my talk page (they're way too long -- and boring! -- to cross post.) If you want I can refer you to various articles' talk pages with further debates.

An unrelated matter; please post your comments at the bottom of my talk page (or anybody else's for that matter). You can do so automatically by clicking on the little plus sign between "edit this page" and "history".

I apologize for having taken the liberty of moving your reply on my talk page to the bottom. Robert Greer (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David M. Broome notability

I've deleted the speedy tag from the article David M. Broome because I believe the references in the article at least presume to give some indication for real notability. Please feel free to prod or send to WP:AFD if you continue to disagree.

After much struggling with the author about the speedy tag, he's gotten the message and now seems to understand how things work here. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 22:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meat shoot speedy tag

Hi there, I've declined the speedy tag here although I absolutely agree that the article is original research. However OR is not a sufficient reason for speedying, and I suggest going through WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead. Incidentally, when tagging an article it's a good idea to warn the originating editor that you've done so. I guess you applied the tag manually? Using something like WP:TWINKLE does this autmoatically (sorry if I'm teaching grandma to suck eggs here...) Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 22:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Why have you nominated FIMI number-one hits of 2002 and FIMI number-one hits of 2008 for deletion? There's absolutely nothing wrong with those articles, they're sourced and everything, and you didn't give a reason for deletion either. Funk Junkie (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curious...

...as to why you did this for an articles whose only content was "Kinetic Communications is based in Birmingham, Alabama and is an internet technology studio specializing in web site development, video production and interactive multimedia presentations". John Reaves 00:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please use edit summaries when tagging articles for speedy deletion. You may also want to hold your horses as you have had a number of nominations declined recently. Catchpole (talk) 10:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Farrows and the Rig Rompers

I believe that this is a good and benefitial article. But it is not notable. How would the Author make this notable to Wikipedia's tight restrictions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenbarrows15 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of places in East Renfrewshire

A tag has been placed on List of places in East Renfrewshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

I've put a prod tag on Achnacloich, Isle of Skye. There are numerous sub-hamlets in the system that are plucked out of gazetteers and unlikely ever to become meaningful articles. Ben Mac Dui 07:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Achnaluachrach, and Achnaluacharch

Hi Scope Creep, I assume these two actually refer to the same place - can you confirm? If so can you redirect the one with the mis-spelling to the one without, as it's not obvious to me. If they are not, then I think a {{distinguish}} template is fairly essential! Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 10:49, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Um, just a thought, in future could you make sure that entries are not "crap", before adding articles. I suggest that making sure that a place exists is a prerequisite for starting an article. A number of users have raised concerns in the past that "non-places" are being added all too frequently. Please see this discussion at Wikiproject Scotland. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Achnaluachrach is listed in a book of Scottish Place Names, from the Gaelic: achadh ("field") & luachair ("rushes"); and I've found it on a map. The second one my be a typo, as it is not in the book nor the map.Pyrotec (talk) 16:23, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It strikes me that Achnaluachrach, Sutherland is a single farm (is it current or a ruin?) and the Glen Spean Lodge Hotel at Roybridge is at Achluachrach (map). Both of the names used in this header are mis-spelt. Neither is worthy of an article! Better to have a Roybridge article, which could mention the hotel, a hostel (Àite Cruinnichidh) and an impressive gorge on the river - I can recommend all 3. Finavon (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scope creep, no probs, I didnt realise you were involved with such a herculean task, so I was maybe a bit snappy too. But I still think these borderline places need to be checked, not only as to whether they exist, but as Finavon comments, whether they merit an article in the first place. I don't know how feasible that is, (without actually going there!) but personally I would err on the side of caution. Verifiability is after all WP's most fundamental policy. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 08:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, the OS maps are really detailed, and up to date too. Keep up the good work! Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 16:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Small villages

Whilst your industry is admirable I wonder if you would mind checking that the OS grid references you provide for Highland villages are accurate and that the OS map links there? Also, please note that villages on Skye fall under Category:Skye Villages. Thanks. Ben Mac Dui 12:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

A little research is a wonderful thing. Sconser is hardly "remote" in the context of the west Highlands. As you later note, it is on the main road. Category:Villages in Highland is very large and needs attention. This is why Skye villages are placed in Category:Skye Villages. If you are going to cut and paste text for numerous articles on these tiny places, you might at least save others the trouble of having to change this every time. Please also note that "Isle of Skye" is a redirect, this being a colloquial expression. The islands name is Skye. Thank-you. Ben Mac Dui 07:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please not that Ross-shire has not been a county since 1889. Better to use Wester Ross, Ross and Cromarty etc. Ben Mac Dui 07:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Applecross

Hi Scope creep - was there any reason why you deleted the coordinates for Applecross? I've put them back, but if there was a good reason why you took them out, feel free to remove them again - preferably with some explanation in the edit summary! Grutness...wha? 05:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK - that makes sense. Sorry that I didn't see the double-up of coordinates. Grutness...wha? 05:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Riding the Stang

Still to do, Ceffyl Pren scope_creep (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy James Children's Books

Hi Scope creep,

Question: I'm unfamiliar with these children's books, and find nothing when I search Google with the term "Bobo Bowen" or when I search Dorling Kindersley's site with the terms "Wendy James" or "The Adventures of Bobo Bowen". Can you help me out here? AtomikWeasel (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for responding. Agreed. I don't doubt you for an instant, but without anything we can find I suppose it's best you remove it pending a proper cite of some sort. – If that makes sense to you as well. AtomikWeasel (talk) 03:08, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tagging

Please take a few minutes to read over the speedy deletion guidelines. I have been following you around, trying to clean up your mis-tagged articles.

this is a db-bio, there is content, there is not info about why they are notable

this needs refs, but is certainly not gibberish

Same deal here

--Terrillja _talk 00:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks for the help, I know I made a boo boo of some of that. I've read the speedy deletion guidelines. I've been spending the last couple of hours trying to apply them, i'll need to do a bit more reading of wp policies, get a bit more practive in. scope_creep (talk) 00:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I made a ton of mistakes when I was learning. If you aren't sure on one, want me to check over them or have any other questions, feel free to drop a note on my talkpage. FWIW, I use twinkle to tag with csd tags. Once you get the idea of the criteria, you may want to check it out. Helps with AfD tagging too, you just have to be careful because it can be too easy to tag an article for csd or AfD--Terrillja _talk 00:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Israel-Poland relations.

Hi there. While that new article is a mere stub, I think the subject is noteworthy enough to give it a try. Hence my "expand" notice. De728631 (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you think these articles are unimportant, feel free to prod or to afd them, I won't object. De728631 (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serious Eats entry

Hey, dude. I saw you hit "Serious Eats" up for a speedy deletion. I wanted to thank you for being vigilant with articles that may not meet Wikipedian standards, such as Ariel Zelichov, which was a good catch. But I would ask you to take the time to read the talk pages before you do so. Thanks. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Food Channel

This may well fail WP:WEB but the standard for speedy deletion is stricter than that. Specifically "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion." The criteria also specifically state that this "is a lower standard than notability". In general this is taken to mean that if there are suggestions that it could meet notablity requirements then it shouldn't be speedied. The two sources indicate why it may be notable. Additionally the article also mentions a newsletter which was published regularly for a long time which also indicates to me it may be notable. Finally it's been around for a while with some pretty regular editors have edited it, and has been the subject of discussion at WP:RfD so if it were an obvious speedy I'm sure someone else would've tagged it. Yes I accept this is a border line case but all-in-all, for the little extra effort involved, I think this is worth taking to WP:PROD or WP:AfD. Dpmuk (talk) 10:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Scope creep. You have new messages at Mdd's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 22:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all the Scottish Highlands articles you've just created! --Rosiestep (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Scope creep! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Serge Haroche - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to The Stig

Hi. Please stop putting Stig's identity as Michael Schumaccher. It has been discussed at great length on the talk page and the BBC have admitted themselves that Schumaccher was only the stig for a brief time because he was the only one who could drive that Ferrari. Looneyman (talk) 19:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want further proof that it was a stunt, read this where it is comfirmed to be a stunt since Shumaccher drove the ferrari. Looneyman (talk) 20:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TODO

Elishader

Mark Anstice

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mark Anstice. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Mark Anstice. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Active Banana (talk) 19:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting of AfD's

[This kind] of edit usually confuses the regular participants at AfD. Normally, the nominator's !vote is expressed within his deletion rationale, and it should be kept that way. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 19:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Worst Britons

The people themselves are notable, but is the list itself? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephan Ohsowski

Lol!!! Sorry but this guy's actions have just made him out to be an asshole tonight. He's on a final warning for removing the afd template from the article, he keeps blanking his own user talk page so you can't see all the warnings he's been left when you visit, and he's just been "well obviously I'm notable, it's official" in all communications. I should berate you for your personal attack on him, but I just spat Pepsi Max all over my computer screen in laughter! -- role^player 21:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I only just noticed that. -- role^player 22:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not many seem to have spotted those dates. Congrats on a bit of good proofreading (from one whose trade includes accuracy of text...). Peridon (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

T2 SDE

The article T2 SDE was put up for AfD, and then deleted. I don't understand the rationale for deletion. The article is referenced in 12 wikipedia articles, and now they all have red-ink links. If I add the article back as a redirect, is there a good place to redirect it to, and would they delete the redirect, too? Obankston (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polar Tree

I have relisted the above AfD, as the nominator withdrew their nomination. However, you had !voted 'delete', and so your response would be useful, either to confirm that you still think that the article should be deleted, or that the article should now be kept. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with SkillSlate

Appreciated. I'm hunting for more people to write about for biographies; if you know of anybody who is notable, with references, that I can write about, tell me their name and what they do, and I'll consider it, thanx.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:12, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

Proposed move of various village articles in the Outer Hebrides- see Category talk:Villages in the Outer Hebrides. Ben Mac Dui 16:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ferness

Good to see your tireless efforts to tidy List of places in Highland. I've re-added Ferness as the real place is in fact in Highland, south of Nairn. The name was also used for the fictional setting of the film Local Hero, hence the Aberdeenshire confusion. --Deskford (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Scope creep! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 14:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Ride and Tie, Scope creep.

Unfortunately Hasteur has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

The creator is not allowed to mark a new article patrolled.

To reply, leave a comment on Hasteur's talk page.

Speedy deletion declined: Opi Karim

Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Opi Karim, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguous advertising (can be cleaned without a fundamental rewrite). Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unreviewed articles

Hey Scope Creep. I recently got a talkpage message from you informing me that you had unreviewed two articles I had reviewed, List of Break Free episodes and Leon Pape respectively. To "List of Break Free episodes" you added a refimprove tag, something that was already present prior to your edit. For Leon Pape you made, according to the page history, no changes or maintenance tags at all. Why did you unreview the articles? Ironholds (talk) 03:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you've now returned to editing. Could you please address these queries? Ironholds (talk) 09:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Component analysis (research)

I just wanted to let you know that I declined your A1 speedy deletion nomination of Component analysis (research). In the criterion's definition, it clearly points out that it is only meant to be used for very short articles, which I do not believe this falls under. Furthermore, I would argue that it is possible to identify the subject of the article through its context, which is why I have declined the speedy deletion nomination.--Slon02 (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slon. I'm still going to have to nominate this for deletion, although I don't really want to, because I'm an illusionist by nature and it looks as interesting subject. I've looked at this article for some time, and still can't make of it sense. For instance what does changing behavior in relation to what. Also you have defined the article in negation to something else, which is never a good idea. Also the article sources only point to a single source. Without extensive reading of the single references, it impossible to determine the context of this article. scope_creep (scope_creep) 16:05, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, nominate the article for deletion if you think it is appropriate. I'm not saying that deletion isn't appropriate in this case- just that speedy deletion isn't.--Slon02 (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pad Thai

Please check the article's history before tagging for a speedy delete. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Nazryati

The references were added. No need to delete. Delljvc (talk) 15:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess Titans

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess Titans. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Mahjong

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Mahjong. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purble Place

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purble Place. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 01:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hi Scope creep: One of your recent AfDs was added to a list I watch, and I noticed when I looked that your signature doesn't contain a link either to your talkpage or your userpage. This is against the rules and is likely to be frustrating for the article creators you're notifying about the AfDs, so could you please fix it asap? Thanks! Yngvadottir (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you fixed it. Thanks! Yngvadottir (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Castaldo

Hello, in the AfD debate about Richard Castaldo, you made a harshly critical remark that I think was intended for the Scott Holleran AfD. Castaldo is not a follower of Ayn Rand. On the contrary, he is a leftist and a member of the Green Party, as well as the victim of a horrific crime. i encourage you to make a correction. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:39, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Scope creep. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaston Javier Algard.
Message added 13:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynx (spacecraft)

Although probably not necessary, you might want to fix your !vote. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Galenka

Please see my comments about Galenka at Talk:Galenka. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Ganesh (given name)

Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ganesh (given name), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This page should not be speedily deleted because this article appears to have been created before the user was blocked. . Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Galenka

Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Galenka, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G4. Not previously deletion by a deletion discussion. G4 does not apply if an article was previously deleted speedily or as an expired prod. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Propinquity

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I only appear to be the first editor of this article because I deleted the page and later restored it in User:Anakowi's sandbox. I have no interest in fixing any outstanding issues Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andaleeve Rahman

Hi.. Andaleeve Rahman clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN as a member of Bangladesh parliament. Please be careful while nominating articles for deletion in future.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 10:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent A9s

I have no inclination about the fate of Kalil Wilson as I did not write it but how dare you tag Easy to Love (Kalil Wilson album) under WP:A9 while Kalil Wilson still exists and how dare you tag Onyx (DJ) under WP:A9 when he is not a musical recording!--Laun chba ller 19:11, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a polite (by my standards) notification: Per WP:SIGLINK, your signature must contain a link to your user page, talk page or (for some reason I do not understand) your contributions. Might I suggest scope_creep?--Laun chba ller 19:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rüchardt Experiment

Re your message: Yes, a couple of anonymous editors left a few messages asking for somebody to create an article about the experiment. They noted that an article exists on the German Wikipedia, that there is information available in undergraduate courses (gave a now dead link to a PDF at the University of British Columbia), and the mention of a journal article: Modification of Rüchardt's Experiment. Feel free to create a brand new talk page. I had deleted it way back then as a matter of cleaning up orphaned talk pages. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rüchardt Experiment may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{\gamma}=\frac{4 {\mathrm{pi} m{V}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teflon (nickname)

Hello. You participated in a 2007 discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teflon character. Consensus of that discussion was to keep the article, which has since been moved to Teflon (nickname). I note, however, that the article contains no treatment of the nickname as such. Perhaps it would be better recast as a stand-alone list. If you are interested, please see Talk:Teflon (nickname)#Is it a list? Cnilep (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heinrich Scholz may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of [[Adolf von Harnack|Adolf von Harnack]], in philosophy of [[Alois Riehl|Alois Riehl]] and [[Friedrich Paulsen|Friedrich Paulsen. In 1910, Scholz [[Habilitation|habilitated]] in the subjects

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SORCER

Since you commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORCER you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORCER (2nd nomination) and are cordially invited to consider the article again and to do so. Fiddle Faddle 23:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gisbert Hasenjaeger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hao Wang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Universal Turing machine, built by Gisbert Hasenjaeger.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Universal Turing machine, built by Gisbert Hasenjaeger.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Stuart (major-general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highlander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cipher Department of the High Command of the Wehrmacht may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

ref name="Vol2"/> Also Germany was unable to crytanalyze British and American high-grade systems ([[Ultra]] carrying critical Allies data. As a result, OKW/Chi had no hint that their own high-grade
''weights'', i.e. each bigram could be assigned a weight from 1 to 5. For example, (D->5), (I->3),(O->1),(P->1). In this manner, the digraph DE was given the weigh 5, the digraph IL the weight 3, the digraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cipher Department of the High Command of the Wehrmacht may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: The Fresh Grocer

Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Fresh Grocer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Maybe you would have a case for A7 (notability) - maybe, but not for G11 as it does not look like an ad. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 18:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Ewan Kirk and Colm O'Shea

Thank you for nominating my two articles for speedy deletion. I will be contesting both. Both Colm O'Shea and Ewan Kirk are important british business men and manage amongst the largest hedge funds in the world. If you believe that neither of these are important, then you should also mark for speedy deletion the 100's of other important hedge fund managers listed on wikipedia. Here is a link to get you started. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:American_hedge_fund_managers https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:English_hedge_fund_managers. There is nothing promotional about the pieces that I have written. They are objective, well sourced, and in no way suggest that anyone should invest in these funds and they do not mention the returns. There are probably 50 multibillion hedge funds based in the UK, I plan on slowly starting wikipedia pages on the most important ones over the next few months. As you can see from my above links the American Fund managers are better represented on Wikipedia than the British ones, and for no good reason. It is neither productive nor helpful you deleting these pieces. If you feel they are badly written or promotional please feel free to edit them. I based the writing style on other Wikipedia profiles of famous hedge fund managers, and I can not see how my pieces are any different than the existing pieces that you have maybe just not gotten around to deleting. Hedgefunding (talk) 17:38, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion decline Mara Adamitz Scrupe

Scope-creep, I decline your recommendation for deleting my article: Mara Adamitz Scrupe. I took my user name because I have visited this artist's studio. There is no other association, and I believe that your posting is egregious in its assumptions. The article is about an acclaimed American artist and educator, it is well researched and accurately attributed. I am new to Wikipedia and it has taken me some time to learn how to use the system so I trust that you will receive this message. I have removed your posting from my new article. Thank you. CliffEerie (talk) 17:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Howard Sutermeister Merritt

Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Howard Sutermeister Merritt, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The existence of an authority control entry is in itself an assertion of importance. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hi Scope creep,
When writing on AFDs please either use 4 tildes ~~~~ or the pen above and don't press enter and space, If you need to start a new line simply press enter otherwise it looks like the "example" below

Example

Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Institute for Studies in Industrial Development

Hi Mate, Thanks for your advice on the above article. I have since repositioned the image to a more suitable place. Cheers!!--jojo@nthony (talk) 02:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ra: Khaemwaset (Vizier)

Hello, thanks for the review. I can't read the source that you linked but the namesake son of Ramesses II is Khaemwaset, while the Vizier is an unrelated (and later) man. See also here for a list of Khaemwasets. Cheers, Khruner (talk) 09:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broadway 4D

I appreciate your bringing this to AFD, but to answer your statement "Can't see how the article context can be notable, it's been cancelled", I direct you to WP:NFF (paragraph 2)... which tells us how even a failed or unmade project can be just notable enough per the guidelines to find a place within the encyclopedia. Be well. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amer Huneidi

Just for future reference, if you want to nominate an article for deletion and there's been a prior AFD discussion, then you don't relist it by affixing a new comment to the bottom of the original discussion and then relisting that — rather, you need to create a new discussion page at the title "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amer Huneidi (2nd nomination)". It's a moot point in this case, as I've already speedy deleted the article as a G4 ("recreation of deleted content") — but if you ever find yourself in a similar situation again, please initiate a new discussion instead of appending your nomination to the old one. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this edit, in which you initiated a new AFD discussion about the article by adding it to the bottom of the first, already closed discussion instead of by starting a new page. I speedied the article afterward because it qualified for speedy as a recreation of deleted content, so you don't need to do anything now — but I just needed to let you know that if you come across a similar situation in the future, you need to create a new AFD discussion by adding "(2nd nomination)" to the page's title, rather than appending your renomination to the first one. Bearcat (talk) 22:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article did exist at the time all of this happened; it doesn't exist now because I speedied it afterward. All I know is that it's your name on the diff, your signature on the new comment, and your name on the edit that added the AFD template to the article — I don't know how Page Curation works when it comes to AFD nominations, so maybe it made a technical error and accidentally appended your deletion rationale to the first nomination instead of creating a new one, but it all happened under your name. Bearcat (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yarim-Lim of Alalakh

hello, Yarim-Lim wasn't born in 1735 bc, he started to reign in c. 1735 bc. The .... means a date, we don't know when he died, its known that he died in the first years of Niqmi-Epuh of Yamhad reign, Niqmi-Epuh reigned C. 1700 BC – c. 1675 BC , so Yarim-Lim would die any time between 1700 and 1690 BC. Since we don't know the exact date I wrote four dots , a dot for every number. I changed the dots and replaced them with ? --Attar-Aram syria (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy

Hey, I declined the speedy at GTA (group). There was enough of an assertion of notability to where it just falls short of being a good speedy candidate. I do have my doubts about its overall notability, but this is one of those cases where it'd be best to take it to AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:37, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge at Talk:Battle of Big Bethel

Could you revisit your merge proposal at that talk page and explain what's being merged and where? Thanks. BusterD (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of language

It has come to my attention that you are using rather unacceptable language to describe other human beings when talking to editors. Please refrain from using such rude language. Thank you. I have asked an admin to review your account. DinkyExpress (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

No I am not Amanda. Stop abusing your editing privileges here. I am a wikipedia user who is all for fairness and correct editing protocol. DinkyExpress (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Yafim Weinstein

Do you want to revisit this? I added some material, the Al Qaida connection and convictions of the perpetrators put it in the category of political/terrorist/militant Islamist murders. Which does seem to me o give it enduring notability.ShulMaven (talk) 22:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Your signature currently does not include a link to your user page, your talk page or your contributions. Such a link is required by WP:SIGLINK. Please modify your signature accordingly. On an unrelated note, something went wrong with the AfD nomination of Ted Barnes; Davey2010 fixed it, and the discussion can now be found at WP:Articles for deletion/Ted Barnes (2nd nomination). Huon (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Hiya, I've had to the entire AFD page up from scratch [1] - Perhaps you should install WP:TWINKLE as it's far more easier to nominate articles with amongst other things :)
Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Barnes

about the Ted Barnes article - I started it because I heard a couple of pieces on radio and thought them good, that's all really - the presenter said he worked with beth Orton and such and I thought he sounded notable -I didn't realize there was an article called Clayhill either that covers much of the notable work - so if it is deleted I think that's probably right after all. Sayerslle (talk) 15:37, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Speedy deletion nomination of TLV1

Hi Scope creep,

Thanks for notifying me about tagging TLV1 for speedy deletion.

I'm happy to make to clarify and argue for the subject's notability, and have contested it on the talk page. 1-555-confide (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature (2)

Just saw your signature on a page, and wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Signatures, specifically WP:SIGLINK, states that you "must include at least one direct internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page", which your ccurrent signature does not. All the best, G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 20:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some interesting reading

These are some interesting articles, particularly relevant to your editing behaviour: W:Disruptive Editing and W:Competence is required. You should read them, so that you can help improve Wikipedia, instead of continually wasting the time of yourself and others. 1-555-confide (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Madaffer

Just a note I declined the A7 on this article because it far and away makes a credible claim of significance (he served on the San Diego city council and the California Transportation Commission). Try AfD instead. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 13:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent average

Your article titled Vincent average, created in July, finally came to my attention and to that of the Mathematics Wikiproject as a result of someone's adding a category tag to it.

I think it's opening sentence did not convey to the lay reader ignorant of statistics that statistics is what it's about. I edited that somewhat, and also cleaned up the notation. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

. . . . and only ONE other article currently links to it. That's something to work on. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Scope creep! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon, May 2015

Hey there! As a Wikipedian in Scotland I thought you might be interested in the Scottish Fairground Culture editathon taking place on 7 May at the Riverside Museum - drop me a line if you'd like to know more, or if you'd be interested in taking part remotely! Lirazelf (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, linkfail! Here's the correct one... Scottish Fairground Culture Editathon Lirazelf (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 384

Your AfD nomination fouled up; it's pointing to an old discussion. Try again? --Dweller (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NB We have articles on 273 such routes, currently. --Dweller (talk) 11:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sooraj Pancholi

Hi! I have created an article, Sooraj Pancholi, which was earlier re-directed to the film's page after been discussed on 28 August 2014. I developed the article after the release of his first film, and it has been proposed for deletion again. So could you please help me in identifying to keep the article without being deleted because I am not much familiar with the terms used here. And is one film actor not notable, cause I have provided enough reliable sources to support it. Thank you in advance. Hoping for a reply. Shaphiu (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sooraj_Panchoali

Hi there. Just wanted to let you know I moved your AFD discussion to anew page, located here. Page curation messed it up somehow and it was putting it on the original discussion page. Might need to see if that was a one time thing or if there's a problem with the code for it. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 20:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Holly Turner AFD

Hi, just to let you know you malformatted your signature somehow (see here). You may want to re-sign (not resign, LOL). Yours, Quis separabit? 11:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ?

Hi,

Please see this article, Ajit Ravi. I feel this is ridiculous, people are creating articles for themselves. The reference given is also his own website. Kindly have a look and if necessary, suggest for deletion or you may be able to develop also. I am not favouring any single line articles but I don't work in this area so, suggesting you to take necessary action. DreamSparrow ^Chat 18:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Words of Farewell

Hello, とある白い猫,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Words of Farewell should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Words of Farewell .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 15:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I did create that page but it was an article on an Anime which was then merged to a larger list. You ought to notify ShockD (talk · contribs) instead since the overridden the redirect to create the current article on the metal band. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 10:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Review of deletion criteria

Hello scope_creep. It looks like you're very fond of nominating articles for deletion. Might I suggest a review of the deletion criteria? A cursory glance over your deletion nominations turn up quite a few nominations on notable articles. For example: Doaktown Consolidated High School, Esther Earl, Stew Leonard, Jr., Housing.com, Grupo de Diarios América, TLV1, Smart shoe, Illionaire Records, etc. The list goes on. In the interest of saving other people (and yourself) a lot of time, I think it'd be worth your while to review what makes an article notable. --63.155.40.75 (talk) 23:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion nomination

Hello,

I posted an article yesterday, about Fantastic Services, but it was deleted. The reason is said to be promotional language. The idea was not to advertise the page, but to give some info about a company that's been in the news lately. It was deleted just a few hours after publishing which means there wasn't given any chance for fixing any issues with the language. Could the request be reconsidered or can you give some tips about improving the article?

Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VanessaFaye (talk • contribs) 08:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the German Navy News Service page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited German Navy News Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scandinavian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited German Navy Intelligence Service, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Memel, Soest and Arkona. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited German Navy Intelligence Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page List. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete?

I just looked at David Drake (venture capitalist) and agree it should be deleted. I tried to clean it up but there doesnt seem to be any meat there. 199.102.168.8 (talk) 03:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erich Hüttenhain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conrector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion criteria

Hi Scope creep,

You're still tagging articles for speedy deletion which really aren't speedy deletion candidates. For example, although an article about Helen Santos, a character in a TV series might not be notable enough to keep, and I'd probably !vote delete in an article deletion discussion, it's certainly not a speedy deletion candidate.

Speedy deletion is for cases where there is absolutely no doubt that the article must go ASAP, for example:

Articles that don't make any sense (Nonsense, no context, etc.)
Articles that are obviously misleading (Really obvious hoaxes, joke pages, etc.)
Articles that are plainly, obviously not notable (Completely unremarkable people or things)
Articles that break our rules (attack pages, copyright violations, blatant advertising, etc.)

Proposed deletion is for articles that clearly shouldn't be on Wikipedia, but don't meet the strict CSD standard, for example:

Unreferenced biographies of living people
Unverifiable articles (more subtle hoaxes, crackpot theories, etc.)
Non-notable subjects: after looking for sources, it's clear there are none and never will be.

Something like the Helen Santos article probably reaches the level where we should go for WP:AfD instead, because there are reasonable Wikipedians who would strongly argue to keep it, no matter how strongly you or I might feel that it's pointless WP:Cruft. --Slashme (talk) 17:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

for example, Carolina Crusher (truck) is not not a person, company, group of people , individual animal, or web content-- A7 does not apply. (and in any case the artile asserts some degree of significance . DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Image of Hans Rohrbach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image of Hans Rohrbach.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Image of Hans Rohrbach.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image of Hans Rohrbach.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help

Thank you for the work you put in on Adlocutio, it really means a lot to me. Iazyges (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please note that per WP:SIGLINK, your signature must contain at least one link to your user page, user talk page or contributions page. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Scope creep (talk) 13:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Novopaschenny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belarusian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dr Walter Fricke.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dr Walter Fricke.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 19:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dr Walter Fricke.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Walter Fricke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Fricke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fellowship. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dr Walter Fricke.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Walter Fricke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Walter Fricke, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiable Sources

Hi Scope Creep

Youre too fast for me! Most of these you are referring to are stubs, which now give people a place and a opportunity to participate. Some of my older stubs have matured and numerous people have contributed, so please be patient. The problem with this kind of military history is that a lot of it is however oral in nature. How do you address that? Another issue is that the vast amount of archived military history pre 1994 was on paper and the current government has not made much effort in keeping it maintained. These documents were however handed over to the National Military Museum in Saxonwold Johannesburg, so that is a big plus. It will very interesting to understanding how these documents can be used for in line citations.

Georg Jacob Vollweiler

Thanks for the message about Georg Jacob Vollweiler. Why did I write that he is noted as a teacher: I discovered him while writing an article about Lindsay Sloper, who was taught by him; he also taught Ferdinand Hiller and Aloys Schmitt, who were well known in their day – so it was worth mentioning in the summary that he was a noted teacher. While working on the article I was surprised to find that he worked in London for a period, managing a branch of a printing company, so it was an interesting article to write. I have not come across any pictures of Vollweiler. Regards, AtticTapestry (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as B-Dienst. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution. It's simple: just include the template {{PD-notice}} immediately after your citation. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

B-Dienst

I have removed the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://uboat.net/technical/enigma_ciphers.htm, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dianna, Here is the additional document I intend to use for B-Diesnt Offensive Crypto including cipher table and the rest of section. Regarding the Ralph Erskine document; author as described beforehand, he is Historian specializing in WW2 cryptography and Bletchley Park Signal Processing. This is him - [Erskine]. The document I was originally talking about last night I originally saw here: [[2]] where I got the name HMTR-2066-2. Searched both .doc and .pff and eventually found this blog. [[3]], which says it's crown copyright, but I can't find a reference for it. I see, it is not in any ww2 archive, because it is current. This is the reference on Taylor and Francis Online: [[4]]. That would be valid? Except I don't have a login for T & L. I'm also planning to use the following, if you want to take a squint. This [SHORT SIGNAL SYSTEMS - AND HOW BLETCHLEY PARK EXPLOITED THEM, if I can get hold of it, and this [Essential Turing] book, the [The Battle For The Code] By Hugh Sebag-Montefiore. I also plan to cite this doctoral thesis called 2009-Carper.pdf, which described similar information and provides some truly excellent sources found here: [SECRET WAR] by Colleen Carper.

Cipher Department of the High Command of the Wehrmacht

Hi Scope creep,

obviously, I was not fast enough to respond to your request.

original text:

The letter "Chi" for the Chiffrierabteilung is, contrary to what one might expect, not the Greek letter Chi, nor anything to do with the chi test, a common cryptographic test used as part of deciphering of enciphered message, and invented by Solomon Kullback, but only to the first three letters of the word Chiffrierabteilung (English:cipher department).

My changes were motivated by the following aspects:

The used link chi test is a redirection to "Chi-squared test (Redirected from Chi test)". In this article, a person named "Kullback" is not mentioned, however, the following is stated:

Applications
In cryptanalysis, chi-squared test is used to compare the distribution of plaintext and (possibly) decrypted ciphertext. The lowest value of the test means that the decryption was successful with high probability.[2][3] This method can be generalized for solving modern cryptographic problems.[4]

In Solomon Kullback, a test proposed by him is not mentioned.

As I can see, in the meantime you have removed the misleading link to "Chi test" yourself.

I still believe that the references to the letter Chi or the chi test in this paragraph are not very useful here (and thus perhaps unnecessary): they are stressing what Chi is not (instead of explaining its meaning in the context at hand). Ukjt (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Cross-Product Sum Statistic" (Chi test) seems to be a different name. Possible source of more information: Solomon Kullback, "Statistical Methods in Cryptanalysis" National Security Agency Technical Literature Series, Monograph No. 14, 1967, pp iii+194 (Reprint of 1938 paper) Ukjt (talk) 22:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pers Z S: Personnel Seconded from OKW/Chi

Hi scope_creep, you disagreed with changes I made.

Tirpitzufer

Tirpitzufer is a Berlin street address, the Bendlerblock building being located at 72-76 Tirpitzufer (street renamed to Reichpietschufer in 1947).

see en:B-Dienst#Background: During World War II, B-Dienst was located in 72–76 Tirpitzufer in Berlin, which was later renamed Bendlerblock

see en:Max_Reichpietsch#Commemoration: After World War II, the name of the Berlin street on which the former German Imperial Naval Office was located in the Bendlerblock was changed from Tirpitzufer (after Admiral Alfred von Tirpitz) to Reichpietschufer in honour of Max Reichpietsch,

see de:Alfred_von_Tirpitz#Ehrungen Das Berliner Reichpietschufer hieß von 1933 bis 1947 Tirpitzufer.

So, I still recommend the change I proposed. Would you agree?

Quotation

Dr Hans Rohrbach commented:

   ...definitely lower grade personnel and had come here to be trained[32] I-22, Paragraph 50

In TICOM I-22, p. 7 [9], paragraph 50 (see https://archive.org/stream/ticom/TicomI-22) reads

50. Dr. Kunze was then dismissed and Messrs. Rave, Hierer and Grosse were called. Professor Rohrbach in the meantime explained that these gentlemen were of a definitely lower grade and had come to 'Per ZS' to be trained. He spoke of them with obvious distaste.

So, I assumed that my quote

   ...these gentlemen were of a definitely lower grade and had come to 'Per ZS' to be trained

was an exact quote from that source.

What is the source of definitely lower grade personnel and had come here to be trained? Do different versions of TICOM I-22 perhaps exist?

Thank you for your help.

Ukjt (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm Tranow

Hi scope_creep,

Sorry, but I to have to come back once again to my question concerning the source for "old drive".

current version reads: He was described as having [an] old drive and energetic.[4] Freidrich, Bauer L. (2000). Decrypted Secrets - Method and Maxims of Cryptology 3th Edition. Springer. p. 449.

In the following, some literal quotations:

Friedrich L. Bauer, 2000, Decrypted Secrets – Method and Maxims of Cryptology, SECOND Edition. Springer.

page 242: under the regime of the experienced and energetic Tranow

Friedrich L. Bauer, 2002, Decrypted Secrets – Method and Maxims of Cryptology, THIRD Edition. Springer.

page 426: under the regime of the experienced and energetic Tranow

Friedrich L. Bauer, Entzifferte Geheimnisse – Methoden und Maximen der Kryptologie, Dritte, überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage

Seite 449: der unter der Leitung des alterfahrenen und energischen Tranow stand

So, I am somewhat puzzled that you reverted my reference – even if the tag I used ("Bauer-2000-DSM-426") was incorrect (the reference itself correctly was to the 2002 edition and the tag (and only the tag) should have read better "Bauer-2002-DSM-426".)

Your comment says "Replaced older quote with younger" and refers to an English Third edition of 2000. My reference was exactly to the English THIRD edition of 2002.

Other than that, in Bauer-2000-DSM (english 2nd ed.), Tranow is mentioned on pages 425, 426 and 427, but not on page 449.

Also, in Bauer-2002-DSM (english 3rd ed.), Tranow is mentioned on pages 425, 426 and 427, but not on page 449.

So, I still believe that my reference (and the quote) is correct (until we come up with a better one).

Wouldn't you agree? Ukjt (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Scope creep. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including General der Nachrichtenaufklärung, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:58, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol

Hi. Due to the very poor standard of New Page Patrolling, the community decided through two very widely publicised RfC to introduce a new user right for reviewing new pages and marking them as patrolled. All users who had been active during the qualifying period in 2016 were accorded the right without needing to apply for it (this was in fact only a low number), and some 1,400 others known to have been reasonably active were personally sent a message suggesting that they may wish to apply for the right through a process that only takes a few seconds. If you would like to familiarise yourself with WP:NPR and apply for the right, if your patrolling history is without serious issues, an admin will accord you the right. Hope this helps. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hello Scope creep. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter (November 2016)

Hello Scope creep,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 806 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

Originally sent to all New Page Reviewers 26 November 2016. This message sent manually. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Scope creep,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

Improve the tools: Vote here.
Reduce your review load: Vote here

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .[reply]

December 2016

Your addition to Johann Friedrich Schultz has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Nicholas Masson

Hi Scope creep,

Thanks for your notice. I've responded there and believe, upon review, you may wish to withdraw this nomination. Thanks again. X4n6 (talk) 08:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shadows of the Workhouse

Hi Scope creep - Thanks for your tag, but I'm afraid I can't really see what you're driving at. All my references named and to reliable sources, I can't see that any of them are liable to link rot.Picknick99 (talk) 22:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scope Creep. At the time you made this edit the article had perfectly formatted sources. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Milani

If you look at the selected publications section of the article you will find numerous links and references. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trijeets (talk • contribs) 03:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of Barsoi-Radhikapur branch line

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Barsoi-Radhikapur_branch_line

Hi User:Scope creep thanks for your review. I have added both sufficient references & also categorazied it. please give it a check. Paulsubhojit (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLP PROD on Christopher Shawn Rech

Just as an FYI I have removed the BLP PROD tag that you placed on this article. BLP PROD requires that there be no sources of any form in the article in any form, and the article did have links to multiple sites at the time you tagged it. The other deletion processes would be the way to move forward on this one. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also on Shadow Di General as an FYI. BLP PROD is not something that is used for bad sourcing but for no sourcing. Thanks for helping with patrolling for unreferenced BLP articles and NPP, both are desperately needed, but the criteria for BLP PROD is pretty defined. If you still think this article should be deleted, use on of the other methods that fit :) TonyBallioni (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanimo culture

You emailed me that the article on Vanimo culture had been earmarked for deletion. Vanimo is an important town in West Sepik Province of Papua New Guinea, and the language is important in that province, as it straddles the West Papuan border. An encyclopedia like Wikipedia needs to include entries on different ethnic groups around the world. Can you please indicate the grounds you have for deletion. John D. Croft (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB

I suggest you read Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites#IMDb. While not a reliable source, IMDB is perfectly usable for External links. Dark Knight 2149 21:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Márta Lacza

Good morning Scope creep, and thanks for tagging Márta Lacza for deletion – it definitely needed some attention. I've done a bit of work on it, which I think addresses the concerns and satisfies the guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia. I've also put a "Keep" comment on the AfD page. If you have further concerns about the article, please let me know. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia — Hebrides (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Ritter

Hi Scotsman. The interwiki you reformed into an external link was just created by me as a sign the article is a translation. Interwikis are to be published in the left column but before I added one annually they (the German and Bulgarian ones) weren't. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 02:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Younesi

Hi Scope creep. Thank you for your note and assistance. I have added multiple references to the artile, and would appreciate if you are able to review and confirm that it now meets the necessary standards. MichaelCohenProjectMc2 (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scope creep - thanks for the additional feedback. I have added several additional references and removed IMDB. I am confident the article adheres to the necessary requirements and appreciate your help in doing so. Please let me know if there are any outstanding edits you believe are required. MichaelCohenProjectMc2 (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Márta Lacza

Thank you for trying to withdraw your AfD on Márta Lacza. It seems you may have missed out a stage, because a passing bot has just put the AfD back onto the article! It seems that to withdraw your own AfD you have to go through the steps on WP:CLOSEAFD (a Google search led me to that page). Like you, I think the AfD has accomplished its purpose, as it prompted me to do some work on the article. There is a load more material about her in contemporaneous Hungarian newspapers, but I think there is sufficient in the article now for it to warrant a place in Wikipedia. Cheers. — Hebrides (talk) 21:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NPR

Hi. A user has expressed a concern on my talk page about your use of the new page reviewer right. I am of course obliged to investigate and in doing so I see no immediate cause to remove your account from the NPR user group. However, you might wish to take anoth in-depth view of the instructions, particularly (but not only) with focus on PROD and BLPPROD. Don't be afraid to pass over an article if you are not sure what to do - someone else will review it. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to post at WT:NPR or ask me direct on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for not replying to your message. I have been inactive of late and only just saw it. Hopefully the issue is fixed! Ben Mac Dui 12:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esso Hamburg.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Esso Hamburg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erhard Maertens.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Erhard Maertens.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Cypher No. 5.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:British Cypher No. 5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ludwig Stummel.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ludwig Stummel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hey. Just wanted to let you know I did a bit of clerking on your AfD for Craig Dillon. The nomination can now be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Dillon (4th nomination). Since you manually nominated the page, the template defaulted to the first nomination, when this was, in fact the fourth.

If you want to continue to nominate manually, you will have to get in the habit of searching for prior nominations or checking the talk page, assuming the closer did things correctly.

Otherwise I highly recommend you enable Wikipedia:Twinkle, which enables a popup option to nominate an article for AfD in literally three clicks, plus a bunch of other nifty features. TimothyJosephWood 13:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Zuteilungsliste From Kenngruppen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zuteilungsliste From Kenngruppen.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Ecwa academy demsa

Hello Scope creep. I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Ecwa academy demsa as an article that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the topic under CSD A7. That criterion did not apply because educational institutions are specifically exempted from the reach of CSD A7. Please read it carefully. Adam9007 (talk) 01:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Admiralty Naval Cipher Page 5.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:British Admiralty Naval Cipher Page 5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 10:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Vero Ban

Hi, You placed the 'proposed to be deleted'-template on the fairly new (Dec. 25) article about this author. I do not agree: an author who published thirteen books, some of which are translated to English, German, Slovak, French, Russian and Croatian seems quite relevant to me. So I kindly ask you to remove this template from the page. Laurier (talk) 21:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Reifsnyder Deletion Proposal

Hello -

The article does link directly to IMDB as well as Playbill - I edited the Playbill link to go directly to the performer's profile instead of the playbill/castlist (which it did originally - since he was not in the top four or five cast members and viewers had to scroll down, this may have caused some confusion). You should now find this appropriately sourced. I appreciate your insight into making the article better and would appreciate you removing your deletion proposal.

Thanks! Finlocke —Preceding undated comment added 09:37, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haroon Khawaja page deletion

Hi, you have marked my page for deletion. Instead of deletion can you please mention which references are invalid and i can fix that part? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gresys (talk • contribs) 11:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furio De Monaco

Hi Scope. I don't often participate in sports-related AfDs, hence my question to you on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furio De Monaco. The discussion was improperly NAC'ed as a Keep. That, it is not as we are still within the 168 hours window, and a Speedy Keep would in my mind have been wrong as well, as you did not indicate the nomination was withdrawn, we were still discussing subject's merits. I'd prefer the discussion be re-opened, delsorted, and then a few other editors could chime in. What do you think? — Sam Sailor 19:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wim de Waele

Hi you recently removed a PROD tag with a comment "Removed Prod. Prof. dr. ir. Wim De Waele. More than enough to pass WP:PROF. Large Google Scholar presence." I think you may have got mixed up between Wim de Waele who is a professor at Dept. of Mechanical Construction and Production at the Soete Laboratory at Ghent University since 2003 see his Bio here and the subject of this article who is an economist and did his masters degree at Ghent University see his linkedin profile here. From what I can see all the subjects on Google Scholar concern the first Wim de Waele and not the second. Could you please check and if you agree with me that the Wim de Waele is a homonym of the subject revert your edit. Thanks --Domdeparis (talk) 09:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Reservehandverfahren Booklet.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Reservehandverfahren Booklet.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki page deleted

Hello, I'm going to re-post my Wiki page about Serena Brook with more citations. Thank you. GeraldineandJennings (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of page Asha Nautiyal

I added few links on article and removed tag. Please let me know what we are looking to add on that arcitles?

thank you Mrinalbenjwal (talk) 10:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Scope creep,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 806 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your AfD

Would you consider withdrawing your AfD? It looks clear that the sourcing issues have been fixed, with sources like [5] from a national high quality newspaper being indentfied. I think that this is enough to pass WP:BASIC. TheMagikCow (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from General der Nachrichtenaufklärung. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello Scope creep,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 806 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AVVE (music duo)

Hello, there were very little explanation given as to why my page about the music duo, AVVE, was deleted. Can you please give more detailed explanation? I've already included their discography, their origins and achievements. I don't understand why it was deleted. Please, be a responsible moderator and provide more explanation as i've requested, if you would like us contributors to help WIkipedia keep growing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanescenttattooed (talk • contribs) 13:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signal Intelligence Regiment (KONA) copyright concern

Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from http://allworldwars.com/German-Radio-Intelligence-by-Albert-Praun.html, which appears to be copyright, not public domain as stated. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting here for future reference that this report was a false positive. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Georg Aumann.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Georg Aumann.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Georg Aumann

added links pointing to Cypher and Friedrich Bauer

The Lohmann Affair

added a link pointing to Reichstag

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jaiswal Brahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avvy Go

She was named to the Order of Ontario in 2014.198.58.162.200 (talk) 03:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Horst Hauthal

added a link pointing to Halle

Signal Intelligence Regiment (KONA)

added a link pointing to Eastern Front

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bionic Tour

Thanks for your work spotting this article had been recreated. Just as a quick heads-up, because the AFD was closed as a merge the recreations should be reverted back to the redirect rather than deleted. This is because we need to keep the page history accessible for copyright reasons. Thanks again for your vigilance. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of bays of the British Isles

added links pointing to North Bay, South Bay, East Bay, White Bay, Union Bay, West Bay, Long Bay and Bell Bay

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very long user talk page

This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving.

I know this is probably not for me to say as I am really rather new to Wikipedia and you are clearly not, but this is the longest user talk page I have seen... ever. The above is merely a suggestion. Please do not take this as hostility and ignore or delete this message if you see fit. Sofaclass (talk) 20:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pers Z S, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamburgh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content removal on Peterhead Bay

Hi, this is to let you know that I've had to remove two paragraphs from Peterhead Bay in this edit as they appear to have copied text from a copyrighted source; namely, http://www.nts.org.uk/Peterhead/HistoryResearch/HistoryPeterhead. Let me know if I've missed something. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 15:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]