User talk:Rhain/2015 January–June

talk

2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014
2015 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2016 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2017 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2018 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2019 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2020 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2021 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2022 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2023 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2024 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)

newsletters

... image: John Robert McPherson

DYK for Grand Theft Auto IV

Harrias ^talk 00:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2014

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2014, the project has:

• 188 Featured Articles
• 67 Featured Lists
• 9 Featured Topics
• 20 Featured Pictures

• 42 A-Class Articles
• 749 Good Articles
• 13 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements

• Feature: Refmining – Another side of WikiGnoming
• Interview: Marasmusine

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Adrift (video game)

Hello! Your submission of Adrift (video game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar ⨹ 23:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Adrift (video game)

The DYK project (nominate) 13:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto V controversies

Hey Rhain. I was bored today and created a draft for a purported split of the GTA V controversies. Please have a look and tell me what you think. I don't have time to work on it anymore today, but if you have a moment, feel free to see if you can expand out any of the sections with more reliable sources. I didn't really do a proper lead section yet, and I thought that input from Steven Ogg on the torture sequence would be an important addition but didn't have time to get into it today. Feel free to go nuts and edit away. CR4ZE (t • c) 03:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

CR4ZE, you finally started it! I'll see what I can do. I like what you've got so far. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 06:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Also, I'm not sure if it's helpful, but Carolyn Petit has actually written a bit of a response to the criticisms about her review over on her blog. I don't know if there's anything there that can be included in the article, but I thought I should mention it nonetheless. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 11:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that Rhain. I put Petit's blog in because I think her sentiments are a nice way to finish up that section. I think there's more to be said about the torture controversy, so I'm inviting you to help me out with that if you have the time. If you see any good sources for inclusion, let me know. I'll try to work more on this section. CR4ZE (t • c) 03:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

I really like the way that the page is coming together, CR4ZE. I've been meaning to see if I can work on it at all, but I've just been busy with some other articles. I'll try and help out in the future, in any way I can. Keep up the fantastic work! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 07:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bill Elm & Woody Jackson on Red Dead Redemption.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bill Elm & Woody Jackson on Red Dead Redemption.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Bill Elm & Woody Jackson on Red Dead Redemption.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bill Elm & Woody Jackson on Red Dead Redemption.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of Red Dead Redemption

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Development of Red Dead Redemption you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of Red Dead Redemption

The article Development of Red Dead Redemption you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Development of Red Dead Redemption for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

FYI what I found out about Notifications, and question

Hi Rhain1999, thanks for stopping by my DYK and sorry you couldn't stop by earlier. I thought I had pinged you and thought you were ignoring it, but I just ran a quick test with the help of another editor: the {{u|Rhain1999}} template does not notify the editor as the Ping template (and the manually done [[User:Rhain1999]]) does; my apologies; I will not use the U template anymore. Say, could you let me know more detail about sourcing problems with that article that you mentioned in case I do take it to FA? Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 15:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

No need to apologise; I usually add my DYK reviews to my watchlist, but I have must forgotten this time. As for the article itself: most of it is brilliantly written. I had a quick skim through Gameplay and Plot (haven't played it yet, so I don't wish to spoil it for myself) and they look pretty good to me. The Development section, while brilliantly written and researched (seriously, good job on that one), feels a little short. Of course, I haven't looked into the development of the game, so maybe there's not much information out there, but I feel as though it could be a little longer. It's also possible that you're not very keen on thorough research into the development, and that's fine too; there's plenty of development articles whose editors I'm sure could help out. Personally, I would also merge Development and Release (which has been done on The Last of Us) but this is in no way required, and is simply a personal preference. You should always do what you feel is right.

My main concern is the Reception section. If you look at articles like Grand Theft Auto V, Grand Theft Auto IV or Infamous Second Son (among many others), you'll see that they focus on specific elements of the games in separate paragraphs, such as the gameplay, open world, characters, and plot. Also, the review table should be cut down to include about 10–15 reviews. This is basically my only real concern with the article. Other than that, I really like what you've done with it, and could absolutely see it reaching FA one day. Let me know if you need any help, or have any remaining concerns. Thank you! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 21:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Rhain1999, this is so helpful; I took a look at the other game articles you mention and I see what you mean; the reception section of the article I improved summarizes the reviews quite a bit too much, doesn't it. No trouble with the sources, it's just there isn't enough prose expounding on the material from the sources. I would definitely have no trouble expanding that section now that I see a good example of what to shoot for. Perhaps I will look you up then for a quick read-through (hopefully you will have played the game by that time; I hope you enjoy it). Cheers.

Say, as a test of Wikipedia's notification system, could you please type {{u|Prhartcom}} below and save your changes? I just heard from the template developer that there is nothing wrong with the U template after all; let's find out. Prhartcom (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Prhartcom, looking through my notifications, it turns out that I must have actually received a notification from Hafspajen a few days ago, when I was mentioned on the page, but never saw it. Sorry about that; I normally take a thorough look at my notifications. Anyway, I'm glad my feedback is helpful. I'd be happy to take a look at the article whenever you need it; I'm only a message away. I'll try and get around to playing the game sometime in the next few months. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 06:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry about that. Thanks for testing that, I did receive the notification, but I asked another person to do it and I didn't receive their notification. I think I'll just use the Ping template like you said. Prhartcom (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Rhain1999, I feel the need to follow-up: The developer says the U template is fixed. (Template talk:User link#Does not notify user) Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

That's good to hear. Thanks for the effort you've put into this, and for keeping me updated! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 20:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Rhain1999, did you get a notification for this one, then? Prhartcom (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Prhartcom. Since it's my talk page, I get a notification for everything on here. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 21:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

My gosh, that should have been obvious to me, sorry. I received yours, so yay. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. That's good that it worked for you. Looks like it should be fixed now! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 21:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Development of Red Dead Redemption

The article Development of Red Dead Redemption you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Development of Red Dead Redemption for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

TLoU template

Hey Rhain1999,

I already had a feeling I might've beaten you to the punch! :) Great work on the characters article by the way. --Soetermans. T / C 14:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for creating the template! It's pretty much the same as what I had planned. Also, I'll try and work on the Characters article a little more; it's quite difficult to find behind-the-scenes information on some of the other characters. I'll see what I can dig up. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 14:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of accolades received by The Last of Us

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Development of The Last of Us

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Development of Red Dead Redemption

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Update for TLoU accolades!

I just want to tell you that the first SXSW Gaming Awards was in 2014, which The Last of Us won four out of seven awards including Game of the Year. Here's the link below:

http://sxsw.co.uk/interactive/news/2014/2014-sxsw-gaming-awards-so-many-amazing-winners

--90.206.8.151 (talk) 15:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Thank you!

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2015, the project has:

• 192 Featured Articles
• 67 Featured Lists
• 9 Featured Topics

• 21 Featured Pictures
• 823 Good Articles
• 14 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements

• Feature: Shove It in a Table: How to Write Featured Lists of Video Games
• Interview: Sergecross73

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you very much for beautfying the gameplay section of Star Wars: Battlefront. I really appreciate it. AdrianGamer (talk) 05:32, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! It's my pleasure to help. I wouldn't have done it if you hadn't put all of the helpful information down in the first place. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 05:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Doctor Who (series 9)

Apologies about the new template I implemented and its errors - I realize that I hadn't created it correctly, so documentation was more than likely included. It was my first template to replace something I seem to copy-paste a lot, but if it's working now, then I'm glad. Just wanted to clear this up with you. Alex|The|Whovian 08:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Ahh, that makes more sense now. I probably should have edited the template, instead of immediately reverting your edit on the article, but I was rushing. I'm glad to see that you've made the template yourself, as I'm sure it will be helpful for a lot of people!

Thanks for contacting me about it! Everything's fine now. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 09:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Last of Us

Harrias ^talk 21:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto Online

Hello. What is wrong? If article not exist there is red link. Link to other language is nonsense. Please answer me on my discussion page. Eurohunter (talk) 20:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me. As per the guidelines (see WP:REDDEAL), linking to an article from a foreign-language version of Wikipedia is allowed, despite your personal opinions about it. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)}

It means it must be changed or it is nonsense. In Polish version we have type of "Do not change the red links to blue by the strength." and it is obvious. Eurohunter (talk) 05:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean. WP:REDDEAL states that articles may "use a link to the article in the foreign-language version of Wikipedia instead of or next to a red link", so I believe the current use of the link on the Grand Theft Auto Online article is suitable. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 08:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/The Last of Us: Left Behind

Rhain1999, it is up to the person who promotes the nomination to decide which of the reviewed and approved hooks to use, and the promoter's opinion sometimes differs from the reviewer. In this case, the promoter chose a hook that would work well in the final prep slot, which is generally used for quirky hooks.

If you strongly disagree with the hook being used, even though it's one of the three you initially proposed, you can certainly raise the issue at the DYK talk page. However, nominators should not edit their own hooks in prep once they've been promoted, so I've reverted your edit that did just that. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, thank you for clarifying that for me. Though I would prefer the main hook, I understand why ALT2 was chosen. I apologise for editing the preparation page without further consultation. Thank you for letting me know of the guidelines. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 23:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Last of Us: Left Behind

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 07:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wolfenstein: The Old Blood page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ellie (The Last of Us)

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 15:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of The Last of Us

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music of The Last of Us you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of The Last of Us

The article Music of The Last of Us you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Music of The Last of Us for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Music of The Last of Us

The article Music of The Last of Us you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Music of The Last of Us for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 04:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your email

Hi there, i have just now read your mail about using my images. What exactly do you need? I can provide you with more current material, if you like. The name you can refer to is "Steven White (WP user Cush)" or so. ♆ CUSH ♆ 12:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for responding, Cush. I don't actually need anything from you anymore; I used the image in my assignment, and credited you accordingly; it fits the work really well! Thanks again, and keep up the excellent work. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 12:37, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

2019 in video gaming listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2019 in video gaming. Since you had some involvement with the 2019 in video gaming redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix | Talk  16:44, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ADR1FT gameplay screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ADR1FT gameplay screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

New link for Left Behind accolades!

Two awards (Best Storytelling, Best Gaming Moment) were nominated and won for The Last of Us: Left Behind at the 2014 32nd Golden Joystick Awards. Here's the link below:

http://www.gamesradar.com/winners-and-trailers-32nd-golden-joysticks-awards/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.147.72.68 (talk) 17:59, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Here's more! Left Behind won Best DLC out of two nominations (Best Writing) at Hardcore Gamer's Game of the Year Awards 2014 — and a Best Remaster nomination for Remastered! Here's link below:

http://www.hardcoregamer.com/2015/01/05/hardcore-gamers-game-of-the-year-awards-2014/127497/ 81.147.72.68 (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

The Last of Us

I'll assume you know what I'm talking about. What is "Ignition" then? Is it this? If that is it, it should be linked in the infobox. I don't agree with the caption though because it isn't important. I think it's excessive information. Fez's infobox is fine because the artwork is made by a notable individual. —DangerousJXD (talk) 06:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Ignition can be found here. I don't think it's too excessive, since it's only a few words in the infobox. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 06:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't have a problem with it per se, but how is it notable? Ignition doesn't have an article so if that isn't notable enough to have an article, how is this notable? Yeah they worked on the cover but it isn't, per the last sentence, important. Maybe if this Ignition made it by themselves but the caption is saying that isn't the case. How is the reader supposed to know what Ignition is? —DangerousJXD (talk) 06:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

I guess it's not entirely "notable", as such, but I think it's cool to mention. I guess that's just a personal opinion, though, so I won't revert your edit if you remove it again. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 06:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for The Last of Us Remastered

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV

The article Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV

The article Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 10:01, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Music of The Last of Us

Hello! Your submission of Music of The Last of Us at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – czar 18:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:LA Noire soundtrack.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LA Noire soundtrack.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Music of The Last of Us

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto IV

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis

The article Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 13:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis

The article Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis

Hello! Your submission of Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Last of Us: Left Behind

The article The Last of Us: Left Behind you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Last of Us: Left Behind for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 22:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neil Druckmann

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neil Druckmann you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 10:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neil Druckmann

The article Neil Druckmann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Neil Druckmann for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 11:21, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

WebCite links

It surprised me seeing that Eddie Murphy clip on loop with the GameSpot link. I don't want to digress while reviewing the page so I'm curious if other GameSpot/Giant Bomb links are like that outside the others. GamerPro64 01:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

GamerPro64, I was surprised to see that too, so I had a look through some of the references on The Last of Us, and they all seem to do the same thing. As far as I can tell, it must be something coded into the sites themselves (perhaps they don't want people archiving their website?). If so, that's very strange. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 01:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

That's one possibility. This should be brought up on the project page. GamerPro64 01:24, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

I agree. It might also be a good idea to contact the GameSpot/Giant Bomb staff, if we can't find a reason/solution ourselves. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 01:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The Video game Barnstar

---

For your outstanding work on The Last of Us topic: thorough without delving into uninteresting minutiae. The topic's subarticles (Accolades, Development, Music, List of fictional characters, article on Ellie but not Joel) are models for how similar video game articles should be handled in the future (and perhaps more importantly, models for the amount of coverage needed to write a complete subarticle). So here's to getting it right, and somehow mustering the will to finish the topic long after the task becomes a slog. – czar 12:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much! That means so much to me. It's things like this that make all of my hard work feel worth it. Of course, the examples that editors like you set beforehand helped me out significantly, just as I hope that my work will help other editors in the future. Thank you! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 12:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wolfenstein: The New Order

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wolfenstein: The New Order you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 15:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wolfenstein: The New Order

The article Wolfenstein: The New Order you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wolfenstein: The New Order for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wolfenstein: The New Order

The article Wolfenstein: The New Order you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wolfenstein: The New Order for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 09:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC)