User talk:Saga City/Archive 2010-2011

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Saga City! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

John Wilkinson (poet) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Patrick Demarchelier - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Al Jackson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Adrienne Posta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, Saga City/Archive 2010-2011! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 01:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service award update

Hello, Saga City! The requirements for the service awards have been updated, and you may no longer be eligible for the award you currently display. Don't worry! Since you have already earned your award, you are free to keep displaying it. However, you may also wish to update to the current system.

Sorry for any inconvenience. — the Man in Question (in question) 10:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced articles

Hi Saga City/Archive 2010-2011! An article you have created, edited, or contributed to, still has no refereces since being tagged in July 2009. As the article reads like an essay its lack of verifiable sources could suggest a blatant WP:COPYVIO which will result in the article being reduced to a one lone stub, or even deleted.. If you are able to help with these major issues please see talk:Hanbury, Worcestershire and address the various points if you can. Thanks. Kudpung (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hastings (name)

Hi Saga City, I noticed your change from Hastings (surname) to Hastings (name) and I have but one quibble with it. You dropped the brief name derivation paragraph at the top which, I believe, should be reinstated. In my 20 plus years of historical and genealogical research related to the name, I have yet to find an instance of use that didn't suggest a connection to the surname. For instance, in my own family, I have close cousins where this is both a surname and a middlename. Furthermore, I believe that users of this page will want and expect some sort of explanation as to how the name evolved. I think the one you removed was a bit weak but better than nothing. Thanks and look forward to your reply. SBmeier (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2010 (UTC)SBmeier[reply]

(answer is on SBmeier's talk page)

Banburyshire - deletion nomination

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Banburyshire

A tag has been placed on Talk:Banburyshire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

unsourced, fictional, original research

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Talk:Banburyshire|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ugborough

Why? Jolly Ω Janner 22:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clive Arrowsmith

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Clive Arrowsmith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Splittist (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cemmaes Road

Too many roads indeed, cut and paste error on my part. Good catch. Britmax (talk) 18:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dressing-down

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dressing-down requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 22:05, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is what's known as a Soft redirect so this speedy deletion criteria does not apply. S a g a C i t y (talk) 13:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Proprietress

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Proprietress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 22:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is what's known as a Soft redirect so this speedy deletion criteria does not apply. S a g a C i t y (talk) 13:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Occasional table

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Occasional table, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.occasionaltables.net.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False positive!

Why I reverted Derry Urban Area

It has been an ongoing thing in the Derry area, and is well documented in local media that Derry dwellers "border-hop" to escape Rates (NI council tax) and avail of education etc. Some quick examples are [1], [2] and here were the person in question states "I consider Derry my local town," . A further reason why most shops in Derry accept Euro alongside the Pound. Thought I would just provdie this explanation for my revert. Cheers --NorthernCounties (talk) 17:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A535 road for deletion

The article A535 road is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A535 road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. AD 12:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sheppey Light Railway

Re this edit, was that a mistake? Mjroots (talk) 11:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Sick mouse syndrome to blame - now corrected. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

kml

Just saw your edit to Category:Villages in Islay. What a fun little template - many thanks. Ben Mac Dui 16:36, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Makaravilakku

Hi there. I noticed this edit which I don't understand, but I did not revert it since there might be something I'm missing so I thought I'll ask. First, {{unreferenced stub}} was merged with {{unreferenced}} per Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 5#Template:Unreferenced stub. Is there a reason to reintroduce it? Second, regarding the "auto" parameter, per documentation at {{unreferenced}} "This parameter should be removed after an editor has checked that the tag hasn't been placed in error", so why restore it? Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 08:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit for the time being. --Muhandes (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Johnny Lingo

I noticed you moved said page, and I've put some notes on the talk page. Could you provide your opinion as to the move? Cheers, ~Araignee (talk • contribs) 19:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with it being moved back - but other editors will have different views. S a g a C i t y (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Place name disambiguation

Hello! I saw your recent move of "Alford, Aberdeenshire" to "Alford, Scotland". Whilst this is consistent with the disambiguation guideline, I have also seen other editors moving pages in the opposite direction, namely "Ellon, Scotland" to "Ellon, Aberdeenshire", "Huntly, Scotland" to "Huntly, Aberdeenshire" and "Kintore, Scotland" to "Kintore, Aberdeenshire". Although these moves go against the guideline, referring to places this way feels more natural to me. I'm worried we could end up moving things back and forth in both directions if we're not careful. This has prompted a rather longer than intended essay from me at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Local Authority names in page titles/ URLs. I would be interested in your thoughts there. Best wishes, --Deskford (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:APO needs your help

Hey, we need your help at WikiProject Anthroponymy! Come check out our new layout.


Wikipedia ads	file info – #226

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 02:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Dogs Trust, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you have a reason for removing the "Animal Welfare" category from the Dogs Trust page, please put your reason in the edit summary as I am sure alot of people will not understand why it has been removed since Dogs Trust is seen as an animal welfare organisation. Tomd2712 | Tell me something? 16:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Service award level

There has been a major revision of the the Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable.

Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.

Herostratus (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An invite

Hi SC, can I tempt you (and your camera) to Derby?, hope to see you at Derby Museum on the 9th. Sign up for free lunch, tour etc Victuallers (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yowl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yowl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 14:26, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skulduggery

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Skulduggery, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.skulduggerypleasant.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Goosegrass"/"Goose grass"

Hello Saga City. I notice recently you've done a bit of redirecting work around the subject of "Goose grass", but I'm inclined to think that some form of disambiguation might be more helpful for encyclopedia readers, seeing as the distinction between "Goose grass" (redirected to Eleusine indica) and "Goosegrass" (redirected to Galium aparine) is so subtle that readers may end up not finding what they want (and actually the encyclopedia's listed common name for E. indica is "Indian goosegrass", with no space between "goose" and "grass" anyway). PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 05:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right - will research + fix soon S a g a C i t y (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meanie unblock

Hi! I got a kick out of the section you used to write me; I thought some disgruntled user was calling me a meanie! :P Anyway, it's unprotected and waiting for you to apply your special brand of magic to it. Thanks for asking. Regards, PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to do it and glad you caught me lurking about. Thanks again! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Evulsion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evulsion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Porturology (talk) 13:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evulsion

Sorry my mistake Porturology (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirects to Wiktionary

From the last couple of messages above, I get the impression that you have established, somewhere, that the large number of soft redirects you are creating to Wiktionary are acceptable under policy here. I'm tempted to take them to WP:RFD, but before I make a fool of myself — I've done so enough times already, thank you very much — I was hoping that you might enlighten me. I don't doubt that they ought to pass a speedy deletion nomination, but I don't know why they should survive RFD. Can you enlighten me? Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before I answer can you confirm that you are familiar with WP:SRD? I could be that the answer's there. S a g a C i t y (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I don't find it there, though authority might arguably come from a link on that page to Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Other_projects. The criteria for the existence of the soft redirect would appear to be "If an article to be deleted is likely to be re-created under the same name, it may be turned into a soft redirect to a more appropriate sister project's article. This is especially true for Wiktionary." I have some doubt just how likely it would be for articles on "foozle" and "foofaraw," or even "expediency," to be recreated if they were to be deleted here at WP. Rather than get into an article by article debate over what would be likely to be recreated and not, I'm hoping, however, that you have some better authority than that which will show my concerns to be clearly misplaced. Do you? Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope to give you a reply within next 24 hours - have been away and experiencing change of culture having got my first iMac yesterday. Now where's the tilde?? Found it. S a g a C i t y (talk) 16:06, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that you're another well-seasoned editor, like me (you were born in the Attlee adminstration, I believe; I in the Truman), so looking forward to your reply with no hurry. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hey, you had previously contributed a helpful edit to the article on the book Skipping Towards Gomorrah. Just an FYI that I have recently expanded the article with additional sourced information, you may be interested in it. Also, I recently created a new article by the same author, Savage Love: Straight Answers from America's Most Popular Sex Columnist. If you have any suggestions or ideas for additional secondary sources, please don't hesitate to stop by the articles talkpages. Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus at List of castles in England

A consensus is taking place at Talk:List of castles in England#Consensus to split List of castle in England. You are invited to participate. Ma®©usBritish ^[^talk] 21:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Saga City! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Stoke Fleming

Hi! Re Stoke Fleming - has something changed? I thought refs always come before ext links - per WP:ORDER. —SMALL JIM 21:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right - amnesia attack! S a g a C i t y (talk) 22:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Benjamin Wrigglesworth Beatson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iambic Verse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note This link to a disambiguation page was deliberate.

Dabbing Orby

Thanks for disambiguating Orby -> Orby (horse). I don't leave as many of these hanging around as I used to, but one or two do slip through. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 00:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]