User talk:Saltean

Image copyright problem with Image:Scheme for sensitivity analysis.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scheme for sensitivity analysis.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Andrea Saltelli.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrea Saltelli.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Andrea Saltelli.JPG

A tag has been placed on Image:Andrea Saltelli.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Andrea Saltelli.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 21:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Saltean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sdrtirs (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scientific knowledge and its social problems

Hello Saltean,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Scientific knowledge and its social problems for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crystallized C (talk) 20:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Scientific knowledge and its social problems

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Saltean, thanks for creating Scientific knowledge and its social problems!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from independent reliable sources that talk about the book in depth (not just listings or quick mentions) to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallized C (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NUSAP article

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I notice that all the citations are to Funtowicz and van der Sluijs. Are there any reliable sources on the topic that you can add to anyone else showing that this method is well-used, like to textbooks? Blythwood (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Saltean. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Saltean. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Post-normal science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PNS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Your addition to Post-normal science has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Saltean. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation and footnotes

Hi. Regarding your article on Sociology of quantification, please see WP:REFPUNC. Largoplazo (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks. Is it OK now? Saltean

Speedy deletion nomination of Applications of sensitivity analysis in chemistry

Hello Saltean,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Applications of sensitivity analysis in chemistry for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kj cheetham (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Environmental applications of sensitivity analysis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Environmental applications of sensitivity analysis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ijraset.com/fileserve.php?FID=15258. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Applications of sensitivity analysis to time-critical decision making (window of opportunity)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Applications of sensitivity analysis to time-critical decision making (window of opportunity) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1474034613000669. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Applications of sensitivity analysis to time-critical decision making (window of opportunity)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Applications of sensitivity analysis to time-critical decision making (window of opportunity), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Saltean

A tag has been placed on User:Saltean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 19:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Saltean

Thank you for creating Ethics of nanotechnologies.

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Instead of "Ethical aspects of nanotechnologies are discussed in [1]," you should summarize the information from the source in the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 21:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

@Sam-2727: Done, thanks for your comment. Andrea Saltelli 14:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your investigatory work on Sensitivity analysis. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Andrea Saltelli Photo.JPG

The file File:Andrea Saltelli Photo.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended peer community moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Extended peer community, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extended peer community (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Extended peer community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saltean! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extended peer community (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carpimaps was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article only starts to define what "extended peer community" only from 3rd sentence.

Secondly, you need to explain what

"space where perspectives, values, styles of knowing and power differentials are expressed in a context that may include inequalities and conflict" is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Extended peer community and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 06:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Post-normal science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Rosen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!, corrected.

Andrea Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Saltean. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this warning, but I do not have conflict of interest other than I know the people and their work being a practitioner myself of sensitivity analysis. I have reformulated the section pointing to the visual methods. Please let me finish it before you undo it. If you undo this again I am not pursuing this further.

Regards Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've been writing about yourself and your work all over the encyclopedia. That is obviously a conflict of interest as we define it here. MrOllie (talk) 16:50, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User talk:MrOllie, Thanks for this assessment of my work in Wikipedia and for your interventions. I am reacting in the Talk section of some of the pages where you worked last September 2023:

While I understand the need to discipline authors’ enthusiasm for their own subjects and works and to avoid conflicts of interest, I believe that some of your interventions need revision. I am also leaving a comment in your Talk page. All the best. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 09:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extended peer community has been accepted

Extended peer community, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fermiboson (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! No problem with this approach. Please note that while I have read the book, my review is based on three secondary sources. All the best. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the AfD discussion reached a consensus that this was the best way to improve this article.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence has been accepted

Resisting AI: An Anti-fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 21:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 17:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Sensitivity auditing, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFC, AN/I, etc.

Moving this to user talk, since the panteince for that thread at WP:AN seems to mostly have run out.

WP:AFC is not done in main-space (article-space), but in draft-space, in this case probably at a page titled Draft:Sampling (computational modeling), which would eventually move to replace Sampling (computational modeling) redirect if the draft's content and sourcing There's no cabal/conspiracy here. You've accused MrOllie of a lot of wrongdoing, but don't really have evidence to back this up. There is no "closing of ranks", you're simply not making a good case. Our civility policy does not require anyone to be saccharine-sweet, show deference, or avoid raising objections or voicing criticisms to keep someone else happy. It's basically about not turning Wikipedia into a battleground or a flamewar. I have not pored over every bit of interaction between the two of you; if there's something you're certain transgresses the actual WP:CIVIL or WP:NPA or WP:HARASS policies, not your personal notions of politeness vs. rudeness, then it could in theory be a matter to raise at WP:AN/I (very concisely). The community does take habitual patterns of incivility, and non-habitual outbursts of extreme incivility, seriously. However, you've poisoned your own well on this matter already. If you did open such an AN/I, your own behavior would be examined and judged, too. Probably the first thing people will notice is your casting of aspersions about MrOllie's mental health with comments like "not all is well with this person". So, WP:BOOMERANG would be very likely to apply; there's a dim view taken of those who are clearly being uncivil in the course of pointing the finger at someone else for allegedly being uncivil. When a dispute thas gotten to the "both sides insulting each other" point, both sides needs to step away.

MrOllie does indeed get a lot of complaints, but they are almost always from IP addresses, very new registered users, citation spammers (which is what he seems to suspect you are, i.e. someone promoting their own publications by citing them as sources), and outright spammers (advertisers linking promotionally to websites), as well as people who do not understand WP:NOT policy and keep adding non-encyclopedic claptrap. A bunch of us do in fact receive about the same level of disputation as he does. E.g., I piss off everyone on the system at one point or another, because I'm one of the shepherds of our WP:Manual of Style, the primary value of which is its long-term stability not exactly which version of what rule it happened to settle on, and I and a few others routinely revert editors making willy-nilly changes to it that suit their personal preferences but which could affect literally millions of articles. Trust me, it's a very thankless role. Everyone thinks some line-item or other in MoS is "wrong" and is angry about it. Anyone regularly doing anti-vandalism, anti-spam, notability patrolling, and other work to clean garbage out of the encyclopedia gets at least as much complaint as MrOllie (or me).

"I am an author and not an editor ... I believe our roles are different" reads like "I'm am a book and journal author, and I have no interest in being a Wikipedia editor beyond promoting my work/views" (i.e. WP:NOTHERE). Likely you mean something else, since you have a long track record on the site, but perceptions matter in such disputes, especially venues like WP:AN. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 15:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for these considerations. These will be kept in mind and are part of my learning process. Yes, you are indeed right, I do not wish to become an editor. No, perhaps being here to promote my views in a bit severe. There is maybe a speck of genuinely encyclopedic interest in me. Then we can all change, cannot we? You say of me:

While Saltean has a long history here, the bulk of their editing is within a topical sphere that seems to correlate strongly with their work life (and some of it is questionably encyclopedically constructive, including a lot of writing about rather random-looking academic edited volumes that clearly do not pass WP:GNG, or WP:NBOOK more narrowly, and are tagged as non-notable, so are probably going to WP:AFD at some point.

Well, maybe I am a truly mediocre author. On the other hand my mediocre pages can be improved by other authors, so not all will be lost in the end. This is the way of Wikipedia, isn't it? I review books from well-reputed academic publishing houses and from [what I judge to be] good scholars - maybe they would deserve a better pen than mine.

I will take your input as an encouragement to do better. Thanks! Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Andrea. This is meant to be a gentle word, as I see that you didn't re-post it, but I saw that you previously added a link to a website that apparently contained information about someone's personal life (page history). Please do not do this again, this is not appropriate. Thank you, Sdrqaz (talk) 00:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can you please help me out here? You point to my sandbox here; I understand I did something wrong but still don't get whose website you are referring to. Thanks for your help Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 07:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saltean We obviously can't reveal that here, it would be outing again. And please note you are an editor here, everyone who posts anything here is an editor. Of course you are also a well published author as your Wikipedia page makes clear. Doug Weller talk 11:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. My email is andrea.saltelli@gmail.com, available everywhere, e.g. at www.andreasaltelli.eu. In case you can spare the time and are so inclined please communicate with me the nature of the error. All the best. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is regarding the citation note here – the one that was removed shouldn't be re-posted on Wikipedia, as it contains personal information about another editor. I hope this helps. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 02:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda forgot about this discussion. A book lacking notabilty doesn't mean it's mediocre, just that it hasn't (yet) attracted in-depth coverage in independent, secondary, reliable sources. A great deal of excellent (and influential, as shown by rate of citation within its field) academic work isn't notable in Wikipedia's sense (summarized at WP:GNG), i.e. isn't something that in and of itself makes for something to have its own stand-alone coverage as a subject here. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Politics of Uncertainty

Hello, Saltean

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, The Politics of Uncertainty, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Saltean. Thank you for your work on Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

With 2 reviews in independent sources is does seem to meet WP:NBOOK, although it might be argued that these are routine. Showing evidence of lasting impact of the work would be a helpful way of improving the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about The Politics of Uncertainty

Hello Saltean, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Politics of Uncertainty, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Politics of Uncertainty.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Measure of Reality

Regarding your request on my talk page, I'm looking into it, but have had other stuff going on, so probably won't finish it until tomorrow. Rather than just go tweak the article myself, I'm treating this as basically like a WP:GAN review, and making a detailed list of suggested improvements. Some of them are very trivial, but others are more in-depth, involving better use of the sources (I'm actually reading them, not just doing a check for typos and the like, since macrohistory is among my topics of interest). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks a and looking forward to it. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 15:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]