User talk:Pincermitosis

Welcome!

Hi Pincermitosis! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neopaganism in Italy has been accepted

Neopaganism in Italy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 14:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E0C1:A3E1:922:144. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E0C1:A3E1:922:144 (talk) 17:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pincermitosis:Pincermitosis/sandbox2 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pincermitosis:Pincermitosis/sandbox2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and error. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I didn't mean to publish it,

hould I draft all my other sandboxs as well?

Pincermitosis (talk) 14:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't created them yet so no worries!

You can use Wikipedia:Article wizard to create your own drafts more easily.

Happy editing! 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hi, btw a WikiProject’s been created on oral tradition if you’re interested, it’s at WP:WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce Kowal2701 (talk) 18:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'm now onboard! Pincermitosis (talk) 20:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Western canon

Just fyi, I reverted your edit to Western canon because the article is about the Canon. It doesn't need a long list of 17th and 18th century philosophers, it only needs a few to illustrate the point.

If it is of any consolation, you are far from unusual in making such good faith edits but the result is that articles get bloated to the point that they fail the tl;dr test. (If an article is tightly edited, crammed with essential information, but still too long, it can be WP:SPLIT. So one to note for [long-term] future reference.) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand that, but wouldn't you agree that Giuseppe Mazzini (romaticism) and Marsilio Ficino (Neoplatonism) be considered as majour canon philosophers, influential enough to be mentioned? Giambattista Vico is considered by some as the father of Philosphy of History, would that not be related to the western canon? Pincermitosis (talk) 12:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes if you can find a citation that explicitly identifies them as "canonical" – per WP:NOR, you can't do so based on your own knowledge ore experience. (I'm not defending the current list as it is poorly cited too, so do please feel free to prune it.) --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:10, 24 October 2024 (UTC) amended 15:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @JMF hope all is well! I added the information back with references let me know what you think and what we should do about the rest of the un-referenced information

Pincermitosis (talk) 09:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work, that is exactly how it should be (and should always have been) done.

As for the others, we can (a) boldy delete them (which is maybe too provocative) or (b) tag them with {{citation needed}}, leave it for a month for a response, and then delete them or (c) search for supporting citations, if you are willing. I advise option b for now in any case. If you are motivated, then obviously c but that is not an overnight task. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will try and focus on this page for a bit. Thank you for the advice and encouragement! I only stumbled on it trough the "suggested edits" function, but now looking at the article and the discussion (wow!) I see there's quite a lot of work needed to improve it. Pincermitosis (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fulesta has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fulesta. Thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thabk you @Vanderwaalforces! I couldn't find anything specifically related to that date of the shows starting from 2008, I only translated it from the Italian article where this reference is also missing. I found a few websites mentioning this show happening throughout the years, all pointing to different dates. I picked the one that looks to be most reliable however that article is referring to the 2016 edition. Pincermitosis (talk) 16:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about removing it entirely on the grounds that it is unverifiable? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well the 2008 edition is unverifiable, but the 2016 version is. Pincermitosis (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fulesta (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Read the guide to citing WP:OFFLINESOURCES.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fulesta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pincermitosis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]