User talk:Orastor

Welcome!

Hi Orastor! I noticed your contributions to Talk:Hackney Diamonds and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quizimaze (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quizimaze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 20:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orastor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette ^{(Merry Christmas, and a happy new year)} 20:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Max & Ruby episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 10:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Quizimaze

Hello Orastor, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Quizimaze, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quizimaze.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Justiyaya}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Justi yaya 04:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mr. Kershaw's Dream System

The article Mr. Kershaw's Dream System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Orastor This article is probably too short and insufficiently notable for a standalone article. I've redirected it to Atkinson's filmography page where it is referred to with a note that it is a promotional ad. Any further detail could be added there. Local Variable (talk) 02:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Orastor (talk) 15:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Sobel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mike Sobel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The UnXplained

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The UnXplained, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The UnXplained. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image of Calvin and Hobbes

I see it was removed with the message WP:NFC#Implementation. Please read that and note that File:Final Calvin and Hobbes Comic.png is likely to be reduced but still can't be used unless you comply with our policy. Doug Weller talk 17:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Final Calvin and Hobbes Comic.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Final Calvin and Hobbes Comic.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blackadder

Hi Orastor! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Blackadder that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Thanks for adding the useful information to the page. AussieWikiDan ^(talk) 09:39, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oatsandcream. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 08:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 11:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why the fuck am I blocked??

I didn't do anything. Geez, browse commons for some images once in a while and persistently bring up a movie.I bet its the racism and profanity, right? I'm sorry, @Doug Weller. Orastor (talk) 14:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea why you are asking when the block notice above makes it obvious. Doug Weller talk 14:48, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]