This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ravichandar84. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Do you keep forgetting to fill in the edit summary box before saving your edits? Well, you can let Wikipedia remember for you! Go to your Preferences, select the "Editing" tab, and check the option box that says "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". With this option set, Wikipedia will nag you to create an edit summary.
To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use{{totd-random}}
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
On 24 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Raja of Panagal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Quite well, thank you, and I trust that the same goes for you. I did see the idiot's assault and the only thing I am surprised about is that it did not come earlier. Nevertheless, I am quite unable to comprehend how he managed to secure a UK-based connection, having used an India-based one earlier. If he has travelled half the way around the globe merely for this purpose, I think he had best visit Gunaseelam.
Right from the beginning I realised that he was confounding the identities of the Sholiyars and the Sivacharyas. In his opinion, the two are identical while from what I know there are quite a few Gurukkals and Sholiyars who point out glaring differences between them. The 'Sholiyar' identity, from what I gather, is quite an amorphous one, with numerous different Tamil Brahmin groups claiming to be one of them, while some of their own members express dissent. There is nothing quite so crystal clear as old Tiger-Power would make us believe.
I have one sincere request to make. Could you, for heaven's sake, get the page on Vadama semi-protected again? Not only is he raving now, he is creating nuisance ad nauseam. And if you wish to have a good laugh, have a look at the history of my talk page to witness his delirium; perhaps acute delirium tremens. Voltigeur (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello RC! I think you are making some very good contributions. You have contributed to many DYKs. Keep up the good work! Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
On 1 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Mildenhall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Yazdegerd I
On 11 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yazdegerd I, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
I apologise for the long absence of all communication from me. While the problems with Vyaghradhataki continue, we now have another problem with User:Harishpsubramanian, who insists upon including material without references, and is also bent upon deleting ideas not in conformation with his own. While the latter would be welcome were he to cite references, his attribution of all of them entirely to legend is, to say the least, disconcerting. He takes another trait of our late friend, in the civility of his replies, though, thankfully, not to the same extent. Perhaps, it would be worthwhile if you were to remonstrate with him; you can see the response to my message to him, on my talk page.
I just saw your remark on the origins of different communities on Talk:Vadama. Perhaps, you would be interested in knowing that the Gounders are descended from the Gaudas brought in as administrators by the Ganga kings of Orissa, who ruled Tamil Nadu in the 5th and 6th centuries A.D. Both the Gowdas of Karnataka and the Gauds of Orissa, are of the same descent. And thanks, for your help. Voltigeur (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Concerning your repositioning of reference [2], the book merely says that they originated north of the Tamil Kingdoms, and does not refer to any particular pouplation concentrations. Furthermore, there used to be substantial Vadama concentrations in Ramnad and Tinnevelly. I suggest that it should be repositioned after the statement that they originated from the north. Let me know what you think. Voltigeur (talk) 18:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
Ah, okay. I declined it because I couldn't see any evidence of a repost, being a different article title. I suspected it but I prefer caution when it comes to deletion. :) Thanks for clarifying. Best, PeterSymonds(talk)20:28, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: Higginson
Nice work I must say. I did not know this, but another thing which you may find equally interesting. Most of the officials in Yale's period, and some of his contemporaries when he was a junior officer, were from New England. Interestingly, this is believed to have included a couple of the Chief Engineers, and some of the Lead Gunners, including the one who constructed St. Mary's Church (Fort St. George).
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
Project News
Tag & Assess 2008, an assessment drive initiated by the assessment department began on June 7, 2008 and will be running until July 2008. Many Wikipedians have started contributing to this mammoth task. This housekeeping activity will help manage articles in better way. You can also get involved!
Bot Assisted Assessment was successfully done using Bot0612 in May 2008. 1744 articles (18.5%) of all India unassessed articles were marked if they had been assessed by some other project.
IPL was hot on Wikipedia too!!! During the tournament, the article was among the most frequently edited articles. It is currently the only Indian article in top 100, occupying 58th spot.
Do you know of an article that is currently underrated? If so, please nominate the article at the Assessment Department's request for assessment. This will allow our project to get a better idea of the quality of our articles.
Article statistics and to-do lists
Article Statistics
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
Is India the largest democracy? A request has been made to the Mediation Cabal for mediation on India article. There is currently an ongoing edit war if India be called the largest democracy of world.
This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – July 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
The last newsletter was more than a year ago and after feeling the pinch, we got together in working towards in renewing this feature for our members. Fresh pair of legs we are, and hence can greatly improve with your suggestions and ideas. Please feel free to let us know of your thoughts. We hope to release the newsletter on a monthly/bi-monthly basis as per our initial thoughts.
One question; are blog references acceptable in Wikipedia? The reason I ask is two references to a blog at wordpress.com have been included by another user. Do let me know. Voltigeur (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
What do you suggest I do? Should I retain the material with a 'citations needed' tag while throwing out the reference or discard both? The problem is that the article has already been labelled as not neutral, and I do not want to do anything that justifies that label. Voltigeur (talk) 17:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: Vyaghradhataki
As I concluded long ago, the chap is stark, staring, raving mad. Either that, or he is a fanatic with not an iota of reason in him, which adds up to about the same. Voltigeur (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
DYK
On 20 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hindu Munnani, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Thanks for uploading Image:Iran Map 1921.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Well, I've sent an arbitration request as well as a request for oversight in a mail of mine. However, I observe that nothing has been done. I'm well convinced that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are nothing more than a joke. Administrators are bent on furthering their POV in every possible way and involved in protecting vandals. Anyway, I decided that I better pack off and put an end to my Wikipedia experience -RavichandarMy coffee shop17:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I've noticed it. One of the checkusers has gotten fed up and locked his IP range. No doubt he'll find a way around it and if he turns up, tell me and I'll block the new IPs or accounts for you. Yes, some admins don't do anything - a lot are scared of retribution from vandals possibly ringing them up, some others are happy with having no rules, and some have a strategic policy of turning a blind eye to certain things, usually a "my enemy's enemy is my friend" type paradigm. This is very common. Nevermind that, just look for some useful admin who has had experience with this NisarKand guy. As for banned users, they don't have anything to lose so they often resort to full-on abuse, because it might have the effect of getting rid of their opponents. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, thank you very much for your help. Well, the confrontationist attitude of the anonymous IP had subsided after sometime; however, the IP sock of NisarKand never regretted or apologized for his action. Moreover, he hadn't been warned even once. I felt completely let down when an administrator reacted as if nothing had happened. I am sorry for my outbursts a couple of days back.-RavichandarMy coffee shop17:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, that's the "benefit" I guess of being permanently banned. If they don't think they'll be able to (or don't want to) come back legally, then they've got nothing to lose by attempting to win by illegal editing and trying to racially/personally abuse the other guy into losing their mind and leaving. You're comments aren't a problem at all, but with banned users who don't any have intention of coming back, there's no point warning them since they are editing illegally and don't care anyway so they are just blocked. Thatcher (talk·contribs) and Alison (talk·contribs) are the two checkusers who keep an eye on the Central Asia sockpuppetteers including NisarKand, so if anyone pops up they can sort them out quickly. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Database Console Commands (Transact-SQL) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kevin (talk) 22:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ravichandar84. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
