User talk:Paper9oll

Status: 🔴 ^[?]

Committed identity: 0de937202d344a1ff750e4a22ad4cbd81b224c6550f10e765abb306e3b377d78c1fbe634497f1ed3a69a74caccfa62807438a29aa3623acb53062bdf2941e62d is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

⚠️ Attention editors

Please ensure you:

1. are cooperative, civil, and respectful.

2. have the ability to read English well enough to avoid misinterpretation and/or miscommunication.

Do note that your discussion will be rolled back if you fail to meet the above requirements.

Any forms of false accusations and/or personal attacks and/or harrassment will be escalated to an Administrator immediately.

Archived discussion: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19

This talk page is automatically^[?] archived by Lowercase sigmabot III every 24 hours. Threads that are stale will be automatically archived.

illit artistry page

i’m not sure if my last 2 messages sent but please communicate with me on why my illit artistry writings keep getting deleted even after i corrected it the exact why the guidelines require me to. Getting warnings for doing nothing wrong has been incredibly frustrating and makes it so hard to remain patient and understanding. Please verbalize to me what the problem is. It went from “not correct sources” because I used an instagram link to “you’re working for illit” because of how much details I put and now to “you’re being disruptive” just for fixing my previous edits. Sorry for ranting but this feels so unfair. Helpinghandsinhands (talk) 11:11, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Helpinghandsinhands You were clearly informed by RachelTensions (here), Drmies (here), RachelTensions again (here) and Skywatcher68 (here) that your edits were unacceptable. Therefore, your rationale is unfounded. You were explicitly told that your edits were unacceptable in their entirety, not just in isolated instances. Being reverted by three editors clearly indicates that your edits are problematic. Furthermore, reverting/restoring your edits five times after these warnings constitutes disruptive editing and/or edit warring. Additionally, you were provided a list of links titled "Welcome to Wikipedia!", which you clearly did not read. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is not specific enough for my liking but another user instead specified better for me and actually pointed out where i went wrong, but thanks anyways. and i did read the welcome to wikipedia page. Helpinghandsinhands (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Helpinghandsinhands If you found another response more useful, then that's fine. The "Welcome to Wikipedia" is a starting point, not a solution to every editing issue. It contains links to core policies, but reading it doesn't guarantee you've absorbed or fully understood all the relevant guidelines. Just so you know, "not specific enough for my liking" is not valid rationale to continue your disruptive editing. Lastly, you've exceeded WP:3RR threshold, so you must obtain WP:CONSENSUS per WP:BRD at Talk:Illit to restore any materials, even if you made changes that you assumed were correct or "nothing wrong". — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:49, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i was not going to continue editing without an explanation, so please don’t worry about that. i have paused for several hours everytime i am given an explanation to restart and change things. don’t think of my questions or concerns as a warning or anything. i just ask for more details to understand things better, but i still appreciate you directing me to specific links regardless. i am working on fixing things and taking that users critiques into consideration. Helpinghandsinhands (talk) 13:27, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Helpinghandsinhands I want to reiterate that "restart and change things" does not mean you can simply re-add your edited material to the article. Because you have exceeded the WP:3RR threshold, you must obtain WP:CONSENSUS at Talk:Illit before restoring any of your edits, regardless of any changes you make. This is not about "restarting; it's about following Wikipedia's policies and engaging in collaborative discussion to reach an agreement. Continuing to edit the main article without consensus will be considered disruptive. Please focus your efforts on the Talk:Illit page to discuss your proposed changes and seek consensus. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 14:06, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]